Category: Attack the Press

Trump’s Vicious Lawsuit Strategy Targets Media Outlets to Silence Criticism

Donald Trump, emboldened by a recent $15 million settlement from ABC News for a defamation lawsuit, is now targeting the Des Moines Register, promising to sue over a poll he claims misrepresented his electoral strength in Iowa. Trump, who has a long history of litigating against media outlets, accused the Register of election interference, despite the outlet’s spokesperson defending the accuracy of their poll results and asserting that a lawsuit would lack merit.

Trump’s strategy of filing lawsuits against news organizations is not just an attempt to silence criticism; it serves as a broader campaign to paint the press as the enemy of the people. By threatening litigation against reputable sources, Trump seeks to intimidate journalists and undermine the credibility of factual reporting, a tactic reminiscent of authoritarian regimes.

Experts highlight that Trump’s lawsuits often contain exorbitant claims, such as a $5 billion demand against journalist Timothy O’Brien, which was dismissed. This pattern of vexatious litigation not only burdens the media but also sends a chilling message to local news organizations, potentially deterring them from critical reporting.

In addition to the Des Moines Register, Trump has ongoing lawsuits against various outlets, including CBS News and Simon & Schuster, showcasing his relentless efforts to retaliate against any unfavorable coverage. These lawsuits are frequently characterized by their lack of legal foundation, yet they serve to amplify Trump’s narrative of media bias while creating a hostile environment for journalistic integrity.

The implications of Trump’s actions extend beyond individual lawsuits; they contribute to a growing culture of fear among journalists, reminiscent of tactics used by autocrats to suppress dissent. As Trump continues to leverage the legal system to further his agenda, it becomes increasingly vital for the public to recognize these threats to democracy and the free press.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-threatens-lawsuit-des-moines-register-poll-media/)

Trump’s Dangerous Pick of Kari Lake for VOA Leadership

Donald Trump has appointed Kari Lake to lead the Voice of America (VOA), raising serious concerns about the implications of this choice. Lake, a staunch supporter of Trump’s disinformation tactics, has a history of spreading false claims regarding the 2020 election and promoting a divisive agenda. This appointment signals a troubling trend where the integrity of public media is compromised to align with Trump’s authoritarian vision.

Lake’s selection is seen as a blatant move to exert control over a vital source of news and information, undermining the VOA’s mission to provide accurate reporting. Critics have pointed out that her leadership may further erode journalistic standards, transforming the VOA into a propaganda tool that serves Trump’s interests rather than the public.

The decision to place a known purveyor of falsehoods in such a powerful position illustrates the ongoing pattern of corruption within Trump’s administration. This is not merely a matter of poor judgment; it reflects a systematic effort to manipulate media narratives and silence dissenting voices. By appointing Lake, Trump is effectively dismantling the foundations of independent journalism.

Furthermore, this move raises alarm bells about the future of democracy in the United States. It highlights the Republican Party’s continued embrace of authoritarianism, where loyalty to Trump supersedes ethical governance. The implications of this appointment extend beyond media; it poses a direct threat to the integrity of democratic institutions that rely on free and fair reporting.

In conclusion, Trump’s choice of Kari Lake to lead the VOA marks a dark turn in American politics, as it consolidates power in the hands of those who prioritize deceit over truth. This is yet another chapter in the Republican agenda to dismantle democratic norms, leaving citizens vulnerable to misinformation and manipulation.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-picks-kari-lake-to-lead-voa/)

Trump Attacks Kristen Welker Over Nasty Interview Claims About Biden

Donald Trump has publicly attacked NBC News anchor Kristen Welker, labeling her interview style as “nasty” while erroneously claiming she was accommodating towards Joe Biden during an interview that never took place. This tirade reflects Trump’s ongoing hostility toward the media, particularly outlets that hold him accountable for his actions and statements.

During his recent comments, Trump expressed disdain for Welker’s questioning techniques, suggesting that they were unfair and biased. He continues to foster a narrative that the mainstream media is out to get him, a tactic common among those who seek to undermine journalistic integrity and accountability.

Despite his criticism, Trump offered no evidence to support his claims about Welker’s purported kindness to Biden. This type of baseless accusation is emblematic of Trump’s frequent attempts to distort reality and distract from his own shortcomings. His remarks serve as a reminder of his disdain for any press that challenges him.

Trump’s fixation on attacking journalists has been evident throughout his presidency, as he consistently labels critical reporting as “fake news.” This behavior not only undermines public trust in the media but also poses a threat to democratic discourse by discouraging honest journalism.

As Trump continues to lash out at those who challenge his narrative, it becomes increasingly clear that his tactics are designed to confuse and mislead the public. His unfounded claims about Welker highlight a broader pattern of behavior aimed at delegitimizing the press and obscuring the truth.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-lashes-out-at-welker-for-nasty-interview-claims-she-was-nice-to-biden-in-interview-that-never-happened/)

Trump Nominates Project 2025 Author Brendan Carr To FCC

Brendan Carr, President-elect Donald Trump’s appointee to head the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), has openly threatened broadcast media with stricter regulations under the guise of enforcing their public interest obligations. Trump’s choice of Carr, a staunch advocate for conservative media policies, raises alarm bells about potential government overreach into the media landscape. Notably, Carr’s comments come against a backdrop of Trump’s persistent grievances regarding media coverage, particularly following a contentious 60 Minutes interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.

During an appearance on Fox News, Carr indicated that he would closely scrutinize media operations, claiming that legacy media must change due to a loss of public trust. He cited Jeff Bezos’s assertion that Americans consider news media to be the least trusted source, suggesting that this sentiment justifies a shift in FCC policies to hold broadcasters accountable for their content.

Moreover, Carr’s support for a controversial merger between Paramount and Skydance appears contingent on the outcome of an ongoing FCC complaint related to CBS’s coverage of the Harris interview. His remarks signal a willingness to intertwine regulatory actions with political grievances, a move that could further undermine the independence of the FCC and jeopardize journalistic integrity.

In Carr’s view, the FCC should reassess its role in regulating broadcasters, who are granted access to public airwaves in exchange for serving the public interest. His statement about enforcing these obligations raises concerns that the FCC may become a tool for furthering partisan agendas, rather than a neutral body ensuring fair media practices.

With Carr’s history connected to the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025, concerns mount regarding his commitment to unbiased media oversight. His comments align with Trump’s broader narrative of combating perceived censorship and promoting ‘free speech,’ which often translates into silencing dissenting voices under the guise of regulation. The implications of Carr’s leadership at the FCC could reshape the information landscape and pose risks to the foundational principles of a free press.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trumps-fcc-pick-threatens-broadcast-media-promises-to-enforce-their-public-interest-obligation/)

Trump Says OK If An Assassin Shoots Through The Press

During a recent rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made shocking remarks suggesting he would not mind if someone attempted to shoot through the media to reach him. This statement, made while he was critiquing the bulletproof glass shielding him, raises serious concerns about his attitude towards violence and the press.

Trump, who has a history of inflammatory rhetoric, referred to the media as “fake news” and “bloodsuckers” while gesturing towards the protective glass. His comments come in the wake of multiple assassination attempts against him, including a recent incident where a bullet grazed his ear and resulted in the death of an audience member.

The former president’s reckless comments not only trivialize the threats against his life but also serve to incite his supporters against the press. By implying that the media is a barrier to him, he dangerously promotes the idea that violence against journalists is acceptable.

Trump’s spokesperson attempted to clarify his remarks, claiming he was trying to protect the media. However, this belies the reality of Trump’s consistent pattern of hostility towards journalists who challenge him. His rhetoric has been known to embolden extremist behavior among his followers, leading to increased violence against the press.

This incident is a stark reminder of the toxic environment Trump has cultivated, where incitement and division take precedence over respect and dignity. As he continues his campaign for the presidency, the implications of his words and their potential effects on public safety and discourse cannot be overstated.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-lititz-pennsylvania-rally-shoot-through-media-bulletproof-glass/)

Trump’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Against CBS is a Frivolous Attack on Press Freedom

Former President Donald Trump has launched a ludicrous legal attack against CBS, claiming $10 billion in damages over the network’s ’60 Minutes’ interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. This frivolous lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Texas, is riddled with absurd accusations that CBS engaged in partisan election interference and misled the public during the presidential election process. Trump’s legal team alleges that the interview was unfairly edited to disadvantage him, a claim that has been categorically dismissed by CBS.

The suit has been met with widespread ridicule from First Amendment experts, who have condemned it as a dangerous overreach aimed at stifling press freedom. Prominent attorneys have asserted that Trump’s actions are not just meritless but also represent a blatant attempt to control how the media reports on political figures, undermining the fundamental protections of the First Amendment. Legal analysts emphasize that the media, not governmental entities or political candidates, should dictate the coverage of news events.

Trump’s lawsuit specifically demands CBS release the full, unedited transcript of the interview, further demonstrating his desperation to manipulate the narrative surrounding his political image. The rationale behind filing in Texas, particularly in a court presided over by a Trump appointee, raises suspicions of ‘judge shopping,’ a tactic often employed by litigants seeking favorable rulings.

CBS has firmly rejected Trump’s claims, asserting that the interview was accurately presented and that the lawsuit lacks any substantive basis. A representative for CBS stressed that their coverage was intended to inform viewers, not mislead them, directly countering Trump’s narrative of deceit. Furthermore, the legal action has drawn sharp criticism from experts who argue that such attempts to intimidate the media only serve to highlight Trump’s ongoing struggles with accountability and the truth.

During a rally in Nevada, Trump boasted about the lawsuit, showcasing his continued penchant for theatrics over substance. This legal maneuver is yet another indication of Trump’s relentless pursuit to reshape public perception while disregarding journalistic integrity. As the case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of protecting the freedom of the press against politically motivated litigation.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/media/trump-cbs-lawsuit-harris-60-minutes-interview/index.html)

Trump’s Baseless Election Lies Exposed in Joe Rogan Interview

In a recent interview with Joe Rogan, former President Donald Trump reiterated multiple falsehoods regarding the 2020 election, continuing his pattern of spreading misinformation. Trump insisted that he didn’t lose the election, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. According to numerous investigations, including those by his own attorney general, significant fraud was never found, and Trump lost to Joe Biden by a clear margin.

During the conversation, Trump claimed that judges avoided ruling on the merits of over 50 lawsuits he filed to contest the election results. However, a study revealed that most of these cases were dismissed after hearings, and many were dropped by Trump before even reaching substantive arguments. This misrepresentation of the legal outcomes is a clear attempt to distort the narrative surrounding his election defeat.

Trump also falsely suggested that the majority of voting machines are unreliable and that the U.S. should revert to using paper ballots. In reality, over 90% of election jurisdictions already utilized paper ballots in 2020, contradicting Trump’s assertions. The misconception that voting machines are the sole mechanism of fraud has no basis in fact.

Furthermore, Trump claimed that the COVID-19 pandemic was used as a cover to rig the election through increased mail-in voting. This is misleading, as both Republican and Democratic officials encouraged mail-in voting to protect public health during the pandemic. Trump’s narrative of a grand conspiracy lacks substance and is rooted in his ongoing attempt to delegitimize the electoral process.

Ultimately, the 2020 election was found to be secure, with isolated cases of fraud that were insufficient to affect the overall outcome. Trump’s repeated lies not only undermine public trust in the electoral process but also pose a significant threat to democracy. The facts clearly demonstrate that Trump’s claims are unfounded and serve only to perpetuate division and misinformation.

(h/t: https://apnews.com/article/trump-election-lies-rogan-interview-ballots-voting-c8c06eb608c1b1ae8ca0e93ec1022b02)

Trump’s Dangerous Request to Murdoch: Censor Negative Ads and Free Speech

Donald Trump recently declared his intention to ask Rupert Murdoch to intervene at Fox News, demanding that the network stop airing negative advertisements against him for 21 days leading up to the election. This request, made during his appearance on the Fox & Friends show, exemplifies Trump’s continued efforts to control the narrative surrounding his campaign. Trump, who claimed to be ‘the most stable human being’ during the segment, expressed his frustration over the perceived unfairness of negative ads from opponents, particularly those targeting him.

In his complaints, Trump noted that he has seen a surge of advertisements attacking him while his own campaign is underrepresented. He indicated that he believes this imbalance in advertising could harm his chances in the upcoming election. Trump’s plea to Murdoch to halt negative ads highlights a troubling trend of political figures seeking to censor dissenting views, a move that undermines the fundamental principles of free speech.

The irony of Trump’s request is striking, particularly considering the Republican Party’s long-standing narrative about protecting free speech. Their hypocrisy is evident when contrasting Trump’s demands with their previous claims regarding the censorship of conservative voices. For instance, the uproar over the purported suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story demonstrates how Republicans selectively champion free speech only when it aligns with their interests.

Trump’s desire to control what the media reports about him extends beyond Fox News. He has previously suggested shutting down networks like CBS, ABC, NPR, and CNN, all of which have been critical of his actions and statements. This alarming trend shows a blatant disregard for journalistic integrity and an authoritarian approach to governance, as he attempts to silence critics and control the flow of information.

As Trump continues to express his grievances regarding media coverage, it becomes increasingly clear that his agenda involves not just winning an election but also shaping the media landscape to serve his narrative. This manipulation of media and free speech raises significant concerns about the future of democratic discourse in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/donald-trump-rupert-murdoch-negative-fox-news-ads-1236035125/)

Trump Calls On FCC To Revoke CBS’ Broadcast License, From The Authoritarian Playbook

Donald Trump is calling on the FCC to revoke the license of CBS after 60 Minutes was found to have (dun dun dun) edited down one of Kamala Harris’ answers for time, something that happens quite regularly when Trump runs to his safe space Fox News.

The FCC obviously pushed back, but the people leading the FCC now pointing out Trump’s wishes obviously is anti-constitutional, will not be there once Donald Trump retakes power.

As I’ve said before, the First Amendment is a cornerstone of our democracy. The FCC does not and will not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because a political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage. – FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel

In the authoritarian playbook, clamping down on independent media will happen quick and we’ll never get it back. Recall when Hugo Chavez in Venezuela sent forces to take over independent private news agencies and brought them back online as propaganda outlets.

It wasn’t that long ago that the last independent news agency in Hungry was kicked off the air when Viktor Orban revoked all broadcast licenses of a free and open press, and now all Hungry has is pro-Orban propaganda outlets. Orban was recently a featured speaker at CPAC, the largest gathering of conservatives, on how to successfully import authoritarianism in a Western democracy.

So far Trump has previously threatened the broadcast licenses of ABC, NBC, PBS, NPR and simply for reporting on the things he says and does. And now Trump is threatening CBS because he ducked out of 60 Minutes like the pussybitch he is because they wouldn’t agree to not fact check him.

It will happen here. If not with Trump, then the next Republican because the authoritarian model has been fully adopted by the GOP.

Trump Makes Unfounded Accusations Against CBS’s ’60 Minutes’

Former President Donald Trump made unfounded allegations against CBS’s “60 Minutes” following an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. He claimed that the program manipulated the interview footage to portray Harris in a more favorable light, describing the editing as deceptive and possibly illegal. Trump’s statements were posted on his Truth Social platform, where he expressed outrage at what he termed a significant breach of journalistic integrity.

In his post, Trump asserted that the editing of Harris’s responses was so extensive that it rendered her answers incoherent. He claimed this editing effort was aimed at enhancing her public image, labeling it as a violation of campaign finance laws. Trump called for an immediate investigation into the matter and demanded a public apology from CBS, declaring the situation a stain on the network’s reputation.

However, Trump is lying as the complete interview with Harris can be viewed on YouTube, where she articulates her responses clearly without any noticeable edits. Trump’s accusations seem to lack substantial evidence, raising doubts about their credibility.

Additionally, it’s noteworthy that Trump had declined to participate in an interview with “60 Minutes” the previous week, reportedly out of concern that the program would fact-check his controversial statements, including misleading claims regarding Haitian immigrants.

These developments highlight Trump’s ongoing pattern of attacking media outlets and spreading misinformation, a strategy that has characterized his public discourse and political approach since his presidency.

 

1 2 3 … 64