Category: Bullying

Donald Trump’s rhetorical style is straight out of middle school. He’s like an eighth-grade girl.

Trump Struggles with Economic Policy in Challenging Bloomberg Interview

In a recent interview with Bloomberg News, former President Donald Trump faced intense questioning regarding his economic policies, revealing a significant lack of understanding of basic economic principles. During the discussion, Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait challenged Trump on his plans involving widespread tariffs on imported goods, which have been criticized by economists for potentially raising costs for American consumers. Trump maintained that other countries would bear the brunt of these tariffs, demonstrating a disconnect from the realities of international trade.

As the conversation progressed, Trump became increasingly defensive, dismissing critiques from Micklethwait and attacking the credibility of the Wall Street Journal when confronted with estimates that his economic proposals could inflate the national debt by $7 trillion. Despite Micklethwait’s attempts to keep the discussion focused, Trump often veered off-topic, notably failing to provide coherent answers about how his policies would aid small businesses that rely on imports.

Trump’s frustrations were palpable as he deflected questions regarding the impact of his immigration policies on the labor market. Instead of addressing economic implications, he resorted to discussing crime rates among undocumented immigrants, making unfounded claims about the dangers they pose. Micklethwait attempted to redirect the conversation to economic outcomes, but Trump continued to emphasize crime, undermining the economic discourse.

In a particularly notable moment, when asked about how he would cut government spending, Trump pointed to the remodeling of Air Force One as an example, which did little to elucidate his fiscal strategy. This response further exemplified his inability to articulate a clear economic vision, relying instead on vague anecdotes and deflections.

The interview concluded with Trump attempting to justify his disjointed speaking style, referring to it as a ‘weave’ of thoughts. However, this approach did not resonate well, as many observers noted that it reflected a troubling lack of clarity and focus on pressing economic issues that will impact voters in the upcoming election.

(h/t: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-crumbles-pressed-economic-policy-bloomberg-interview-1235134459/)

Trump Advocates Violence Against Heckler at California Rally

Former President Donald Trump made controversial remarks during a rally in Coachella, California, suggesting that a heckler should receive violent treatment. In his speech, Trump referred to the upcoming election as an opportunity to deliver a message, and upon noticing the heckler, he said, “She gets the hell knocked out of her,” indicating a disturbing pattern of promoting violence against dissenters.

This incident is not isolated; Trump has a history of using aggressive language towards hecklers. In previous rallies, he has encouraged supporters to physically confront those who interrupt him, contributing to a culture of hostility at his events.

During the rally, Trump painted a grim picture of the United States, labeling it as an “occupied country” and continuously spreading misinformation about undocumented immigrants. He falsely asserted that the nation was overrun by criminal gangs, despite evidence showing that the majority of immigrants do not have criminal backgrounds.

Trump’s rhetoric included plans for a deportation initiative dubbed “Operation Aurora,” aimed at dismantling alleged criminal networks linked to undocumented immigrants. However, local officials disputed his claims about gangs taking over communities, highlighting the disconnect between Trump’s statements and factual reality.

The rally concluded a week filled with Trump’s controversial remarks, including disparaging comments about Vice President Kamala Harris and various Democratic figures. His speeches have increasingly focused on anti-immigrant sentiments while downplaying the complexities of crime statistics related to undocumented immigrants.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/12/trump-heckler-violence/)

Trump Attacks Kamala Harris and ‘The View’ Hosts in Misogynistic Tirade

Former President Donald Trump recently criticized Vice President Kamala Harris and the hosts of ABC’s ‘The View,’ labeling them with derogatory terms such as ‘dummy’ and ‘dumb women.’ His comments, made via Truth Social, included a rebuke of Harris’ assertion that she would not have acted differently than President Biden during his term, which he deemed her ‘dumbest answer so far.’ This tirade is particularly striking given Trump’s recent attempts to appeal to female voters, a demographic in which Harris currently enjoys stronger support.

Trump’s history of making disparaging remarks about women, especially those who oppose him, contradicts his claims of being a champion for women’s rights. Despite proclaiming his dedication to the well-being of women during campaign rallies, his aggressive rhetoric towards female critics reveals a pattern of misogyny that undermines his political narrative. This behavior is consistent with his past, where he has faced multiple allegations of sexual misconduct and has been found liable for sexual abuse in a civil court.

Whoopi Goldberg responded to Donald Trump’s derogatory remarks regarding her and her fellow co-hosts on ‘The View,’ which he labeled as ‘dumb’ and criticized Goldberg’s comedy as ‘filthy dirty.’ During a Pennsylvania rally, Trump expressed that he would never hire Goldberg again, despite having done so four times in the past. In a spirited comeback, Goldberg highlighted this contradiction, questioning Trump’s intelligence by stating, ‘Are you dumb? You hired me four times.’

Goldberg’s rebuttal came after she and her co-hosts staged a walkout on the show to Christina Aguilera’s song ‘Dirrty,’ a direct nod to Trump’s insults. She pointed out that Trump was aware of her comedic style before hiring her, reinforcing her stance on the matter. Goldberg’s comments aimed to remind viewers of Trump’s history of engaging with them, despite his current criticisms.

Co-host Sunny Hostin also chimed in, thanking Trump for his constant stream of material for their discussions, implying that his actions have inadvertently provided content for their show. Hostin remarked on the irony of Trump’s attention to ‘The View’ while significant issues, such as natural disasters, persist in the country.

Goldberg further criticized Trump for focusing on her and her co-hosts rather than addressing pressing national concerns, including the aftermath of Hurricane Milton in Florida. She emphasized that Trump’s irritation with the show’s hosts revealed his viewership, contradicting his claims of disinterest.

Goldberg’s response serves as a reminder of the ongoing tensions between Trump and various public figures, particularly those in the entertainment industry who challenge his narrative. This exchange also underscores the broader cultural conversations surrounding media, celebrity, and political discourse.

(h/t: https://variety.com/2024/tv/news/whoopi-goldberg-slams-donald-trump-the-view-hosts-dumb-1236174464/

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/shows/top-stories/blog/rcna174654)

Trump Makes Unfounded Accusations Against CBS’s ’60 Minutes’

Former President Donald Trump made unfounded allegations against CBS’s “60 Minutes” following an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. He claimed that the program manipulated the interview footage to portray Harris in a more favorable light, describing the editing as deceptive and possibly illegal. Trump’s statements were posted on his Truth Social platform, where he expressed outrage at what he termed a significant breach of journalistic integrity.

In his post, Trump asserted that the editing of Harris’s responses was so extensive that it rendered her answers incoherent. He claimed this editing effort was aimed at enhancing her public image, labeling it as a violation of campaign finance laws. Trump called for an immediate investigation into the matter and demanded a public apology from CBS, declaring the situation a stain on the network’s reputation.

However, Trump is lying as the complete interview with Harris can be viewed on YouTube, where she articulates her responses clearly without any noticeable edits. Trump’s accusations seem to lack substantial evidence, raising doubts about their credibility.

Additionally, it’s noteworthy that Trump had declined to participate in an interview with “60 Minutes” the previous week, reportedly out of concern that the program would fact-check his controversial statements, including misleading claims regarding Haitian immigrants.

These developments highlight Trump’s ongoing pattern of attacking media outlets and spreading misinformation, a strategy that has characterized his public discourse and political approach since his presidency.

 

Liz Cheney’s remarks at a Harris campaign event evidently struck a nerve with Trump

 

At a recent Kamala Harris campaign event, former Representative Liz Cheney delivered a powerful message urging voters to reject what she called the “depraved cruelty of Donald Trump.” This bold statement sent ripples through Republican circles, prompting a swift and vitriolic response from Trump himself on his social media platform, Truth Social. He not only attacked Cheney but also criticized her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has also endorsed Harris.

In his lengthy post, Trump condemned Liz Cheney for her participation in the January 6 House select committee and disparaged her father’s historical decisions regarding the Middle East. He referred to the Cheneys as a “pathetic couple” suffering from what he termed “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” This animosity isn’t new; it’s rooted in Cheney’s outspoken criticism of Trump and her pivotal vote to impeach him following the January 6 Capitol riots, which significantly contributed to her primary defeat in 2022.

Despite the backlash, Cheney remains a staunch critic of Trump, asserting that he is unfit to lead the country. During her speech, she stated, “What January 6 shows us is that there is not an ounce of compassion in Donald Trump. He is petty, he is vindictive and he is cruel.” Her remarks struck a nerve with Trump, highlighting the intensity of their ongoing feud.

Cheney’s endorsement of Harris aligns with a broader strategy to attract anti-Trump Republicans, demonstrating her commitment to opposing Trump’s influence in the Republican Party. She praised Harris for her efforts to unite reasonable individuals across the political spectrum, further solidifying her stance against Trumpism.

While Cheney’s decision to support Harris may seem surprising given their party differences, it reflects a growing trend among some Republicans who are increasingly disillusioned with Trump’s leadership. Harris is actively courting this demographic, despite facing criticism from within her party for these efforts.

However, the potential impact of GOP endorsements for Harris remains uncertain. The Cheney name carries significant historical baggage, particularly due to Dick Cheney’s controversial tenure in the Bush administration, leaving many Democrats wary of his endorsement. This dynamic illustrates the complex and often contentious landscape of American politics as the 2024 elections approach.

 

Trump Calls for Investigation of Pelosi Amid Stock Sale Controversy

 

Former President Donald Trump has urged attorneys general in Republican-controlled states to investigate Nancy Pelosi following a stock sale by her husband, Paul Pelosi. The request stems from a report that Paul Pelosi sold 2,000 shares of Visa just before the federal government announced an antitrust lawsuit against the credit company. Trump inaccurately claimed during a rally that the sale occurred the day before the lawsuit was made public, asserting a need for investigation.

Paul Pelosi sold the Visa shares on July 1 for approximately $500,000. However, there is no clarity on whether he profited from this transaction, as the details surrounding the sale remain ambiguous. The Justice Department’s lawsuit against Visa was made public shortly after the sale.

Trump’s call for investigation highlights a growing trend among his supporters and Republican leaders to scrutinize and challenge the actions of Democratic figures, often without substantial evidence. This demand for investigations appears to be part of a broader effort to politically undermine opponents, particularly as Trump seeks to galvanize his base ahead of the upcoming elections.

The former president’s comments reflect a pattern of behavior where he leverages misinformation to create political narratives that serve his interests, a tactic he has employed throughout his career. His rhetoric often relies on unfounded accusations, which can further polarize political discourse and incite his followers.

Critics argue that such demands for investigations are not only unfounded but also serve to distract from Trump’s own controversies and legal challenges. By shifting the focus onto Pelosi, Trump aims to divert attention from his record and ongoing issues within his political sphere, including previous investigations into his conduct during his presidency.

 

Trump’s False Claims About Immigrants Eating Pets Spark Controversy During Debate

During a recent presidential debate, Donald Trump propagated a baseless and racially charged rumor regarding Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, claiming they were consuming pets. This statement, made in front of an audience of 67.1 million viewers, has been criticized for reinforcing harmful stereotypes. The rumor originated from fringe online communities, particularly from a neo-Nazi group known as Blood Tribe, which initially circulated the idea of pets being eaten in August. Trump’s comments were seemingly amplified by his running mate, Senator JD Vance, who has made similar claims about the influx of immigrants in the area.

Trump’s assertion was not only unfounded but also drew immediate backlash from various quarters, including his own party members. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham expressed concern, emphasizing that the focus should be on serious issues related to immigration, such as crimes committed by undocumented individuals, rather than whimsical claims about animals. This reflects a broader trend where Trump has consistently highlighted immigration issues, often framing them in a controversial manner.

The spread of the rumor on social media has been significant, with a notable increase in posts discussing the issue leading up to the debate. Research indicated that mentions of Haitians allegedly eating pets surged dramatically on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) in the days prior to Trump’s comments. Vance himself contributed to this narrative, posting about the supposed dangers posed by Haitian immigrants, which helped transition the rumor from fringe discourse to a mainstream debate topic.

Despite the sensationalism surrounding the issue, local law enforcement in Springfield reported no credible evidence supporting claims of pets being harmed. In fact, the claims about pets being abducted and eaten have been dismissed by the Springfield police, highlighting a disconnect between the online narrative and reality. Vance later acknowledged that these rumors could be false, yet continued to leverage them politically.

The incident underscores how fringe conspiracy theories can permeate high-profile political discourse, especially through the lens of social media. Trump’s use of this rumor during a prime-time debate illustrates a tactic of drawing attention to specific grievances that resonate with his base, despite their lack of factual basis. This approach is indicative of a broader strategy to mobilize support by highlighting perceived threats associated with immigration.

The debate echoed a long-standing pattern in Trump’s political career, where he has utilized inflammatory rhetoric regarding immigration, often to stoke fear and division among his supporters. Critics argue that such tactics detract from substantive discussions about immigration policy and public safety, instead prioritizing sensationalism and fear-mongering.

As the fallout continues, political analysts and commentators are left to ponder the implications of Trump’s comments and the role of misinformation in shaping public perception. This incident serves as a reminder of the potent intersection between social media, political rhetoric, and the dissemination of false information, particularly concerning immigration.

Ultimately, the Springfield rumor illustrates the challenges faced in combating misinformation and the potential consequences it holds for public discourse and policy discussions.

 

Trump’s Authoritarian Threats of Jail Time for Election ‘Cheaters’ Expose Dangerous Intentions

In a recent rally in Mosinee, Wisconsin, former President Donald Trump threatened severe legal repercussions for those he claims would ‘cheat’ in the upcoming election, promising long prison sentences for any perceived electoral misconduct. This alarming declaration reflects Trump’s persistent narrative of widespread voter fraud, a baseless assertion he has clung to since losing the 2020 election. Despite numerous court rulings and bipartisan affirmations of the election’s legitimacy, Trump continues to fuel doubts about electoral integrity, creating an atmosphere of fear and intimidation ahead of the November elections.

Trump’s warnings extend to various groups, including lawyers, political operatives, and election officials, indicating a willingness to wield his presidential power as a means of retribution against opponents. This strategy suggests an authoritarian approach to governance, where dissent is not tolerated, and political enemies are threatened with prosecution. Such tactics are reminiscent of despotic regimes, where the legal system is weaponized to suppress opposition.

At the same rally, Trump reiterated his claims of being targeted by the Biden administration, alleging that the Department of Justice is conspiring to imprison him for exposing their corruption. However, these claims lack any substantiation, with independent investigations and court rulings consistently refuting his narrative of victimization. Trump’s refusal to accept the outcome of the 2020 election and his ongoing legal troubles only serve to highlight his desperate attempts to maintain influence and evade accountability.

In a bid to distract from his legal issues and the impending debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump has resorted to incendiary rhetoric and nostalgic appeals to his 2016 campaign themes, such as ‘draining the swamp.’ Despite having occupied the presidency for four years, he continues to portray himself as an outsider fighting against a corrupt political establishment, which is disingenuous at best.

As the election approaches, Trump’s threats of retribution raise significant concerns about the integrity of American democracy. His willingness to use the power of the presidency to pursue vendettas against perceived enemies undermines the rule of law and sets a dangerous precedent for future administrations. Harris campaign representatives have warned that a second Trump presidency would likely involve the politicization of the justice system, further eroding trust in democratic institutions.

(h/t: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/trump-threatens-long-prison-sentences-for-those-who-cheat-in-the-election-if-he-wins)

Alina Habba suggests Trump will give her government job to hit Democrats ‘deep and hard’

 

Alina Habba, a lawyer for Trump, suggested at a Turning Point Action conference that if Trump wins another term, he might give her a government position to target his enemies. She emphasized going after Democrats and being relentless in Washington. The remarks hint at Habba possibly being tasked with attacking Trump’s foes from within the government.

She insinuated that Trump’s opponents hide their actions by focusing on him, diverting attention from their own deeds. Habba asserted that after one year, the spotlight will turn on them, promising a thorough investigation. The video of her speech at the conference captures these implications.

 

Trump demands removal of Judge Merchan in meltdown before contempt hearing

 

Donald Trump went on an all-caps tirade demanding the removal of Judge Juan Merchan before a contempt hearing related to his attacks on Truth Social. Facing a criminal trial on 34 felony counts, Trump accused the trial of being a ‘witch hunt’ orchestrated by Democrats and presided over by a conflicted judge. Legal experts noted that Trump’s defiance of a gag order could lead to financial sanctions or even jail time. The former president’s actions were described as showing contempt for the court and the law.

Former President Trump indicated that he is willing to testify in his first criminal trial in Manhattan, which could be a win for the prosecution according to legal experts. Trump’s lawyers have fought against bringing up civil court losses, while prosecutors argue that such information is crucial to assessing Trump’s credibility. The trial is expected to last four to six weeks, with the verdict likely to be issued before the GOP selects its general election nominee.

 

1 2 3 4 … 162