Category: Unpresidential

Trump’s Disturbing Take on Lincoln and the Civil War

In a shocking display of historical ignorance, Donald Trump suggested that Abraham Lincoln could have avoided the Civil War by negotiating with the South, which aimed to preserve slavery. During a Fox News interview, Trump was asked about his favorite president, and after briefly mentioning Ronald Reagan, he expressed admiration for Lincoln. However, he opined that Lincoln should have ‘settled’ the conflict rather than allowing it to escalate into war.

This ludicrous statement raises serious questions about Trump’s understanding of American history. The Civil War was fought primarily to end the institution of slavery, and the notion that Lincoln could have simply brokered a deal with the Confederacy is not only absurd but also dangerously misleading. Trump’s comments indicate a troubling willingness to romanticize a period that was marked by horrific human rights violations.

Furthermore, Trump attempted to link historical events to contemporary issues, claiming that if he were president, Ukraine and other conflicts would have been avoided. He makes these assertions without providing any evidence, demonstrating his tendency to manipulate facts for political gain. His previous comments praising Confederate leaders and defending pro-slavery monuments only add to the pattern of his troubling rhetoric regarding race and history.

Trump’s remarks reflect a broader trend within his party to downplay the significance of the Civil War and its legacy of slavery. This revisionist history is not only factually incorrect but also undermines the struggles for civil rights that continue to this day. By suggesting a compromise with a pro-slavery South, Trump effectively disrespects the sacrifices made by countless individuals who fought against slavery and for equality.

As the 2024 presidential election approaches, it is crucial for voters to recognize Trump’s dangerous rhetoric and the implications it has for understanding American history. His comments are a stark reminder of the ongoing battle against racism and the importance of accurately remembering our past.

(h/t: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/trump-suggests-abraham-lincoln-shouldve-let-the-south-keep-a-little-slavery)

Trump’s Vicious Attack on Judge For Releasing Jack Smith’s Evidence

Former President Donald Trump recently labeled the judge overseeing his January 6 case as ‘the most evil person,’ a statement that reflects his ongoing pattern of attacking the judiciary whenever faced with legal challenges. This latest outburst comes amid mounting legal troubles for Trump, as he has been notified by special counsel Jack Smith that he is a target in the investigation related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Trump’s remarks about the judge are not isolated incidents but part of a broader strategy where he has previously targeted judges based on their ethnicity, religious beliefs, or any rulings that go against him. This behavior exemplifies his disdain for the judicial system and undermines the principle of an impartial judiciary, which is essential to a functioning democracy.

In addition to the ongoing Jan. 6 case, Trump has been embroiled in numerous legal battles, including a recent loss in the Georgia Supreme Court regarding efforts to quash a special grand jury report that recommended criminal charges in the state’s election probe. These legal setbacks appear to be fueling his aggressive rhetoric against judges and the legal establishment.

Trump’s comments have drawn criticism from legal experts who argue that such attacks on the judiciary are dangerous and can contribute to a culture of contempt for the rule of law. This pattern of behavior raises concerns about his respect for judicial independence and the potential ramifications for the justice system if he were to regain power.

As Trump continues to face legal scrutiny, his incendiary remarks only serve to further alienate him from mainstream political and legal discourse. Many analysts believe that these tactics are designed to rally his base but risk further destabilizing the already strained relationship between the executive branch and the judicial system.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/trump-calls-judge-overseeing-jan-6-case-evil-person-rcna176112)

Donald Trump’s Abrupt Interviews Reveal His Declining Mental Fitness

Donald Trump continues to demonstrate his unfitness for office as he abruptly cut short an interview with Dan Bongino, a former Fox News personality, leaving many to question his mental state. Just minutes into their conversation, Trump declared, “I gotta get going,” a clear sign of his inability to engage coherently. Bongino, visibly confused, was left in a state of disbelief, highlighting Trump’s erratic behavior that has become all too familiar.

In a moment that can only be described as bizarre, Trump expressed sympathy for Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced producer found guilty of serious sexual crimes. Trump’s comments on Weinstein, who he claimed was treated unjustly, reveal a troubling affinity for figures embroiled in scandal and misconduct. The juxtaposition of Trump’s casual dismissal of serious allegations against Weinstein alongside his own questionable past raises alarms about his judgment.

https://twitter.com/KamalaHQ/status/1847295800436474125?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1847295800436474125%7Ctwgr%5E358670c2387b8dc25d9c2c549fa2f4f64cb3440a%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rawstory.com%2Ftrump-dan-bongino-ends-interview%2F

Reactions from the political arena have been swift, with Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign questioning Trump’s well-being, posting the video and stating simply, “Is he okay?” The super PAC No Dem Left Behind went further, branding Trump as “Drowsy Don” and suggesting he is in desperate need of a nap, a critique that underscores the perception of his declining vigor and capacity to lead.

John Laprise, a Ph.D. researcher focusing on cyber warfare, pointed out that Trump’s inability to keep pace with Harris’s energetic campaign underscores his unsuitability for the presidency. He warned that if Trump were to win, the rigors of the office could prove too taxing, raising doubts about his ability to serve a full term. This assessment is corroborated by numerous observations regarding Trump’s fatigue during public engagements.

As the election approaches, Trump’s retreat from substantive interviews and his reliance on alternative figures like rapper Waka Flocka Flame instead of himself for outreach efforts signals a campaign in disarray. Trump’s consistent avoidance of challenging conversations only serves to highlight his fear of accountability and his authoritarian tendencies, further alienating potential voters and diminishing his credibility.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-dan-bongino-ends-interview/)

Trump Blames Zelensky for Ukraine War in Recent Interview

In a recent podcast interview, former President Donald Trump attributed blame for the ongoing war in Ukraine to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, rather than Russian President Vladimir Putin. This statement contradicts the established timeline and facts surrounding the invasion, which began with Russia’s troop buildup and subsequent attack on Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

Trump’s remarks came as he critiqued President Biden’s foreign policy and military support for Ukraine. He described Zelensky as an effective salesman for securing U.S. aid, asserting that Ukraine has received unprecedented financial support during the conflict. Trump claimed that Zelensky should have negotiated with Putin to prevent the war, framing the situation as a failure on Zelensky’s part.

During the interview, Trump said, “He should never have let that war start. That war is a loser,” highlighting his view that the responsibility for the destruction caused by the invasion lies with the Ukrainian leadership. This is not the first time Trump has expressed skepticism about Zelensky’s role in the crisis.

In previous statements, Trump suggested that a deal could have been reached to stave off the conflict, implying that Zelensky’s actions contributed to the current devastation. His comments reflect a continued strategy of blaming Ukrainian officials while minimizing the responsibility of Russia for its aggressive military actions.

This narrative aligns with certain viewpoints promoted by Russian state media, which often seeks to blame Ukraine for the consequences of the invasion. Trump’s remarks serve as a notable example of disinformation that distorts the events leading to the war, undermining the clear responsibility of Putin’s regime in initiating the conflict.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/17/us/politics/trump-zelensky-putin-ukraine-war.html)

Fox News Town Hall with Trump Lacks Transparency and Factual Integrity

Fox News recently aired an all-women town hall featuring former President Donald Trump in Georgia, presenting it as a platform for female voters to engage with the Republican candidate. However, the network failed to disclose that the audience was largely composed of local Republican supporters. This omission raises questions about the integrity of the event and the network’s transparency.

The Georgia Federation of Republican Women claimed on social media that they helped host the event, which Fox News later denied. The group’s president, Pam Lightsey, contradicted earlier statements by asserting their role had been misrepresented. Despite this, Fox News maintained that the event was solely theirs and did not clarify the audience’s partisan makeup in their communications.

During the event, many attendees expressed their support for Trump through their questions and comments. For instance, one woman thanked Trump for engaging with a “room full of women the current administration would consider domestic terrorists.” Notably, Fox News edited her statement to remove her declaration of voting for Trump, raising concerns about selective editing aimed at downplaying overt political support.

Furthermore, Trump made numerous false claims during the session, yet Fox News host Harris Faulkner did not fact-check any of these statements on-air. The audience responded enthusiastically to Trump’s criticisms of President Biden, emphasizing their alignment with his views. This suggests that the event was less a town hall and more a rally, with Fox News presenting it as a straightforward discussion.

The Independent reported that many attendees were members of local Republican groups, contradicting the narrative promoted by Fox News. Overall, this lack of transparency and factual accuracy at the town hall underscores the network’s ongoing pattern of misleading its audience and fostering a politically biased environment.

(h/t: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/10/16/media/fox-news-women-town-hall-supporters)

Trump’s Misinformation on Immigrants and Pets: A Deep Dive

Former President Donald Trump has reiterated his controversial claims regarding Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, suggesting that they are not only eating pets but also consuming unspecified ‘other things.’ These assertions were made during a recent town hall event and follow a previous debate where he first introduced the topic, claiming that local residents were concerned about their pets being eaten. Trump’s statements have been labeled as misinformation, as they stem from unverified reports linked to extremist online communities.

During a Univision town hall, Trump was questioned by an undecided voter about his belief in these claims. In response, he dismissed the question by stating that he was merely repeating what he believed to be reported in the media, without providing any credible evidence to support his assertions. This lack of substantiation highlights the baseless nature of his claims.

Fact-checkers and news organizations have quickly dispelled Trump’s allegations, emphasizing that they have no foundation in reality. His remarks have been criticized for perpetuating harmful stereotypes about Haitian migrants and for stoking fears among the local population. The unfounded nature of these claims is significant, given that they were shared with a large audience during a presidential debate.

The issue is further complicated by Trump’s broader narrative surrounding immigration, where he has frequently framed the arrival of migrants as a threat to American communities. His comments about Springfield, where he asserted that an influx of 30,000 migrants in a town of 52,000 would lead to disaster, reflect a common theme in his rhetoric that seeks to instill fear regarding immigration.

Overall, Trump’s repeated and unfounded claims about Haitian immigrants are part of a larger strategy that relies on misinformation and racial stereotypes, undermining the integrity of public discourse on immigration issues. His statements have sparked outrage and calls for accountability regarding the spread of such false narratives.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-now-claims-immigrants-are-eating-other-things-that-theyre-not-supposed-to-in-addition-to-pets/)

Trump Struggles with Economic Policy in Challenging Bloomberg Interview

In a recent interview with Bloomberg News, former President Donald Trump faced intense questioning regarding his economic policies, revealing a significant lack of understanding of basic economic principles. During the discussion, Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait challenged Trump on his plans involving widespread tariffs on imported goods, which have been criticized by economists for potentially raising costs for American consumers. Trump maintained that other countries would bear the brunt of these tariffs, demonstrating a disconnect from the realities of international trade.

As the conversation progressed, Trump became increasingly defensive, dismissing critiques from Micklethwait and attacking the credibility of the Wall Street Journal when confronted with estimates that his economic proposals could inflate the national debt by $7 trillion. Despite Micklethwait’s attempts to keep the discussion focused, Trump often veered off-topic, notably failing to provide coherent answers about how his policies would aid small businesses that rely on imports.

Trump’s frustrations were palpable as he deflected questions regarding the impact of his immigration policies on the labor market. Instead of addressing economic implications, he resorted to discussing crime rates among undocumented immigrants, making unfounded claims about the dangers they pose. Micklethwait attempted to redirect the conversation to economic outcomes, but Trump continued to emphasize crime, undermining the economic discourse.

In a particularly notable moment, when asked about how he would cut government spending, Trump pointed to the remodeling of Air Force One as an example, which did little to elucidate his fiscal strategy. This response further exemplified his inability to articulate a clear economic vision, relying instead on vague anecdotes and deflections.

The interview concluded with Trump attempting to justify his disjointed speaking style, referring to it as a ‘weave’ of thoughts. However, this approach did not resonate well, as many observers noted that it reflected a troubling lack of clarity and focus on pressing economic issues that will impact voters in the upcoming election.

(h/t: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-crumbles-pressed-economic-policy-bloomberg-interview-1235134459/)

Trump’s Controversial Remarks on Transgender Athletes During Podcast

Donald Trump engaged in a contentious discussion regarding transgender athletes during a recent appearance on the Barstool Sports podcast, Bussin’ With The Boys. Hosted by former NFL players Will Compton and Taylor Lewan, the episode included Trump expressing his weariness from a packed media schedule while still enjoying the conversation.

As the podcast neared its conclusion, Compton inquired about Trump’s vision for uniting the country. Trump diverged into a critique of transgender participation in sports, specifically stating, “they want men playing in women’s sports” and expressing discomfort with the idea, claiming to have seen athletes get hurt in such circumstances.

During the discussion, Trump erroneously asserted that two Olympic female boxers were actually men. Compton did not challenge Trump’s misinformation but did suggest that one of the boxers should have continued fighting rather than quitting during a match. This statement prompted a back-and-forth between Compton and Trump about the expectations of athletes in high-pressure situations.

Compton argued that a fighter trains their entire life for such moments and should push through injuries, to which Trump sarcastically questioned if the boxer should have “gotten the sh*t knocked out of her.” This comment highlighted the tension between Trump’s views and Compton’s stance on athletic perseverance.

The exchange showcased Trump’s controversial opinions on transgender athletes, which align with a broader narrative among conservative circles that oppose transgender participation in women’s sports. The podcast concluded with Trump shifting topics, reiterating the theme of his earlier comments.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/sports/exhausted-trump-gets-in-tense-spat-with-barstool-sports-hosts-about-trans-athletes-she-should-have-gotten-the-sht-knocked-out-of-her/)

Trump Defends Laura Loomer Amid Controversy Over Racist Comments

Former President Donald Trump recently addressed questions regarding his relationship with far-right activist Laura Loomer, whom he described as a “free spirit” and supporter. During a news conference in Southern California, Trump emphasized that he does not control Loomer and acknowledged her as a longtime supporter of his campaign. This statement came in response to concerns raised by his allies about their close association.

Hours later, Trump attempted to distance himself from Loomer by expressing disagreement with some of her statements on social media, though he refrained from specifying which remarks he found objectionable. He characterized her as a private citizen and reiterated that she shares frustrations with what he termed the “Radical Left Marxists and Fascists” attacking him.

Loomer is known for her controversial views, including her self-identification as a “proud Islamophobe” and her promotion of conspiracy theories, such as the claim that the 9/11 attacks were an “inside job.” Despite her assertions that she is not anti-Muslim, her history of incendiary comments has led to her bans from major social media platforms.

Trump’s rhetoric and support for Loomer reflect a broader pattern in his political behavior, where he has aligned himself with conspiracy theorists and controversial figures as long as they support him. At a recent rally, Trump echoed Loomer’s unfounded claims about Vice President Kamala Harris, further fueling the political narrative surrounding conspiracy theories.

Criticism of Loomer’s remarks has come from various quarters, including Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who labeled them as “appalling and extremely racist.” Trump’s acknowledgment of Loomer’s presence on his private plane during a debate with Harris has raised eyebrows, as it suggests a deeper connection with figures who have promoted divisive rhetoric.

(h/t: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/09/13/politics/donald-trump-laura-loomer)

Trump Promises Mass Deportation Using 1798 Law Amid Controversy

During a recent rally in Aurora, Colorado, former President Donald Trump announced plans to use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to initiate mass deportations of immigrants. Trump described immigrants as “the worst criminals in the world” and vowed to expedite the removal of individuals he referred to as “savage gangs”. This law, historically associated with the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, would empower the president to enact broad deportation measures.

Trump’s rhetoric included specific threats to Haitian-American immigrants, whom he stated would need to return to Haiti regardless of their legal status in the U.S. He asserted that local police would receive immunity from prosecution for actions taken under this mass deportation scheme, which he claimed would affect up to 20 million people.

The former president’s comments have elicited pushback from local officials, including Aurora’s Republican mayor Mike Coffman, who stated that the city is not overrun by gangs, contrary to Trump’s claims. The mayor emphasized that Aurora is a safe city, countering Trump’s characterization of the area as a “war zone”.

Critics have highlighted the potential human rights implications and economic consequences of Trump’s proposed deportations, warning that it could lead to widespread suffering among immigrant communities. Trump’s approach reflects a continuation of his administration’s hardline stance on immigration, aiming to galvanize support among his base by invoking fear related to crime and safety.

As Trump seeks to re-establish his influence in the political landscape, his latest remarks signal a return to familiar themes of fear and division surrounding immigration policy. The potential implementation of the Alien Enemies Act raises significant concerns about civil liberties and the treatment of immigrant populations in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.salon.com/2024/10/11/theyre-animals-vows-mass-deportation-under-law-used-to-justify-japanese-internment-camps/)

1 2 3 4 5 … 350