Category: National Security

DOGE.gov Security Flaw Exposes Reckless Politics

The DOGE.gov website, launched under the direction of Elon Musk’s self-proclaimed Department of Government Efficiency, has been exposed as fundamentally insecure. Reports indicate that it employs a database that can be overwritten by anyone, raising serious concerns over data integrity. This seems to be yet another reckless move emblematic of the lax approach to governance and accountability often exhibited by Republicans and their allies.

Two independent web development experts, who conducted an investigation into the DOGE.gov site, confirmed that the platform is not securely hosted on government infrastructure. Instead, it relies on a Cloudflare Pages site, which is easily vulnerable to unauthorized edits. Users have even added humorous yet critical entries to the database, underscoring the inadequacy of this so-called federal initiative.

Elon Musk’s assertions regarding transparency are rendered laughable in the face of such glaring security flaws. Despite claims of striving for open government, this situation exemplifies the opposite. The misguided belief that privatizing public services results in efficiency is continually undermined by practical evidence, showing such systems render critical governmental functions susceptible to manipulation.

The rapid deployment of this site appears to reflect a hasty advance toward a vision that prioritizes spectacle over genuine efficacy. Rather than fulfill his purported aim of transparency, Musk’s initiative merely showcases the irresponsibility that often characterizes Republican approaches to regulation and oversight, which favor technological opportunism over fundamental governance.

This incident is yet another stark reminder of the consequences of placing wealth and influence over effective public service. As America faces important challenges, the fundamental integrity of government websites must not be compromised by irresponsible actors who treat crucial institutions as playthings in their tech-driven fantasies.

(h/t: https://www.404media.co/anyone-can-push-updates-to-the-doge-gov-website-2/)

Trump’s Loyalty Tests Corrupt National Security Hiring and Threaten Democracy

Donald Trump is imposing loyalty tests on candidates for top national security and law enforcement positions within his administration. These tests often revolve around two critical events: the false claims surrounding the 2020 election results and the January 6 Capitol attack. Candidates have been asked to affirm unsubstantiated narratives, such as whether January 6 was an “inside job” or if the election was “stolen.” Those who refuse to validate these fabrications find themselves sidelined in the hiring process.

Former officials seeking positions in Trump’s administration reported being pressured to conform to these expectations, effectively requiring them to abandon their integrity. Even under normal circumstances, political alignment with the administration is standard practice; however, demanding a specific loyalty regarding false claims erodes the fundamental objectivity that national security roles require. Intelligence professionals must provide accurate assessments, unclouded by partisan preferences, a principle undermined by Trump’s authoritarian policies.

The implications of this loyalty purge extend to the inner workings of the FBI and intelligence agencies, where extensive vetting processes now scrutinize candidates’ past political statements and affiliations. Reports indicate that even seasoned agents have been thrust into uncomfortable positions, with inquiries targeting their views on the Capitol insurrection and the legitimacy of the election. Their fates have become entangled in a politically charged atmosphere, turning traditional roles into partisan battlegrounds.

Dissent against these loyalty tests has emerged within the ranks of former intelligence officials, emphasizing that adherence to truth is paramount for effective governance. Some observers draw parallels with historical instances of purges related to loyalty during political upheaval, such as the McCarthy era. Trump’s pursuit of loyalty to a personal agenda within the intelligence community marks a dangerous precedent, reminiscent of the Nixon administration’s attempts to manipulate federal agencies for personal gain.

The overarching goal appears clear: to reshape federal agencies to align with Trump’s vision, disregarding established norms and ethical conduct. This strategy of using political loyalty as a litmus test threatens not only the integrity of U.S. intelligence but also the very fabric of democratic governance. As Trump continues his quest for power, the erosion of nonpartisan intelligence oversight poses significant risks to national security and the rule of law.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/02/08/trump-administration-job-candidates-loyalty-screening/)

Trump Revokes Biden’s Security Clearance

Former President Donald Trump has announced that he is revoking Joe Biden’s security clearance, claiming there is no need for him to access classified information. This move appears to be a retaliatory action stemming from Biden’s critique of Trump’s trustworthiness during his presidency, when Biden suggested Trump should not receive intelligence briefings due to his “erratic behavior.” Trump’s decision is just another attempt to undermine his political rivals under the pretense of national security.

Trump further justifies his decision by referencing the findings of Special Counsel Robert Hur, who investigated Biden’s handling of classified documents. However, it is crucial to note that Hur ultimately did not find sufficient evidence to recommend criminal charges against Biden, undermining Trump’s claims of Biden’s untrustworthiness. By distorting the context of these findings, Trump reveals a desperation to distract from his own questionable record and actions.

This policy move is illustrative of a broader trend in the Republican party, which often seeks to manipulate narratives surrounding national security and intelligence. Trump’s behavior embodies a dangerous precedent of using state power to attack political adversaries, thereby eroding the fundamental norms that underpin democratic governance. His actions against former officials, including John Bolton and Gen. Mark Milley, serve to illustrate an alarming pattern of retribution against those who challenge him.

Trump’s rhetoric surrounding security clearance also reflects a continual effort to obscure his own administration’s failures concerning intelligence and national security. By directing public attention towards Biden’s past statements and decisions, Trump distracts from ongoing discussions about his own disastrous policies and the broader implications for U.S. democracy.

Ultimately, Trump’s latest maneuver is not about security; it is a calculated effort to stifle dissent and reassert control. This represents a dangerous trajectory where political enemies are systematically marginalized through the manipulation of state mechanisms. Such tactics should be condemned as they directly contribute to the erosion of democratic principles and the normalization of fascist practices within American politics.

Trump’s Appointment of Joe Kent Signals GOP’s Embrace of Extremism and Threats to National Security

Donald Trump has appointed Joe Kent, a far-right conspiracy theorist with known affiliations to white nationalism, to lead the National Counterterrorism Center. This choice has been condemned by Democratic leaders who argue that Trump is jeopardizing national security for political gain. Kent’s connections to extremist ideologies and inflammatory views reflect a disturbing trend within the Republican Party, demonstrating a prioritization of loyalty to Trump over the safety of American citizens.

Joe Kent has previously engaged with individuals who espouse Nazi sympathies, including a reported discussion with a known white nationalist. Despite attempting to distance himself from these associations, Kent has a documented history of promoting false narratives about the legitimacy of the 2020 election, claiming it was “rigged” and “stolen.” This embrace of conspiracy theories highlights an alarming alignment with those who incite division and undermine democratic principles.

In his rhetoric surrounding abortion, Kent has taken extreme positions, going so far as to compare legal abortion to slavery. His views are not only controversial but reflect a broader Republican agenda aimed at dismantling reproductive rights nationally. Kent’s stance signifies a backward shift for women’s rights and underscores the dangerous ideologies that Trump continues to endorse through his appointments.

Moreover, Kent has actively supported figures within the far-right movement and has endorsed their policies. His connections to known extremists and his support for Trump’s unfounded claims surrounding the January 6 insurrection only further bolster concerns regarding his capability to lead the National Counterterrorism Center effectively. Such affiliations raise significant questions about the integrity and objectivity required in a role that is intended to safeguard national security.

Trump’s appointment of Joe Kent is emblematic of a troubling trend where the Republican Party increasingly embraces figures aligned with white nationalism and conspiracy theories. This is not merely a matter of partisan politics; it represents a clear and present danger to American democracy and values, echoing a fascist ideology that undermines the foundational principles of equality and justice.

(h/t: https://democrats.org/news/trump-picks-far-right-conspiracy-theorist-with-ties-to-white-nationalism-to-lead-national-counterterrorism-center/)

Suspended USAID Officials Expose Elon Musk’s DOGE Threats Amid Trump Administration’s Attack on Humanitarian Aid

Two senior security officials from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) have been placed on administrative leave after trying to prevent personnel from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing sensitive agency systems. Reports indicate that the DOGE personnel used aggressive tactics, threatening to involve law enforcement when USAID officials refused entry into the headquarters in Washington, D.C.

The DOGE team allegedly sought access to USAID’s security systems and personnel files, including classified information, despite lacking the necessary security clearances. The incident raises serious concerns, with Senator Jeanne Shaheen emphasizing the implications for national security and calling for immediate bipartisan inquiry.

Elon Musk has publicly attacked USAID, labeling it a “criminal organization,” amidst ongoing efforts by the Trump administration to consolidate power and potentially dismantle the agency, which facilitates critical humanitarian aid worldwide. This situation aligns with Trump’s broader agenda, which has faced bipartisan criticism, particularly regarding the legality of disbanding a federal agency without Congress’s approval.

With the recent suspension of all foreign aid and an initiative to merge USAID with the State Department, experts warn that such actions could severely undermine U.S. soft power and its ability to effectively respond to global crises. Critics argue that the State Department lacks the specialized capacity and local engagement that USAID provides, which could lead to significant setbacks in international development efforts.

The move reflects a systematic strategy by Trump and his Republican allies to erase vital government functions, disregarding historical precedents set by previous administrations for humanitarian engagement. This dismantling of agencies like USAID not only jeopardizes global health and aid efforts but also risks deepening existing crises that require robust and compassionate U.S. intervention.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/02/politics/usaid-officials-leave-musk-doge/index.html?cid=ios_app)

President-elect Donald Trump continues to avoid si…

President-elect Donald Trump continues to avoid signing the legally required ethics agreement mandated for a smooth presidential transition, raising serious ethical concerns about his leadership. This agreement is crucial for ensuring that Trump does not engage in conflicts of interest that could arise from his extensive business dealings, a fact that has been a significant point of contention throughout his presidency.

Trump’s reluctance to sign the ethics pledge illustrates his ongoing battle with transparency and accountability, as he attempts to shield his financial interests from scrutiny. Despite the fact that the ethics requirement was established under the Presidential Transition Act—legislation that Trump himself endorsed—his transition team has not prioritized compliance, jeopardizing national security as deadlines for essential agreements are missed.

Transition experts are alarmed by this delay, emphasizing that it could severely impair the incoming administration’s preparedness. The Biden administration’s General Services Administration had set deadlines for agreements that would provide Trump’s team with necessary resources and briefings, which are crucial for national security. The failure to comply with these requirements could leave the future administration unprepared to handle urgent issues from Day 1.

Furthermore, Trump’s ongoing business ventures, including his significant stake in Truth Social and other licensing deals, raise additional ethical questions. This lack of adherence to ethical standards, coupled with his refusal to sign the pledge, suggests a disregard for the foundational principles of governance that are essential for maintaining public trust.

As the transition process hangs in the balance, lawmakers like Rep. Jamie Raskin have expressed deep concerns about the implications of Trump’s actions, stating that ignoring established norms poses a threat to the fundamental institutions of American democracy. Without the necessary agreements in place, the implications for national security are dire, echoing past failures that have had catastrophic consequences.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/09/politics/trump-transition-ethics-pledge-timing/index.html?)

Trump Sent COVID Tests to Putin During 2020 Shortage, New Book Reveals

A new book by Bob Woodward, titled “War,” reveals that during the COVID-19 testing shortage in 2020, then-President Donald Trump secretly sent COVID-19 tests to Russian President Vladimir Putin for his personal use. Amidst a global pandemic, Putin, who was concerned about the virus, accepted the tests but requested that Trump keep the operation confidential to avoid political backlash in the U.S.

According to the book, Putin cautioned Trump, saying, “I don’t want you to tell anybody because people will get mad at you, not me.” This incident highlights the ongoing relationship between Trump and Putin, which has persisted even as Trump campaigns for the presidency in 2024 while Putin continues his aggressive actions in Ukraine.

Woodward’s account indicates that Trump has maintained contact with Putin since leaving office, with reported conversations occurring as many as seven times. The book paints Trump as potentially more reckless than Nixon, suggesting that his actions pose significant risks to U.S. interests and international stability.

In response to the revelations, a Trump campaign spokesman dismissed Woodward’s claims as fabricated, criticizing the author and questioning the credibility of the book. Despite these denials, the narrative presented in “War” depicts Trump as unfit for presidential office, contrasting him with President Joe Biden, who is portrayed as exhibiting steady leadership amidst ongoing international conflicts.

Woodward’s book is set to be released on October 15, 2023, and explores the ramifications of Trump’s foreign policy decisions while he was in office, particularly regarding relations with Putin and the implications for U.S. national security. It also delves into Biden’s handling of foreign crises, including the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, providing insights into the complexities and challenges faced by the current administration.

 

Trump threatens to dump thousands of ISIS fighters into Europe

President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to dump thousands of Islamic State prisoners in Europe if the countries they originated from refused to take them back in.

Speaking with reporters at the White House, Trump specifically mentioned France and Germany as two countries where its citizens who pledged their loyalty to the Islamic State, the terrorist group also known as ISIS, could be dropped off.

“We’re holding thousands of ISIS fighters right now, and Europe has to take them,” Trump said. “If Europe doesn’t take them, I’ll have no choice but to release them into the countries from which they came, which is Germany and France and other places.”

Trump’s suggestion for the US to release the prisoners comes amid plans to reduce its 2,000 troops in Syria, stoking fears of a rekindling of the jihadist movement throughout the country and beyond and ultimately hurting the global fight against ISIS.

This leaves a precarious situation for the Syrian Democratic Forces, a US-backed Kurdish group that relies on the presence of US personnel – and has the responsibility of holding thousands of prisoners in makeshift facilities.

The SDF is detaining the lion’s share of ISIS fighters. The SDF had detained 9,000 militants in Syria by April, according to US military officials. The military also estimated that 1,000 of them hailed from 50 countries.

A recent inspector general’s report from the international task force battling ISIS noted that the reduction in US forces reduced the task force’s ability to maintain “visibility” at a refugee camp, which “created conditions that allow ISIS ideology to spread ‘uncontested.'”

The US State Department counterterrorism coordinator Nathan Sales said the US was urging other nations to repatriate the ISIS fighters and prosecute them.

“Across the coalition, we need to prosecute ISIS leaders, fighters, financiers, and facilitators for the crimes they’ve committed,” Sales said earlier in August. “That includes building the law-enforcement capacity of partner states that have the will to act but might lack the resources or expertise to do so. It also means repatriating and prosecuting foreign terrorist fighters.”

About 1,050 Germans joined the Islamic State in the Middle East after 2013, and about 1,190 French citizens joined the group, according to Soufan Center, the global security nonprofit group. Following the collapse of ISIS’ bastions in Iraq and Syria, scores of these foreign nationals were either killed or captured by coalition forces – leaving many of the prisoners’ fates in limbo as their governments debate on their status.

In June, France passed legislation to repatriate French jihadists on a case-by-case basis – 12 French and two Dutch orphans whose parents were militants were transported to France. Germany also considered children as “victims” and has allowed them to be repatriated.

[Business Insider]

White House fires DHS general counsel

The White House has fired John Mitnick, who served as the general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), The New York Timesreported on Tuesday.

A spokesperson for the department confirmed Mitnick’s exit to the news publication, saying: “We thank John for this service, and we wish him well.”

The official also told the paper that Chad Mizelle, an associate counsel to the president, will fill the position in Mitnick’s place.

Mitnick, who was nominated to the post by President Trump in 2017 and confirmed by the Senate the following year, was the department’s fifth general counsel.

His reported firing comes as DHS has continued to see a series of top aides and officials leave the agency amid tensions with the White House over its handling of immigration policy in recent months.

The news comes months after former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsenresigned from her post following speculation that her position was in jeopardy as the president grew frustrated over the situation at the border.

In the months following her exit, other top staffers, including Andrew Meehan, who served as top aide to acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan, resigned from the department as tensions between it and the White House escalated.

The White House and DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The Hill.

[The Hill]

Trump fires John Bolton

President Donald Trump abruptly announced in a tweet Tuesday that he has asked national security adviser John Bolton to resign, noting that he “strongly disagreed with many” of Bolton’s suggestions “as did others in the administration.””I thank John very much for his service. I will be naming a new National Security Advisor next week,” Trump wrote.The tweet came just one hour after the White House press office said Bolton was scheduled to appear at a Tuesday press briefing alongside Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin.Asked during the briefing whether he and Mnuchin were surprised that Bolton was fired, given that he was supposed to appear alongside them, Pompeo said, “I’m never surprised.”Bolton tweeted minutes after Trump’s announcement, “I offered to resign last night and President Trump said, ‘Let’s talk about it tomorrow.'”

Bolton reiterated the point that it was he who offered to resign on Fox News Tuesday.Trump has plowed through an unprecedented number of national security professionals while multiple geopolitical crises have played out.The President has had three national security advisers — Bolton, Michael Flynn and H.R. McMaster. He has summarily fired a secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, by tweet after undercutting the former ExxonMobil CEO for months.

Secretary of Defense James Mattis resigned, reportedly in frustration over Trump’s decision to pull out of Syria.The President has also churned through two Homeland Security secretaries, John Kelly and Kirstjen Nielsen, and a National Security Agency director, Mike Rogers. He’s lost a deputy national security adviser, K.T. McFarland and an ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley. Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and his deputy, Sue Gordon, left their posts last month.Bolton’s departure comes as tensions with Iran are escalating in the Persian Gulf, North Korea continues to develop its weapons capabilities, arms control experts are warning of a potential nuclear arms race with Russia and trade tensions with China are intensifying, while Trump is discussing a drawdown of forces in Afghanistan.White House deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley told reporters that Charles Kupperman is the acting national security adviser.

“John Bolton’s priorities and policies just don’t line up with the President’s and any sitting president has the right to put someone in that position that can carry out his agenda. That became no longer tenable so the President made a change,” Gidley told reporters.He claimed there was “no one issue” that led to Bolton’s firing, and referred reporters to the forthcoming briefing for more information.Yet, Bolton’s ouster was so sudden that the now-former National Security Adviser even led a meeting of top administration officials, known as a principals committee meeting, Tuesday morning prior to Trump’s tweet, a source familiar told CNN.The source said the meeting went on as planned and there was no indication that Bolton’s firing was imminent.

[CNN]

1 2 3 … 5