Category: Attack the Press

Trump Attacks Kristen Welker Over Nasty Interview Claims About Biden

Donald Trump has publicly attacked NBC News anchor Kristen Welker, labeling her interview style as “nasty” while erroneously claiming she was accommodating towards Joe Biden during an interview that never took place. This tirade reflects Trump’s ongoing hostility toward the media, particularly outlets that hold him accountable for his actions and statements.

During his recent comments, Trump expressed disdain for Welker’s questioning techniques, suggesting that they were unfair and biased. He continues to foster a narrative that the mainstream media is out to get him, a tactic common among those who seek to undermine journalistic integrity and accountability.

Despite his criticism, Trump offered no evidence to support his claims about Welker’s purported kindness to Biden. This type of baseless accusation is emblematic of Trump’s frequent attempts to distort reality and distract from his own shortcomings. His remarks serve as a reminder of his disdain for any press that challenges him.

Trump’s fixation on attacking journalists has been evident throughout his presidency, as he consistently labels critical reporting as “fake news.” This behavior not only undermines public trust in the media but also poses a threat to democratic discourse by discouraging honest journalism.

As Trump continues to lash out at those who challenge his narrative, it becomes increasingly clear that his tactics are designed to confuse and mislead the public. His unfounded claims about Welker highlight a broader pattern of behavior aimed at delegitimizing the press and obscuring the truth.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-lashes-out-at-welker-for-nasty-interview-claims-she-was-nice-to-biden-in-interview-that-never-happened/)

Trump Nominates Project 2025 Author Brendan Carr To FCC

Brendan Carr, President-elect Donald Trump’s appointee to head the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), has openly threatened broadcast media with stricter regulations under the guise of enforcing their public interest obligations. Trump’s choice of Carr, a staunch advocate for conservative media policies, raises alarm bells about potential government overreach into the media landscape. Notably, Carr’s comments come against a backdrop of Trump’s persistent grievances regarding media coverage, particularly following a contentious 60 Minutes interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.

During an appearance on Fox News, Carr indicated that he would closely scrutinize media operations, claiming that legacy media must change due to a loss of public trust. He cited Jeff Bezos’s assertion that Americans consider news media to be the least trusted source, suggesting that this sentiment justifies a shift in FCC policies to hold broadcasters accountable for their content.

Moreover, Carr’s support for a controversial merger between Paramount and Skydance appears contingent on the outcome of an ongoing FCC complaint related to CBS’s coverage of the Harris interview. His remarks signal a willingness to intertwine regulatory actions with political grievances, a move that could further undermine the independence of the FCC and jeopardize journalistic integrity.

In Carr’s view, the FCC should reassess its role in regulating broadcasters, who are granted access to public airwaves in exchange for serving the public interest. His statement about enforcing these obligations raises concerns that the FCC may become a tool for furthering partisan agendas, rather than a neutral body ensuring fair media practices.

With Carr’s history connected to the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025, concerns mount regarding his commitment to unbiased media oversight. His comments align with Trump’s broader narrative of combating perceived censorship and promoting ‘free speech,’ which often translates into silencing dissenting voices under the guise of regulation. The implications of Carr’s leadership at the FCC could reshape the information landscape and pose risks to the foundational principles of a free press.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trumps-fcc-pick-threatens-broadcast-media-promises-to-enforce-their-public-interest-obligation/)

Trump Says OK If An Assassin Shoots Through The Press

During a recent rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made shocking remarks suggesting he would not mind if someone attempted to shoot through the media to reach him. This statement, made while he was critiquing the bulletproof glass shielding him, raises serious concerns about his attitude towards violence and the press.

Trump, who has a history of inflammatory rhetoric, referred to the media as “fake news” and “bloodsuckers” while gesturing towards the protective glass. His comments come in the wake of multiple assassination attempts against him, including a recent incident where a bullet grazed his ear and resulted in the death of an audience member.

The former president’s reckless comments not only trivialize the threats against his life but also serve to incite his supporters against the press. By implying that the media is a barrier to him, he dangerously promotes the idea that violence against journalists is acceptable.

Trump’s spokesperson attempted to clarify his remarks, claiming he was trying to protect the media. However, this belies the reality of Trump’s consistent pattern of hostility towards journalists who challenge him. His rhetoric has been known to embolden extremist behavior among his followers, leading to increased violence against the press.

This incident is a stark reminder of the toxic environment Trump has cultivated, where incitement and division take precedence over respect and dignity. As he continues his campaign for the presidency, the implications of his words and their potential effects on public safety and discourse cannot be overstated.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-lititz-pennsylvania-rally-shoot-through-media-bulletproof-glass/)

Trump’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Against CBS is a Frivolous Attack on Press Freedom

Former President Donald Trump has launched a ludicrous legal attack against CBS, claiming $10 billion in damages over the network’s ’60 Minutes’ interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. This frivolous lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Texas, is riddled with absurd accusations that CBS engaged in partisan election interference and misled the public during the presidential election process. Trump’s legal team alleges that the interview was unfairly edited to disadvantage him, a claim that has been categorically dismissed by CBS.

The suit has been met with widespread ridicule from First Amendment experts, who have condemned it as a dangerous overreach aimed at stifling press freedom. Prominent attorneys have asserted that Trump’s actions are not just meritless but also represent a blatant attempt to control how the media reports on political figures, undermining the fundamental protections of the First Amendment. Legal analysts emphasize that the media, not governmental entities or political candidates, should dictate the coverage of news events.

Trump’s lawsuit specifically demands CBS release the full, unedited transcript of the interview, further demonstrating his desperation to manipulate the narrative surrounding his political image. The rationale behind filing in Texas, particularly in a court presided over by a Trump appointee, raises suspicions of ‘judge shopping,’ a tactic often employed by litigants seeking favorable rulings.

CBS has firmly rejected Trump’s claims, asserting that the interview was accurately presented and that the lawsuit lacks any substantive basis. A representative for CBS stressed that their coverage was intended to inform viewers, not mislead them, directly countering Trump’s narrative of deceit. Furthermore, the legal action has drawn sharp criticism from experts who argue that such attempts to intimidate the media only serve to highlight Trump’s ongoing struggles with accountability and the truth.

During a rally in Nevada, Trump boasted about the lawsuit, showcasing his continued penchant for theatrics over substance. This legal maneuver is yet another indication of Trump’s relentless pursuit to reshape public perception while disregarding journalistic integrity. As the case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of protecting the freedom of the press against politically motivated litigation.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/media/trump-cbs-lawsuit-harris-60-minutes-interview/index.html)

Trump’s Baseless Election Lies Exposed in Joe Rogan Interview

In a recent interview with Joe Rogan, former President Donald Trump reiterated multiple falsehoods regarding the 2020 election, continuing his pattern of spreading misinformation. Trump insisted that he didn’t lose the election, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. According to numerous investigations, including those by his own attorney general, significant fraud was never found, and Trump lost to Joe Biden by a clear margin.

During the conversation, Trump claimed that judges avoided ruling on the merits of over 50 lawsuits he filed to contest the election results. However, a study revealed that most of these cases were dismissed after hearings, and many were dropped by Trump before even reaching substantive arguments. This misrepresentation of the legal outcomes is a clear attempt to distort the narrative surrounding his election defeat.

Trump also falsely suggested that the majority of voting machines are unreliable and that the U.S. should revert to using paper ballots. In reality, over 90% of election jurisdictions already utilized paper ballots in 2020, contradicting Trump’s assertions. The misconception that voting machines are the sole mechanism of fraud has no basis in fact.

Furthermore, Trump claimed that the COVID-19 pandemic was used as a cover to rig the election through increased mail-in voting. This is misleading, as both Republican and Democratic officials encouraged mail-in voting to protect public health during the pandemic. Trump’s narrative of a grand conspiracy lacks substance and is rooted in his ongoing attempt to delegitimize the electoral process.

Ultimately, the 2020 election was found to be secure, with isolated cases of fraud that were insufficient to affect the overall outcome. Trump’s repeated lies not only undermine public trust in the electoral process but also pose a significant threat to democracy. The facts clearly demonstrate that Trump’s claims are unfounded and serve only to perpetuate division and misinformation.

(h/t: https://apnews.com/article/trump-election-lies-rogan-interview-ballots-voting-c8c06eb608c1b1ae8ca0e93ec1022b02)

Trump’s Dangerous Request to Murdoch: Censor Negative Ads and Free Speech

Donald Trump recently declared his intention to ask Rupert Murdoch to intervene at Fox News, demanding that the network stop airing negative advertisements against him for 21 days leading up to the election. This request, made during his appearance on the Fox & Friends show, exemplifies Trump’s continued efforts to control the narrative surrounding his campaign. Trump, who claimed to be ‘the most stable human being’ during the segment, expressed his frustration over the perceived unfairness of negative ads from opponents, particularly those targeting him.

In his complaints, Trump noted that he has seen a surge of advertisements attacking him while his own campaign is underrepresented. He indicated that he believes this imbalance in advertising could harm his chances in the upcoming election. Trump’s plea to Murdoch to halt negative ads highlights a troubling trend of political figures seeking to censor dissenting views, a move that undermines the fundamental principles of free speech.

The irony of Trump’s request is striking, particularly considering the Republican Party’s long-standing narrative about protecting free speech. Their hypocrisy is evident when contrasting Trump’s demands with their previous claims regarding the censorship of conservative voices. For instance, the uproar over the purported suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story demonstrates how Republicans selectively champion free speech only when it aligns with their interests.

Trump’s desire to control what the media reports about him extends beyond Fox News. He has previously suggested shutting down networks like CBS, ABC, NPR, and CNN, all of which have been critical of his actions and statements. This alarming trend shows a blatant disregard for journalistic integrity and an authoritarian approach to governance, as he attempts to silence critics and control the flow of information.

As Trump continues to express his grievances regarding media coverage, it becomes increasingly clear that his agenda involves not just winning an election but also shaping the media landscape to serve his narrative. This manipulation of media and free speech raises significant concerns about the future of democratic discourse in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/donald-trump-rupert-murdoch-negative-fox-news-ads-1236035125/)

Trump Calls On FCC To Revoke CBS’ Broadcast License, From The Authoritarian Playbook

Donald Trump is calling on the FCC to revoke the license of CBS after 60 Minutes was found to have (dun dun dun) edited down one of Kamala Harris’ answers for time, something that happens quite regularly when Trump runs to his safe space Fox News.

The FCC obviously pushed back, but the people leading the FCC now pointing out Trump’s wishes obviously is anti-constitutional, will not be there once Donald Trump retakes power.

As I’ve said before, the First Amendment is a cornerstone of our democracy. The FCC does not and will not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because a political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage. – FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel

In the authoritarian playbook, clamping down on independent media will happen quick and we’ll never get it back. Recall when Hugo Chavez in Venezuela sent forces to take over independent private news agencies and brought them back online as propaganda outlets.

It wasn’t that long ago that the last independent news agency in Hungry was kicked off the air when Viktor Orban revoked all broadcast licenses of a free and open press, and now all Hungry has is pro-Orban propaganda outlets. Orban was recently a featured speaker at CPAC, the largest gathering of conservatives, on how to successfully import authoritarianism in a Western democracy.

So far Trump has previously threatened the broadcast licenses of ABC, NBC, PBS, NPR and simply for reporting on the things he says and does. And now Trump is threatening CBS because he ducked out of 60 Minutes like the pussybitch he is because they wouldn’t agree to not fact check him.

It will happen here. If not with Trump, then the next Republican because the authoritarian model has been fully adopted by the GOP.

Trump Makes Unfounded Accusations Against CBS’s ’60 Minutes’

Former President Donald Trump made unfounded allegations against CBS’s “60 Minutes” following an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. He claimed that the program manipulated the interview footage to portray Harris in a more favorable light, describing the editing as deceptive and possibly illegal. Trump’s statements were posted on his Truth Social platform, where he expressed outrage at what he termed a significant breach of journalistic integrity.

In his post, Trump asserted that the editing of Harris’s responses was so extensive that it rendered her answers incoherent. He claimed this editing effort was aimed at enhancing her public image, labeling it as a violation of campaign finance laws. Trump called for an immediate investigation into the matter and demanded a public apology from CBS, declaring the situation a stain on the network’s reputation.

However, Trump is lying as the complete interview with Harris can be viewed on YouTube, where she articulates her responses clearly without any noticeable edits. Trump’s accusations seem to lack substantial evidence, raising doubts about their credibility.

Additionally, it’s noteworthy that Trump had declined to participate in an interview with “60 Minutes” the previous week, reportedly out of concern that the program would fact-check his controversial statements, including misleading claims regarding Haitian immigrants.

These developments highlight Trump’s ongoing pattern of attacking media outlets and spreading misinformation, a strategy that has characterized his public discourse and political approach since his presidency.

 

Trump’s Tirade Against Media Triggers Concerns About Authoritarianism

Donald Trump’s latest social media diatribe directed at the media unleashed a wave of condemnation, raising a potent red flag about his authoritarian tendencies. In a late-night rant on Truth Social, Trump accused MSNBC of “election interference” through “constant attacks” on him and the Republican party, labeling its CEO a “slimeball” who needs to be punished by the “so-called government.” He ominously promised “much more to come,” leaving observers deeply troubled by the implications for press freedom and democratic values.

This outburst isn’t an isolated incident. Trump’s repeated attacks on the media, his labeling of journalists as “enemies of the people,” and his efforts to undermine institutions like the judiciary paint a disturbing picture of someone comfortable with suppressing dissent and consolidating power. His language echoes tactics used by authoritarian regimes, aiming to delegitimize criticism and sow fear amongst journalists and the public.

The chilling aspect of Trump’s threat lies in his explicit call for the government to “come down hard” on his critics. This statement goes beyond mere rhetorical bluster; it’s a direct attack on a cornerstone of democracy – a free and independent press. If acted upon, such measures could cripple the ability of journalists to hold power accountable and inform the public, paving the way for unchecked abuses and undermining the very checks and balances that safeguard democratic norms.

Trump’s authoritarian inclinations aren’t merely a matter of fiery rhetoric; they represent a tangible threat to the fabric of American democracy. These latest attacks serve as a stark reminder of the potential dangers posed by a leader who sees dissent as an enemy and prioritizes personal vendettas over the principles of a free and open society. Recognizing and resisting these encroachments upon our fundamental rights is crucial to protecting the future of American democracy.

Shannon Bream’s Steele Dossier Defense for Biden Allegations

Skip to main content Manage SubscriptionLogin! subscribe Politics TV Interviews Entertainment Sports Podcasts Opinion UK Mediaite+ Mediaite Manage SubscriptionLogin! subscribe Politics TV Interviews Entertainment Sports Podcasts Opinion UK Mediaite+ Appeals Court Upholds Gag Order on Trump – But Allows Him To Criticize Jack Smith GOP Mega-Donor Slams ‘Disgraceful’ Last Months of Trump’s Presidency While Endorsing Haley on Fox News ‘I Am A Really Bad Person’: Michigan School Shooter Addresses Court Before Sentencing Elon Musk Trying to Get Disney Chief Bob Iger Fired After DealBook Disaster White House Dumps Council on American-Islamic Relations from Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia Materials Fox’s Shannon Bream Cites Debunked Steele Dossier as Republican Defense for Using Unverified Allegations Against Biden Colby HallJul 21st, 2023, 9:08 am Twitter share button Heretofore, we shall call this the “Steele Dossier” defense against using unverified allegations to smear a political opponent, and while Fox News anchor Shannon Bream does not get credit for coming up with it, she did cite it during a Thursday hit on Special Report. At issue is an internal document recently released by Senator Chuck Grassley that had not been made public because the FBI could not verify the information included. The specific document is a FD-1023s, and contains allegations that Ukrainian energy company, Burisma, hired Hunter Biden as a means of protecting the company through his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden. The document contains descriptions of second-hand discussions of payments made to the Biden family. According to the FBI, all information in FD-1023s include “raw, unverified reporting from confidential human sources.” To wit: FD-1023s merely document that information; they do not reflect the conclusions of investigators based on a fuller context or understanding. Recording this information does not validate it, establish its credibility, or weigh it against other information known or developed by the FBI in our investigations. As former Attorney General Bill Barr stated, the Department of Justice investigated these claims and, ostensibly, could not find any merit to the allegations. Again, this was under the Trump administration. Cut to Thursday night, Fox News guest anchor Gillian Turner noted that Democrats are claiming that “Republicans have now had years, three years to investigate this. And at this point, they’ve not come up with a smoking gun.” Bream replied, “Republicans will say, well, let people read this and see what they think it is. And now we need to know whether this DOJ, which, by the way, has all of this percolating against the backdrop of, we think, former President Trump about to be indicted again and potentially on another round of federal charges, whether they’re treating all political families the same way.” She then introduced a clip of Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin saying: The Republicans on the Oversight Committee have been on a wild goose chase since we began. They’ve basically been trying to rehabilitate and revive the completely debunked and discredited charges that Rudy Giuliani began with several years ago about the Bidens being involved in corruption in Ukraine. And nothing has ever come of that. “So he continues to link this to Rudy Giuliani; Bill Barr says there was no link,” Bream followed. “There’s nothing in this document that mentions his name. But again, as he talks about unverified allegations, Republicans say what was the Steele Dossier?” There are clear parallels here – the Steele Dossier contained outlandish and unverified information and fueled speculation surrounding the Trump campaign’s coordination with Russian intel officers. Fox News has long used the media’s eager coverage of the unverified Steele Dossier as evidence of bias against Trump. And if the argument is that the unverified allegations against Biden are effectively the same thing, what does that say about our media’s ever shifting journalistic standards? Watch above via Fox News. Have a tip we should know? [email protected] Filed Under: Hunter BidenJoe BidenShannon BreamSteele dossier Previous PostNext Post Previous PostNext Post Colby Hall – Founding Editor Colby Hall is the Founding Editor of Mediaite.com. He is also a Peabody Award-winning television producer of non-fiction narrative programming as well as a terrific dancer and preparer of grilled meats. More Stories by Colby Hall Load Comments Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. Tips Have a tip or story idea? Email us. Or to keep it anonymous, click here. Most Popular ‘We Heard Him With Our Own Ears!’ CNN’s Dana Bash Stunned By Trump Rival’s Claim Cops Incited Jan. 6 Rioters ‘I Have No Evidence But—’ NBC’s Chuck Todd Floats Trump Collusion With Debate Attack Dog Ramaswamy ‘I Was Shaking Listening to Him’: Van Jones Says Vivek Ramaswamy’s Debate Remarks ‘One Step Away From Nazi Propaganda’ ‘Pathetic and Disgusting’: McGovern Slams Marjorie Taylor Greene, Says ‘It’s Really Rich to Get a Lecture on Civility’ From Her Hot Mic Catches Megyn Kelly’s Post-Debate Panel Mocking Ron DeSantis’s Expression: ‘Looked Like You Shot His Dog’ You may also like: ‘Very Important Point!’ CNN Says Hunter Biden Charges Not Connected To President Biden — Don’t Help Impeachment Tommy ChristopherDec 8th, 2023, 8:30 am JUST IN: CNN Airs ‘Disgusting’ Footage of Israeli Soldiers Holding Blindfolded Men Stripped to Underwear in Gaza Colby HallDec 8th, 2023, 7:52 am Jamaal Bowman Rips Mike Lawler For ‘Speaking Like an Expert’ on the Border, West Bank Despite Having Never Visited: ‘I’ve Been!’ Charlie NashDec 8th, 2023, 6:50 am ‘He Was Pissed Off’: Megyn Kelly Reveals What Chris Christie Complained About During Debate Commercial Break Charlie NashDec 7th, 2023, 10:02 pm Hunter Biden Hit With 9 New Federal Charges Charlie NashDec 7th, 2023, 8:50 pm Fox News Correspondent Jennifer Griffin Fact-Checks Tucker Carlson’s Wild Claim About Biden Administration: ‘100% Not True’ Charlie NashDec 7th, 2023, 8:14 pm © 2023 Mediaite, LLC About Us Advertise Privacy Accessibility User Agreement Ethics & Diversity Policy Contact

Fox News says it’s okay to investigate man-not-in-government Hunter Biden with completely unverified allegations and unreliable sources because of the Steele Dossier, and it’s okay to go tit-for-tat.

One problem, those two are not the same. All of the crazy Hunter Biden allegations that have *already* been looked at by Bill Barr’s DOJ and found to be bunk, Lev Parnas who Rudy Giuliani tasked to lead the Hunter Biden investigation in Ukraine testified this was all bunk, and when the Steele Dossier was leaked it was not yet investigated but still raw intelligence, some of which turned out to be true.

[https://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-shannon-bream-cites-debunked-steele-dossier-as-republican-defense-for-using-unverified-allegations-against-biden/]

1 2 3 4 5 … 66