Category: Unpresidential

Fact-Checking Trump’s Misleading Claims at Butler Rally

During a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made several claims regarding immigration, the economy, and Hurricane Helene that were fact-checked for accuracy. Trump stated that illegal immigration was at its lowest when he left office, citing a chart with misleading data. In reality, his presidency ended in January 2021, and the low numbers he referenced in April 2020 were influenced by pandemic-related lockdowns.

Trump also misrepresented the federal response to Hurricane Helene, stating that victims would receive only $750 in aid. This amount is from FEMA’s Serious Needs Assistance program, which covers immediate needs and is not the total aid provided. As of October 4, FEMA had disbursed over $45 million for recovery efforts.

Additionally, Trump claimed that 13,099 murderers were allowed into the U.S. during the Biden administration, a misleading statistic that does not specify when these individuals entered the country. The figure refers to noncitizens with homicide convictions over a 40-year span and does not imply a direct correlation to current immigration policies.

On economic claims, Trump asserted that his administration achieved the greatest economy in history, but data shows that while unemployment dropped, GDP growth was lower than in previous administrations. Other economic indicators such as wages and business investment also contradict his assertion.

Lastly, Trump inaccurately claimed that Vice President Kamala Harris was tasked with managing border security. Her role is focused on addressing the root causes of migration rather than direct control over border enforcement, which falls under the Department of Homeland Security.

 

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Did Not Endorse Donald Trump

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has not endorsed Donald Trump for president, directly contradicting claims made by the former president. Rumors surfaced online, particularly on Truth Social, where Trump asserted that Dimon had thrown his support behind him. However, a spokesperson for JPMorgan Chase confirmed that these assertions are inaccurate, clarifying that Dimon has not made any endorsements in the current presidential race.

In a recent interview, Dimon explicitly stated, “I’m not endorsing anyone at this time,” emphasizing his focus on policy issues rather than political endorsements. This aligns with previous reports indicating that Dimon had supported Trump’s GOP primary rival, Nikki Haley, as he sought to rally other business leaders behind her candidacy.

Trump then laughably denied any knowledge of his own post

Despite the false claims of Dimon’s endorsement circulating on social media, it is evident that he has maintained a position of non-partisanship in this election cycle. The misinformation has been propagated by various users on platforms like X, amplifying Trump’s false narrative.

Furthermore, while Trump has previously mentioned considering Dimon for a Treasury Secretary position should he regain the presidency, he later retracted those comments, suggesting uncertainty about the origins of such reports. This inconsistency highlights the ongoing pattern of misleading statements from Trump regarding endorsements and support.

Ultimately, Jamie Dimon’s stance remains clear: he has not endorsed Donald Trump, and the claims made by Trump are unfounded. This incident underscores the need for accurate reporting and fact-checking in the political discourse surrounding the upcoming presidential election.

Liz Cheney’s remarks at a Harris campaign event evidently struck a nerve with Trump

 

At a recent Kamala Harris campaign event, former Representative Liz Cheney delivered a powerful message urging voters to reject what she called the “depraved cruelty of Donald Trump.” This bold statement sent ripples through Republican circles, prompting a swift and vitriolic response from Trump himself on his social media platform, Truth Social. He not only attacked Cheney but also criticized her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has also endorsed Harris.

In his lengthy post, Trump condemned Liz Cheney for her participation in the January 6 House select committee and disparaged her father’s historical decisions regarding the Middle East. He referred to the Cheneys as a “pathetic couple” suffering from what he termed “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” This animosity isn’t new; it’s rooted in Cheney’s outspoken criticism of Trump and her pivotal vote to impeach him following the January 6 Capitol riots, which significantly contributed to her primary defeat in 2022.

Despite the backlash, Cheney remains a staunch critic of Trump, asserting that he is unfit to lead the country. During her speech, she stated, “What January 6 shows us is that there is not an ounce of compassion in Donald Trump. He is petty, he is vindictive and he is cruel.” Her remarks struck a nerve with Trump, highlighting the intensity of their ongoing feud.

Cheney’s endorsement of Harris aligns with a broader strategy to attract anti-Trump Republicans, demonstrating her commitment to opposing Trump’s influence in the Republican Party. She praised Harris for her efforts to unite reasonable individuals across the political spectrum, further solidifying her stance against Trumpism.

While Cheney’s decision to support Harris may seem surprising given their party differences, it reflects a growing trend among some Republicans who are increasingly disillusioned with Trump’s leadership. Harris is actively courting this demographic, despite facing criticism from within her party for these efforts.

However, the potential impact of GOP endorsements for Harris remains uncertain. The Cheney name carries significant historical baggage, particularly due to Dick Cheney’s controversial tenure in the Bush administration, leaving many Democrats wary of his endorsement. This dynamic illustrates the complex and often contentious landscape of American politics as the 2024 elections approach.

 

Trump FEMA Claim Debunked: Agency Not Running Out Of Money Because Of Migrants

 

Former President Donald Trump has falsely claimed that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is running low on funds due to spending on migrant assistance. During a recent rally, Trump asserted that Vice President Kamala Harris had diverted billions from FEMA’s budget to house illegal migrants, echoing comments from Fox News host Jesse Watters. However, this claim has been debunked by multiple sources.

FEMA’s funding for disaster relief and migrant assistance comes from separate budget allocations. While FEMA has indeed allocated over $1 billion to aid communities supporting migrants this year, this funding is drawn from the Shelter and Services Program, distinct from the Disaster Relief Fund used for hurricane recovery efforts. This separation means that the financial challenges FEMA faces are not due to migrant-related expenditures.

On October 3, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas acknowledged that FEMA is experiencing a cash crunch for disaster relief efforts but clarified that these financial difficulties are not linked to migrant assistance. The Disaster Relief Fund is specifically reserved for managing disasters, and its funds have not been diverted for non-disaster related purposes.

The current issues with FEMA’s budget stem from a lack of additional funding from Congress. Recent stopgap funding measures did not provide the necessary resources, forcing FEMA to prioritize immediate disaster needs while halting non-emergency rebuilding projects. Democratic lawmakers have raised concerns about FEMA’s financial situation, urging Congress to reconvene and allocate more funds.

As Hurricane Helene wreaks havoc across parts of the Southeast, estimates suggest the storm could lead to damages exceeding $34 billion. The financial strain on FEMA could hinder its ability to respond effectively to ongoing disaster recovery efforts, especially with hurricane season continuing through November.

Trump’s claims about FEMA’s financial situation have been met with strong rebuttals from the Biden administration, with officials emphasizing the agency’s commitment to assisting all communities affected by disasters without bias. The administration has stressed the importance of accurate communication regarding disaster relief efforts, particularly during such critical times.

 

Trump Misrepresents Kemp’s Communication with Biden Amid Hurricane Helene

Former President Donald Trump made claims regarding Georgia Governor Brian Kemp’s communication with President Joe Biden amid Hurricane Helene. Trump suggested that Kemp was struggling to reach Biden, asserting that the federal government was not being responsive. However, this statement contradicted Kemp’s earlier remarks, in which he confirmed that he had spoken with Biden and appreciated the president’s offer of assistance.

During a visit to Valdosta, Georgia, Trump stated, “the governor’s doing a very good job,” but insisted that Kemp was having difficulty contacting the president. He also criticized Vice President Kamala Harris, suggesting she was preoccupied with fundraising activities rather than attending to the crisis.

Kemp, on the other hand, clarified that he had missed a call from Biden the previous day but had returned it promptly. He reported that Biden had asked him what assistance was needed and offered to help further if required. This direct communication contradicts Trump’s narrative of a lack of responsiveness from the Biden administration.

Additionally, Trump made broader accusations against the Democratic leadership, claiming they neglected Republican areas during disaster responses. These comments appear to have been made in a context of political posturing rather than factual reporting, raising concerns about the accuracy and integrity of his statements.

This incident exemplifies ongoing tensions between Trump, his Republican allies, and the Democratic administration, particularly in contexts of emergency response. The misrepresentation of facts regarding communication between Kemp and Biden highlights the issues of credibility in political discourse.

 

Trump Misrepresents Immigration Stats to Attack Harris

 

Former President Donald Trump has made misleading claims regarding immigration statistics in an effort to attack Vice President Kamala Harris. He asserted that 13,000 convicted murderers entered the U.S. during her tenure as Border Czar, implying that these individuals are now living freely in the country. However, these statistics encompass noncitizens who entered over several decades, including during Trump’s own administration. Trump’s statements misrepresent the data by suggesting it only pertains to those who have recently entered the U.S.

Furthermore, Trump’s assertion that these individuals are all freely roaming the streets is incorrect. The statistics include individuals who are currently incarcerated for their crimes. The data released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) indicates that as of July 2024, there were 425,431 convicted criminals on the non-detained docket, with 13,099 having homicide convictions. It is crucial to note that these figures are not specific to Harris’s time in office.

The Department of Homeland Security clarified that the data spans decades and includes individuals whose custody determinations were made long before the current administration. A former ICE acting director stated that it is completely false to claim that all homicide offenders on this docket entered the U.S. during Harris’s vice presidency. The non-detained docket includes individuals from various administrations, including Trump’s.

Trump’s rhetoric has been echoed by various Republican lawmakers and right-wing media outlets, which have misrepresented the statistics to criticize Harris’s immigration policies. However, it is essential to understand that the increase in the number of individuals on the non-detained docket is not solely attributable to the Biden administration, as the statistics show a consistent presence of these individuals across multiple administrations.

Moreover, the ICE non-detained docket reflects a complex legal situation where individuals cannot be deported due to their countries’ refusal to accept them back, leading to their release after serving their criminal sentences. This process is governed by a Supreme Court decision that limits indefinite detention.

In summary, Trump’s claims about immigrants and homicide are exaggerated and misleading. The statistics he references do not specifically point to recent immigration trends under Harris, and the complexities of immigration law and international relations play a significant role in the current situation. The context surrounding these statistics is crucial for understanding the realities of immigration enforcement.

 

Trump’s Rally Remarks Draw Parallels to ‘The Purge’, Spark Outrage

 

Donald Trump proposed a controversial policy during a rally in Pennsylvania, which many critics have likened to legalizing “The Purge.” This remark drew significant backlash on social media, with commentators and journalists drawing parallels to the dystopian film series that portrays a government-sanctioned free-for-all of crime for a 12-hour period.

At the rally, Trump expressed dissatisfaction with current policing practices, claiming that police are not permitted to effectively perform their duties. He suggested that to curb crime, a singular day of extreme violence would be necessary, stating, “one really violent day” would send a message to deter criminal activity.

Responses to Trump’s comments were swift and critical. Political analysts and media figures noted the alarming nature of his suggestion, with some questioning whether he had been inspired by the film series itself or independently arrived at such an idea.

Among the critics was University of Texas law professor Lee Kovarsky, who highlighted the distinction between asserting hard truths and making reckless statements. The overall sentiment on social media reflected deep concern about Trump’s call for what many interpreted as an endorsement of police brutality.

Former presidential speechwriter Dan Cluchey remarked on the gravity of the situation, suggesting that a presidential candidate calling for a violent day of police action should warrant significant media attention. The implications of Trump’s rhetoric sparked discussions about law enforcement practices and the potential consequences of such extreme proposals.

The rally further illustrated the challenges Trump faces in maintaining audience engagement, as reports indicated that some attendees were leaving during his speech, suggesting a disconnect between his messaging and public interest. Overall, the incident raised serious questions about the direction of political discourse in the United States.

 

Trump Launches Luxury Watch Line Priced Up to $100,000

Donald Trump has launched a new line of luxury watches, with prices reaching up to $100,000. The announcement was made through a post on Truth Social, where Trump described the watches as “truly special” and suggested they would make excellent Christmas gifts.

The watch line includes two distinct models: the Trump Victory Tourbillon and the Fight Fight Fight Watch. The Victory Tourbillon is reportedly crafted from 18-carat gold and adorned with 122 diamonds, featuring a tourbillon mechanism designed to enhance accuracy. It is priced at $100,000, while the Fight Fight Fight model ranges from $500 to $800.

According to the official website, only 147 units of the Victory Tourbillon will be produced, which will carry a “Swiss made” stamp. The Fight Fight Fight Watch is gold-plated and available in multiple colors. The marketing claims that wearing the Victory Tourbillon will signify success.

However, the watches are not directly associated with Donald Trump or The Trump Organization. They are being produced under a licensing agreement with a company named TheBestWatchesonEarth LLC, which lists its address in Wyoming. This company also sells other Trump-branded merchandise, further raising questions about the authenticity and quality of the products.

Notably, all sales of the watches are final with no refund policy, and the website states that none of the proceeds will benefit Trump’s presidential campaign, emphasizing that the watches are intended solely for personal enjoyment as collectible items.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-watches-tourbillon-100000/)

Trump Calls for Investigation of Pelosi Amid Stock Sale Controversy

 

Former President Donald Trump has urged attorneys general in Republican-controlled states to investigate Nancy Pelosi following a stock sale by her husband, Paul Pelosi. The request stems from a report that Paul Pelosi sold 2,000 shares of Visa just before the federal government announced an antitrust lawsuit against the credit company. Trump inaccurately claimed during a rally that the sale occurred the day before the lawsuit was made public, asserting a need for investigation.

Paul Pelosi sold the Visa shares on July 1 for approximately $500,000. However, there is no clarity on whether he profited from this transaction, as the details surrounding the sale remain ambiguous. The Justice Department’s lawsuit against Visa was made public shortly after the sale.

Trump’s call for investigation highlights a growing trend among his supporters and Republican leaders to scrutinize and challenge the actions of Democratic figures, often without substantial evidence. This demand for investigations appears to be part of a broader effort to politically undermine opponents, particularly as Trump seeks to galvanize his base ahead of the upcoming elections.

The former president’s comments reflect a pattern of behavior where he leverages misinformation to create political narratives that serve his interests, a tactic he has employed throughout his career. His rhetoric often relies on unfounded accusations, which can further polarize political discourse and incite his followers.

Critics argue that such demands for investigations are not only unfounded but also serve to distract from Trump’s own controversies and legal challenges. By shifting the focus onto Pelosi, Trump aims to divert attention from his record and ongoing issues within his political sphere, including previous investigations into his conduct during his presidency.

 

Trump Lays the Groundwork for More Bogus Stolen Election Claims: ‘They Cheat’

 

Former President Donald Trump has begun laying the groundwork for future claims of a rigged election ahead of the upcoming November elections. Speaking at a rally in Walker, Michigan, Trump expressed doubts about a potential loss, asserting that any defeat would be due to widespread cheating, a claim he has made numerous times since the 2020 elections. He stated, “If we lose, the next time we’re gonna have the same group of people in Caracas, Venezuela because it’s much safer than any place in our country if she wins. Much safer,” referencing Vice President Kamala Harris and continuing his pattern of baseless allegations against immigrants and crime rates.

Trump’s assertion that he could only lose due to cheating resonates with his supporters, who have previously engaged in violent acts, such as the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. His rhetoric at the rally reflects a longstanding narrative that he has pushed since 2016, where he claimed that illegal voting had deprived him of the popular vote victory. This pattern of rhetoric is critical to understanding Trump’s ongoing influence within the Republican Party and among his voter base.

As he continues to propagate these unfounded claims, Trump has also been encouraging law enforcement to be vigilant against alleged voter fraud. At another event, he urged police officers to monitor polling places, suggesting that their presence could intimidate potential fraud. This approach raises significant concerns about the implications for voter intimidation and the integrity of the electoral process.

Critics argue that Trump’s rhetoric not only undermines trust in democratic institutions but also poses a threat to public safety. The Attorney General of Michigan has initiated legal proceedings against individuals involved in a fake elector scheme stemming from the 2020 election, highlighting the ongoing repercussions of Trump’s claims and the organized efforts to challenge legitimate electoral outcomes.

In summary, Trump’s continued allegations about election fraud are not only a repeat of his past rhetoric but also serve to mobilize his base ahead of the upcoming elections. This strategy has far-reaching implications for the political landscape, as it fosters an environment of distrust and potential violence, reminiscent of the events that transpired on January 6, 2021. The responsibility lies not only with Trump but also with Republican leaders and media outlets, such as Fox News, that amplify these narratives without scrutiny.

 

1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 350