Category: Not Factual

CDC’s Controversial Vaccine-Autism Study Risks Public Health Amid Trump Administration’s Anti-Vaccine Rhetoric

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is embarking on a controversial study examining a fabricated link between vaccines and autism, despite overwhelming evidence countering this claim. This decision has raised alarms among public health advocates, given that extensive scientific research has consistently debunked the supposed correlation between vaccinations and autism.

The misinformation surrounding vaccines traces back to a widely discredited study from 1998 by Andrew Wakefield, which falsely linked the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine to autism based on just 12 children. Wakefield’s fraudulent claims led to his medical license being revoked and The Lancet retracting the study in 2010 after concluding that several aspects of his work were inaccurate and based on ethical violations.

Despite the established safety of vaccines, which have saved millions of lives globally, the Trump administration—which includes prominent vaccine skeptics like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—has continued to promote anti-vaccine narratives. President Trump recently exaggerated autism statistics, framing a need for further research, which ultimately undermines public confidence in critical vaccination efforts.

As the CDC prepares for this study, concerns are mounting that investigating a debunked theory could harm public health initiatives, especially with rising measles cases in the U.S. The cost of this new investigation could strain resources already allocated to autism research, further diverting focus from evidence-based health policies.

In an era where misinformation thrives, the CDC’s decision to pursue this research underlines the ongoing threats to public health championed by Trump and his administration. As scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports vaccination, continuing to question it without substantial evidence could negatively impact efforts to control disease outbreaks, thus posing a significant risk to societal health.

(h/t: https://www.iflscience.com/us-to-spend-money-researching-heavily-debunked-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-78394?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2MB_yipWEblpP453c_941Mr-7P45hjCdKiKRUY3UQzfkl5UUolkxL4GHI_aem_RxyLLzThM1hOERoFUP-sVw)

Trump Aide Claims Tariffs Are Drug War in Confusing Rant

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett recently made contradictory statements about President Trump’s tariffs against Canada and Mexico. During an interview on ABC’s This Week, Hassett insisted that these tariffs were part of a “drug war” rather than a “trade war,” despite clear evidence to the contrary. He attempted to justify the tariffs as a negotiation tactic to curb fentanyl smuggling from these countries.

Host Jonathan Karl challenged Hassett’s claims by highlighting that the actual percentage of fentanyl smuggled across the border is only around one percent, questioning the logic behind Hassett’s assertions. In defiance, Hassett claimed Canada was a “major source” of fentanyl, though he provided no substantiating evidence for this statement.

As the conversation progressed, Karl pointed out the hypocrisy in the administration’s messaging, where tariffs positioned as a response to drug trafficking were simultaneously characterized as a trade dispute. Representative Adam Schiff later addressed this inconsistency during the program, describing Hassett’s rationale as “incomprehensible.”

Hassett’s statements underscore a broader pattern of misleading narratives created by the Trump administration, aiming to portray aggressive tariffs as necessary to combat drug-related issues. This manipulation of public perception reflects a troubling strategy often seen in Trump’s political playbook.

Overall, the discussion illustrates the ongoing confusion and lack of accountability within Trump’s rhetoric, where the administration morphs clear economic policies into convoluted justifications for its actions, marking a significant departure from transparent governance.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/kevin-hassett-trump-trade-war/)

CNN Fact Check Rips Apart Trump’s False Dairy Tariff Claims

Donald Trump recently made sweeping claims regarding Canada’s dairy tariffs, alleging they exceed 200 percent. However, CNN’s fact checker, Daniel Dale, quickly debunked this statement. He clarified that these high tariffs only come into effect after exceeding a negotiated limit of tariff-free exports to Canada, a limit that Trump himself established.

Dale pointed out that during Trump’s first term, he had already signed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which retained these tariffs. Contrary to Trump’s assertion that the situation with Canadian dairy tariffs worsened under President Biden, it was confirmed that the tariffs were not raised during Biden’s presidency. Instead, the existing tariffs were upheld as part of the USMCA agreement.

In his remarks, Trump claimed that the dairy tariffs were being inflated under Biden’s administration, but both government records and dairy industry sources contradicted this. Trump’s administration was responsible for the initial tariff structure he now criticizes, labeling it an inconsistency on his part.

As for retaliation, Trump has threatened to impose new U.S. dairy tariffs starting April 2. However, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick indicated that such measures are not immediate and are pending further developments.

While Trump did negotiate some beneficial terms for American dairy farmers via the USMCA, which allowed specific quotas for imports, it did not effectively lead to any reductions in tariffs on imports that exceeded those quotas. Ultimately, Trump’s claims regarding dairy tariffs represent another instance of misrepresentation, revealing a pattern of dishonesty that continues to undermine American credibility on the international stage.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-dairy/)

Trump’s Economic Claims: Disregarding Realities and Undermining Americans’ Financial Health

During an interview on “Sunday Morning Futures,” President Donald Trump dismissed concerns about a potential market recession while advocating for his economic policies. He touted that his administration was working to bring wealth back to America, claiming that this transition period would ultimately benefit industries like agriculture. Trump asserted that under his presidency, China adhered to a trade agreement requiring substantial purchases from American farmers, a claim he used to contrast his administration’s actions with those of President Biden.

When pressed about the potential downturn in the stock market due to recent tariffs and economic disruptions, Trump downplayed the significance of market fluctuations. He suggested that America should not focus solely on quarterly metrics, drawing a comparison to China’s longer-term strategic outlook. This perspective highlights a fundamental disconnect within his administration’s economic philosophy, prioritizing a facade of strength over the realities of economic stability.

Trump’s claims of successful negotiations with China and promises of reinvestment by major corporations, such as the proposed $200 billion chip manufacturing plant, are misleading. These assertions often lack substantiation and overlook the damaging effects his tariffs have had on American households. The reality is that these tariffs have exacerbated inflation and placed additional financial burdens on the very citizens Trump claims to support.

Furthermore, Trump’s framing of economic progress as building a “tremendous foundation for the future” fails to account for the immediate economic hardships faced by many Americans. While he highlights major investments, the escalating trade war and sanction-driven isolationist policies have resulted in objects like high consumer prices, making everyday essentials less affordable.

Ultimately, the rhetoric employed by Trump embodies a broader trend among Republicans: prioritizing short-term political gains over the long-term health of the economy and the welfare of working-class Americans. His administration’s approach not only threatens economic stability but also diminishes trust in the fundamental values of American democracy and fair governance.

(h/t: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/03/09/trump_dont_watch_the_stock_market_china_has_a_100-year_perspective_we_go_by_quarters.html)

Trump Administration Deletes Key Study Basing Immigrants as Less Criminal Than Citizens

The Trump administration has controversially removed a Justice Department webpage that linked to a study indicating that undocumented immigrants commit significantly less crime than U.S. citizens. This move raises questions about the administration’s commitment to presenting factual information, as the study’s findings directly oppose the narrative often promoted by Trump and his allies that migrants are a source of violent crime.

The study, funded by the National Institute of Justice, analyzed crime data from Texas between 2012 and 2018, and it revealed that undocumented immigrants were arrested for violent and drug-related crimes at half the rate of native-born citizens. Furthermore, the undocumented population committed property crimes at only a quarter of the rate of U.S. citizens, emphasizing that they represent a lower overall offending rate for both felony and violent felony crimes in the state.

Prior to its removal, this information supported the broader consensus among researchers that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than their native counterparts, a point frequently ignored by the Trump administration’s rhetoric. The Department of Justice has not commented on the removal of this webpage, which immigration expert David Bier noted occurred recently, prompting speculation about the administration’s motives.

The Trump administration has a history of labeling unauthorized migrants as “violent criminals,” despite evidence indicating that a significant portion of those in immigration detention have not been convicted of any crime. This stark contradiction paints a clear picture of how the Trump administration distorts facts to fortify its punitive immigration policies and justify mass deportation efforts.

As Trump continues his political campaign, he has exploited public fear surrounding crime, often conflating immigration with a narrative of danger. In stark contrast to the findings of the now-deleted study, Trump claims that his administration’s actions prioritize public safety by removing individuals he paints as “killers” and “rapists.” This narrative serves both to distract from the evidence of lower crime rates among undocumented immigrants and to reinforce a harmful, xenophobic agenda.

Trump’s Tariffs Threaten American Economy with Rising Prices and Inflation

In a recent interview, Donald Trump admitted that his ongoing tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico could lead to economic disruptions and even a potential recession. Despite the significant implications of his trade policies, Trump dismissed immediate concerns and maintained that the tariffs would ultimately strengthen the American economy. This contradictory stance has drawn attention as American businesses are likely to bear the brunt of these tariff costs, which will be passed on to consumers, leading to increased prices and inflation.

During the interview with Fox News, Trump stated there could be “a little disruption,” yet he still framed the tariffs as necessary actions to “get back” at foreign nations he alleges have taken advantage of the United States. He asserted that over the years, globalists have ripped off the country, a claim lacking substantial evidence and designed to rally his base. These statements reveal a disconnection from the immediate realities faced by American citizens, who will see increased prices for essential goods.

Trump noted that the tariffs, currently set at 25 percent, might be raised in the future, indicating a willingness to escalate an already tense trade war. His rhetoric suggested that the U.S. is a major player in these negotiations, downplaying the fact that the economic repercussions of his policies might be more significant for American consumers rather than the countries he targets. This self-serving narrative conveniently ignores the complexities of the global economy and the adverse effects of his administration’s decisions.

Furthermore, Trump’s comments reveal a concerning pattern of prioritizing political gains over the economic well-being of Americans. By framing his tariffs as a form of negotiation rather than a burden on the public, he distracts from the fact that these trade wars could precipitate the economic instability he claims he is fighting against. The historical context shows that such tactics lead to retaliatory measures that can hurt American industries and agriculture even more.

Ultimately, Trump’s ongoing tariff threats show a clear disregard for the economic health of the American people. While he continues to push the narrative of bringing wealth back to America, the resulting implications from his policies demonstrate a clear pattern of harming the very citizens he claims to support. Such actions underscore the broader theme of Republican policies that prioritize corporate interests over the needs of everyday Americans, further contributing to the erosion of economic stability.

(h/t: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-americans-suffer-tariffs-trade-war-1235292475/)

Trump’s Water Release Plan Wastefully Neglects California Needs

The Army Corps of Engineers released over 2.5 billion gallons of water from two California reservoirs in January 2025 under the orders of former President Donald Trump. A recently obtained memo reveals that Col. Chad W. Caldwell, responsible for the operation, was aware that the water would not reach its intended recipients in Southern California, contradicting Trump’s claims aimed at supporting farmers and urban areas.

This expedited release was ordered amid catastrophic wildfires in Los Angeles County, yet logistical issues were ignored, resulting in ineffective and potentially harmful outcomes for California’s agricultural communities. Caldwell’s memo indicated that proper coordination with local and state entities was impossible within the tight timeframe mandated by Trump’s order, demonstrating a significant lack of foresight and respect for local water management protocols.

Despite objections from local farmers and concerns of flooding downstream, the plan went ahead, highlighting the Trump administration’s reckless disregard for water management in a region where every drop counts. Critics, including Senators and local officials, condemned the action as a politically motivated stunt rather than a genuine effort to assist Californians affected by the fires.

As the water release caused alarm among local leaders, it became clear that this alarming decision was made without consultations that typically accompany such actions. This lack of communication and planning jeopardized not only infrastructures but also the safety of communities downstream, raising urgent questions about Trump’s interference in federal water policy aimed at serving elite interests over those of the general public.

In addition to being an ineffective response to the immediate crisis, the incident highlights a broader pattern of mismanagement characteristic of the Trump administration, which prioritized short-term political gains over responsible governance. This disregard for established protocols showcases the dangerous implications of having a leader who operates without regard for expertise or the realities of infrastructure, undermining the safety of those most affected by such decisions.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/03/07/trump-water-release-california-fires/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0GiGgFq5BWDSegsQVpEwKUmKD80y9Ox7qDGOdY8j_KNSxvLtVLM_s_bss_aem_aaxKjwAsoxKD0eWKS3wv8g)

Kennedy’s Misinformation Fuels Measles Outbreak in Texas, Undermines Vaccination Efforts

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is under scrutiny for promoting unconventional therapies during a measles outbreak in West Texas, where 159 cases have been reported. Rather than emphasizing the effectiveness of the measles vaccine, Kennedy has suggested a treatment regimen involving a steroid, an antibiotic, and cod liver oil, which he claims could lead to “miraculous” recoveries. His actions highlight a troubling trend of misinformation surrounding vaccines amidst a public health crisis.

Kennedy’s endorsement of these treatments aligns with his controversial history. One physician he praised, Dr. Richard Bartlett, faced disciplinary action from the Texas Medical Board for inappropriate prescribing practices that included powerful medications without proper justification. Critics note that there’s a significant difference between immunization and the misguided focus on alternative treatments, as antibiotics like those suggested are ineffective against viral infections like measles.

Medical experts have raised alarms over Kennedy’s claims, particularly his suggestion that vitamin A can be used preventively against measles, a notion countered by scientific consensus. The only proven method to prevent measles is through vaccination with the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, which is highly effective and has been instrumental in controlling outbreaks in the past. Kennedy’s statements downplay the critical role of vaccines, risking further outbreaks and public health deterioration.

Outside of his focus on alternative treatments, Kennedy has been criticized for spreading misinformation about infectious diseases in general, including downplaying the severity of viruses. Public health professionals argue that his rhetoric could lead to dangerous complacency among communities, deter people from receiving vaccines, and exacerbate the ongoing public health challenges in the United States.

As measles cases continue to climb, health advocates like Dr. William Moss emphasize the urgent need for vaccinations over unfounded treatment regimes. The gravity of the current outbreak should galvanize public health efforts rather than muddle the discourse with debates over ineffective alternatives championed by officials who prioritize personal choice over collective health.

(h/t: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/03/06/health/kennedy-measles-texas-doctor-treatment)

Fact-Check: Trump’s Congressional Address Full of False Claims on Economy, Immigration, and Science

During his address to Congress, President Donald Trump perpetuated numerous false claims regarding various topics, including economic issues, immigration policies, and climate change, thereby disregarding factual integrity. His speeches have consistently been marked by misleading statements aimed at promoting a narrative that aligns with his administration’s agenda while undermining the achievements of the previous administration, led by Joe Biden.

In his speech, Trump claimed that the newly established Department of Government Efficiency, under Elon Musk, discovered “hundreds of billions of dollars” in fraud, a statement that lacks substantiation. Despite DOGE’s website indicating potential taxpayer savings of $105 billion, there’s no concrete evidence to support such inflated figures. Trump’s assertions about the department’s efficacy only serve to distract from the inconsistencies and errors in DOGE’s reported savings and the potential misuse of its authority.

Trump also made absurd allegations regarding the National Institutes of Health funding, incorrectly asserting that $8 million was spent on making mice transgender. The actual funding was for research on monkeys aimed at understanding hormone effects on susceptibility to diseases like HIV, underscoring Trump’s manipulative use of scientific funding to push a false narrative. This misrepresentation reflects an ongoing trend wherein Trump exploits scientifically grounded issues to propagate unfounded claims about gender and sexuality.

When discussing the economy, Trump made misleading remarks about tariffs, implying they would bring in “trillions of dollars.” However, tariffs are imposed on importers and often ultimately cost American consumers more. In addition, he cited a substantial drop in egg prices as evidence of his economic prowess while ignoring the role of avian flu and its widespread impact on poultry prices—a phenomenon that began escalating during the Biden administration.

Moreover, Trump continued his falsehoods regarding immigration and crime, claiming record lows in border crossings that are not supported by historical data. He also repeated unfounded assertions about other countries releasing mental health patients into the U.S., which have no basis in fact. The presiding narrative crafted by Trump seeks to portray a national security crisis driven by fear, while the statistical realities paint a very different picture.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/04/politics/fact-check-trump-address-congress/index.html)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Dangerous Anti-Vaccine Doublespeak Threatens Public Health Amid Measles Outbreak

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., under President Donald Trump’s administration, has revived his controversial anti-vaccine rhetoric amidst a critical measles outbreak in Texas. His op-ed for Fox News ostensibly promotes vaccinations but subtly undermines the urgency of the issue. Experts have refuted Kennedy’s claims about the normalcy of such outbreaks, pointing out they stem from declining vaccination rates, with some parents refusing to vaccinate their children.

In his op-ed, Kennedy expresses concern over the outbreak that has tragically resulted in a child’s death, yet he conspicuously avoids stating that the deceased child was unvaccinated. Instead, he frames vaccination as a personal choice, sidestepping the public health imperative of vaccination to combat measles, a disease known for severe complications like pneumonia and encephalitis.

Kennedy’s dismissal of vaccine effectiveness, referencing vitamins and ‘clean’ living, mirrors the well-documented tactics of anti-vaccine activists. He offers vague reassurance about community health and personal choices rather than firmly endorsing vaccination or denouncing the misinformation that has fueled the outbreak. Such language creates uncertainty rather than clarity, undermining legitimate public health messages.

Even as Kennedy addresses the outbreak, he fails to renounce his long-held anti-vaccine stance, leaving it unclear whether he truly supports the vaccines he is expected to promote as Secretary of Health and Human Services. The op-ed reads like an effort to placate critics while continuing to foster anti-vaccine sentiments among his followers.

Fox News’ coverage, while embedding portions of Kennedy’s claims, carefully highlighted more definitive messages about the necessity of vaccines. This nuanced editorial choice suggests an underlying recognition of the need to address the threat of vaccine-preventable diseases despite the platform’s typical alignment with anti-vaccine narratives. Ultimately, Kennedy’s continued equivocation poses a real danger to public health, especially as misinformation continues to spread rapidly in the era of COVID-19.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/rfk-jrs-measles-op-ed-plays-the-same-old-anti-vaxx-games-but-fox-news-threw-their-readers-a-lifeline/)

1 2 3 4 … 168