Category: Corruption

Trump Demands No Judge Stop His Military Ballroom

President Donald Trump posted inflammatory messages on Truth Social attacking Judge Richard Leon’s ruling on his $400 million White House ballroom project, characterizing the structure as militarily essential and declaring “no Judge can be allowed to stop” its construction. Trump’s posts came after Leon issued a revised order allowing underground construction of bunkers, bomb shelters, and military installations while prohibiting Trump from finalizing the above-ground ballroom design without Congressional approval, which the project still lacks.

Trump accused Leon of undermining national security and engaging in “illegal overreach,” claiming the ballroom is vital for presidential safety during events, inaugurations, and global summits. In his lengthy Truth Social rant, Trump detailed the ballroom’s purported military features, including missile-resistant steel, drone-proof ceilings, blast-proof glass, and military-grade venting, framing these specifications as necessary for protecting future presidents and world leaders.

Trump insisted the underground and above-ground portions are inseparable, claiming the underground sections serve no purpose without the upper structure and that the entire project is “tied together as one big, expensive, and very complex unit.” He further asserted that material worth hundreds of millions of dollars has already been ordered and partially paid for, suggesting the court order threatens investments already committed to the construction.

The ballroom remains funded through private donations and Trump’s personal cash rather than taxpayer money, yet Trump has framed judicial oversight as obstructing national defense. Trump previously attacked the court halt, and his administration appointed an unqualified receptionist to the Commission of Fine Arts, illustrating his pattern of circumventing institutional expertise and oversight on the project.

Trump’s assertion that judges cannot stop the project defies judicial authority and the requirement for Congressional approval, establishing a precedent for executive defiance of court orders. His characterization of legitimate legal review as “Trump Hating” and a “mockery to our Court System” exemplifies his broader pattern of attacking judicial independence when rulings oppose his interests.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-drops-wild-post-about-his-militarily-imperative-ballroom-no-judge-can-be-allowed-to-stop-it/)

Trump DOJ Seeks to Vacate Seditious Conspiracy Convictions

Trump’s Department of Justice, led by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, filed motions on Tuesday to vacate convictions against members of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys who were convicted of seditious conspiracy and related crimes for their roles in the January 6 Capitol attack. The filing seeks to erase convictions for Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, militia members Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, and Jessica Watkins, and Proud Boys members Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola. This escalates Trump’s earlier mass pardons and commutations issued on his first day in office.

Stewart Rhodes, convicted of seditious conspiracy and sentenced to 18 years in prison, had his sentence commuted to time served by Trump in January. Enrique Tarrio, former Proud Boys leader also convicted of seditious conspiracy and sentenced to 22 years, was similarly pardoned. The remaining defendants had their sentences commuted to time served, though convictions technically remained until these new motions. Federal prosecutors argue that continuing prosecution is not in the interests of justice, according to the filed motions.

Rhodes founded the Oath Keepers anti-government militia group in 2009 and coordinated extensive preparations for armed conflict before January 6, including weapons caches and encrypted messaging discussions about a violent response to the 2020 election. Similarly, Proud Boys members including Nordean, Biggs, and Rehl were convicted after evidence demonstrated they orchestrated a violent plot to stop the peaceful transfer of power. Rehl called for “firing squads” for election “traitors,” and Pezzola was filmed using a stolen Capitol riot shield to break windows during the assault.

The Trump administration is systematically dismantling accountability for the January 6 attack through mass pardons, sentence commutations, and now attempted erasure of convictions. Stewart Rhodes appeared at Trump’s Las Vegas rally in January following his sentence commutation. Additionally, the administration has targeted federal prosecutors involved in January 6 cases and is identifying FBI agents involved in investigations while removing evidence and public statements about the attack from government websites.

Convicted rioters are now suing the federal government alleging excessive force by law enforcement, and the Justice Department has already settled with the family of Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot by Capitol police. Trump pledged to review the shooting decision. At least one rioter who called for police to be killed now works for the Trump administration, and a newly launched White House website attributes blame to law enforcement for “deliberately escalating tensions” during the Capitol breach.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-jan-6-oath-keeper-proud-boys-doj-b2957740.html)

Acting AG Blanche Denies DOJ Weaponization While Targeting

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the Trump administration’s use of the Justice Department against political rivals during a White House press conference on Tuesday, dismissing concerns about weaponization as “completely false.” Blanche instead inverted the accusation, claiming that former President Joe Biden’s DOJ had weaponized the department against Trump in an unprecedented manner by pursuing multiple indictments and supporting local prosecutions, including the Manhattan hush-money case and the Georgia election interference case.

Blanche criticized media outlets for what he characterized as selective outrage, stating that journalists had ignored Biden-era prosecutions of Trump but now complained when the Trump administration targeted his political rivals. He argued that Trump and his associates, including family members, staff, and security personnel, had been subjected to “massive investigations” under the previous administration. Blanche has previously boasted about purging federal employees from the DOJ and FBI who investigated Trump, describing the effort as necessary reforms rather than political retaliation.

The acting attorney general reframed the Trump administration’s prosecutorial actions as pursuing “justice” rather than political vengeance, claiming the president has repeatedly stated he wants the department to serve the rule of law. However, the administration has already expanded DOJ investigations into Democratic officials, including subpoenaing Minnesota Democratic leaders over immigration policies. Blanche’s remarks occurred less than a week after Trump dismissed former Attorney General Pam Bondi and appointed him to lead the Justice Department.

The controversy over DOJ misuse reflects a pattern within the Trump administration of conflating investigations into Trump’s own legal exposure with claims of Democratic weaponization. Blanche, Trump’s former criminal defense lawyer now serving as acting attorney general, has already demonstrated willingness to suppress information, including announcing in advance that the department would withhold documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein files despite legal requirements for transparency. The administration’s deployment of the DOJ against Democratic targets contradicts its public denial of political prosecutions.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/new-ag-todd-blanche-fumes-over-question-about-weaponization-of-doj-against-trump-enemies/)

Trump Calls Vance the ‘Fraud Czar.’ Here’s What We Know About the Role

President Donald Trump designated Vice President J.D. Vance as the country’s “fraud czar” on Friday, claiming that fraud is “massive and pervasive” in the United States. Trump stated in a Truth Social post that Vance would coordinate anti-fraud efforts “everywhere,” but primarily in Democratic-led states including California, Illinois, Minnesota, Maine, and New York, asserting without evidence that addressing fraud could help balance the federal budget.

Vance’s authority stems from an Executive Order Trump signed on March 16 establishing a national anti-fraud task force to combat fraud, waste, and abuse in federal benefit programs. Vance serves as chairman of the task force and held its first meeting last week, calling for a “whole-government approach” to address both the theft of taxpayer money and the disruption of critical services that Americans depend on.

The Trump administration has already targeted specific states under the fraud initiative. Minnesota experienced a federal freeze on childcare funding and suspension of more than $250 million in Medicaid funding, while California saw federal officials announce the arrest of eight individuals accused of health care fraud schemes in and near Los Angeles. Vance’s task force also suspended more than 200 hospice and health care providers in California.

In January, Vance created a new Justice Department position dedicated to fraud investigation, and Trump subsequently named Colin McDonald as Assistant Attorney General for National Fraud Enforcement. McDonald was sworn in by Vance on Wednesday and will report directly to both Vance and the President, establishing a direct line of authority outside traditional judicial independence structures.

Democratic governors have pushback against the administration’s fraud allegations. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and California Governor Gavin Newsom both stated their states have worked for years to combat fraud and pointed to Trump’s previous pardons of individuals convicted on fraud charges, undermining claims of systematic Democratic malfeasance.

(Source: https://time.com/article/2026/04/03/trump-vance-fraud-czar/)

Hegseth has intervened in military promotions for more than a dozen senior officers

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has systematically blocked or delayed promotions for more than a dozen Black and female senior officers across all four military branches, according to nine U.S. officials familiar with the process. Some officers targeted appear to have been singled out because of their race, gender, or perceived alignment with Biden administration policies. Hegseth refused to meet with Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George when George requested discussion of the promotion blocks targeting women and Black men, and Hegseth subsequently fired George on Thursday.

Hegseth has cited officers’ past support for COVID-19 vaccines, mask mandates enacted during the Biden administration, affiliation with diversity, equity and inclusion programs, or association with former Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley as reasons for removal from promotion consideration. In recent weeks, Hegseth blocked three Marine officers—two women and a Black man—who were recommended for promotion by Marine Corps leadership and had no open investigations against them. A Navy list of officers selected for one-star admiral promotion has been held up for over a month, with concern that officers may be removed based on race or gender.

The Army’s promotion list included approximately 30 officers for one-star general positions; Hegseth removed four names before it reached the Senate in mid-March, striking two women and two Black officers without documented cause or investigation. Military law requires the president, not the defense secretary, to possess authority to block promotions, and a reason such as an ongoing investigation must be provided if removal occurs before White House transmission. The removed officers had deployed, performed their duties, and were combat-tested, yet Hegseth provided no explanation for their removal.

Defense secretaries typically do not remove officers from promotion lists or reject service branch recommendations, and this intervention violates longstanding military practice and law requiring promotions be based on individual merit. U.S. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the blocking “disgraceful” and “a complete betrayal of the merit-based promotion system.” A retired senior military officer warned that unexplained intervention in the promotion process will erode officer trust and create the perception that careers can be “politicized in a career-ending manner.”

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell disputed the reporting as “fake news from anonymous sources” and claimed promotions are based on merit. However, military demographics show active-duty forces are 80 percent male and 74 percent white among officers, while only 9 percent of officers are Black, indicating the concentration of promotion authority in Hegseth’s hands poses significant risk of abuse when applied selectively against officers from underrepresented groups.

(Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/hegseth-intervened-military-promotions-dozen-senior-officers-rcna266062)

Karoline Leavitt Fumes Over NYT Slamming Trump’s Ballroom

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Trump’s $400 million White House ballroom project on Sunday after the New York Times published a critical analysis of its design and construction timeline. Leavitt attacked the Times’ writers on X, claiming they had “studied fine arts,” “long written about urban planning,” and “never built anything,” while asserting that Trump and his architect have “built world-class buildings around the world.”

The New York Times piece, however, included a trained architect, a fine artist, and an urban planning expert who documented significant design flaws and structural concerns. The article noted that the proposed East Wing addition is approximately 60 percent larger than the White House residence by floor area and more than three times as large by cubic volume, making it the dominant building of the White House complex when viewed from the south.

According to the Times reporting, the project timeline has created serious credibility problems. The White House announced plans to begin construction in spring while design documents remained under review, a compressed schedule that architect Thomas Gallas stated “never made any sense” to him. He explained that a building of this scale typically requires 18 months to two years from initial concept to completed construction documents.

The article identified numerous design flaws, including fake windows on the north side, columns that block interior views and daylight, and a lopsided appearance that disrupts symmetry with the West Wing. The south portico, which was not part of the initial design, contains no doors into the ballroom, and an unnecessarily large rooftop area was flagged as another concern.

The National Capital Planning Commission was scheduled to grant final approval to the project on Thursday, despite the ongoing design changes and compressed timeline. Trump has previously admitted the ballroom functions as a monument to himself, stating that he is building it because “no one else will.”

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/karoline-leavitt-fumes-over-ny-times-feature-slamming-design-of-trumps-supersized-ballroom/)

Kash Patel’s push against Democratic lawmaker raises concerns within FBI – The Washington Post

FBI Director Kash Patel is directing agents in the San Francisco office to rapidly redact and prepare for public release a decade-old investigative file concerning Representative Eric Swalwell and a suspected Chinese intelligence operative, according to three sources with knowledge of the matter. No evidence of wrongdoing by Swalwell has been identified in the file.

Patel's push to release the file has generated alarm within the FBI, with officials concerned that the action reflects a pattern of weaponizing the bureau against political opponents. The effort represents a continuance of Trump administration tactics targeting Democratic lawmakers, particularly those who have been vocal critics, including Swalwell and other members who led investigations into Trump.

Swalwell has been a consistent Trump critic and was previously targeted by the administration's Department of Justice in unsubstantiated allegations. The renewed focus on a file containing no evidence of his misconduct demonstrates the administration's systematic use of law enforcement to discredit and intimidate political adversaries rather than pursue genuine national security interests.

Internal FBI resistance to Patel's directive underscores deep institutional concern about the politicization of the bureau under his leadership. Career officials view the accelerated release of an investigative file unrelated to any proven violation as an abuse of power designed to damage a Democratic lawmaker through selective disclosure and public innuendo.

Representative Swalwell was approached by an FBI informant named Fang Fang, but upon being confronted by the FBI, he immediately cooperated and worked with federal agents to help stop the foreign operative's activities. However, conservative media outlets and Fox News spent years deliberately spreading false claims that Swalwell had a romantic relationship with Fang Fang, when in fact such a relationship involved a different political figure. In stark contrast, when Donald Trump was confronted with evidence of foreign agent involvement, the Mueller Investigation documented that he instead leveraged these contacts for his benefit and actively obstructed the FBI's ability to investigate him and his associates.

(Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/28/fbi-patel-eric-swalwell/)

Donald Trump Plans to Add His Signature to US Currency | Vanity Fair

The Trump administration is adding Donald Trump’s signature to all denominations of US currency, replacing the signature of Treasurer Brandon Beach for the first time in 165 years. The Treasury Department is already developing new printing plates, with the bills scheduled to enter circulation within months. This marks the first instance in American history of a sitting president’s signature appearing on currency, and the measure is permanent unless a future administration reverses it.

Trump’s signature will appear alongside that of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on all future bills. Treasurer Brandon Beach defended the decision in a statement, calling Trump’s signature on currency “appropriate” and “well deserved,” and framing it as recognition of Trump’s economic agenda. Beach claimed the president’s “mark on history as the architect of America’s golden age economic revival is undeniable.”

This currency initiative is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to stamp his name and image throughout federal institutions and public spaces. Trump has already draped enormous banners of his face over government buildings, added his name to the Kennedy Center’s walls, and ordered the East Wing of the White House demolished to construct a 90,000-square-foot ballroom decorated with gold accents. The administration is also pursuing additional projects to promote Trump’s image on national symbols.

Last week, the Commission of Fine Arts, composed entirely of Trump appointees, approved a 24-karat commemorative gold coin featuring Trump’s likeness to mark the nation’s 250th anniversary. These actions reflect Trump’s consistent pattern of using his position to advance his personal brand across American institutions and currency systems.

(Source: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/trump-signature-dollar-currency)

Trump administration announces new probes into Harvard over race and religion | The Independent

The Trump administration’s Education Department has opened two new federal investigations into Harvard University, alleging the institution discriminates against students based on race, color, and national origin in violation of federal law. The probes will examine whether Harvard employs race-based preferences in admissions following the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that ended affirmative action in higher education, and will also investigate allegations of antisemitism on campus. Harvard’s spokesperson rejected the accusations, stating the university is “firmly committed to confronting antisemitism,” does not discriminate on grounds of race, and complies with all applicable laws including the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision.

The investigations represent part of the Trump administration’s broader campaign targeting universities over pro-Palestinian protests, transgender policies, climate programs, and diversity initiatives. Last week, the administration sued Harvard seeking billions of dollars for allegedly failing to protect Jewish students, while a separate February lawsuit demanded documents to determine whether the university considered race in admissions. Academic advocates have warned these efforts could violate privacy rights and constitute “a tool for anti-civil rights enforcement,” according to a former Biden administration official.

Pro-Palestinian protesters, including some Jewish groups, argue the government conflates legitimate criticism of Israel’s military actions in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and wrongly characterizes Palestinian rights advocacy as support for extremism. The Trump administration has not initiated equivalent investigations into allegations of Islamophobia or anti-Palestinian bias at universities. Legal and judicial obstacles have impeded the administration’s efforts to freeze federal funding at universities, though it has reached settlement deals with some institutions including Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $200 million.

Academic experts have flagged concerns that settlement agreements set a dangerous precedent for “pay-to-play” arrangements between the government and universities. Harvard’s spokesperson characterized the new investigations as “retaliatory actions” against the university for refusing to “surrender our independence and constitutional rights.” A deal to resolve the multiple probes against Harvard remains unresolved, as the administration continues escalating its pressure campaign against the institution.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-harvard-university-investigations-race-religion-b2944219.html)

Trump administration will pay a French company $1 billion in taxpayer funds to not build wind farms | CNN

The Trump administration announced it will pay French energy corporation TotalEnergies nearly $1 billion in taxpayer funds to abandon offshore wind farm development off the coasts of New York and North Carolina. The Justice Department will reimburse the company for federal leases purchased under the Biden administration, effectively blocking two projects that could have generated over 4 gigawatts of electricity. TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanné stated the company will instead invest the funds in a liquified natural gas plant in Texas and expand oil drilling operations in the Gulf of Mexico and shale projects across the United States.

This represents a shift in the Trump administration’s strategy to block renewable energy projects after failing to prevent construction of more established offshore wind operations. The Interior Department previously halted federal permit approvals for renewable energy initiatives, and this payment marks the first instance of the federal government directly paying companies to prevent wind farms from being built. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum claimed offshore wind is too expensive and unreliable, assertions contradicted by energy experts who note that wind projects operate under fixed power agreements with stable costs unlike fossil fuels.

The cancellation worsens an emerging electricity shortage affecting the United States, particularly in mid-Atlantic states where power demand from data centers and vehicle electrification is straining available capacity and driving prices upward. Elizabeth Klein, former director of the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, stated the scrapped New York project specifically would harm a region desperately needing new electricity sources, and called the administration’s decision nonsensical.

Industry representatives have condemned the payment as wasteful and counterproductive for consumers. Sam Salustro, senior vice policy official for the Oceantic Network offshore wind trade association, characterized the arrangement as political theater that removes affordable domestic energy while electricity costs soar. Multiple energy companies holding undeveloped offshore wind leases worth over $5 billion have publicly indicated they expect reimbursement if prevented from proceeding, including German renewables firm RWE, which paid $1.2 billion for three leases and stated it will pursue legal action if necessary to recover its investment.

The Interior Department has not disclosed whether additional reimbursement agreements are under negotiation with other developers. Klein criticized TotalEnergies for accepting the arrangement, noting that while the deal benefits the corporation, it constitutes a poor outcome for American taxpayers and national energy requirements.

(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/23/climate/trump-totalenergies-offshore-wind-cancellation?Date=20260323&Profile=CNN&utm_content=1774297189&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAQuy0BleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeXrMNBFritZlgXiCGcc-cSL6nY6v1Cg00nqgRU2sEO6-K5n_TeSikdvfEdMI_aem_IQ24n7QPilVpv78sNc1G9Q)

1 2 3 … 42