Category: Ill-Tempered

Trump’s Vicious Attack on Judge For Releasing Jack Smith’s Evidence

Former President Donald Trump recently labeled the judge overseeing his January 6 case as ‘the most evil person,’ a statement that reflects his ongoing pattern of attacking the judiciary whenever faced with legal challenges. This latest outburst comes amid mounting legal troubles for Trump, as he has been notified by special counsel Jack Smith that he is a target in the investigation related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Trump’s remarks about the judge are not isolated incidents but part of a broader strategy where he has previously targeted judges based on their ethnicity, religious beliefs, or any rulings that go against him. This behavior exemplifies his disdain for the judicial system and undermines the principle of an impartial judiciary, which is essential to a functioning democracy.

In addition to the ongoing Jan. 6 case, Trump has been embroiled in numerous legal battles, including a recent loss in the Georgia Supreme Court regarding efforts to quash a special grand jury report that recommended criminal charges in the state’s election probe. These legal setbacks appear to be fueling his aggressive rhetoric against judges and the legal establishment.

Trump’s comments have drawn criticism from legal experts who argue that such attacks on the judiciary are dangerous and can contribute to a culture of contempt for the rule of law. This pattern of behavior raises concerns about his respect for judicial independence and the potential ramifications for the justice system if he were to regain power.

As Trump continues to face legal scrutiny, his incendiary remarks only serve to further alienate him from mainstream political and legal discourse. Many analysts believe that these tactics are designed to rally his base but risk further destabilizing the already strained relationship between the executive branch and the judicial system.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/trump-calls-judge-overseeing-jan-6-case-evil-person-rcna176112)

Trump Struggles with Economic Policy in Challenging Bloomberg Interview

In a recent interview with Bloomberg News, former President Donald Trump faced intense questioning regarding his economic policies, revealing a significant lack of understanding of basic economic principles. During the discussion, Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait challenged Trump on his plans involving widespread tariffs on imported goods, which have been criticized by economists for potentially raising costs for American consumers. Trump maintained that other countries would bear the brunt of these tariffs, demonstrating a disconnect from the realities of international trade.

As the conversation progressed, Trump became increasingly defensive, dismissing critiques from Micklethwait and attacking the credibility of the Wall Street Journal when confronted with estimates that his economic proposals could inflate the national debt by $7 trillion. Despite Micklethwait’s attempts to keep the discussion focused, Trump often veered off-topic, notably failing to provide coherent answers about how his policies would aid small businesses that rely on imports.

Trump’s frustrations were palpable as he deflected questions regarding the impact of his immigration policies on the labor market. Instead of addressing economic implications, he resorted to discussing crime rates among undocumented immigrants, making unfounded claims about the dangers they pose. Micklethwait attempted to redirect the conversation to economic outcomes, but Trump continued to emphasize crime, undermining the economic discourse.

In a particularly notable moment, when asked about how he would cut government spending, Trump pointed to the remodeling of Air Force One as an example, which did little to elucidate his fiscal strategy. This response further exemplified his inability to articulate a clear economic vision, relying instead on vague anecdotes and deflections.

The interview concluded with Trump attempting to justify his disjointed speaking style, referring to it as a ‘weave’ of thoughts. However, this approach did not resonate well, as many observers noted that it reflected a troubling lack of clarity and focus on pressing economic issues that will impact voters in the upcoming election.

(h/t: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-crumbles-pressed-economic-policy-bloomberg-interview-1235134459/)

Trump Attacks Kamala Harris and ‘The View’ Hosts in Misogynistic Tirade

Former President Donald Trump recently criticized Vice President Kamala Harris and the hosts of ABC’s ‘The View,’ labeling them with derogatory terms such as ‘dummy’ and ‘dumb women.’ His comments, made via Truth Social, included a rebuke of Harris’ assertion that she would not have acted differently than President Biden during his term, which he deemed her ‘dumbest answer so far.’ This tirade is particularly striking given Trump’s recent attempts to appeal to female voters, a demographic in which Harris currently enjoys stronger support.

Trump’s history of making disparaging remarks about women, especially those who oppose him, contradicts his claims of being a champion for women’s rights. Despite proclaiming his dedication to the well-being of women during campaign rallies, his aggressive rhetoric towards female critics reveals a pattern of misogyny that undermines his political narrative. This behavior is consistent with his past, where he has faced multiple allegations of sexual misconduct and has been found liable for sexual abuse in a civil court.

Whoopi Goldberg responded to Donald Trump’s derogatory remarks regarding her and her fellow co-hosts on ‘The View,’ which he labeled as ‘dumb’ and criticized Goldberg’s comedy as ‘filthy dirty.’ During a Pennsylvania rally, Trump expressed that he would never hire Goldberg again, despite having done so four times in the past. In a spirited comeback, Goldberg highlighted this contradiction, questioning Trump’s intelligence by stating, ‘Are you dumb? You hired me four times.’

Goldberg’s rebuttal came after she and her co-hosts staged a walkout on the show to Christina Aguilera’s song ‘Dirrty,’ a direct nod to Trump’s insults. She pointed out that Trump was aware of her comedic style before hiring her, reinforcing her stance on the matter. Goldberg’s comments aimed to remind viewers of Trump’s history of engaging with them, despite his current criticisms.

Co-host Sunny Hostin also chimed in, thanking Trump for his constant stream of material for their discussions, implying that his actions have inadvertently provided content for their show. Hostin remarked on the irony of Trump’s attention to ‘The View’ while significant issues, such as natural disasters, persist in the country.

Goldberg further criticized Trump for focusing on her and her co-hosts rather than addressing pressing national concerns, including the aftermath of Hurricane Milton in Florida. She emphasized that Trump’s irritation with the show’s hosts revealed his viewership, contradicting his claims of disinterest.

Goldberg’s response serves as a reminder of the ongoing tensions between Trump and various public figures, particularly those in the entertainment industry who challenge his narrative. This exchange also underscores the broader cultural conversations surrounding media, celebrity, and political discourse.

(h/t: https://variety.com/2024/tv/news/whoopi-goldberg-slams-donald-trump-the-view-hosts-dumb-1236174464/

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/shows/top-stories/blog/rcna174654)

Trump Makes Unfounded Accusations Against CBS’s ’60 Minutes’

Former President Donald Trump made unfounded allegations against CBS’s “60 Minutes” following an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. He claimed that the program manipulated the interview footage to portray Harris in a more favorable light, describing the editing as deceptive and possibly illegal. Trump’s statements were posted on his Truth Social platform, where he expressed outrage at what he termed a significant breach of journalistic integrity.

In his post, Trump asserted that the editing of Harris’s responses was so extensive that it rendered her answers incoherent. He claimed this editing effort was aimed at enhancing her public image, labeling it as a violation of campaign finance laws. Trump called for an immediate investigation into the matter and demanded a public apology from CBS, declaring the situation a stain on the network’s reputation.

However, Trump is lying as the complete interview with Harris can be viewed on YouTube, where she articulates her responses clearly without any noticeable edits. Trump’s accusations seem to lack substantial evidence, raising doubts about their credibility.

Additionally, it’s noteworthy that Trump had declined to participate in an interview with “60 Minutes” the previous week, reportedly out of concern that the program would fact-check his controversial statements, including misleading claims regarding Haitian immigrants.

These developments highlight Trump’s ongoing pattern of attacking media outlets and spreading misinformation, a strategy that has characterized his public discourse and political approach since his presidency.

 

Liz Cheney’s remarks at a Harris campaign event evidently struck a nerve with Trump

 

At a recent Kamala Harris campaign event, former Representative Liz Cheney delivered a powerful message urging voters to reject what she called the “depraved cruelty of Donald Trump.” This bold statement sent ripples through Republican circles, prompting a swift and vitriolic response from Trump himself on his social media platform, Truth Social. He not only attacked Cheney but also criticized her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has also endorsed Harris.

In his lengthy post, Trump condemned Liz Cheney for her participation in the January 6 House select committee and disparaged her father’s historical decisions regarding the Middle East. He referred to the Cheneys as a “pathetic couple” suffering from what he termed “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” This animosity isn’t new; it’s rooted in Cheney’s outspoken criticism of Trump and her pivotal vote to impeach him following the January 6 Capitol riots, which significantly contributed to her primary defeat in 2022.

Despite the backlash, Cheney remains a staunch critic of Trump, asserting that he is unfit to lead the country. During her speech, she stated, “What January 6 shows us is that there is not an ounce of compassion in Donald Trump. He is petty, he is vindictive and he is cruel.” Her remarks struck a nerve with Trump, highlighting the intensity of their ongoing feud.

Cheney’s endorsement of Harris aligns with a broader strategy to attract anti-Trump Republicans, demonstrating her commitment to opposing Trump’s influence in the Republican Party. She praised Harris for her efforts to unite reasonable individuals across the political spectrum, further solidifying her stance against Trumpism.

While Cheney’s decision to support Harris may seem surprising given their party differences, it reflects a growing trend among some Republicans who are increasingly disillusioned with Trump’s leadership. Harris is actively courting this demographic, despite facing criticism from within her party for these efforts.

However, the potential impact of GOP endorsements for Harris remains uncertain. The Cheney name carries significant historical baggage, particularly due to Dick Cheney’s controversial tenure in the Bush administration, leaving many Democrats wary of his endorsement. This dynamic illustrates the complex and often contentious landscape of American politics as the 2024 elections approach.

 

Trump’s False Claims About Immigrants Eating Pets Spark Controversy During Debate

During a recent presidential debate, Donald Trump propagated a baseless and racially charged rumor regarding Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, claiming they were consuming pets. This statement, made in front of an audience of 67.1 million viewers, has been criticized for reinforcing harmful stereotypes. The rumor originated from fringe online communities, particularly from a neo-Nazi group known as Blood Tribe, which initially circulated the idea of pets being eaten in August. Trump’s comments were seemingly amplified by his running mate, Senator JD Vance, who has made similar claims about the influx of immigrants in the area.

Trump’s assertion was not only unfounded but also drew immediate backlash from various quarters, including his own party members. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham expressed concern, emphasizing that the focus should be on serious issues related to immigration, such as crimes committed by undocumented individuals, rather than whimsical claims about animals. This reflects a broader trend where Trump has consistently highlighted immigration issues, often framing them in a controversial manner.

The spread of the rumor on social media has been significant, with a notable increase in posts discussing the issue leading up to the debate. Research indicated that mentions of Haitians allegedly eating pets surged dramatically on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) in the days prior to Trump’s comments. Vance himself contributed to this narrative, posting about the supposed dangers posed by Haitian immigrants, which helped transition the rumor from fringe discourse to a mainstream debate topic.

Despite the sensationalism surrounding the issue, local law enforcement in Springfield reported no credible evidence supporting claims of pets being harmed. In fact, the claims about pets being abducted and eaten have been dismissed by the Springfield police, highlighting a disconnect between the online narrative and reality. Vance later acknowledged that these rumors could be false, yet continued to leverage them politically.

The incident underscores how fringe conspiracy theories can permeate high-profile political discourse, especially through the lens of social media. Trump’s use of this rumor during a prime-time debate illustrates a tactic of drawing attention to specific grievances that resonate with his base, despite their lack of factual basis. This approach is indicative of a broader strategy to mobilize support by highlighting perceived threats associated with immigration.

The debate echoed a long-standing pattern in Trump’s political career, where he has utilized inflammatory rhetoric regarding immigration, often to stoke fear and division among his supporters. Critics argue that such tactics detract from substantive discussions about immigration policy and public safety, instead prioritizing sensationalism and fear-mongering.

As the fallout continues, political analysts and commentators are left to ponder the implications of Trump’s comments and the role of misinformation in shaping public perception. This incident serves as a reminder of the potent intersection between social media, political rhetoric, and the dissemination of false information, particularly concerning immigration.

Ultimately, the Springfield rumor illustrates the challenges faced in combating misinformation and the potential consequences it holds for public discourse and policy discussions.

 

Trump mocked as ‘feeble’ after confusing Jimmy Kimmel and Al Pacino in bizarre rant

 

Former President Donald Trump faced mockery and criticism after confusing late-night host Jimmy Kimmel with actor Al Pacino in a social media rant. Trump’s error-filled diatribe on Truth Social claimed Kimmel stumbled during the Oscars, which was actually presented by Pacino. The confusion led to Trump being labeled ‘feeble and confused’ by opponents.

Despite Trump’s claims of Kimmel’s poor performance, reviews of the 96th Academy Awards were generally positive, with ratings climbing for the third consecutive year. Al Pacino, not Kimmel, announced the Best Picture winner, and the actor’s odd delivery was due to producer instructions to skip reading all nominees again.

The Biden-Harris campaign quickly seized on Trump’s misstep, highlighting it as another example of his confusion and flubs. The incident underscores the former president’s tendency to make complete misstatements, providing ammunition for his critics.

Trump’s mix-up between Kimmel and Pacino was widely criticized, with the incident showcasing his penchant for errors and misinformation. The confusion further fueled the ongoing narrative of Trump’s struggles with accuracy and his opponents’ efforts to capitalize on his missteps.

 

Donald Trump Rages at Judge, Calls for Immediate Recusal

Donald Trump criticizes Judge Merchan for imposing a gag order before his hush-money trial in April, calling for the judge’s immediate recusal and sanction. The case involves allegations that Trump falsified payments to lawyer Michael Cohen, which Trump denies. Trump insists the case is a political witch hunt to interfere with the election. He accuses the DOJ of bias and coordination against him to aid Joe Biden’s reelection. Trump’s attacks on Merchan and his daughter have escalated, claiming a social media post aimed at his imprisonment.

Judge Merchan recently imposed a gag order on Trump, prohibiting public comments about the trial’s participants, except for Merchan and prosecutor criticism. The judge cited Trump’s history of inflammatory remarks as the reason for the order. Trump’s campaign to discredit the case and the judge continues, with accusations of political bias and unjust legal actions.

Trump’s denial of the charges and insistence on the case’s dismissal reflect his ongoing fight against the legal challenges he faces. The upcoming trial is crucial as it marks the first of four criminal cases against Trump. The former president’s rhetoric on the case is central to his campaign narrative as he seeks to regain the presidency.

Despite the gag order, Trump remains vocal on his Truth Social platform, using it as a tool to rally supporters against what he perceives as biased legal proceedings. The escalating conflict between Trump and Judge Merchan underscores the contentious nature of the upcoming trial and its potential implications for Trump’s political future.

Trump Vows to Veto Defense Bill Over Amendment to Rename Military Bases Named After Confederates

President Donald Trump vowed to veto a $740 billion defense spending bill unless Congress drops a proposed amendment to rename U.S. military bases named after Confederate leaders.

As the country faces ongoing social unrest over the death of George Floyd, the public debate continues on whether Confederate figures deserve to be publicly honored with statues or major instillations bearing their names. Amid these calls for racial justice, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has proposed an amendment for the Defense Authorization Bill that would require the names of Confederate leaders to be completely scrubbed from several military bases over the next 3 years.

Trump has repeatedly defended monuments honoring Confederates in recent weeks, and on Tuesday night, he used his racially-charged insult for Warren again while promising to veto the bill if her amendment gets through.

[Mediaite]

Trump Slams Fox News for Hiring Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile: ‘Where Are You Roger Ailes?’

President Donald Trump took yet another swipe at Fox News for hiring Democratic pundits, this time former DNC Chair Donna Brazile.

Brazile trended on Twitter after getting into it with co-hosts on The Five Tuesday afternoon. In response to one tweet saying Brazile should not be on Fox News, the president went after Fox in a tweet referencing the infamous CNN debate questions controversy and invoking the late Roger Ailes.

“She gets fired by @CNN for giving Crooked Hillary the debate questions, and gets hired by @FoxNews. Where are you Roger Ailes?” Trump tweeted.

UPDATE: After some Twitter comments remarking upon how Ailes is dead, the President of the United States actually tweeted a clarification that “I know better than anyone that my friend Roger Ailes died 3 years ago”:

[Mediaite]

1 2 3 … 99