Category: Corruption

Trump’s Egg Price Claim: A Striking Example of Deceit

The recent assertion by President Donald Trump regarding egg prices is one of the most egregious instances of misinformation he has propagated. At a press conference on March 12, alongside Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin, Trump boldly claimed that egg prices had decreased by 30% since he took office. This statement, however, has been thoroughly debunked by fact-checkers, notably by the account FactPost, which pointed out that egg prices have actually surged by 28% since Trump assumed the presidency.

This blatant lie exemplifies Trump’s consistent pattern of distorting economic realities to fit his narrative, as he attempts to deflect criticisms surrounding inflation and rising costs. Despite the actual statistics showing significant increases in food prices, including eggs, Trump continues to mislead the public while presenting an illusion of economic stability. The fallout from this misleading claim has been significant, with countless responses on social media condemning the disconnection from reality that Trump’s remarks reveal.

Opinionated commentators were quick to respond, with one user quipping about Trump’s fabricated data, suggesting it originates from an “alternate universe.” The public’s frustration is palpable, as the inflated food prices dramatically affect daily life for millions of Americans. It reinforces the perception that Trump is out of touch with the struggles faced by ordinary citizens as he prioritizes false narratives over factual integrity.

In the past, Trump has promised to reduce grocery prices “on day one” of his presidency, yet the reality is far from his assertions. He has previously cited alarming increases in food prices—bread, cereals, and egregiously, eggs—but instead of accountability, he shifts blame onto others, like President Joe Biden, for the current economic woes. It is confounding to observe Trump blaming others for issues he himself has failed to address effectively during his administration.

This incident regarding egg prices is not merely a slip of the tongue—it’s indicative of a larger trend in Trump’s communication strategy, which often entails ignoring truths in favor of a narrative that serves his interests. This approach not only misleads his base but also undermines the public’s trust in information critical to making informed decisions about their lives and finances. Trump’s persistent lies contribute to the broader issue of disinformation that is deeply damaging to American democracy.

(h/t: https://www.indy100.com/news/donald-trump-lie-are-egg-prices-down)

Trump’s Pardon for Convicted Ex-Lawmaker Raises Ethical Red Flags and Undermines Justice

Former President Donald Trump has issued a pardon for Brian Kelsey, a convicted former Tennessee lawmaker who was serving a 21-month prison sentence for an illegal campaign finance scheme. Kelsey had previously pleaded guilty to funneling tens of thousands of dollars from his state campaign committee to fund his failed congressional bid in 2016. Sources report that Trump signed the pardon paperwork on Tuesday, although the White House has not provided any public commentary regarding the action.

Kelsey was just two weeks into his prison sentence when he received the pardon, which raises significant ethical concerns given that he was represented by current White House Counsel David Warrington. The role of the White House counsel typically involves reviewing presidential pardons, leaving many to question whether Warrington appropriately recused himself from the pardon process due to his prior involvement with Kelsey.

During Kelsey’s legal proceedings, Warrington argued that Kelsey’s decision to plead guilty was made in a state of confusion, influenced by personal turmoil, including the death of his father and the birth of his twins. However, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw did not accept this argument, maintaining that Kelsey was aware of his actions upon entering his guilty plea. The Supreme Court later declined to hear Kelsey’s appeal, which solidified his prison sentence.

Upon receiving the pardon, Kelsey expressed gratitude to Trump on social media, invoking religious language to describe the perceived injustices he faced during his legal battles. The timing and implications of this pardon further illustrate the troubling pattern of Trump favoring individuals connected to him or his administration, thus undermining the integrity of the justice system.

This incident not only spotlights the problematic intersection of law and politics but also raises alarms about the long-term consequences of Trump’s continued use of pardons as a tool for personal and political gain. As Trump remains embroiled in ongoing legal challenges, the ramifications of such pardons extend beyond individual cases, posing serious threats to democratic principles and accountability.

Trump’s Tariffs Spark Global Trade War; Economy at Risk

President Donald Trump has imposed sweeping 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports into the United States, a poorly calculated decision that threatens both the economy and consumer prices. This latest move appears to be part of his ongoing campaign to manipulate trade dynamics in favor of US manufacturing, supposedly correcting alleged trade imbalances, but in reality, it is likely to stimulate a damaging global trade war.

The European Union and Canada wasted no time in retaliating against Trump’s protectionist measures. Canada announced a series of retaliatory tariffs, targeting $20.1 billion worth of US goods, while the EU revealed plans to impose equivalent tariffs on American exports worth up to $28 billion. This swift response highlights how Trump’s trade policies not only provoke international backlash but also risk isolating the US on the global stage.

While the intention behind these tariffs may be to bolster domestic production, analysts warn that they could lead to significant price hikes for a wide range of consumer goods, from cars and appliances to medical devices. Past tariffs implemented during Trump’s first term saw similar outcomes, where the protective measures paradoxically caused inflated costs and diminished industrial output.

Economic experts have predicted that the 25% tariffs could ultimately cost around 100,000 American jobs, undermining Trump’s claims that such policies will benefit US workers. Employment in the manufacturing sector, particularly in aluminum production, is already vulnerable and could deteriorate further as costs rise and competitiveness declines.

Trump’s trade strategy, marked by its volatility and deviation from established norms, has seen reversals and confusing statements, even leading to threats of escalated tariffs. His administration’s approach to tariffs showcases an alarming trend of economic self-destructive behavior that prioritizes short-term political gains over the long-term health of the U.S. economy.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/12/economy/trump-steel-aluminum-tariffs-hnk-intl/index.html)

Elon Musk’s Influence Over FAA Signals Corporate Corruption in Air Safety Governance

Elon Musk has aggressively maneuvered to influence the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), seeking to replace Verizon’s $2.4 billion air traffic control contract with a lucrative deal for his company SpaceX. Musk’s interest in the FAA escalated dramatically after he criticized Verizon’s management, claiming the FAA was on the verge of failing to protect air traveler safety due to outdated systems.

The FAA’s telecommunications network, which is essential for managing U.S. airspace, has faced financial strain and infrastructure challenges. In response to rising concerns over air travel safety, Musk dispatched his engineer Ted Malaska to the FAA with a directive to accelerate the deployment of SpaceX’s Starlink satellite systems without the usual bureaucratic delays. Musk’s approach indicates a desire to leverage potential government contracts to enhance his wealth and power.

Federal employees have reported that Malaska threatened job security for those who resisted his agenda, raising significant ethical concerns about the influence Musk is exerting over government operations. With at least 30,000 federal positions cut under his tenure, Musk has transformed government dynamics to favor private partnerships that could enrich him and his corporation, at the expense of public safety.

Skepticism surrounding the collaboration with SpaceX has emerged from various lawmakers and former FAA officials, who warn that fast-tracking decisions without proper vetting could compromise air safety and open avenues for corruption. These individuals decried the possible conflict of interest when the FAA, which oversees SpaceX’s licensing and safety investigations, also engages it as a contractor.

As the FAA contemplates the future of its contract with Verizon amid Musk’s push, questions remain about the motivations behind these rapid developments. The tight-knit relationship between Musk and Donald Trump, who recently assumed office, underscores a troubling intertwining of corporate interests and government power, posing a real threat to the integrity of democratic processes and public safety.

(h/t: https://www.seattletimes.com/business/how-elon-musk-muscled-his-way-into-the-faa/)

Trump Aide Claims Tariffs Are Drug War in Confusing Rant

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett recently made contradictory statements about President Trump’s tariffs against Canada and Mexico. During an interview on ABC’s This Week, Hassett insisted that these tariffs were part of a “drug war” rather than a “trade war,” despite clear evidence to the contrary. He attempted to justify the tariffs as a negotiation tactic to curb fentanyl smuggling from these countries.

Host Jonathan Karl challenged Hassett’s claims by highlighting that the actual percentage of fentanyl smuggled across the border is only around one percent, questioning the logic behind Hassett’s assertions. In defiance, Hassett claimed Canada was a “major source” of fentanyl, though he provided no substantiating evidence for this statement.

As the conversation progressed, Karl pointed out the hypocrisy in the administration’s messaging, where tariffs positioned as a response to drug trafficking were simultaneously characterized as a trade dispute. Representative Adam Schiff later addressed this inconsistency during the program, describing Hassett’s rationale as “incomprehensible.”

Hassett’s statements underscore a broader pattern of misleading narratives created by the Trump administration, aiming to portray aggressive tariffs as necessary to combat drug-related issues. This manipulation of public perception reflects a troubling strategy often seen in Trump’s political playbook.

Overall, the discussion illustrates the ongoing confusion and lack of accountability within Trump’s rhetoric, where the administration morphs clear economic policies into convoluted justifications for its actions, marking a significant departure from transparent governance.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/kevin-hassett-trump-trade-war/)

CNN Fact Check Rips Apart Trump’s False Dairy Tariff Claims

Donald Trump recently made sweeping claims regarding Canada’s dairy tariffs, alleging they exceed 200 percent. However, CNN’s fact checker, Daniel Dale, quickly debunked this statement. He clarified that these high tariffs only come into effect after exceeding a negotiated limit of tariff-free exports to Canada, a limit that Trump himself established.

Dale pointed out that during Trump’s first term, he had already signed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which retained these tariffs. Contrary to Trump’s assertion that the situation with Canadian dairy tariffs worsened under President Biden, it was confirmed that the tariffs were not raised during Biden’s presidency. Instead, the existing tariffs were upheld as part of the USMCA agreement.

In his remarks, Trump claimed that the dairy tariffs were being inflated under Biden’s administration, but both government records and dairy industry sources contradicted this. Trump’s administration was responsible for the initial tariff structure he now criticizes, labeling it an inconsistency on his part.

As for retaliation, Trump has threatened to impose new U.S. dairy tariffs starting April 2. However, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick indicated that such measures are not immediate and are pending further developments.

While Trump did negotiate some beneficial terms for American dairy farmers via the USMCA, which allowed specific quotas for imports, it did not effectively lead to any reductions in tariffs on imports that exceeded those quotas. Ultimately, Trump’s claims regarding dairy tariffs represent another instance of misrepresentation, revealing a pattern of dishonesty that continues to undermine American credibility on the international stage.

(h/t: https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-dairy/)

Trump Declares Protests Against Tesla as Domestic Terrorism While Shielding Corporate Interests

President Donald Trump has made a provocative statement regarding potential protests against Tesla dealerships, labeling any violence associated with these protests as “domestic terrorism.” This announcement comes amid increasing tensions surrounding the company, which is facing significant protests labeled by some as the “Tesla Takedown,” directly impacting its stock prices.

Trump made this declaration while appearing alongside Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, during a media event at the White House. The pair’s focus was on showcasing support for the electric vehicle manufacturer as it aims to bolster its vehicle output in the U.S. However, the backdrop of protests seems to indicate a growing movement against corporate practices that some believe are harmful to workers and consumers alike.

The characterization of protests as domestic terrorism reflects a wider trend among right-wing figures to establish punitive narratives around dissent against corporate interests. This tactic not only aims to intimidate dissenters but also to manipulate public perception, reinforcing a narrative of victimization that shields corporations like Tesla from legitimate criticism.

It’s essential to note that Trump’s threat to label dissent as terrorism comes at a time when his administration has previously favored the interests of wealthy elites and corporations over worker rights. In this context, such rhetoric can be seen as an overt attempt to align corporate hostility with national narratives of security and patriotism, which only serves to suppress the voices of those advocating for ethical business practices.

As Trump continues to wield his influence through such declarations, it raises critical questions about the repercussions for civil discourse and the future of lawful protest. The implications of labeling dissenting opinions in the realm of corporate governance as terrorism not only threaten democratic principles but also deepen divisions in American society, particularly when the influence of wealth and power is already a prevailing concern.

(h/t: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-will-label-violence-against-tesla-dealers-domestic-terrorism-2025-03-11/)

DHS Bypasses Bidding to Fund $200 Million Anti-Immigrant Campaign Favoring Trump Allies

 

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is rapidly moving to award contracts for a $200 million ad campaign, sidestepping competitive bidding in favor of two firms closely linked to the Republican Party. Under Secretary Kristi Noem, an associate of President Donald Trump, the initiative aims to promote anti-immigrant messages while lauding Trump’s stringent immigration policies, which have become a hallmark of his political agenda.

DHS claimed the urgency of Trump’s national emergency declaration at the U.S.-Mexico border justified bypassing the standard procurement process. This distinction raises alarms about transparency and the potential for corruption, given that the ads prominently feature Noem thanking Trump for his border closure efforts. The ads juxtapose images of Trump with alarming portrayals of migrants, effectively perpetuating a fear-based narrative.

The two firms receiving contracts are People Who Think, LLC, owned by Trump campaign veteran Jay Connaughton, and Safe America Media, LLC, recently founded by GOP consultant Mike McElwain. This selection process raises concerns about cronyism, as connections between these firms and Trump’s inner circle have been documented. These actions exemplify the unethical practices that have increasingly characterized the Trump’s administration.

Moreover, the DHS has been criticized for misusing taxpayer dollars by prioritizing sensationalist advertising over more pressing issues such as election security and misinformation. As personnel responsible for protecting the integrity of elections face administrative sidelining, the department’s focus becomes glaringly aligned with partisan objectives at the expense of public interest.

This ad campaign, heavily airing on traditional media, especially Fox News, seeks to deliver a divisive message that vilifies immigrants while attempting to rally support for Trump’s repugnant policies. In this environment, where deceit and fear are strategically weaponized, the fundamental tenets of American democracy face unprecedented threats from the GOP’s agenda.

Trump Allies Manipulate Justice System to Shield Themselves from Accountability

The U.S. Justice Department has initiated a review of the nine-year prison sentence given to Tina Peters, a former county clerk in Colorado and an ally of Donald Trump. Peters was convicted for leading a security breach of election systems following the 2020 presidential election, a blatant disregard for election integrity that echoes the dangerous tactics often employed by Trump and his supporters.

Peters was found guilty of allowing access to sensitive election software to an individual linked to MyPillow’s Mike Lindell, who is notorious for spreading false claims about election fraud. The repercussions of her actions have amplified the pervasive misinformation undermining democratic processes across the nation. Peters’ intent to appeal her conviction suggests a troubling trend where individuals associated with Trump attempt to evade accountability for their actions.

The Justice Department’s intervention, although unusual, raises alarms about potential favoritism from Trump-appointed officials towards his allies. This situation reflects a broader pattern of interference often exhibited by the Republican Party, prioritizing the protection of their political allies over the integrity of the judicial process. As highlighted by Daniel Rubinstein, the Mesa County District Attorney, the prosecution was initiated by a conservative district attorney, dispelling the notion that it was politically motivated.

The Justice Department’s filing claims that Peters’ case represents a broader study of alleged abuses within the criminal justice system, a rationalization that risks undermining the legitimacy of the legal process. Such actions could be interpreted as an attempt to shield Trump’s allies from the consequences of their unlawful activities, perpetuating a cycle of impunity that is characteristic of authoritarian regimes.

The manipulation of legal frameworks for political ends threatens to dismantle the foundation of accountability within the American democratic system. Peters’ case exemplifies the lengths to which Trump’s faction will go to protect themselves while perpetuating baseless narratives about election integrity. This ongoing saga serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need to uphold the principles of justice, even in the face of political pressure.

(h/t: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/justice-department-reviewing-state-election-tampering-conviction-trump/story?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dhfacebook&utm_content=null&id=119425719&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1993KO5FgsWXzjDBBgovNbJS8MhI-RzSyZePAiol6oTtASVW81a3y9rLI_aem_SWtxPzsG5owX8SituotZVw)

Wealthy Elites Pay Millions to Dine with Trump, Undermining Democracy and Fueling Corruption

Recent reports reveal that individuals are willing to pay exorbitant sums to dine with Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate. This trend highlights the continued allure of Trump among wealthy elites, who prioritize personal connections with powerful figures over democratic principles.

These extravagant dinners, costing millions, serve as fundraising events for the Republican Party, showcasing Trump’s ability to attract large donations while blatantly disregarding ethical considerations. Wealthy donors, often with ties to far-right agendas, are essentially purchasing access to Trump, further exemplifying the corrupt nature of American politics under his influence.

Trump’s activities at Mar-a-Lago, particularly his associations with various far-right figures, signal a troubling convergence of wealth and power. His praise for authoritarian leaders and purging dissenters from the GOP reflects a dangerous trajectory towards fascism that undermines democratic norms and erodes accountability.

This pattern is not just concerning on a domestic front; Trump’s expansionist rhetoric about acquiring territories like Greenland and his admiration for extremist counterparts abroad illustrate a deeply troubling mindset that threatens global stability and undermines international alliances.

Ultimately, Trump’s extravagant dining events not only reinforce a hierarchy prioritizing wealthy donors over ordinary citizens but also contribute to a political climate that enables corruption, autocracy, and a disregard for the foundational tenets of democracy.

(h/t: https://apple.news/AkmTF5iRgRO-OkCNEG0la0g)

1 2 3 … 20