Category: Unpresidential

President-elect Donald Trump continues to avoid si…

President-elect Donald Trump continues to avoid signing the legally required ethics agreement mandated for a smooth presidential transition, raising serious ethical concerns about his leadership. This agreement is crucial for ensuring that Trump does not engage in conflicts of interest that could arise from his extensive business dealings, a fact that has been a significant point of contention throughout his presidency.

Trump’s reluctance to sign the ethics pledge illustrates his ongoing battle with transparency and accountability, as he attempts to shield his financial interests from scrutiny. Despite the fact that the ethics requirement was established under the Presidential Transition Act—legislation that Trump himself endorsed—his transition team has not prioritized compliance, jeopardizing national security as deadlines for essential agreements are missed.

Transition experts are alarmed by this delay, emphasizing that it could severely impair the incoming administration’s preparedness. The Biden administration’s General Services Administration had set deadlines for agreements that would provide Trump’s team with necessary resources and briefings, which are crucial for national security. The failure to comply with these requirements could leave the future administration unprepared to handle urgent issues from Day 1.

Furthermore, Trump’s ongoing business ventures, including his significant stake in Truth Social and other licensing deals, raise additional ethical questions. This lack of adherence to ethical standards, coupled with his refusal to sign the pledge, suggests a disregard for the foundational principles of governance that are essential for maintaining public trust.

As the transition process hangs in the balance, lawmakers like Rep. Jamie Raskin have expressed deep concerns about the implications of Trump’s actions, stating that ignoring established norms poses a threat to the fundamental institutions of American democracy. Without the necessary agreements in place, the implications for national security are dire, echoing past failures that have had catastrophic consequences.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/09/politics/trump-transition-ethics-pledge-timing/index.html?)

Trump’s Demands for Recess Appointments Highlight GOP’s Submission to His Agenda

Donald Trump is once again attempting to exert his influence over Republican senators, demanding their support for recess appointments to expedite the confirmation of his nominees. In a recent post, he insisted that any senator vying for leadership must commit to this controversial tactic, which has been met with skepticism from many in Congress. Recess appointments allow presidents to bypass the Senate when Congress is in recess, a practice that has been blocked by the opposition party in recent years.

Despite the contentious nature of this demand, the leading GOP candidates for the Senate majority leadership have quickly signaled their support for Trump’s wishes. Senators John Thune and John Cornyn, both seen as frontrunners, have expressed their openness to the idea, indicating a troubling trend where the party appears willing to undermine traditional legislative processes to placate Trump and his agenda.

Trump’s insistence on recess appointments highlights a significant power struggle within the Republican Party, as various factions vie for control. While some senators, like Rick Scott, have eagerly endorsed Trump’s approach, others remain cautious, recognizing the risks involved in expanding presidential powers. This clash reflects a broader concern about the erosion of checks and balances in the face of Trump’s demands.

Moreover, Trump’s call for recess appointments is not merely about filling positions; it is a strategic move to prevent the current Democratic-controlled Senate from pushing through judicial appointments. He has urged Republicans to block any such attempts during the leadership transition, revealing his willingness to disrupt the Senate’s functionality for partisan gain.

This situation poses serious implications for the Senate’s future operations, as Trump’s tactics could lead to further polarization and conflict. Recess appointments, once a rare and controversial measure, may become a tool for a party unwilling to engage in genuine legislative negotiations. As the GOP navigates this leadership election, the fallout from Trump’s demands will likely shape the Senate’s dynamics for years to come.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/10/politics/trump-senate-recess-appointments-gop-leader/index.html)

Trump Expresses Regret Over Leaving Office While Peddling Dangerous Lies

In a recent rally held in Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump lamented his departure from the White House, claiming he “shouldn’t have left.” This statement reflects his persistent delusions regarding the legitimacy of the 2020 election and suggests a troubling unwillingness to accept defeat in future elections.

Throughout his speech, Trump escalated his baseless assertions of widespread voter fraud, insinuating that the only way he could lose again in 2024 would be through Democratic cheating. This rhetoric continues to undermine the integrity of the electoral process and incites division among his supporters.

Trump’s remarks also hinted at a dangerous attitude towards violence, as he expressed indifference to the idea of reporters being shot at while criticizing the media. Such comments are alarming, especially considering the violent events that occurred on January 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters stormed the Capitol based on his false claims.

Despite a clear lack of evidence for his claims, Trump continues to capitalize on fear and division as he campaigns for the upcoming election, labeling the Democratic Party as “demonic.” This kind of inflammatory language is reminiscent of his previous tactics that incited unrest and violence.

As the election draws near, Trump’s unwillingness to concede and his promotion of dangerous rhetoric raise significant concerns about the future of democracy in America. It is evident that should Trump regain power, he would likely resist leaving the White House again, posing a serious threat to democratic norms.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/03/us/politics/trump-pa-rally-election.html)

Trump Says OK If An Assassin Shoots Through The Press

During a recent rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made shocking remarks suggesting he would not mind if someone attempted to shoot through the media to reach him. This statement, made while he was critiquing the bulletproof glass shielding him, raises serious concerns about his attitude towards violence and the press.

Trump, who has a history of inflammatory rhetoric, referred to the media as “fake news” and “bloodsuckers” while gesturing towards the protective glass. His comments come in the wake of multiple assassination attempts against him, including a recent incident where a bullet grazed his ear and resulted in the death of an audience member.

The former president’s reckless comments not only trivialize the threats against his life but also serve to incite his supporters against the press. By implying that the media is a barrier to him, he dangerously promotes the idea that violence against journalists is acceptable.

Trump’s spokesperson attempted to clarify his remarks, claiming he was trying to protect the media. However, this belies the reality of Trump’s consistent pattern of hostility towards journalists who challenge him. His rhetoric has been known to embolden extremist behavior among his followers, leading to increased violence against the press.

This incident is a stark reminder of the toxic environment Trump has cultivated, where incitement and division take precedence over respect and dignity. As he continues his campaign for the presidency, the implications of his words and their potential effects on public safety and discourse cannot be overstated.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-lititz-pennsylvania-rally-shoot-through-media-bulletproof-glass/)

Trump’s Disturbing Comments on Race and Privilege Highlight His Inadequacy as a Leader

In a recent rally in Michigan, former President Donald Trump made headlines by boasting about his “beautiful white skin” immediately after disparaging Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump’s comments come amid a contentious election campaign where he has frequently insulted Harris, whom he labeled as a “low I.Q. individual” and previously questioned her racial identity at a conference of Black journalists.

Trump’s remarks about Harris reflect his ongoing strategy of using personal attacks to undermine his opponents. His history of offensive comments regarding race, such as questioning Harris’s Blackness, demonstrates a troubling pattern of behavior that raises serious concerns about his fitness for office. As he continues to escalate his rhetoric, it becomes clear that Trump is not only out of touch but also dangerously divisive.

During his speech, Trump lamented that his presidential duties have kept him from enjoying leisure activities, specifically hitting the beach. This self-indulgent complaint underscores his detachment from the everyday struggles of average Americans, who are facing economic hardships and uncertainty. Instead of addressing significant issues, Trump chose to focus on his personal experiences, further highlighting his privilege.

By lamenting his lack of a tan while insisting he has the “whitest skin,” Trump attempted to inject humor into his speech. However, this remark only served to reinforce the perception of him as a superficial figure more concerned with appearances than policy. His fixation on skin color in the context of a political campaign is not only inappropriate but also reflects a deeper insensitivity to the complexities of race in America.

As Trump rallies support for his campaign, it is crucial to recognize the implications of his words and actions. His continuous belittling of opponents, particularly women and people of color, undermines the values of respect and inclusivity that are essential for a healthy democratic process. Voters must critically assess the character and integrity of candidates as they head to the polls.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-boasts-he-has-beautiful-white-skin-right-after-slamming-kamala-harris/)

Trump’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Against CBS is a Frivolous Attack on Press Freedom

Former President Donald Trump has launched a ludicrous legal attack against CBS, claiming $10 billion in damages over the network’s ’60 Minutes’ interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. This frivolous lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Texas, is riddled with absurd accusations that CBS engaged in partisan election interference and misled the public during the presidential election process. Trump’s legal team alleges that the interview was unfairly edited to disadvantage him, a claim that has been categorically dismissed by CBS.

The suit has been met with widespread ridicule from First Amendment experts, who have condemned it as a dangerous overreach aimed at stifling press freedom. Prominent attorneys have asserted that Trump’s actions are not just meritless but also represent a blatant attempt to control how the media reports on political figures, undermining the fundamental protections of the First Amendment. Legal analysts emphasize that the media, not governmental entities or political candidates, should dictate the coverage of news events.

Trump’s lawsuit specifically demands CBS release the full, unedited transcript of the interview, further demonstrating his desperation to manipulate the narrative surrounding his political image. The rationale behind filing in Texas, particularly in a court presided over by a Trump appointee, raises suspicions of ‘judge shopping,’ a tactic often employed by litigants seeking favorable rulings.

CBS has firmly rejected Trump’s claims, asserting that the interview was accurately presented and that the lawsuit lacks any substantive basis. A representative for CBS stressed that their coverage was intended to inform viewers, not mislead them, directly countering Trump’s narrative of deceit. Furthermore, the legal action has drawn sharp criticism from experts who argue that such attempts to intimidate the media only serve to highlight Trump’s ongoing struggles with accountability and the truth.

During a rally in Nevada, Trump boasted about the lawsuit, showcasing his continued penchant for theatrics over substance. This legal maneuver is yet another indication of Trump’s relentless pursuit to reshape public perception while disregarding journalistic integrity. As the case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of protecting the freedom of the press against politically motivated litigation.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/media/trump-cbs-lawsuit-harris-60-minutes-interview/index.html)

Trump’s Threatening Remarks Against Liz Cheney Reveal Dangerous Political Rhetoric

During a recent rally in Glendale, Arizona, Donald Trump escalated his attacks against former Representative Liz Cheney, referring to her as a “war hawk” and suggesting she should be fired upon. Trump’s inflammatory language, which included remarks about having guns aimed at Cheney, represents a troubling continuation of his trend of using violent rhetoric against political opponents. This incident comes just days before an election where Trump is already facing scrutiny for undermining public confidence in the electoral process.

Cheney, a prominent critic of Trump, had previously condemned his actions regarding the 2020 election and the January 6th Capitol riot. In response to Trump’s comments, she warned that such threats are characteristic of dictators who aim to suppress dissent. Cheney emphasized the dangers of allowing a “petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man” like Trump to wield power, highlighting the risks to democracy posed by his rhetoric and actions.

Trump’s remarks have drawn significant backlash, with many viewing them as a dangerous escalation that normalizes violence in political discourse. His campaign attempted to defend his comments by labeling Cheney as a warmonger, yet this defense fails to address the alarming implications of his call to violence against those who criticize him.

The former president’s history of violent language dates back to his first campaign and includes past suggestions of shooting protesters. His insistence on using military force against political dissenters further illustrates his authoritarian tendencies, raising concerns about his suitability as a candidate.

Vice President Kamala Harris has pointed out the implications of Trump’s rhetoric, noting that he is not focused on improving the lives of American citizens but rather on consolidating power through intimidation. As the election approaches, the stakes are high, and it remains crucial for voters to recognize the threat posed by Trump’s continued embrace of violent and divisive language.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/politics/donald-trump-liz-cheney-war-hawk-battle/index.html)

Trump Misleads New Mexico Crowd with False Claims of Victory

Former President Donald Trump recently held a rally in New Mexico, where he falsely claimed that he had won the state in the past, despite clear evidence to the contrary. Trump’s assertion of having ‘won it twice’ reflects his continued pattern of spreading misinformation regarding election results, a tactic he employs to energize his base while undermining public trust in the electoral process.

Trump’s rally drew a crowd, but his claims about New Mexico were met with skepticism, especially since his own advisors had suggested that campaigning there was futile. Ignoring this advice, Trump insisted that the state was winnable and propagated unfounded allegations that the votes were rigged against him.

His rhetoric included derogatory remarks about immigrants, portraying them as threats rather than contributing members of society. This inflammatory language not only perpetuates harmful stereotypes but also attempts to shift the narrative away from his electoral losses by framing it as a battle against a supposed conspiracy.

By claiming that ‘if God could count the votes’ he would win, Trump not only invokes a religious reference to bolster his arguments but also further sows discord and distrust in the electoral system. Such statements are part of a broader strategy to galvanize his supporters by painting himself as a victim of a rigged system.

Overall, Trump’s baseless claims and divisive rhetoric at the New Mexico rally serve to reinforce his narrative of victimhood and electoral fraud, diverting attention from his repeated failures and undermining the integrity of democratic processes.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/news/we-won-it-twice-trump-whips-up-screaming-fans-with-claim-he-really-won-their-state-he-did-not/)

Trump’s Lies About Schools and Transgender Surgeries Exposed

Former President Donald Trump has once again spread the harmful falsehood that schools in the U.S. are sending children for gender-affirming surgeries without parental consent. This baseless claim, first made during a rally in late August, has been thoroughly debunked by multiple reputable sources, including CNN, which revealed that Trump’s own campaign could not provide a single instance to support this outrageous assertion.

Despite being discredited, Trump has doubled down on his narrative, repeating it during discussions filmed by Fox News and on a podcast with Joe Rogan. He insists that there are places where children leave for school and return having undergone surgical changes, a claim that is not only misleading but also entirely fabricated. He fails to specify any such locations, exposing the lack of evidence behind his outlandish claims.

Experts in transgender healthcare have unequivocally stated that Trump’s assertions are false. There are no instances of schools facilitating gender-affirming surgeries, and any medical intervention for minors must involve parental consent. Leading medical professionals emphasize that surgeries, whether gender-affirming or otherwise, cannot be performed in school settings and require a qualified medical center.

Moreover, the process for minors seeking gender-affirming care is comprehensive and involves careful evaluation by medical professionals. Parental consent is not just a formality; it is a legal requirement that ensures informed decision-making regarding a child’s health. The American Academy of Pediatrics and other authoritative bodies have made it clear that no healthcare provider would perform surgery on a minor without the involvement and consent of parents.

Trump’s continued propagation of this false narrative reflects a dangerous trend of misinformation that undermines trust in educational and healthcare institutions. The overwhelming consensus among experts is that these surgeries are not performed in schools, and the claims made by Trump serve only to stoke fear and division as he aims to mobilize his base ahead of the upcoming elections.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/26/politics/fact-check-trump-rogan-children-gender-affirming-surgeries/index.html)

Trump’s Baseless Election Lies Exposed in Joe Rogan Interview

In a recent interview with Joe Rogan, former President Donald Trump reiterated multiple falsehoods regarding the 2020 election, continuing his pattern of spreading misinformation. Trump insisted that he didn’t lose the election, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. According to numerous investigations, including those by his own attorney general, significant fraud was never found, and Trump lost to Joe Biden by a clear margin.

During the conversation, Trump claimed that judges avoided ruling on the merits of over 50 lawsuits he filed to contest the election results. However, a study revealed that most of these cases were dismissed after hearings, and many were dropped by Trump before even reaching substantive arguments. This misrepresentation of the legal outcomes is a clear attempt to distort the narrative surrounding his election defeat.

Trump also falsely suggested that the majority of voting machines are unreliable and that the U.S. should revert to using paper ballots. In reality, over 90% of election jurisdictions already utilized paper ballots in 2020, contradicting Trump’s assertions. The misconception that voting machines are the sole mechanism of fraud has no basis in fact.

Furthermore, Trump claimed that the COVID-19 pandemic was used as a cover to rig the election through increased mail-in voting. This is misleading, as both Republican and Democratic officials encouraged mail-in voting to protect public health during the pandemic. Trump’s narrative of a grand conspiracy lacks substance and is rooted in his ongoing attempt to delegitimize the electoral process.

Ultimately, the 2020 election was found to be secure, with isolated cases of fraud that were insufficient to affect the overall outcome. Trump’s repeated lies not only undermine public trust in the electoral process but also pose a significant threat to democracy. The facts clearly demonstrate that Trump’s claims are unfounded and serve only to perpetuate division and misinformation.

(h/t: https://apnews.com/article/trump-election-lies-rogan-interview-ballots-voting-c8c06eb608c1b1ae8ca0e93ec1022b02)

1 … 30 31 32 33 34 … 382