Category: Corruption

Trump family business files for trademark rights on any airports using the president’s name

The Trump Organization filed federal trademark applications seeking exclusive rights to use President Trump’s name on airports and related merchandise including buses, umbrellas, travel bags, and flight suits. The filings were triggered by a Florida state bill proposing to rename Palm Beach International Airport after Trump, and separate disputes over naming rights for a New York-New Jersey tunnel and Dulles International Airport in Virginia.

The Trump Organization stated it would not charge royalties or accept financial consideration for the Palm Beach airport renaming, claiming the applications were filed to protect against “bad actors” exploiting what it asserts is “the most infringed trademark in the world.” The company did not respond when asked whether it would charge royalties for using Trump’s name at other airports or on merchandise covered by the trademark filings.

Trademark lawyer Josh Gerben, who discovered the filings, called them “completely unprecedented,” noting that no sitting president’s private company has previously sought trademark rights in advance of airport naming proposals. He highlighted that presidents historically wait years—or must die—before airports are named after them: Bill Clinton waited 11 years, Ronald Reagan nine, and Gerald Ford 22 years, with JFK being the exception at one month following his assassination.

Recent months have seen multiple public venues and infrastructure renamed for Trump, including the Kennedy Center performing arts venue, a boulevard outside Mar-a-Lago, and a new class of battleships. The Trump Organization has also expanded its branding internationally, placing the Trump name on towers, golf resorts, and residential developments in Dubai, India, Saudi Arabia, and Vietnam, while simultaneously selling Trump-branded electric guitars, bibles, and sneakers through its DTTM Operations unit.

Trump has previously defended his family’s business activities by stating the company is held in trust by his sons and that he has no day-to-day involvement, a response to ongoing criticism that he and his family are profiting from his presidency. The company’s claim of having the world’s most infringed trademark could not be quickly verified against established luxury brands like Gucci, Prada, and Rolex, which have all battled extensive counterfeiting for decades.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-family-business-files-trademark-172427158.html)

Trump Accepts Invented ‘Clean Coal’ Trophy From Mining

President Trump accepted a bronze trophy from Peabody Energy CEO Jim Grech at a White House event on Wednesday, named “Undisputed Champion of Beautiful Clean Coal” by the Washington Coal Club, a pro-coal advocacy group with financial ties to the coal mining industry. Trump used the occasion to tout his administration’s coal policies, claiming he “ended the war on coal” and citing a 4 million ton monthly production increase, while promoting withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord.

The award represents Trump’s repeated pattern of accepting newly invented honors created by organizations and individuals seeking his favor. Trump previously accepted a newly created “FIFA Peace Prize” from FIFA President Gianni Infantino in December 2025 after failing to receive a nomination for an actual Nobel Peace Prize, an omission he has publicly lamented. In January 2026, Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado presented Trump with a Nobel Peace Prize despite the prize’s organizers explicitly stating the award “cannot be revoked, shared or transferred.”

Trump’s promotion of “beautiful clean coal” directly contradicts established climate science. During a December 2025 NORAD Christmas Eve call, Trump pressured a child who declined coal as a gift, insisting coal is “clean and beautiful,” despite coal being a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Trump has also directed the Pentagon to increase coal-generated electricity purchases through executive order, artificially subsidizing a declining fossil fuel industry.

The ceremony drew comparisons to Trump’s acceptance of a custom gold-plated gift from Apple CEO Tim Cook in August 2025, which prompted online criticism describing the gesture as deference to authoritarian leadership. Trump’s collection of self-created or invented awards underscores a pattern of surrounding himself with loyalists and industry figures willing to fabricate honors that reinforce his preferred narratives.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-clean-coal-white-house-meeting-b2918708.html?fbclid=IwdGRleAP8F_tleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEe6qODtF520ZXkp8eFUWEZM0Ebz6YmUmRHz4-tjI0fUz_kq7chvFn3eGrgdx4_aem_nS9se4Nk2uqaOHIq1XXBgw)

Trump Orders Pentagon to Purchase Coal Power

President Trump issued an executive order directing the Pentagon to increase purchases of coal-generated electricity, effectively using the Department of Defense budget to subsidize a declining fossil fuel industry. The order represents a direct intervention into energy markets to artificially prop up coal production, which has failed to remain competitive against cheaper and cleaner alternatives.

Coal generation is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, yet Trump continues to promote it as economically and environmentally sound. His administration has pursued fossil fuel favoritism through exclusive assistance to oil and coal companies, while simultaneously blocking renewable energy projects, demonstrating deliberate prioritization of polluting industries over clean energy development.

This Pentagon directive exemplifies Trump’s pattern of weaponizing federal agencies to advance personal ideology and financial interests aligned with fossil fuel donors. The order compels military spending to serve as a subsidy mechanism for an uncompetitive industry rather than optimizing defense procurement based on cost or operational efficiency.

Trump has repeatedly made false claims about coal being “clean and beautiful,” contradicting established scientific consensus on coal’s environmental harm. The administration is simultaneously pushing looser pollution rules and increased coal funding, while the EPA delays Biden-era pollution standards that would otherwise protect waterways and air quality.

The executive order redirects taxpayer dollars from military readiness and innovation into sustaining a dying industry, subordinating national defense priorities to fossil fuel industry profits. This diversion of Pentagon resources demonstrates how Trump’s administration systematically bends federal power toward enriching allied industries regardless of economic rationality or public health consequences.

(Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/02/11/trump-coal-pentagon-order/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwY2xjawP698xleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEersty_fFS5HGzkHTkEM7ZQSoTKMW1nx6KGJ_yNjB0KB40S39AeTAEN5P90rM_aem_oqWqjPN1L0uzL5J7-4JNaQ)

DOJ Fails to Indict Six Democrats Over Military Video

The Trump administration’s Department of Justice attempted and failed to indict six Democratic lawmakers who appeared in a November video urging military and intelligence personnel to refuse unlawful orders. The federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., rejected the prosecution’s case on Tuesday, with prosecutors unable to convince even a single juror that probable cause existed for charges, according to sources familiar with the investigation. The video featured Representatives Jason Crow of Colorado, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, and Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan—all with military or intelligence backgrounds—explaining that service members can refuse orders that are manifestly illegal under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The prosecution, led by Trump appointee Jeanine Pirro at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, employed political appointees rather than career prosecutors, according to one source. Trump had publicly accused the lawmakers of “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH” on his Truth Social platform following the video’s release. Legal experts widely rejected the prosecution’s theory, citing both First Amendment protections for political speech and the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause, which grants lawmakers immunity from prosecution for legislative acts.

The failed indictment reflects a broader pattern of weaponizing the Justice Department against Trump’s perceived political opponents. The administration previously dismantled the Public Integrity Section, eliminating standard oversight requirements that normally govern investigations of sitting members of Congress, especially those involving free speech considerations. The Justice Department has also failed to secure indictments against New York Attorney General Letitia James before separate grand juries in Norfolk and Alexandria, and Pirro’s office has struggled to obtain convictions even in cases involving alleged assaults on federal officers.

Senator Kelly stated that the prosecution attempt followed administrative retaliation by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who issued a formal censure and sought to reduce Kelly’s retirement rank to punish his participation in the video. Slotkin condemned the effort as indicative of Trump’s authoritarian approach, declaring that “whether or not Pirro succeeded is not the point. It’s that President Trump continues to weaponize our justice system against his perceived enemies.” Other lawmakers rejected intimidation tactics, with Representative Crow stating that “Americans should be furious that Trump and his goons tried to weaponize our justice system again against his political opponents.”

(Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/doj-fails-secure-indictment-democrats-involved-illegal-orders-video-rcna258385)

Trump Blocks Bridge After Billionaire Competitor Meets Commerce Secretary

Donald Trump threatened to block Canada’s Gordie Howe International Bridge hours after Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick met privately with Detroit billionaire Matthew Moroun, who controls the competing Ambassador Bridge, according to The New York Times. Two officials briefed on the meeting confirmed Lutnick met with Moroun in Washington on Monday, and Lutnick subsequently spoke with Trump by phone about the matter.

The Moroun family has spent decades attempting to prevent the Gordie Howe bridge through litigation and lobbying, including a challenge that reached Canada’s Supreme Court. The family previously urged Trump to halt construction of the $4.7 billion publicly funded bridge, which will compete with the Ambassador Bridge for over $300 million in daily cross-border trade once operational.

Trump posted on Truth Social threatening to block the bridge unless Canada addressed “a long list of grievances,” according to the Times report published Tuesday. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Trump’s position by claiming he was “putting America’s interest first,” objecting to Canadian control of the bridge and land on both sides, and criticizing insufficient use of American-made materials.

The timing coincides with escalating tension between the nations since Trump’s election, during which he has questioned Canadian sovereignty and imposed tariffs on steel, lumber, and automobiles. The Gordie Howe bridge is fully financed by Canada and will be jointly operated by Canada and Michigan, making Trump’s threat an intervention in a cross-border infrastructure project already under construction.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-canada-2675257271/)

NSA Detected Foreign Call About Trump Associate Gabbard Blocked

Last spring, the National Security Agency detected a phone call between two foreign intelligence operatives discussing a person close to Donald Trump. Rather than following standard protocol to distribute the intelligence report, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard delivered a paper copy directly to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and subsequently instructed the NSA to transmit the classified details to her office instead of publishing the report.

On April 17, a whistleblower contacted the inspector general alleging that Gabbard blocked the classified intelligence from routine distribution. The whistleblower filed a formal complaint on May 21 detailing Gabbard’s actions. The NSA does not monitor individuals without justification, and the person discussed in the call is not understood to be an administration official or special government employee, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The intelligence community inspector general dismissed the complaint after a 14-day review on June 6, stating the office “could not determine if the allegations appear credible.” The watchdog’s independence may be compromised after Gabbard assigned one of her top advisers, Dennis Kirk—a co-author of Project 2025 and a first Trump administration official—to work in the inspector general’s office on May 9, two weeks after the whistleblower’s initial contact.

For eight months, the complaint remained classified and withheld from congressional intelligence committees, violating the law requiring agencies to relay whistleblower complaints to Congress within 21 days. Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner stated the months-long delay reflected an effort to “bury the complaint.” Members of the “gang of eight” received a heavily redacted version on Tuesday night, with much of the complaint withheld under claims of executive privilege—a move Gabbard’s attorney said flags presidential involvement in the underlying intelligence concerns.

Gabbard’s office denied all allegations, stating “every single action taken by DNI Gabbard was fully within her legal and statutory authority.” House Oversight Committee Democrat Stephen Lynch warned that Kirk’s appointment raised “troubling questions about the independence” of the intelligence community inspector general’s office, compromising the agency’s ability to serve as an independent watchdog against weaponization of intelligence for political purposes.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/07/nsa-foreign-intelligence-trump-whistleblower)

Trump Demands Penn Station Rename for Tunnel Funding

President Donald Trump demanded that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer agree to rename Penn Station in New York and Dulles International Airport in Washington after himself in exchange for unfreezing $16 billion in federal funding for a rail tunnel project connecting New York and New Jersey, according to Punchbowl News. The Trump administration had frozen the funds during a government shutdown in the fall, and construction on the tunnel project faced potential shutdown as early as Friday due to lack of resources.

Schumer rejected Trump’s demand and told the president he lacked the legal authority to unfreeze the funds in exchange for renaming public infrastructure. A source close to Schumer stated that Trump could restart the funding unilaterally and that “there’s nothing to trade,” indicating the demand was a purely self-serving condition with no legitimate policy basis.

This episode reflects Trump’s pattern of using federal resources and public assets to promote his personal brand. In December, Trump announced the renaming of the Kennedy Center to the Trump-Kennedy Center, though the venue’s official name is codified in law and cannot be changed without legislation; several artists subsequently canceled shows in protest, and Trump announced the Kennedy Center would close for “renovations” lasting approximately two years.

Additional recent examples include the State Department adding Trump’s name to the U.S. Institute of Peace and Trump unveiling a new “Trump-class” of battleships he claimed he would personally help design. These actions demonstrate Trump’s repeated attempt to repurpose federal institutions and taxpayer-funded infrastructure for self-aggrandizement.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment regarding the Penn Station and Dulles renaming demand. The lawsuit filed by New York and New Jersey against the Trump administration remains ongoing in federal court in Manhattan.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-reportedly-demanded-his-name-on-penn-station-in-exchange-for-unfreezing-tunnel-project-funds/)

Trump Family Sold 49% Stake to UAE Official for $500M

Four days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, representatives of Abu Dhabi royal Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan secretly purchased a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial, Trump’s cryptocurrency venture, for $500 million according to company documents and sources familiar with the transaction. Eric Trump signed the deal on behalf of the Trump family, with $187 million paid immediately to Trump family entities and at least $31 million directed to entities connected to Steve Witkoff, a World Liberty co-founder appointed as U.S. envoy to the Middle East weeks prior.

Tahnoon, known as the “spy sheikh,” serves as Abu Dhabi’s national security adviser and brother to the UAE’s president, overseeing a personal and state-funded empire exceeding $1.3 trillion spanning AI companies, surveillance operations, and other ventures. This investment represents an unprecedented arrangement in American politics: a foreign government official acquiring direct ownership in an incoming U.S. president’s company, creating an immediate conflict of interest and foreign influence over presidential business interests.

The Biden administration had restricted Tahnoon’s access to advanced American artificial intelligence chips due to security concerns, particularly regarding his AI firm G42’s documented ties to sanctioned Chinese technology company Huawei and other Chinese firms. Although G42 claimed to sever Chinese connections in late 2023, intelligence officials and lawmakers maintained reservations about the company’s loyalty and technological transparency.

Following Trump’s election victory, Tahnoon’s prospects for obtaining restricted AI technology reversed dramatically. The sheikh met multiple times with Trump, Witkoff, and other U.S. officials, including a March White House visit where he expressed interest in American AI collaboration and other bilateral initiatives, demonstrating direct access and influence over Trump administration technology policy.

This transaction exemplifies how Trump’s businesses operate as vehicles for foreign influence and financial benefit tied directly to policy decisions affecting national security and technological sovereignty. The arrangement allowed a UAE official to purchase controlling interest in Trump’s company while simultaneously positioning himself to extract concessions on restricted defense technology, converting Trump’s political power into personal wealth while compromising American strategic interests to hostile foreign governments.

(Source: https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/spy-sheikh-secret-stake-trump-crypto-tahnoon-ea4d97e8?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqdJ5zLTAvzhKBsTCnFnpY0Hit1iMXl82x9x8XrQh8559kAKnQvI83C18ahFU6E%3D&gaa_ts=6987bbab&gaa_sig=MUKE1-y0BmoVCMiKQZcLV8tXNaZXx9xODns2WGIKKRPkfi5c1EK9y-zivZbtL0Axxi4FTrp18hbEQgFSg8dhxQ%3D%3D)

FBI Agent Resigns as DOJ Blocks Renee Good Shooting Probe

FBI supervisor Tracee Mergen resigned from the Minneapolis field office after Washington leadership pressured her to abandon a civil rights investigation into ICE officer Jonathan Ross, who fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Good on January 7. Such inquiries are standard procedure following officer-involved shootings. The Trump administration weaponized the Justice Department by instead investigating Good and her partner for alleged ties to left-wing protest groups, prompting at least six senior prosecutors in the Minneapolis U.S. attorney’s office to resign in protest.

Senior Justice Department officials have stated there are no plans to investigate whether Ross used excessive force when he fired multiple shots at the unarmed mother sitting in her vehicle. Federal investigators refused to cooperate with state and local Minnesota prosecutors seeking to open their own inquiry into the shooting. The New York Times video analysis found no evidence supporting Trump administration officials’ claims that Good attempted to ram Ross with her Honda Pilot, yet they publicly labeled her a “domestic terrorist.”

The Justice Department simultaneously opened investigations into Minnesota Democratic elected officials, including Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, scrutinizing whether they conspired to obstruct Trump’s immigration enforcement through public statements. Subpoenas were issued this week to their offices and St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her’s office as part of this effort.

The department prosecuted three protesters—Nekima Levy-Armstrong, Chauntyll Louisa Allen, and William Kelly—charging them with conspiracy for interrupting a church service to protest a pastor’s apparent ICE work, alleging they “intimidated, harassed, oppressed and terrorized the parishioners.” Federal judges denied prosecutors’ requests to detain the three while awaiting trial.

These actions reflect a coordinated strategy by the Trump administration’s Justice Department to shield federal immigration enforcement from oversight, punish Democratic critics of ICE operations, and criminalize protest activity opposing deportation policies, while Trump falsely claimed protesters were paid agitators.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/23/us/fbi-agent-ice-shooting-renee-good.html)

Trump Sues JPMorgan Chase and CEO for $5B, Alleging They ‘Debanked Him’ After Capitol Riot

Trump filed a $5 billion lawsuit in Florida against JPMorgan Chase and CEO Jamie Dimon on January 22, 2026, claiming the bank “debanked” him for political reasons following the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot. According to the suit, JPMorgan Chase notified Trump in February 2021 that his accounts would be closed within two months. Trump’s legal team, led by attorney Alejandro Brito, alleges the bank made this decision based on “political and social motivations” and “woke” beliefs rather than legitimate business concerns.

JPMorgan Chase rejected the allegations, with a spokesperson stating the bank “does not close accounts for political or religious reasons” and instead closes accounts that “create legal or regulatory risk.” The bank further stated it “regret[s] having to do so but often rules and regulatory expectations lead us to do so.” The bank’s official response to the lawsuit was direct: “While we regret President Trump has sued us, we believe the suit has no merit,” and affirmed its right to defend itself in court.

The lawsuit emerges two months after CEO Dimon publicly declined to fund Trump’s proposed 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom, estimated at $400 million. During a November 2025 CNN interview, Dimon explained that JPMorgan Chase maintains strict policies on government contracts and avoids appearances of “buying favors,” citing concerns about regulatory scrutiny from future administrations. The ballroom is being funded by Trump and other donors including Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, and the Winklevoss twins, but not JPMorgan Chase.

Dimon has previously contradicted Trump’s claims about their relationship. During the 2024 election, Trump falsely claimed Dimon had endorsed him for president, a claim JPMorgan Chase publicly denied. On January 21, 2026, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Dimon stated, “I don’t like what I’m seeing,” indicating continued skepticism of Trump’s policies and actions.

(Source: https://people.com/trump-sues-jpmorgan-chase-5-billion-11890840?utm_campaign=peoplemagazine&utm_content=photo&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_term=69729ffbffed3f00012671e0&fbclid=IwdGRjcAPgaTVleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeLrOftBb_toUMg2YdBsQXRbIDpfcjXp5Npq52X3y9puC9kMJxCy86kH861ag_aem_b3_ScplyKwJuYqHYFrd_xQ)

1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 44