Category: Unpresidential

Trump Appoints Snake Oil Salesman Dr. Oz To Run Medicare and Medicaid

Donald Trump has made a shocking decision by appointing Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a role for which he is grossly unqualified. Despite being a well-known television personality, Oz has no real experience managing a large government bureaucracy that oversees critical health services. This appointment exposes Trump’s reckless disregard for the qualifications necessary to run such an important agency and instead continues to prove he is placing Trump loyalists to be his eyes, ears, and hammer in a fascist movement.

Dr. Oz has long been criticized for promoting dubious health treatments and unproven remedies, making him a controversial figure in the medical community. His history of endorsing questionable products and ideas, often labeled as ‘snake oil’, raises significant concerns about his ability to make sound decisions for the health and welfare of millions of Americans. This is the same individual who infamously referred to the reopening of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic as an “appetizing opportunity” that would only result in a 2-3% increase in mortality—an alarming statement that highlights his lack of genuine concern for public health.

In his statement, Trump touted Oz’s ability to ‘Make America Healthy Again’ and promised to cut waste and fraud. However, his track record suggests that Oz’s leadership might lead to further erosion of trust in medical science rather than reinforcing it. The idea that someone with such a dubious reputation in the health sector could be trusted to lead a vital healthcare agency is not just unthinkable—it is a direct threat to the integrity of America’s healthcare system.

Critics argue that this appointment reflects Trump’s pattern of placing loyalty over competency, showcasing a troubling trend where personal connections supersede the need for qualified leadership. With Oz’s questionable medical practices and lack of substantial administrative experience, there is a genuine fear that patient care and critical health services could suffer under his oversight.

As Oz prepares to potentially take the helm at CMS, there are serious implications for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Trump’s choice of Oz signals a further departure from evidence-based medicine and an embrace of celebrity over accountability. The American public deserves leaders who prioritize science and ethics over popularity and personal relationships.

(h/t: https://www.axios.com/2024/11/19/trump-dr-oz-cms-cabinet)

Trump Nominates Project 2025 Author Brendan Carr To FCC

Brendan Carr, President-elect Donald Trump’s appointee to head the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), has openly threatened broadcast media with stricter regulations under the guise of enforcing their public interest obligations. Trump’s choice of Carr, a staunch advocate for conservative media policies, raises alarm bells about potential government overreach into the media landscape. Notably, Carr’s comments come against a backdrop of Trump’s persistent grievances regarding media coverage, particularly following a contentious 60 Minutes interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.

During an appearance on Fox News, Carr indicated that he would closely scrutinize media operations, claiming that legacy media must change due to a loss of public trust. He cited Jeff Bezos’s assertion that Americans consider news media to be the least trusted source, suggesting that this sentiment justifies a shift in FCC policies to hold broadcasters accountable for their content.

Moreover, Carr’s support for a controversial merger between Paramount and Skydance appears contingent on the outcome of an ongoing FCC complaint related to CBS’s coverage of the Harris interview. His remarks signal a willingness to intertwine regulatory actions with political grievances, a move that could further undermine the independence of the FCC and jeopardize journalistic integrity.

In Carr’s view, the FCC should reassess its role in regulating broadcasters, who are granted access to public airwaves in exchange for serving the public interest. His statement about enforcing these obligations raises concerns that the FCC may become a tool for furthering partisan agendas, rather than a neutral body ensuring fair media practices.

With Carr’s history connected to the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025, concerns mount regarding his commitment to unbiased media oversight. His comments align with Trump’s broader narrative of combating perceived censorship and promoting ‘free speech,’ which often translates into silencing dissenting voices under the guise of regulation. The implications of Carr’s leadership at the FCC could reshape the information landscape and pose risks to the foundational principles of a free press.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trumps-fcc-pick-threatens-broadcast-media-promises-to-enforce-their-public-interest-obligation/)

Trump’s Dangerous Move to Target Military Officers for Courts-Martial Reveals Authoritarian Tendencies

In an alarming move, the Trump transition team is reportedly compiling a list of both current and former U.S. military officers for potential courts-martial. This initiative raises serious questions about the motives behind targeting military personnel who may have opposed or criticized the former president’s actions. The list appears to be part of a broader strategy to silence dissent and further consolidate power, echoing tactics often seen in authoritarian regimes.

Reports indicate that this effort is being driven by individuals connected to Trump’s inner circle, including prominent supporters who have openly embraced conspiracy theories. This behavior is reminiscent of fascist regimes, where loyalty to a singular leader is prioritized over democratic principles and accountability.

Among those associated with this troubling initiative is Matt Flynn, a leader in the QAnon conspiracy movement, alongside his brother Michael Flynn, a disgraced former general. Their involvement underscores the disturbing trend of militarizing political loyalty, where questions or criticisms of leadership are treated as acts of treason.

The implications of compiling such a list are profound, signaling a potential crackdown on military personnel who choose to speak out or maintain their integrity. This tactic not only undermines the values of democracy but also threatens the moral fabric of the armed forces.

As Trump and his allies continue to pursue these authoritarian strategies, it is imperative for the American public to remain vigilant and recognize the dangers posed by such actions. The normalization of hate and the silencing of dissent are hallmarks of a regime that prioritizes power over the principles of liberty and justice.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/trump-transition-team-compiling-list-current-former-us-military-office-rcna180489)

President-elect Donald Trump continues to avoid si…

President-elect Donald Trump continues to avoid signing the legally required ethics agreement mandated for a smooth presidential transition, raising serious ethical concerns about his leadership. This agreement is crucial for ensuring that Trump does not engage in conflicts of interest that could arise from his extensive business dealings, a fact that has been a significant point of contention throughout his presidency.

Trump’s reluctance to sign the ethics pledge illustrates his ongoing battle with transparency and accountability, as he attempts to shield his financial interests from scrutiny. Despite the fact that the ethics requirement was established under the Presidential Transition Act—legislation that Trump himself endorsed—his transition team has not prioritized compliance, jeopardizing national security as deadlines for essential agreements are missed.

Transition experts are alarmed by this delay, emphasizing that it could severely impair the incoming administration’s preparedness. The Biden administration’s General Services Administration had set deadlines for agreements that would provide Trump’s team with necessary resources and briefings, which are crucial for national security. The failure to comply with these requirements could leave the future administration unprepared to handle urgent issues from Day 1.

Furthermore, Trump’s ongoing business ventures, including his significant stake in Truth Social and other licensing deals, raise additional ethical questions. This lack of adherence to ethical standards, coupled with his refusal to sign the pledge, suggests a disregard for the foundational principles of governance that are essential for maintaining public trust.

As the transition process hangs in the balance, lawmakers like Rep. Jamie Raskin have expressed deep concerns about the implications of Trump’s actions, stating that ignoring established norms poses a threat to the fundamental institutions of American democracy. Without the necessary agreements in place, the implications for national security are dire, echoing past failures that have had catastrophic consequences.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/09/politics/trump-transition-ethics-pledge-timing/index.html?)

Trump’s Demands for Recess Appointments Highlight GOP’s Submission to His Agenda

Donald Trump is once again attempting to exert his influence over Republican senators, demanding their support for recess appointments to expedite the confirmation of his nominees. In a recent post, he insisted that any senator vying for leadership must commit to this controversial tactic, which has been met with skepticism from many in Congress. Recess appointments allow presidents to bypass the Senate when Congress is in recess, a practice that has been blocked by the opposition party in recent years.

Despite the contentious nature of this demand, the leading GOP candidates for the Senate majority leadership have quickly signaled their support for Trump’s wishes. Senators John Thune and John Cornyn, both seen as frontrunners, have expressed their openness to the idea, indicating a troubling trend where the party appears willing to undermine traditional legislative processes to placate Trump and his agenda.

Trump’s insistence on recess appointments highlights a significant power struggle within the Republican Party, as various factions vie for control. While some senators, like Rick Scott, have eagerly endorsed Trump’s approach, others remain cautious, recognizing the risks involved in expanding presidential powers. This clash reflects a broader concern about the erosion of checks and balances in the face of Trump’s demands.

Moreover, Trump’s call for recess appointments is not merely about filling positions; it is a strategic move to prevent the current Democratic-controlled Senate from pushing through judicial appointments. He has urged Republicans to block any such attempts during the leadership transition, revealing his willingness to disrupt the Senate’s functionality for partisan gain.

This situation poses serious implications for the Senate’s future operations, as Trump’s tactics could lead to further polarization and conflict. Recess appointments, once a rare and controversial measure, may become a tool for a party unwilling to engage in genuine legislative negotiations. As the GOP navigates this leadership election, the fallout from Trump’s demands will likely shape the Senate’s dynamics for years to come.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/10/politics/trump-senate-recess-appointments-gop-leader/index.html)

Trump Expresses Regret Over Leaving Office While Peddling Dangerous Lies

In a recent rally held in Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump lamented his departure from the White House, claiming he “shouldn’t have left.” This statement reflects his persistent delusions regarding the legitimacy of the 2020 election and suggests a troubling unwillingness to accept defeat in future elections.

Throughout his speech, Trump escalated his baseless assertions of widespread voter fraud, insinuating that the only way he could lose again in 2024 would be through Democratic cheating. This rhetoric continues to undermine the integrity of the electoral process and incites division among his supporters.

Trump’s remarks also hinted at a dangerous attitude towards violence, as he expressed indifference to the idea of reporters being shot at while criticizing the media. Such comments are alarming, especially considering the violent events that occurred on January 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters stormed the Capitol based on his false claims.

Despite a clear lack of evidence for his claims, Trump continues to capitalize on fear and division as he campaigns for the upcoming election, labeling the Democratic Party as “demonic.” This kind of inflammatory language is reminiscent of his previous tactics that incited unrest and violence.

As the election draws near, Trump’s unwillingness to concede and his promotion of dangerous rhetoric raise significant concerns about the future of democracy in America. It is evident that should Trump regain power, he would likely resist leaving the White House again, posing a serious threat to democratic norms.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/03/us/politics/trump-pa-rally-election.html)

Trump Says OK If An Assassin Shoots Through The Press

During a recent rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made shocking remarks suggesting he would not mind if someone attempted to shoot through the media to reach him. This statement, made while he was critiquing the bulletproof glass shielding him, raises serious concerns about his attitude towards violence and the press.

Trump, who has a history of inflammatory rhetoric, referred to the media as “fake news” and “bloodsuckers” while gesturing towards the protective glass. His comments come in the wake of multiple assassination attempts against him, including a recent incident where a bullet grazed his ear and resulted in the death of an audience member.

The former president’s reckless comments not only trivialize the threats against his life but also serve to incite his supporters against the press. By implying that the media is a barrier to him, he dangerously promotes the idea that violence against journalists is acceptable.

Trump’s spokesperson attempted to clarify his remarks, claiming he was trying to protect the media. However, this belies the reality of Trump’s consistent pattern of hostility towards journalists who challenge him. His rhetoric has been known to embolden extremist behavior among his followers, leading to increased violence against the press.

This incident is a stark reminder of the toxic environment Trump has cultivated, where incitement and division take precedence over respect and dignity. As he continues his campaign for the presidency, the implications of his words and their potential effects on public safety and discourse cannot be overstated.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-lititz-pennsylvania-rally-shoot-through-media-bulletproof-glass/)

Trump’s Disturbing Comments on Race and Privilege Highlight His Inadequacy as a Leader

In a recent rally in Michigan, former President Donald Trump made headlines by boasting about his “beautiful white skin” immediately after disparaging Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump’s comments come amid a contentious election campaign where he has frequently insulted Harris, whom he labeled as a “low I.Q. individual” and previously questioned her racial identity at a conference of Black journalists.

Trump’s remarks about Harris reflect his ongoing strategy of using personal attacks to undermine his opponents. His history of offensive comments regarding race, such as questioning Harris’s Blackness, demonstrates a troubling pattern of behavior that raises serious concerns about his fitness for office. As he continues to escalate his rhetoric, it becomes clear that Trump is not only out of touch but also dangerously divisive.

During his speech, Trump lamented that his presidential duties have kept him from enjoying leisure activities, specifically hitting the beach. This self-indulgent complaint underscores his detachment from the everyday struggles of average Americans, who are facing economic hardships and uncertainty. Instead of addressing significant issues, Trump chose to focus on his personal experiences, further highlighting his privilege.

By lamenting his lack of a tan while insisting he has the “whitest skin,” Trump attempted to inject humor into his speech. However, this remark only served to reinforce the perception of him as a superficial figure more concerned with appearances than policy. His fixation on skin color in the context of a political campaign is not only inappropriate but also reflects a deeper insensitivity to the complexities of race in America.

As Trump rallies support for his campaign, it is crucial to recognize the implications of his words and actions. His continuous belittling of opponents, particularly women and people of color, undermines the values of respect and inclusivity that are essential for a healthy democratic process. Voters must critically assess the character and integrity of candidates as they head to the polls.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-boasts-he-has-beautiful-white-skin-right-after-slamming-kamala-harris/)

Trump’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Against CBS is a Frivolous Attack on Press Freedom

Former President Donald Trump has launched a ludicrous legal attack against CBS, claiming $10 billion in damages over the network’s ’60 Minutes’ interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. This frivolous lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Texas, is riddled with absurd accusations that CBS engaged in partisan election interference and misled the public during the presidential election process. Trump’s legal team alleges that the interview was unfairly edited to disadvantage him, a claim that has been categorically dismissed by CBS.

The suit has been met with widespread ridicule from First Amendment experts, who have condemned it as a dangerous overreach aimed at stifling press freedom. Prominent attorneys have asserted that Trump’s actions are not just meritless but also represent a blatant attempt to control how the media reports on political figures, undermining the fundamental protections of the First Amendment. Legal analysts emphasize that the media, not governmental entities or political candidates, should dictate the coverage of news events.

Trump’s lawsuit specifically demands CBS release the full, unedited transcript of the interview, further demonstrating his desperation to manipulate the narrative surrounding his political image. The rationale behind filing in Texas, particularly in a court presided over by a Trump appointee, raises suspicions of ‘judge shopping,’ a tactic often employed by litigants seeking favorable rulings.

CBS has firmly rejected Trump’s claims, asserting that the interview was accurately presented and that the lawsuit lacks any substantive basis. A representative for CBS stressed that their coverage was intended to inform viewers, not mislead them, directly countering Trump’s narrative of deceit. Furthermore, the legal action has drawn sharp criticism from experts who argue that such attempts to intimidate the media only serve to highlight Trump’s ongoing struggles with accountability and the truth.

During a rally in Nevada, Trump boasted about the lawsuit, showcasing his continued penchant for theatrics over substance. This legal maneuver is yet another indication of Trump’s relentless pursuit to reshape public perception while disregarding journalistic integrity. As the case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of protecting the freedom of the press against politically motivated litigation.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/media/trump-cbs-lawsuit-harris-60-minutes-interview/index.html)

Trump’s Threatening Remarks Against Liz Cheney Reveal Dangerous Political Rhetoric

During a recent rally in Glendale, Arizona, Donald Trump escalated his attacks against former Representative Liz Cheney, referring to her as a “war hawk” and suggesting she should be fired upon. Trump’s inflammatory language, which included remarks about having guns aimed at Cheney, represents a troubling continuation of his trend of using violent rhetoric against political opponents. This incident comes just days before an election where Trump is already facing scrutiny for undermining public confidence in the electoral process.

Cheney, a prominent critic of Trump, had previously condemned his actions regarding the 2020 election and the January 6th Capitol riot. In response to Trump’s comments, she warned that such threats are characteristic of dictators who aim to suppress dissent. Cheney emphasized the dangers of allowing a “petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man” like Trump to wield power, highlighting the risks to democracy posed by his rhetoric and actions.

Trump’s remarks have drawn significant backlash, with many viewing them as a dangerous escalation that normalizes violence in political discourse. His campaign attempted to defend his comments by labeling Cheney as a warmonger, yet this defense fails to address the alarming implications of his call to violence against those who criticize him.

The former president’s history of violent language dates back to his first campaign and includes past suggestions of shooting protesters. His insistence on using military force against political dissenters further illustrates his authoritarian tendencies, raising concerns about his suitability as a candidate.

Vice President Kamala Harris has pointed out the implications of Trump’s rhetoric, noting that he is not focused on improving the lives of American citizens but rather on consolidating power through intimidation. As the election approaches, the stakes are high, and it remains crucial for voters to recognize the threat posed by Trump’s continued embrace of violent and divisive language.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/politics/donald-trump-liz-cheney-war-hawk-battle/index.html)

1 2 3 … 350