Category: Corruption

Donald Trump Slams Judge Deciding Kennedy Center’s Fate

Trump continues his campaign to rename and renovate the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, attacking the federal judge overseeing the legal challenge to his efforts. On Truth Social, Trump called the building “old and decrepit” and accused the judge of being “highly conflicted” for blocking his plan to inscribe his name on the structure. In May, a federal judge ruled that only Congress holds authority to rename the institution, which was built to honor President John F. Kennedy.

Trump violated federal law by adding his name to the building’s facade without authorization, then had the sign covered with a tarp in June to conceal the violation. Rather than comply with the court’s ruling, Trump’s Justice Department lawyers have argued that blocking his $250 million renovation project would render the building so unsafe it would require demolition, a threat designed to pressure Congress into allowing the rename. Trump’s allies are attempting to circumvent Congressional approval by proposing an inscription reading “Renovated and Restored by President Donald J. Trump.”

Rep. Joyce Beatty, a Democrat from Ohio and ex officio member of the Kennedy Center’s Board of Trustees, characterized Trump’s renovation and renaming scheme as “very childish” after an emergency court hearing held Thursday. Beatty invoked Trump’s controversial alterations to the White House as evidence of his destructive approach to historic institutions, stating “We’ve seen what he’s done, in the most embarrassing ways, to the White House.”

The Kennedy Center, a storied performing arts venue, has faced significant operational challenges since Trump assumed his chairmanship. Artists have withdrawn from performances, and ticket sales have declined sharply, though Trump blamed the downturn on the need for renovations rather than acknowledging his role in driving away performers and audiences.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/donald-trump-takes-a-shot-at-highly-conflicted-judge-deciding-the-decrepit-kennedy-centers-fate/) than acknowledging his role in driving away performers and audiences.

Trump Official Leaks Debunked Censorship Files

A Trump administration official leaked government files to a conservative online data analyst in a failed attempt to prove that the shuttered Global Engagement Center had conducted domestic censorship operations. Sarah Rogers, the State Department’s undersecretary for public diplomacy, provided the documents to Jennica Pounds, known as DataRepublican, who claimed she was being “entrapped.” Rogers then published the files herself, alleging center officials “betrayed their stated mission.”

Two former senior GEC officials, Daniel Kimmage and Carrie Goux, examined the leaked material and concluded it demonstrates nothing. The files contained a 2022 GEC report on “gendered disinformation” and Kimmage’s congressional testimony, which Rogers selectively presented to suggest the center had targeted American speech. Kimmage stated Rogers “tried to twist” his testimony, in which he explicitly said the GEC “did not” take positions on US outlets, into false evidence of domestic censorship.

The GEC, which operated from 2017 until dissolution in 2025, spent nearly a decade tracking foreign influence operations from Russia, China, and Iran under an explicit foreign-facing mandate. During that period, it published eight detailed reports on Russian and Chinese disinformation campaigns, exposed four major Kremlin operations across Latin America, Africa, Moldova, and against RT, and brokered an international pact on countering state disinformation signed by over two dozen governments. A 2022 inspector general review found the center “generally effective,” though it noted weaknesses in internal controls and contractor oversight.

Republicans, including former House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Michael McCaul, attacked the GEC for allegedly stretching the definition of disinformation to suppress conservative speech. The campaign centered on the center’s funding of the Global Disinformation Index, a UK nonprofit that rated media outlets; the GDI’s separate 2022 study of the US media market rated Newsmax, One America News, and the New York Post as high-risk for disinformation, which critics weaponized as evidence of domestic meddling despite the GEC’s foreign mandate.

The State Department is now resuming counter-disinformation work through other offices, including a proposal to pay up to 30 social media influencers across 11 Southeast Asian countries $2,500 each as part of an $11 million campaign to counter Chinese propaganda. The influencer program, operated by the US Mission to ASEAN, includes messaging, training, and studio visits to “intensive collaboration” in Washington and Houston, with recruitment materials citing Pounds as an ideal model. Goux stated the administration is “spending a lot more tax dollars” attempting to reconstruct the GEC’s functions through contractors while the US “has lost their seat at the table” internationally and “losing trust too.”



(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/30/state-department-global-engagement-center-leaked-documents-foreign-propaganda?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUB2bFwZG9mBWZkaWQWUNhA2nVC-1TIXlpnQcULA8nZq7U7QGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4e46YPv-u3jinexDLfVD5pbBRWNKDJWnPzteIVor6UwLqdj-AiK3cye1072Q_aem_qPXIWAbHlImdCnG_ibNBHg#Echobox=1788089080)

Pentagon Stealth Hires Influencers To Pump Up Pete Hegseth

The Pentagon secretly hired conservative military veterans with large social media followings to amplify Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s agenda and attack Trump administration critics, according to The Washington Post. Retired Air Force Colonel Rob Maness (135,000 X followers), retired Army Colonel Kurt Schlichter (620,000 X followers), and retired Army Colonel Thomas Anderson, who writes as Cynical Publius (323,000 X followers), were assigned to the office of Anthony Tata, the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, with active civilian government email addresses as of late August 2026.

Pentagon spokesman Joel Valdez refused to disclose whether the three influencers draw taxpayer-funded salaries, their specific roles, or the duration of their assignments, contradicting Trump administration claims of running “the most transparent Defense Department ever.” The secrecy surrounding their placements and compensation demonstrates the administration’s use of government resources to orchestrate propaganda through influencers who then amplify official messaging to civilian audiences without public accountability.

All three individuals declined to comment to The Post about their positions and activities. Tata and Hegseth also refused to respond to questions about the program, leaving no official explanation for how the Pentagon justifies placing active political operatives on the public payroll or what oversight, if any, monitors their work.

The revelation follows reporting that Democratic and Republican politicians pay influencers on TikTok and other platforms to promote their agendas, but the Pentagon’s covert hiring of active-duty adjacent figures represents a direct weaponization of military resources for partisan message amplification by the Trump administration.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/the-pentagon-secretly-hires-conservative-influencers-to-amplify-pete-hegseths-agenda/)

Trump bought Boeing stock on same day Navy gave company $880M contract. Here’s proof | Snopes.com

Trump purchased between $250,000 and $500,000 in Boeing stock on June 18, 2026, according to his financial disclosure filed with the Office of Government Ethics. On the identical date, the Department of Defense announced an $880 million contract awarding Boeing a firm-fixed-price agreement for P-8A Poseidon aircraft training systems and sustainment services for the U.S. Navy.

Trump’s financial disclosures demonstrate he has traded millions of dollars in securities throughout his second term, including substantial investments in Boeing and other corporations that maintain major contractual relationships with the federal government. Unlike previous presidents, Trump maintains direct equity stakes in defense contractors receiving government contracts, creating documented conflicts of interest between his personal financial interests and his executive authority over defense spending.

The White House claims Trump’s portfolio is independently managed by third-party financial institutions through discretionary accounts with automatic index replication, asserting Trump exercises no control over investment timing or selection. This defense contradicts the structural reality that Trump personally benefits from stock appreciation resulting from government contracts awarded during his administration, regardless of the mechanical process executing the trades.

Securities law prohibits insider trading under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, but prosecution requires proving intent. Trump’s pattern of acquiring substantial positions in defense contractors immediately preceding or concurrent with major government awards violates ethical standards governing federal officials, even if legal prosecution faces evidentiary barriers regarding knowledge and intent. Trump similarly purchased Intel corporate debt while simultaneously directing an $11 billion government stake in the company, demonstrating systematic self-enrichment through executive power.

Historical Boeing stock data shows the company’s share price declined in the days following June 18, rendering Trump’s timing potentially disadvantageous from a pure profit motive, though this pattern is consistent with Trump acquiring positions before government announcements that boost defense contractor valuations over longer time horizons rather than daily trading cycles.



(Source: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-boeing-navy-contract/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUBV9VwZG9mBWZkaWQWUNcR-T08h1U5UsiJAsvZ0EZRLcI8KmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4qu28QnJhWpigVHOfbfUvq87liZM7uSYU7TS5vmeJFwEB7Am_hZHsTYGs2cQ_aem_JkpE5BepPA1k5aXzNjYiVg#Echobox=1787927122)

Trump Ripped by Critics for NASA Speech: ‘What the F*ck?’

Trump arrived more than an hour late to a NASA ceremony at Johnson Space Center in Houston on Friday, where he was scheduled to honor four astronauts from the Artemis II lunar mission and award them the Congressional Space Medal of Honor. During the event, Trump announced plans for a new U.S. Space Academy to train Space Force members, engineers, and civilian spaceflight personnel.

Trump injected partisan politics into the nonpartisan ceremony, speaking extensively about Venezuela and Iran for over an hour while the audience sat in silence. Aaron Rupar documented that Trump spoke “to complete silence at the NASA center. Not a single person applauding or reacting to anything he said during his brazenly partisan speech.” Trump also requested that a lunar crater be named after him, mirroring the crew’s naming of a crater for astronaut Reid Wiseman’s late wife, drawing a blunt “No” from Rep. Ted Lieu.

Trump made a rambling, incoherent statement during the ceremony, claiming his “uncle who was a great scientist” and “loved space,” then saying “I guess we have genetically, we sort of, I believe in that stuff.” Biographer Seth Abramson responded directly to this moment with “What is this even supposed to be??? What the f*ck is he talking about???” Adam Kinzinger mockingly tweeted “BREAKING NOW: Trump believes in space,” while critics noted Trump falsely claimed the U.S. had no military space program before him, despite U.S. Space Command existing since the Reagan administration.

Trump falsely presented himself as the architect of American space capabilities, contradicting the expertise of the scientists and engineers present. NASA has been undergoing significant workforce reductions under Trump’s administration, cutting over 20 percent of its staff, yet he used the astronauts’ achievement as a platform for self-promotion and partisan rhetoric.

Social media reactions focused on Trump’s narcissism, cognitive decline, and disrespect for accomplished scientists. Commentator Joanne Carducci wrote that “Making incredibly accomplished people wait for him makes him feel ‘powerful,’ when it’s really just pathetic.” Critics characterized the event as one of the most awkward public ceremonies on record, with Trump’s alternate reality clashing with the actual expertise of NASA personnel forced to witness his incoherent, self-serving performance at an event designed to honor their colleagues’ achievements.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-ripped-by-critics-for-nasa-ceremony-speech-what-the-fck-is-he-talking-about/),’ when it’s really just pathetic.” Critics characterized the event as one of the most awkward public ceremonies on record, with Trump’s alternate reality clashing with the actual expertise of NASA personnel forced to witness his incoherent, self-serving performance at an event designed to honor their colleagues’ achievements.

Trump Loses Third Bid to Erase Hush Money Conviction

Federal Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein rejected Trump’s third attempt to move his state court hush money case to federal court and dismiss it on presidential immunity grounds. Hellerstein ruled that Trump’s reasons for the renewed request were “neither new nor legally sufficient” and that Trump had “failed to show good cause and diligence.” This marks the judge’s third denial of Trump’s effort to seize the case from New York state court where he was tried and convicted.

Trump stands as the first former and current U.S. president convicted of a crime, found guilty in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment to adult film actor Stormy Daniels. He was sentenced to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact without additional punishment. Trump has consistently denied Daniels’ account of a sexual encounter a decade prior that threatened his 2016 campaign.

Hellerstein determined that Trump’s legal team made deliberate strategic choices that undermined their federal court removal argument. After the Supreme Court’s July 2024 presidential immunity ruling, Trump’s lawyers first petitioned state judge Juan Merchan to overturn the verdict rather than immediately seeking removal to federal court. Hellerstein characterized this as seeking “two bites at the apple,” a legal maneuver courts disfavor, and noted that by waiting nearly two months to file for federal removal, Trump’s team forfeited remedies available through federal court and sentencing timing.

During February oral arguments, Hellerstein questioned Trump lawyer Jeffrey Wall’s assertion that the legal strategy was sound, noting Trump could have filed a simple notice of removal to federal court and avoided sentencing proceedings entirely. Wall argued the compressed timeline after the Supreme Court ruling justified the approach, but Hellerstein rejected this rationale, stating “you made a choice” and “you didn’t have to do that.” The judge concluded Trump’s delay constituted a “quintessential strategic decision” and that discovering it was ineffective did not establish legal cause for reconsideration.

Trump continues contesting his conviction through the state court appellate process, which remains pending. His efforts to overturn the verdict through federal intervention have now failed three times under Hellerstein’s jurisdiction, with a federal appeals court last year ordering reconsideration that ultimately reinforced the original dismissal reasoning.



(Source: https://abc13.com/story/president-donald-trump-loses-bid-erase-hush-money-conviction/19752439/)

Trump Admin Sends Saudi Nuclear Deal With Uranium Enrichment to Congress

The Trump administration submitted a nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia to Congress on Monday, which would permit uranium enrichment on Saudi territory and take effect automatically in 90 days unless both chambers pass disapproval resolutions. Energy Secretary Chris Wright confirmed the deal includes a pathway for Saudi enrichment of uranium fuel for civilian reactors, though he stated such arrangements remain “many years down the road.” The agreement’s full text was sent to Congress in classified form, described by sources as “highly unusual,” with experts noting that classifying an entire civil nuclear cooperation agreement would be “unprecedented.”

The White House conditioned the agreement’s advancement on Saudi Arabia joining Trump’s Abraham Accords initiative, which normalizes diplomatic relations with Israel, despite the signed agreement containing no such mandate. An administration official stated Trump’s “position has not changed” and that the agreement will proceed only if Riyadh joins the accords. However, the White House offered no explanation for how it would prevent the deal from automatically taking effect after 90 days if Saudi Arabia does not comply, leaving the mechanism for enforcing this condition unclear.

The agreement permits Saudi enrichment without requiring adoption of the Additional Protocol, the standard international safeguard that grants the UN nuclear watchdog broad authority to inspect suspected weapons sites. Wright argued that bilaterally negotiated safeguards developed “in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency” would be sufficient to prevent weapons development. IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi stated the agency’s Board of Governors must review and approve the safeguards agreement and pledged he would “never put forward an agreement that would not guarantee nonproliferation.”

The diplomatic condition linking the deal to the Abraham Accords surprised Trump’s own nuclear negotiators, according to sources briefed on the matter. Trump formally approved the 30-year nuclear agreement in July, structuring it to secure dominant market access for American companies while excluding foreign competitors from Saudi Arabia’s nuclear infrastructure. Scott Roecker of the Nuclear Threat Initiative suggested the administration could refuse to finalize the agreement after Congress completes its review, potentially using the accords condition as leverage to pressure Saudi Arabia toward Israeli normalization.

The administration’s approach mirrors precedent set during George W. Bush’s presidency, when his administration withdrew a nuclear agreement with Russia from congressional consideration in 2008 following Moscow’s invasion of Georgia. Trump issued his certification for the Saudi agreement on July 16, according to the Federal Register, but the intertwining of the nuclear deal with unrelated diplomatic objectives has left lawmakers uncertain how to evaluate the agreement’s nuclear merits independently.



(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/26/politics/trump-saudi-arabia-nuclear-deal?Date=20260826&Profile=CNN&utm_content=1787777104&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAT8SR5wZG9mBWZkaWQWUNPW_zGo1xpalQI2bG2ghAonaG4g3GV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR55T2Hst1IZkGT4sMiro6WFCClyed7RwMEwsG5N7LjK4z4diwjPhGSzT9vEnQ_aem_RBwOCizapX4ifgZJ62oCcA)agreement’s nuclear merits independently.

Trump Brags About White House Renovation Costing Nearly $1 Billion

Trump posted on Truth Social Tuesday boasting about White House beautification and renovation projects, claiming credit for fixes including 2,300 lights repaired, 1,460 benches installed or refurbished, and over 500 graffiti removal instances across Washington, D.C. He specifically highlighted the restoration of Thomas Jefferson Columns at the White House, posting photos and stating the work “turned out beautifully.”

Since returning to office in January, Trump has initiated multiple major renovation projects at the White House. These include a complete Rose Garden redesign that replaced the lawn with a stone patio, which Trump justified as necessary for holding press conferences during poor weather. The centerpiece of his renovation agenda is a massive White House Ballroom project requiring demolition of the entire East Wing.

The ballroom construction faced significant legal obstacles delaying formal approval and project progress. Trump’s various White House renovations have cost nearly $1 billion to date, representing a substantial allocation of federal resources to properties already owned and maintained by taxpayers.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-brags-about-white-house-restoration-turned-out-beautifully/)

Trump admin says White House ballroom ‘beyond the point of no return’ in Supreme Court appeal – ABC News

Trump administration officials filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court on Friday seeking to overturn a lower court injunction that would halt construction of a White House ballroom and helipad. Solicitor General John Sauer, invoking six alleged assassination attempts against Trump, claimed the project is essential to presidential security and that halting work would endanger Trump’s life. The administration asserts it has authority to conduct the renovation without congressional approval, citing precedent for presidential alterations to the executive residence.

A federal district court and divided appeals court determined Trump lacks authority to overhaul the White House without congressional approval, prompting the administration’s Supreme Court intervention. The injunction is scheduled to take effect August 21 unless the Court grants the emergency stay. Sauer argued the district court would improperly elevate a single judge as arbiter of presidential security decisions, framing the matter as one of executive power rather than institutional oversight.

The administration claims the project is 65 percent complete with $200 million spent or committed, operating with a 250-person crew working 20 hours daily seven days a week. White House director Joshua Fisher declared in a sworn statement that stopping construction would be “a disaster” because the concrete-and-steel structure is now “beyond the point of no return” and cannot be safely altered or dismantled. The filing asserts the project operates “on time” and “under budget” with “zero taxpayer dollars” required, though this omits reference to a $1 billion White House hardening request to Congress widely tied to the ballroom project.

The administration’s filings include declarations from the secretary of state, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, FBI director, and Secret Service director defending the project on national security grounds. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which challenged the construction as destructive to the building’s historic integrity, will have the opportunity to respond to the Supreme Court within the coming week. Trump devoted nearly 45,000 words across 84 public events to construction projects including this ballroom during the first seven months of 2026.

Senate Democrats requested the Government Accountability Office audit the project, citing the unusual scale, destruction of historic architecture, opaque funding mix of public and private sources, and absence of standard federal review processes. The Supreme Court is expected to decide whether to grant the emergency stay and potentially expedite oral arguments on the merits of presidential renovation authority versus congressional oversight.



(Source: https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-appeals-supreme-court-white-house-ballroom-construction/story?id=135642539)de whether to grant the emergency stay and potentially expedite oral arguments on the merits of presidential renovation authority versus congressional oversight.

NAS Removes Climate Chapter From Judges Manual After Trump Pressure

The National Academy of Sciences removed a climate science chapter from its Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence after pressure from President Donald Trump and Republican officials who falsely characterized the peer-reviewed work as “biased,” “fraudulent,” and “misleading.” The chapter, titled “Reference Guide on Climate Science,” had been included for the first time in the 2025 edition and covered the greenhouse effect, atmospheric cycling, attribution science, and peer-reviewed research to assist judges in reasoning through cases involving complex scientific topics.

Trump and dozens of state attorneys general attacked the chapter in early 2026, prompting the Federal Judicial Center to remove it in February. The NAS subsequently announced the chapter would remain offline pending an “independent review,” claiming questions about development processes warranted examination. This decision subordinates scientific evidence to political pressure, despite the chapter undergoing rigorous peer review from external scientists, judges, and National Academies staff according to the same standards applied to all manual sections.

Authors Jessica Wentz and Radley Horton, both from Columbia University, defended their work as science-based and properly vetted through extensive external review. Their chapter presented established climate science findings to serve the judiciary in complex litigation. The removal demonstrates how Trump’s federal attack on the National Academy of Sciences extends beyond investigation to direct suppression of scientific guidance that contradicts his interests and those of fossil fuel allies.

The action exemplifies Trump’s systematic assault on independent institutions and scientific authority. By weaponizing accusations of bias against peer-reviewed climate science, Trump manufactures pretexts for erasing inconvenient research from judicial reference materials, obstructing judges’ access to credible scientific evidence necessary for sound legal reasoning on environmental cases. The capitulation by the NAS and Federal Judicial Center signals institutional vulnerability to authoritarian pressure campaigns disguised as procedural reviews.



(Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/national-academy-of-sciences-pulls-climate-chapter-from-judges-manual/?fbclid=IwdGRjcATrIC1wZG9mBWZkaWQWUMZ6s8by4ageyWFLZJOlZd9RMlUyKmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4pJlcKCUmPfRwgQAFhKYQrqASw-byqdNMuOvzpsPkat-GNTLopRJPOkPaenw_aem_0rxQnwFSMEE7-5KTB6PYUw)

1 2 3 … 52