Category: Forever Presidency

Trump primes supporters for a third term and beyond.

Trump Halts Federal Funding to States Harboring Sanctuary

President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that beginning February 1, he will withhold federal funding from states that contain local governments limiting cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Trump made the declaration during a speech at the Detroit Economic Club, stating that sanctuary jurisdictions “protect criminals at the expense of American citizens” and that the administration would cease payments to “anybody that supports sanctuary cities.” When pressed by reporters on which funding programs would be affected, Trump declined specifics, saying only “You’ll see. It’ll be significant.”

This represents an expansion of Trump’s previous threats, which targeted sanctuary cities directly rather than entire states housing them. The Justice Department published a list identifying roughly three dozen states, cities, and counties as sanctuary jurisdictions—a list dominated by Democratic-controlled areas including California, Connecticut, New York, Boston, and Cook County, Illinois. No strict legal definition of “sanctuary city” exists, though the term generally refers to jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Courts have blocked Trump’s funding cutoff attempts twice before. In 2017, during his first term, federal judges rejected similar efforts. Last year, a California-based federal judge struck down an executive order directing federal officials to withhold money from sanctuary jurisdictions, despite government arguments that it was premature to halt the plan when no concrete action had been taken. The administration has already begun targeting specific states through other agencies, with the Department of Health and Human Services halting childcare subsidies to five Democratic-led states over unspecified fraud allegations—a decision a court has placed on hold.

The Trump administration is simultaneously executing broader funding freezes across multiple programs. The Justice Department’s sanctuary cities working group lost all members amid Trump pressure, and the Department of Agriculture has threatened to reduce administrative funds for states refusing to provide Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program data. Minnesota faces particularly aggressive action, including a threat to withhold $515 million quarterly—equivalent to one-fourth of federal Medicaid funding—for fourteen programs labeled “high risk” after the state rejected the administration’s corrective action plan.

Border Patrol operations continue under Trump’s aggressive immigration policies, with the administration weaponizing federal agencies to coerce compliance from state and local governments. State officials are mounting legal challenges to these actions, though the cumulative effect of simultaneous funding threats across healthcare, nutrition assistance, and childcare programs creates immediate pressure on Democratic-controlled jurisdictions.

(Source: https://abc7.com/post/trump-threatens-halt-federal-money-next-month-sanctuary-cities-states/18398676/)

Trump Admin Posts Echo White Supremacist Rhetoric

The Trump administration is deploying recruitment campaigns and official posts across federal departments that incorporate imagery, slogans, and rhetoric linked to white supremacist and extremist movements, according to PBS reporting and analysis by Cynthia Miller-Idriss of American University’s Polarization and Extremism Research Innovation Lab. An ICE recruitment advertisement features the phrase “We will have our home again,” a direct reference to a white supremacist anthem favored by the Proud Boys, while the Department of Labor distributed messaging stating “One homeland, one people, one heritage” alongside heroic depictions of white men. Administration posts also invoke “Trust the plan,” the QAnon conspiracy theory slogan tied to the January 6 Capitol attack, which posits a global cabal of pedophiles and deep state actors that Trump is fighting.

Extremist symbols have surfaced across multiple federal agencies, including the “An Appeal to Heaven” flag, which was carried by January 6 rioters and adopted by evangelical Christian nationalist groups and neo-Nazi organizations. Miller-Idriss identified this pattern as part of a propaganda campaign to reposition ICE operations as serving the public interest while employing dog whistles and explicit racist and conspiratorial messaging. The administration is simultaneously rewriting January 6 history on a newly published website, blaming Democrats for security failures and justifying pardons for over 1,500 defendants involved in the insurrection.

President Trump stated in a New York Times interview that the civil rights movement “hurt a lot of people” and constituted “reverse discrimination” against whites denied college admission or jobs. Billionaire Elon Musk endorsed this framing by endorsing a post claiming “If white men become a minority, we will be slaughtered. White solidarity is the only way to survive”—the Great Replacement Theory, a white nationalist conspiracy falsely asserting intentional replacement of the white population. Miller-Idriss connected this conspiracy theory to terrorist attacks in Pittsburgh, El Paso, Buffalo, Christchurch, and Oslo, resulting in hundreds of deaths.

Miller-Idriss characterized the shift as a “turning point in the propaganda campaign,” driven by ICE’s 57 percent disapproval rating and public awareness of agency abuses circulated through cell phone video. She identified Trump’s statements as an “unedited version” of a longstanding belief system that white men are losing ground, now openly expressed without prior hedging. The administration simultaneously withdrew U.S. support from extremism prevention organizations, cementing its alignment with extremist ideological frameworks.

Miller-Idriss noted that undemocratic leaders employ confusion and propaganda simultaneously to undermine journalism, expertise, and shared truth, citing Hannah Arendt’s analysis of Nazi propaganda: once people stop knowing what is true and false, “it’s very easy for them to stop knowing what’s right and wrong.” The administration’s strategy combines coordinated messaging across departments with high-profile policy actions including ICE deployments, foreign intervention, and territorial threats, designed to normalize extremist rhetoric while obscuring its authoritarian implications through saturation messaging.

(Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-administration-posts-echo-rhetoric-linked-to-extremist-groups?fbclid=IwdGRleAPSxIFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEegXa-oSnnonxrbxD0HIm8ZOScqBnslIjqqgO-WisqCCJBydQdzzodouEcCt0_aem_45dHLtlY5pgg0gPw_BA6LA)

Trump Tells Jared Polis and Colorado ‘RINO’ to ‘Rot in Hell’

President Trump attacked Colorado Governor Jared Polis and a Republican district attorney in a December 31st Truth Social post, calling Polis a “scumbag” and the DA “disgusting” while telling both to “rot in Hell.” Trump’s outburst targeted officials responsible for prosecuting former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, who is serving nine years in prison for seven state-level charges related to 2020 election interference, including providing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s associate unauthorized access to county election software.

Trump falsely claimed earlier in December that he had pardoned Peters, stating she was being “relentlessly” targeted for “demanding honest elections.” However, Trump lacks authority to pardon individuals convicted of state-level crimes; Peters’ conviction and imprisonment remain valid regardless of any presidential pardon claim. Trump characterized her prosecution as evidence that Democrats prosecute election-security advocates while ignoring their own alleged mail-in ballot fraud, assertions contradicted by documented fact patterns showing no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Colorado or nationally.

Trump previously weaponized disaster aid to Colorado, denying federal assistance following wildfires and flooding while Governor Polis governed the state. This pattern of targeting Colorado’s Democratic leadership demonstrates Trump’s use of presidential authority to punish political opponents, further illustrating the authoritarian consolidation of power through weaponized governance.

Trump’s attack on a fellow Republican official as a “RINO” (Republican In Name Only) reflects his ongoing purge of party members who do not demonstrate absolute loyalty to him personally. His refusal to accept Peters’ lawful conviction—despite her documented actions undermining election integrity through unauthorized system access—prioritizes Trump’s electoral narrative over institutional accountability and rule of law.

The Truth Social post exemplifies Trump’s pattern of attacking state officials and judicial processes when outcomes conflict with his interests, framing legitimate prosecutions as political persecution while simultaneously attempting to overturn state convictions through false pardon claims that carry no legal weight.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-tells-scumbag-governor-and-disgusting-rino-to-rot-in-hell/)

Dershowitz tells Trump the Constitution is unclear on third term, WSJ reports     | Reuters

Donald Trump reviewed a draft manuscript by lawyer Alan Dershowitz arguing the Constitution may permit a third presidential term, according to the Wall Street Journal. Dershowitz claimed he told Trump during an Oval Office meeting that constitutional language on presidential term limits is ambiguous, contradicting the 22nd Amendment, which explicitly bars anyone from being elected president more than twice.

The 22nd Amendment, ratified after Franklin D. Roosevelt served four terms, states unequivocally: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” Dershowitz’s unpublished book, titled “Could President Trump Constitutionally Serve a Third Term?”, examines scenarios potentially circumventing this restriction.

Trump has previously signaled interest in circumventing constitutional term limits. He spent months publicly teasing the idea of testing the Constitution’s language before stating in October that he would not pursue a third term, calling the restriction “too bad” but acknowledging it prevented him from running again. Trump’s pattern of attacking institutions and officials who oppose him extends to questioning constitutional boundaries when they constrain his power.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson responded to the report by stating “the American people would be lucky to have President Trump in office for even longer,” signaling openness to the idea without committing to it. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles told Vanity Fair that Trump “knows he can’t run again,” creating contradictory messaging from the administration.

Trump has continuously falsified that he lost the 2020 election to widespread voter fraud, a claim rejected by numerous investigations and courts. His willingness to entertain arguments that constitutional limits may be negotiable reflects a broader pattern of treating constitutional constraints as obstacles rather than foundational law.

(Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/lawyer-dershowitz-told-trump-constitutionality-third-term-is-unclear-says-wsj-2025-12-17/)

Trump’s Disturbing Fascist Memes Prime His Base For A Forever Presidency

Donald Trump is mainstreaming extremist imagery and propaganda by sharing fascist-themed memes that portray him as a ruling god-emperor. In a striking image, Trump is depicted in golden armor while prominent Democrats, such as Schumer and Warren, bow in submission. This aesthetic echoes totalitarian propaganda, furthering Trump’s goal of a one-party state.

By leveraging artificial intelligence, Trump promotes content created by right-wing online communities, effectively merging crude, often racist memes with his political narrative. This engagement with fringe influencers not only amplifies their voice but legitimizes harmful ideologies within mainstream political discourse.

The normalization of such imagery and themes raises alarming questions about the trajectory of American politics. Trump’s consistent use of AI-generated content reinforces a dangerous precedent where traditional governance values are overwhelmed by authoritarian aesthetics and messages.

Experts highlight the implications of a sitting president amplifying extremist rhetoric, underscoring the erosion of democratic norms. Trump’s actions are not merely a personal campaign strategy but part of a broader strategy to reshape the power dynamics in America.

This trend marks a significant departure from established political processes, as Trump positions himself as a ruler who could effectively undermine the principles of democracy to entrench himself further in power.

Bannon’s Controversial Claims on Trump

Steve Bannon, a controversial figure and former advisor to Donald Trump, has reignited discussions suggesting that Trump may pursue a dubious path to a third term. During a recent episode of his podcast, Bannon provocatively claimed that “you can drive a Mack truck through the 22nd Amendment,” implying that the constitutional limitations on presidential terms can be circumvented. This reckless assertion reflects the ongoing, dangerous delusions among Trump loyalists regarding the former president’s political future.

Bannon’s hyperbolic rhetoric has garnered a mixed response. He cites advice from a supposed “top constitutional lawyer,” yet devotes little time to elucidating what specific loopholes could allow Trump to defy the clear stipulations of the law. His comments provoke thoughts of authoritarianism, raising alarms about a continued push for a “forever presidency,” reminiscent of autocratic regimes. Such ideas are alarmingly echoed by some fervent Trump supporters, who appear all too eager to glorify their leader as an “instrument of divine will.”

In the same discussion, Bannon noted that Trump had “longer odds in ’16 and longer odds in ’24,” further hinting at a strategy to revive his presidency in 2028. However, Trump’s previous admissions contradict his allies’ ambitions; he has publicly acknowledged that the Constitution restricts him from running again, expressing disappointment over these limitations. Trump’s mixed messages contribute to the confusion and division within his camp, indicating a struggle between traditional legal boundaries and the entrenched loyalty of the Trump base.

While Trump himself has wavered on his intentions, Bannon and others like him continue to sow discord by pushing fictitious narratives that align with their interests. For example, reactions to Bannon’s claims have been erratic, with some supporting his outlandish position while others, notably conservative commentators like Mark Levin, rebuked him for misrepresenting the legal realities of presidential terms. Levin criticized Bannon for being a “self-serving impotent demagogue” and emphasized the constitutional limits which Trump himself has acknowledged.

The implications of Bannon’s rhetoric suggest a desperate attempt to maintain Trump’s influence in American politics, regardless of the constitutional safeguards in place. As prominent figures like House Speaker Mike Johnson insist that Trump is not considering another run, it seems that Bannon’s claims serve more as a rallying cry for a beleaguered base, rather than a viable political strategy. The conversation surrounding Trump’s potential 2028 campaign remains fraught with legal challenges and moral ambiguities, indicating the ongoing struggle between democracy and authoritarian impulses within the Republican Party.

Trump Plans to Name White House Ballroom After

President Donald Trump is expected to name a new ballroom at the White House after himself, with senior administration officials referring to it as “The President Donald J. Trump Ballroom.” The proposed name aligns with Trump’s history of branding his construction projects. Details indicate that the project will cost approximately $300 million.

The entire East Wing of the White House has been demolished to make way for the ballroom, which is set to cover 90,000 square feet. Imagery of the demolition shows some historic magnolia trees and elements of the Kennedy Garden removed from the site. Despite the extensive changes, Trump has not publicly confirmed what he will name the ballroom but has acknowledged ongoing discussions.

During a recent interaction with ABC News, Trump chose not to elaborate on the ballroom’s name but has expressed confidence in the project, stating he would contribute “millions of dollars” towards it. Trump’s commitment is underscored by reported fundraising efforts that have already raised about $350 million, with substantial support from contributors eager to see the project fulfilled.

Trumps’s focus on enhancing the White House with this ballroom has received mixed reactions amid ongoing discussions about budget allocations. Questions remain regarding the utilization of the surplus funds raised beyond the projected construction costs. Currently, the White House remains engaged in the ballroom’s construction, with further updates expected as the project progresses.

Construction activities are ongoing, despite criticisms regarding the historic significance of the buildings being altered. Trump’s renovation efforts, including this ballroom, highlight his broader vision for the White House, which appears closely tied to his personal branding.

Trump Mocks Schumer and Jeffries, Promotes 2028 Bid in Office

President Donald Trump attempted to give Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries “Trump 2028” hats during a recent Oval Office meeting, which they declined. Trump’s gesture sparked a moment of humor in the room, particularly when Vice President JD Vance responded with “No comment” to Jeffries’ inquiry about Trump pursuing a third term, leading to laughter among attendees.

Following the meeting, Trump posted photos of Schumer and Jeffries next to the hats, further mocking them. In a disturbing turn, Trump shared a video depicting Jeffries in a sombrero, which Jeffries condemned as racist, urging Trump to address him directly rather than resorting to demeaning portrayals. Jeffries emphasized that such attacks reflect Trump’s ongoing history of racism.

The incident is reflective of a broader pattern in which Trump uses humor to undermine his political opponents while dismissing serious accusations of racism against him. Jeffries reiterated the importance of direct confrontation against such racial insensitivity, emphasizing the need for accountability in political discourse.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham has publicly expressed unconstitutional support for Trump’s potential bid for a third term, suggesting a growing faction within the Republican Party that embraces Trump’s authoritarian ambitions. Graham’s comments underline a troubling erosion of constitutional norms regarding presidential term limits.

Overall, these interactions in the Oval Office illustrate the ongoing tensions between Trump and Democratic leaders, with racism and potential autocratic tendencies coming to the forefront of political dialogue. As Trump trolls his opponents with juvenile antics, the serious implications of his rhetoric and aspirations are undeniable.

MAGA Influencers Promote Fake Melania Trump Vanity Fair Cover

MAGA influencers have recently expressed enthusiastic support for a fake Vanity Fair cover featuring Melania Trump, depicting her as “The American Queen.” This image, quickly identified as a fake AI-generated creation by the right-wing Next News Network, has sparked a social media frenzy among Trump supporters, who seem unfazed by its lack of authenticity.

Despite its fabricated nature, influencers like Charlie Kirk and Laura Ingraham have encouraged the idea of memeing the cover into reality, reveling in the reactions from critics. Kirk even highlighted anticipated “liberal meltdowns” as a source of amusement, showcasing the willingness of MAGA supporters to embrace fictional narratives for political trolling.

The fake cover’s originator, Gary Franchi from Next News Network, openly admitted his role in crafting the image, which he intended to provoke outrage among the left. This direct admission underscores a troubling trend of exploiting misinformation, reflecting a broader strategy among far-right figures to distort reality for ideological gains.

A report by Semafor noted internal backlash at Vanity Fair concerning plans for a genuine Melania Trump cover, with staff members reportedly threatening resignations over the prospect of promoting what they termed “MAGA propaganda.” This pushback illustrates the conflict within mainstream media regarding Trump-related narratives.

Ultimately, this incident embodies the troubling intersection of misinformation, media manipulation, and political allegiance within right-wing circles, solidifying the use of deceptive imagery as a tool for ideological warfare among Trump loyalists.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/media/maga-influencers-praise-fake-vanity-fair-cover-of-melania-trump-wearing-a-crown/)

Trump’s Dangerous Joke on 2028 Elections Reveals Disturbing Authoritarian Leanings

At a recent meeting in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump joked with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy about the possibility of a U.S. war in 2028 leading to a situation with “no more elections.” Despite the apparent levity, Trump’s remarks raised alarms about his ongoing insinuations regarding exceeding constitutional limits on presidential terms.

The meeting, which included various top European leaders, marked a notable shift from their previous contentious interaction earlier in the year. Despite a seemingly lighter atmosphere, Trump’s joke came amidst serious discussions on Ukraine’s security, highlighting his troubling inclination toward undermining democratic processes in the U.S.

Trump’s comments, framed as humor, further illustrate his longstanding pattern of contemplating ways to extend his presidency beyond the established two-term rule. This has included promoting “Trump 2028” merchandise and alluding to potential constitutional amendments or unconventional election strategies, which showcases a blatant disregard for democratic principles.

Furthermore, Trump’s history of disruptive rhetoric on elections and governance continues to emerge in this context. His discussions about war and elections reflect a dangerous conflation of military action with domestic political suppression, inciting further skepticism about his commitment to preserving democracy.

The ramifications of Trump’s ongoing flirtation with authoritarianism extend well beyond his remarks, culminating in a broader narrative where the integrity of elections stands at risk. This disturbing trend signals a pressing concern about the future of democratic institutions in America.

1 2 3 4 5