Trump Threatens to Occupy Iran Over Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump threatened to occupy Iran entirely if Tehran does not immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz, according to remarks he made to Fox News on Sunday. In an early morning phone call with Iranian officials, Trump stated, “You close the strait and you won’t have a country. You won’t even make it back to your f***** country. We’ll take over the rest of the country,” according to Fox’s Trey Yingst. The threat escalates Trump’s previous consideration of occupying Kharg Island, a major Iranian oil production facility, and marks a dramatic shift from his stated goal of negotiating a way out of the conflict he initiated in February.

Iran announced Saturday it would close the Strait of Hormuz in response to ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon targeting Hezbollah militants, just days after signing a 60-day ceasefire agreement with the Trump administration on Wednesday. The closure demonstrates the extreme fragility of the ceasefire arrangement and highlights the administration’s inability to restrain Israeli military actions, which have killed over 4,000 people in Lebanon since the war began. Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called for Israeli forces to “burn all of Lebanon,” rhetoric that Iran’s foreign minister and others denounced, yet Trump has proven unable to curb such statements or halt the Israeli assault despite public criticism.

Vice President JD Vance traveled to Switzerland this weekend to lead renewed peace negotiations with Iranian officials, while the administration publicly rebuked Israeli policy decisions. Vance warned Israeli officials not to alienate the United States, their closest ally, and previously expressed frustration that Israel cannot “kill” its way out of every problem. Trump echoed similar sentiments, asserting Israel would not exist without his administration’s support, yet his direct threats to Iran reveal his administration will apply far greater pressure on Tehran than on its Israeli counterpart to enforce the ceasefire terms.

The 60-day ceasefire agreement extends existing ceasefires while offering sanctions relief and access to frozen Iranian funds, provided Iran complies with terms including a commitment to forgo nuclear weapons development. The agreement mirrors language from the Obama-era nuclear deal Trump abandoned in 2018, dividing Republican support. Senator Bill Cassidy criticized the deal as a strategic defeat, stating Iran learned that threatening the Strait works and will repeat the tactic, while the administration’s tacit support for a $300 billion economic redevelopment fund for Iran drew opposition from both hawkish Republicans and Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who pledged his caucus would block votes if the fund reached Congress.

The administration indicated it could authorize many terms of the agreement, including sanctions relief, directly without congressional approval, circumventing legislative oversight. Trump’s volatile approach to negotiation, characterized by extreme threats followed by pursuit of agreements, underscores the instability surrounding U.S.-Iran relations and the ceasefire’s uncertain future as Israel continues operations Trump publicly opposes but cannot effectively control.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-iran-threat-hormuz-ceasefire-b2999930.html)

Trump Attacks Meloni Over Iran War Refusal, Invents Photo Claim

President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Sunday, attacking her in a Truth Social post without naming her directly while simultaneously condemning NATO for failing to support his Iran military campaign. Trump claimed he had denied Meloni a photograph at the Group of Seven summit in France because Italy would not permit U.S. military use of its landing strips and runways, and added that Meloni sought to “be friends again in order to get her ‘numbers up.'”

Meloni directly rejected Trump’s characterization of events, calling his attacks “unprovoked” and “senseless.” She stated that her popularity rests on defending Italy’s national interests and that her country remains a sovereign nation whose military base agreements cannot be violated. Meloni emphasized that Trump’s attempts to control her political standing are not her concern, and countered by suggesting he focus on his own popularity instead.

Trump’s repeated false claims about Meloni begging for a photograph represent a continuation of his pattern of fabricating details to demean allied leaders. His invocation of Italy’s refusal to support military action against Iran contradicts his earlier demands that NATO members fund defense spending, revealing inconsistency in how he applies pressure to allied nations.

The deterioration of Trump’s relationship with Meloni marks a significant rupture with what was previously one of his closest European political relationships. Trump had publicly praised Meloni as a “beautiful young woman” during a speech last year, framing the comment as politically risky but worth the exposure. Trump has threatened withdrawal of U.S. troops from Italy and Spain, citing both nations’ refusal to participate in military action against Iran.

Trump’s broader assault on NATO reflects his demand that allied nations comply with military objectives he deems necessary, regardless of their own strategic assessments or international law. The feud with Meloni demonstrates his willingness to weaponize military presence and personal relationships as leverage against leaders who assert their nation’s sovereignty and independent judgment.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/not-good-trump-ramps-up-feud-with-italys-prime-minister-in-scorching-new-post/)

Trump Invents False G7 Photo Claim to Attack Ally Meloni

President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni by repeating and expanding false claims about her conduct at the Group of Seven summit in France. Trump initially claimed Meloni “begged” him to take a photograph together, stating he “felt sorry for her,” before later telling NBC News she “was a big fan” but was unhelpful regarding the Strait of Hormuz and NATO commitments.

Meloni directly refuted Trump’s fabricated account in a social media video, declaring “Neither I nor Italy ever beg” and calling his statements “completely made up.” She expressed astonishment at Trump’s behavior toward an ally, noting this was not the first instance of such conduct and contrasting it with his lenient treatment of adversarial leaders, as she had previously done when rejecting his fabrications about the G7 encounter.

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani condemned Trump’s remarks as serious and offensive to all of Italy, announcing he would cancel his scheduled U.S. visit for June 21 and 22 in response. The diplomatic breach underscored the damage Trump’s unfounded accusations inflicted on U.S.-Italian relations and NATO cohesion.

The conflict reflects a broader pattern in Trump’s approach to allies. Earlier this year, Meloni criticized Trump’s attacks on Pope Leo XIV as unacceptable, prompting Trump to retaliate by claiming he was “shocked by her” and that he had been wrong about her courage, demonstrating his tendency to turn on supporters who fail to align with him completely.

Trump’s false narrative about Meloni at the G7 summit exemplifies his pattern of inventing interactions to demean political figures. His claims lacked credible basis yet were deployed to undermine a key European partner, revealing how he weaponizes unsubstantiated stories to manage personal grievances regardless of diplomatic consequences.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-meloni-feud-iran-g7-b2999448.html)

Meloni Rejects Trump Fabrication About Begging for G7

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni directly contradicted President Donald Trump’s claim that she begged him for a photograph at the Group of Seven summit in Evian-les-Bains, France on June 17. Trump told Italian broadcaster La7 that Meloni “begged me to take a photo with her” and that “she wanted a photo with me so badly,” adding he “felt sorry for her.” Meloni stated the account was “totally fabricated,” declaring “I and Italy never beg,” and expressed being “stunned” by Trump’s false characterization of their interaction.

Meloni used Trump’s fabricated claim to highlight his pattern of disrespecting longstanding Western allies while treating adversaries with greater deference. “I don’t know why the president of the United States behaves this way with his own allies. It’s not, after all, the first time this has happened,” she said, referencing an April interview where Trump attacked her refusal to support U.S.-Israeli military action against Iran. Video footage from the summit showed the two in an extended seated conversation, contradicting Trump’s framing that he granted her an audience she had desperately sought.

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani condemned Trump’s statements as “serious” and “offensive” to Italy, announcing he would cancel a planned trip to the United States the following week. When Trump doubled down on his false claim in a subsequent phone call with NBC News, he again attacked Meloni for insufficient NATO support during U.S. military operations, conflating the photograph dispute with geopolitical disagreements over the Strait of Hormuz and the Iran conflict.

The escalating conflict marks a sharp reversal between the two right-wing leaders, who were once considered close political allies. Meloni attended Trump’s January 2025 inauguration as the sole European leader present, and Trump previously praised her at his Mar-a-Lago resort as a “fantastic woman” reshaping Europe. Earlier tensions emerged when Meloni publicly defended Pope Leo XIV against Trump’s attacks, prompting Trump to accuse her of lacking courage.

The incident underscores Trump’s pattern of weaponizing false personal narratives against former allies who fail to demonstrate absolute loyalty, particularly when they decline to support his military ventures or defend institutions he attacks. Meloni’s refusal to validate Trump’s fabrication and her public criticism of his treatment of Western partners signal a definitive break in what was marketed as a unified alliance of right-wing populist leaders.



(Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/world/italy/trump-italy-meloni-begged-photo-fabricated-g7-summit-france-rcna350836)

Trump Threatens Iran After Escalating Military Strikes

Trump threatened Iran with unspecified consequences for negotiation delays, stating “Iran will pay the price” after weeks of claiming a deal was imminent. His warning followed U.S. military strikes against Iran on Tuesday in response to Iran downing an Army Apache helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz, after which Iran launched retaliatory strikes on American bases in Jordan, Bahrain, and Kuwait early Wednesday. The escalation tested a ceasefire that began April 8, though a Qatari delegation arrived in Tehran Wednesday to attempt bridging remaining gaps between U.S. and Iranian negotiators.

Trump’s threat marked a sharp reversal from his repeated claims over two months that a breakthrough was imminent. Just 48 hours before his “pay the price” post, Trump had claimed 38 times in two months that a deal was days away, and expressed reluctance about renewed military action. Yet after the helicopter incident, he authorized fresh strikes framed as a warning and did not rule out further targeting of Iranian infrastructure, telling Fox News on Wednesday “I may keep going.”

Fundamental disputes block agreement, including control of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program, with the Trump administration’s wil

(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/09/world/live-news/iran-war-trump-israel)lingness to release $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets remaining contested. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman accused the U.S. and Israel of “repeated ceasefire violations” and stated diplomacy cannot “take place in a vacuum,” signaling Tehran’s willingness to continue talks despite the military exchange. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian called for moving beyond the current “state of neither war nor peace,” suggesting negotiations remain the path forward.

The strikes damaged Iranian infrastructure, with at least 20,000 Iranians losing access to drinking water after two reservoirs were struck. Regional condemnation of Iran’s retaliatory action was swift: Egypt’s foreign ministry condemned the strikes “in the strongest terms,” while Qatar described them as a “flagrant breach of international law.” Energy forecasters warned oil prices will remain elevated through at least July, with Brent crude expected to average $105 per barrel, contradicting Trump’s repeated claims that prices will plunge once an Iran deal materializes.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan condemned Israeli military actions in Syria and Lebanon, warning of regional consequences and accusing Israel of pursuing delusions about territorial expansion. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded by attacking Erdogan as an “antisemitic dictator” and reaffirming Israel’s intent to continue military operations against Iran and its proxies. The competing regional dynamics underscore the complexity of achieving a sustainable agreement amid escalating tensions across multiple fronts.

Trump reportedly considers buying Chagos Islands from Mauritius | Donald Trump | The Guardian

Donald Trump is considering purchasing the Chagos Islands from Mauritius to secure US control of the Diego Garcia military base, according to the Telegraph. The proposal would circumvent UK officials by having the US negotiate directly with Mauritius after the islands are first ceded to Mauritian sovereignty, bypassing stalled British plans to transfer the territory. Trump Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent brought the plan to Trump, though it is not described as a leading option among proposals under consideration.

The US previously blocked legislation in April that would have handed the islands to Mauritius, effectively halting the UK’s sovereignty transfer plans. Some Trump administration officials oppose ceding the island to Mauritius due to concerns that China’s alliance with Mauritius could create espionage vulnerabilities. The White House declined to comment on the reported proposal to the Guardian.

The Diego Garcia base, located in the central Indian Ocean approximately 2,360 miles from Iran, houses a US airbase capable of deploying long-range missiles and has been a strategic asset for US-UK security for nearly 60 years. Since the US-Israel war with Iran began in late February, Iran has launched multiple strikes against the joint base, including one in late March that was intercepted by a US warship. In March, the UK authorized the US to launch missile strikes against Iranian targets from Diego Garcia, a decision Trump criticized as “very late.”

A delegation from the Chagos Refugees Group, visiting the UK last week, accused the British government of allowing the issue to be “hijacked within the halls” of UK politics and demanded the right to return to their birthplace. Louis Olivier Bancoult, the delegation leader, stated the government lacks genuine commitment to resolving the displacement of Chagossians, saying “We’re still suffering and our position is clear, we have the right to live in our birthplace.” The refugees expressed support for the UK to finalize an agreement on the islands’ future.

A UK government spokesperson asserted that maintaining operational control of Diego Garcia is essential to prevent adversaries from gaining strategic footing and that the UK-Mauritius agreement was designed to address long-term security risks both nations face. When asked whether the UK would proceed without US support, a government source confirmed: “We’ve always bee

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/07/trump-deal-chagos-islands-mauritius-uk?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAST2hBleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeHcaW3WDWvK8WxGqhkbE9bFsD-8EJdB_Ez3Hb_ltxfL4i85NkOIwJTm_2HI0_aem_AfM_4giNmngx1uXos9_gaw#Echobox=1780860392)n clear we wouldn’t go ahead without US support,” effectively giving the Trump administration veto power over the islands’ sovereignty transfer.

US Airstrikes Iran After Helicopter Downing

The U.S. military launched airstrikes against Iran on Tuesday at Trump’s direction following Iran’s downing of a U.S. Army Apache helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz on Monday. CENTCOM characterized the strikes as “self-defense operations” and described them as “a proportional response to unjustified Iranian aggression,” while both pilots were rescued safely within two hours by an unmanned surface vehicle in an operational first for the U.S. military.

Trump initially signaled support for military action, posting on Truth Social that the U.S. “must, of necessity, respond to this attack.” However, hours later in a phone call with the Wall Street Journal, Trump contradicted his own administration’s framing by minimizing the incident, calling the helicopter downing “wasn’t a big deal” and emphasizing that “the pilot is fine.”

Trump told the Journal he intended to maintain economic pressure on Iran through an existing blockade, describing it as making the country “very poor” and pledging to keep it in place indefinitely. This statement undercut the military’s formal characterization of the strikes as a measured response to a specific hostile act.

The incident occurs within an already fragile ceasefire framework between the U.S. and Iran, with regional observers monitoring whether the escalation signals a broader shift in U.S. military posture. Trump previously denied campaigning on ending wars, despite explicit 2024 promises to do so.

The conflicting messages from Trump regarding the severity of the incident and the rationale for military action create operational uncertainty about whether the strikes represent a proportional tactical response or serve as justification for sustained pressure on Iran. CENTCOM confirmed the helicopter incident remains under investigation.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/us-iran-bombs-retaliation-apache-helicopter/)

Trump Berates Netanyahu Over Israel Lebanon Escalation

President Trump engaged in an expletive-laden tirade against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a Monday call over Israel's military escalation in Lebanon, according to two U.S. officials and a third source briefed on the exchange. Trump accused Netanyahu of ingratitude and invoked his role in shielding Netanyahu from corruption prosecution, saying "You'd be in prison if it weren't for me. I'm saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this." Trump also demanded Netanyahu halt plans to strike Beirut, telling him he was "fucking crazy" and demanding "What the fuck are you doing?"

Trump's fury stemmed from his assessment that Netanyahu was escalating disproportionately in Lebanon despite understanding Israel's legitimate need to defend itself against Hezbollah attacks. Trump objected specifically to the high civilian death toll and Israel's practice of demolishing buildings to eliminate single Hezbollah commanders. One official stated Trump was "pissed" throughout much of the call, which one source described as among the worst Trump has had with Netanyahu since returning to office. Following the call, Israel abandoned its plan to strike targets in Beirut, an Israeli official confirmed to Axios.

Trump's intervention directly targeted his broader strategic objective of negotiating an end to the conflict with Iran, which has conditioned talks on halting the fighting in Lebanon. Earlier Monday, Iran threatened to withdraw from negotiations over Israel's actions in Lebanon. The U.S. memorandum under negotiation with Iran explicitly calls for an end to the fighting in Lebanon, making Netanyahu's escalation a direct obstacle to Trump's diplomatic initiative.

Netanyahu responded with a defiant statement reaffirming his commitment to strike Hezbollah targets in Beirut if attacks on Israel continue and to expand ground operations in southern Lebanon. A second U.S. official, however, claimed Trump had "steamrolled" Netanyahu on the call, with Netanyahu ultimately acquiescing by saying "OK, OK, just make sure everything is taken care of." Netanyahu's office did not respond to requests for further comment.

The confrontation underscores tension between Trump's objective of securing a negotiated settlement with Iran and Netanyahu's commitment to aggressive military operations against Iranian-backed Hezbollah. Trump posted to Truth Social after the call that Iran talks were "continuing, at a rapid pace," signaling his determination to advance those negotiations despite the friction with Israel's leadership.

(Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/trump-netanyahu-israel-lebanon-call)

Trump Threatens to ‘Blow Up’ Oman Over Strait

President Donald Trump threatened to "blow up" Oman, a US ally, over control of the Strait of Hormuz after Iranian state television reported a draft agreement between Iran and Oman to jointly manage commercial shipping traffic through the strategic waterway. Trump's threat prompted US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to issue a formal warning to Oman on Thursday, declaring that the United States would "aggressively target any actors involved, directly or indirectly," in implementing tolls on the strait and would penalize "any willing partners."

Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei condemned Trump's threat as "another dangerous sign of the normalisation of lawlessness and bullying in international relations." The escalating crisis follows a US military strike against an Iranian drone operation near the Strait of Hormuz, which prompted Iran's Revolutionary Guard to attack a regional US air base and warn of a "more decisive" response to further aggression.

Despite the intensified military tensions, unnamed US officials disclosed to Axios that American and Iranian negotiators have reached agreement on a 60-day memorandum of understanding to extend the ceasefire and begin negotiations on the central nuclear issue. The agreement awaits Trump's approval, indicating a potential diplomatic off-ramp exists alongside the escalatory rhetoric and military exchanges.

Trump's threat to a NATO-aligned ally demonstrates his willingness to use military force against partners who do not comply with his demands, contradicting the principle of coalition-building essential to American foreign policy. Bessent's Treasury warning reinforced the administration's position that any nation facilitating the proposed Iran-Oman arrangement would face economic sanctions, effectively attempting to unilaterally dictate terms for one of the world's most critical shipping lanes.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/us-trump-threatens-oman-strait-of-hormuz-b2985366.html)

Trump Deploys Caribbean Military Armada Threatening Cuba

The Trump administration has deployed the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group, guided missile destroyers, and fighter jets throughout the Caribbean and Florida in what Politico reports is the largest concentration of U.S. military forces outside the Middle East. Military officials acknowledge months of buildup but refuse to comment on operational specifics, while Trump has publicly threatened to seize Cuba, describing the island as a failed state he will "soon be taking." A Trump official told Axios that "everything is on the table," though no invasion is currently planned or imminent.

The White House is executing what administration advisers call an "accelerationism" strategy to collapse Cuba's government through intensified economic strangulation. The strategy combines the existing U.S. blockade with newly imposed oil supply restrictions that have triggered widespread blackouts and humanitarian collapse across the island. One official stated, "We don't want to kill off the regime just yet. There's a method to this. It's in stages," confirming the administration's deliberate use of civilian suffering as a destabilization tactic.

Trump's military posturing follows the January capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and seizure of Venezuela's oil sector, which severed Cuba's primary economic lifeline. Last week, the administration indicted former Cuban president Raúl Castro the same day the Nimitz arrived in Caribbean waters. Mark Cancian, a senior analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Politico that "the Nimitz is likely there primarily for intimidation, though it could be used in a military operation if needed," underscoring the carrier's dual purpose as both threat and operational asset.

High-level Trump officials have delivered explicit warnings to Cuban leadership in recent weeks. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posed before a map of Cuba while meeting with U.S. Southern Command's Gen. Francis Donovan, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe held direct talks with Cuban officials to convey Trump's demands for "fundamental changes" in exchange for engagement. These diplomatic maneuvers, combined with the military buildup, constitute coordinated pressure designed to force regime capitulation or justify intervention.

The Caribbean operation reflects Trump's broader imperial strategy across Latin America. The administration has signed security agreements with Paraguay, Ecuador, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, the Dominican Republic, and Panama, authorizing U.S. troop deployments and military operations under the cover of a "war on drugs." U.S. forces have conducted lethal strikes on suspected drug vessels, establishing a pattern of militarized control over the region while the Trump administration positions itself to exploit Cuba's destabilized state.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-cuba-invasion-navy-caribbean-b2985491.html)

1 2 3 32