Category: Attack the Legislative

Trump Demands Jeffries Expulsion Over Supreme Court Criticism

Donald Trump, the current President of the United States, demanded House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries be removed from Congress after Jeffries criticized the Supreme Court’s decision voiding Louisiana’s second majority Black congressional district as “illegitimate.” Trump posted on Truth Social that Jeffries, whom he called “a Low IQ individual,” should face impeachment, falsely claiming representatives can be impeached when the Constitution permits only expulsion by two-thirds vote of the House.

Jeffries attacked the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling, which eliminated the district that Chief Justice John Roberts characterized as a “snake” created along racial lines and Justice Samuel Alito deemed an “unconstitutional gerrymander.” Jeffries stated the decision helps Trump “scheme to suppress the vote and rig” midterm elections and called it “the Trump Court” rather than the Roberts Court. Trump celebrated the ruling on Wednesday, calling it the “kind of ruling I like,” directly contradicting his subsequent demand to punish Jeffries for questioning it.

Trump’s attack on Jeffries deploys racist language consistent with his documented pattern targeting African Americans with dehumanizing terms. A Truthout examination found that 8 in 10 posts by Trump calling someone “Low IQ” target a person of color, with communications experts identifying the term as “a racist dog whistle with a long history in the US.” Trump frequently uses such terms against Black political figures including Congresswoman Maxine Waters and TV host Don Lemon, focusing narrowly on intelligence while varying insults for others.

This assault on Jeffries violates the implicit agreement to moderate political discourse that followed a shooting incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Trump’s demand to expel a Democratic lawmaker for legitimate criticism of the judiciary demonstrates authoritarian abuse of power and his refusal to acknowledge the connection between his own inflammatory rhetoric and the climate of hostility endangering political figures.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-calls-for-hakeem-jeffries-to-be-impeached-for-bashing-illegitimate-supreme-court-why-not/)

Trump Demands GOP ‘TERMINATE’ Filibuster to Combat Democrats

Trump demanded Republicans eliminate the Senate filibuster to prevent Democrats from investigating election integrity, according to a Truth Social post on Saturday. Trump accused Democrats of hiring “sleazebags” like former Attorney General Eric Holder to probe voter integrity, framing the task force as part of a conspiracy to rig the 2026 midterms and 2028 election. Trump falsely claimed Democrats “rigged” the 2020 election he lost to President Joe Biden and called Democratic efforts to investigate election security “treasonous” and a “War” against the United States.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced a new task force days earlier to protect the 2026 midterms from what he described as threats posed by Trump and his supporters. Schumer stated Trump has “stacked his administration with election deniers” and accused Trump of using the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship to vote, to disenfranchise millions of Americans. Holder is participating as an expert advisor to the group of senators.

Trump has repeatedly demanded filibuster elimination since returning to office in 2025, claiming it “hurts” Republicans. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) joined Trump’s demand last week, telling Fox News it is imperative to eliminate the filibuster during what he called a “moment of national danger,” following an assassination attempt on Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Some Republican lawmakers have signaled they support eliminating the procedural rule.

Trump’s demand to terminate the filibuster reflects his broader push to consolidate power and remove institutional checks on his authority, consistent with prior threats against Republicans resisting filibuster elimination. The SAVE Act, which Trump championed, has stalled in the Senate where Democrats oppose it, making filibuster elimination central to Trump’s legislative agenda.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-demands-gop-terminate-the-filibuster-with-dems-hiring-sleazebags-to-probe-voter-integrity-get-tough-republicans-theyre-coming/)

Trump Calls Dissent on Iran War ‘Treasonous’ at Florida Rally

Trump declared it “treasonous” to state the United States is not winning its war against Iran while addressing supporters at The Villages in Florida, the world’s largest retirement community. The president made this statement despite previously telling Congress the Iran war had already concluded, contradicting his own earlier threat against Tehran.

Trump visited The Villages ostensibly to promote his 2024 campaign promise of removing taxes on Social Security benefits. His rhetorical attack on anyone questioning U.S. military success reflects his demand for absolute loyalty regarding his foreign military operations, consistent with his violation of the War Powers Resolution by refusing congressional authorization for military action against Iran.

Trump’s description of dissent as “treasonous” criminalizes legitimate political speech and debate over military strategy. This authoritarian framing seeks to silence opposition to his wars and establishes a precedent that questioning presidential military decisions constitutes disloyalty punishable as treason.

The president’s contradictory claims about the war’s status, combined with his use of private envoys like Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner for diplomatic negotiations, underscore his pattern of conducting foreign policy through personal representatives rather than institutional channels. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has simultaneously attacked NATO allies refusing to support the Iran campaign, demonstrating Trump’s weaponization of military and diplomatic apparatus to enforce ideological conformity.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/trump-iran-war-treason-new-proposal-video-b2969326.html)

Trump Violates War Powers Resolution, Attacks Congress

President Donald Trump violated the War Powers Resolution by refusing to seek congressional authorization for his military operations against Iran, which exceeded the mandatory 60-day deadline on May 1st, 2026. The 1973 resolution explicitly requires presidential termination of military deployments after 60 days unless Congress authorizes continued action, a requirement Trump dismissed as “totally unconstitutional” despite the law’s plain language and decades of precedent.

Trump falsely claimed that no president has sought congressional approval for military operations and that other countries do not follow such procedures, contradicting historical fact and his own responsibility under U.S. law. He attacked critics demanding compliance with the War Powers Resolution as “unpatriotic” and “losers,” characterizing lawful constitutional oversight as illegitimate while deploying private envoys to negotiate ceasefire terms, suggesting he recognized the conflict’s instability.

Trump invoked an unsubstantiated ceasefire claim to justify extending his authority beyond the statutory deadline, a maneuver that contradicts the resolution’s explicit 30-day extension provision, which requires him to seek congressional authorization regardless. The Senate rejected multiple Democratic attempts to advance legislation requiring Trump to comply with the War Powers Resolution, leaving the executive unchecked in his abuse of power and enabling continued military operations without constitutional authorization.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth characterized the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign as a “gift to the world,” reinforcing Trump’s militaristic posture while the Pentagon circulated proposals to punish NATO members who refused to support the Iran war, exposing the authoritarian nature of Trump’s demand for absolute loyalty from allied governments.

Trump’s refusal to comply with the War Powers Resolution demonstrates his systematic dismantling of constitutional checks on executive power, replacing legislative oversight with unilateral military authority justified by baseless claims and attacks on those demanding lawful governance.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-wildly-claims-seeking-congressional-approval-for-iran-war-is-totally-unconstitutional-these-are-not-patriotic-people-that-are-asking/)

Trump Purges Indiana Republicans Opposing His Gerrymandering

President Donald Trump launched a coordinated campaign on Truth Social endorsing six candidates while attacking six Indiana State Senate members who voted against his redistricting plan in December 2025. Trump used dehumanizing language, labeling the opposing Republicans as “RINO” (Republican in Name Only) politicians and claiming their refusal to gerrymander endangered Republican control of the House ahead of the 2026 midterms. The president explicitly tied the purge to his gerrymandering agenda, stating that Indiana could have “easily picked up two seats” had redistricting passed.

Trump targeted State Senator Travis Holdman, Jim Buck, Spencer Deery, Greg Goode, Greg Walker, and Eric Bassler with hostile posts, using epithets such as “pathetic,” “ineffective,” “LOSER,” and “pawn.” He endorsed Blake Fiechter, Tracey Powell, Paula Copenhaver, Brenda Wilson, Michelle Davis, and Jeff Ellington as replacements, branding them as “America First Patriot” and “REAL Republican” candidates loyal to his political agenda. This abuse of power demonstrates Trump’s weaponization of the presidency to eliminate Republican legislators who refuse to abuse the redistricting process for partisan gain.

The Indiana State Senate voted 31-19 against Trump’s redistricting proposal in December, prompting his threat of a “MAGA primary” to purge dissident Republicans. Trump previously threatened primary challenges against Indiana Republicans who rejected his gerrymandering demand, and his latest endorsement blitz executes that threat by channeling his presidential platform directly into state-level electoral interference. Indiana Governor Mike Braun subsequently aligned with Trump’s gerrymandering push, illustrating the authoritarian consolidation of party loyalty around Trump’s demands.

Trump’s coordinated posting spree violates foundational democratic norms by using the presidency to punish legislators for voting independently on redistricting matters. His language dehumanizes Republican opponents and frames partisan gerrymandering as a patriotic duty, conflating electoral manipulation with loyalty to him personally rather than to constitutional governance. The Supreme Court rejected the Independent State Legislature theory that Trump promoted to justify similar gerrymandering schemes, yet Trump continues leveraging executive authority to coerce state-level compliance with his redistricting agenda regardless of legal and ethical constraints.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-pushes-rino-purge-with-endorsement-spree-against-republicans-who-opposed-his-redistricting-plan/)

Trump Yanks Hurd Endorsement Over Tariff Opposition

President Donald Trump withdrew his endorsement of Representative Jim Hurd (R-CO) on Saturday via Truth Social, citing the congressman’s opposition to Trump’s tariff policies. Hurd voted for H.J.Res.72, which seeks to terminate Trump’s 25% tariff on Canadian goods, an action Trump characterized as betrayal of the country.

Trump claimed this was only the second time he has yanked an endorsement, the first being ex-Representative Mo Brooks (R-AL) in 2022 after Brooks questioned Trump’s false claims about the 2020 election. In his Saturday post, Trump stated Hurd “let me and our Country down” by prioritizing foreign interests over American ones, describing the congressman as more loyal to countries “ripping us off for decades” than to the United States.

Trump immediately endorsed Hope Scheppelman, a Navy veteran and nurse, as Hurd’s replacement in Colorado’s 3rd District. Trump praised Scheppelman as someone who “will never let you down,” contrasting her with what he called a “RINO” (Republican in Name Only) in Hurd. This endorsement shift demonstrates Trump’s willingness to weaponize party support to enforce loyalty to his tariff agenda.

The withdrawal follows Trump’s earlier threats against six Republican members of Congress who opposed his tariff policies, with Trump declaring they would “seriously suffer the consequences come Election time.” The move underscores Trump’s pattern of using primary challenges and endorsement reversals to punish Republicans who defy his economic agenda, effectively demanding absolute loyalty over independent legislative judgment.

Trump’s action came one day after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that his tariff authority exceeded his statutory power under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Trump attacked the justices who ruled against him as “unpatriotic and disloyal,” demonstrating his broader campaign to punish any institution or individual who challenges his authority.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-yanks-endorsement-for-republican-lawmaker-for-second-time-ever-over-lack-of-support-for-tariffs/)

Trump Threatens GOP Tariff Dissenters With Primary Challenges

President Donald Trump threatened Republican members of Congress with primary challenges and electoral defeat if they vote against his tariff policies, declaring they will “seriously suffer the consequences come Election time.” Trump made the threat on Truth Social after six GOP representatives—Don Bacon of Nebraska, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Jeff Hurd of Colorado, Kevin Kiley of California, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, and Dan Newhouse of Washington—joined Democrats in voting to block his emergency tariffs on Canada.

Trump justified the tariffs by citing stock market gains and claimed they reduced the trade deficit by 78 percent, asserting that tariffs provide both economic and national security benefits. He stated that “no Republican should be responsible for destroying this privilege” and framed opposition as disloyalty to the party and the administration’s economic agenda.

Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, countered that the vote was straightforward: “stand with working families and lower costs, or keep prices high out of loyalty to Donald Trump.” Rep. Don Bacon defended his vote by writing that tariffs function as a tax on American consumers and that congressional debate should precede major trade policy decisions.

The nonpartisan Tax Foundation estimated that Trump’s tariffs imposed an average tax increase of $1,000 per U.S. household in 2025 and warned costs could rise further if the policy continues. The tariffs have strained relations with major trading partners including Canada, Mexico, China, India, Brazil, and the European Union, triggering Canadian retaliatory boycotts of American goods.

Trump’s threat represents his pattern of weaponizing federal authority against officials and lawmakers who resist his demands, extending party discipline through electoral intimidation rather than policy persuasion.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-republicans-tariffs-threat-canada-b2918970.html)

DOJ Fails to Indict Six Democrats Over Military Video

The Trump administration’s Department of Justice attempted and failed to indict six Democratic lawmakers who appeared in a November video urging military and intelligence personnel to refuse unlawful orders. The federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., rejected the prosecution’s case on Tuesday, with prosecutors unable to convince even a single juror that probable cause existed for charges, according to sources familiar with the investigation. The video featured Representatives Jason Crow of Colorado, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, and Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan—all with military or intelligence backgrounds—explaining that service members can refuse orders that are manifestly illegal under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The prosecution, led by Trump appointee Jeanine Pirro at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, employed political appointees rather than career prosecutors, according to one source. Trump had publicly accused the lawmakers of “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH” on his Truth Social platform following the video’s release. Legal experts widely rejected the prosecution’s theory, citing both First Amendment protections for political speech and the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause, which grants lawmakers immunity from prosecution for legislative acts.

The failed indictment reflects a broader pattern of weaponizing the Justice Department against Trump’s perceived political opponents. The administration previously dismantled the Public Integrity Section, eliminating standard oversight requirements that normally govern investigations of sitting members of Congress, especially those involving free speech considerations. The Justice Department has also failed to secure indictments against New York Attorney General Letitia James before separate grand juries in Norfolk and Alexandria, and Pirro’s office has struggled to obtain convictions even in cases involving alleged assaults on federal officers.

Senator Kelly stated that the prosecution attempt followed administrative retaliation by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who issued a formal censure and sought to reduce Kelly’s retirement rank to punish his participation in the video. Slotkin condemned the effort as indicative of Trump’s authoritarian approach, declaring that “whether or not Pirro succeeded is not the point. It’s that President Trump continues to weaponize our justice system against his perceived enemies.” Other lawmakers rejected intimidation tactics, with Representative Crow stating that “Americans should be furious that Trump and his goons tried to weaponize our justice system again against his political opponents.”

(Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/doj-fails-secure-indictment-democrats-involved-illegal-orders-video-rcna258385)

Trump Demands Jail for Noem Critics, Attacks Protest ‘Scam’

President Donald Trump defended Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Friday via Truth Social, attacking protesters and Democrats as “Radical Left Lunatics” and “Insurrectionists” while demanding they be imprisoned. Trump claimed Noem is being targeted “because she is a woman” and credited her with fixing “the Border disaster” he inherited, asserting the murder rate reached a 125-year low under his administration.

Trump characterized protests in Minnesota and major cities as a “SCAM” designed to obscure what he labeled “CRIMINAL ACTS of theft and insurrection” by Democrats. He accused Democrats of “stealing Billions of Dollars from Minnesota, and other Cities and States” and instructed Republicans not to be “pushed around” by what he termed aggressive protest manipulation.

The president reiterated his campaign platform of “Strong Borders, and Law and Order” and separately praised Border Czar Tom Homan, whom Trump appointed this week to oversee the immigration enforcement crackdown in Minnesota. The operation has deployed approximately 2,100 federal agents to the Minneapolis area in what officials characterize as the largest immigration enforcement operation ever conducted.

Trump’s remarks come amid DOJ investigations into Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey over allegations they conspired to impede Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations through public statements. Trump’s invocation of imprisonment for political opponents and protesters aligns with his broader pattern of weaponizing federal authority against critics.

The late-night posts demonstrate Trump’s willingness to criminalize dissent and attribute federal policy failures to Democratic sabotage while absolving his administration of responsibility for enforcement outcomes.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-ice-protest/)

Trump Illegally Cuts Funding to Blue States

President Donald Trump announced February 1 as the date he will begin withholding all federal funding from sanctuary cities and states with sanctuary jurisdictions, claiming they “protect criminals at the expense of American citizens.” The Bay Area faces potential losses in the billions of dollars that fund emergency management, child support, and human services; San Francisco alone could lose nearly $1 billion annually, representing 6% of its general fund based on fiscal year 2025 figures.

California operates as a sanctuary state by law, with state and local law enforcement generally limiting cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol agents. State leaders argue the federal government lacks authority to compel local officers to enforce federal immigration law. Trump’s previous threats to withhold federal funding from sanctuary jurisdictions have already been declared unlawful by courts during both his first and second terms.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated he will file suit immediately if the cuts proceed, declaring “We will go to court within seconds, and we will win if he does this, it’s already proven unlawful.” Bonta expressed anger at what he characterized as Trump’s attack on California’s residents, state, and values, while San Francisco and other cities have successfully litigated this identical issue in prior litigation.

Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee countered that the city’s sanctuary policies enable residents to report crimes and access services without fear, and stated no federal threats would alter that commitment. The White House provided no specific executive order or actionable directive when asked about the funding mechanism, instead referring only to Trump’s public remarks made at a Detroit economic club event.

(Source: https://abc7news.com/post/bay-area-could-lose-billions-trump-cuts-funding-sanctuary-cities-attorney-general-rob-bonta-says-unlawful/18401281/?ex_cid=TA_KGO_FB&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook)

1 2 3 … 27