Category: Military Action

Trump Reignites Blockade Against Iran in Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump declared the United States the “Guardian of the Strait of Hormuz” on Monday, announcing a blockade targeting Iranian vessels and a 20% toll on all cargo transiting the waterway. Trump stated that while other nations retain passage rights, Iranian ships and their customers will be barred from entering or leaving, framing the seizure of control over this critical international shipping lane as a matter of “fairness” for American protection costs. The announcement followed retaliatory U.S. military strikes against Iran after Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces attacked a Cyprus-flagged container ship and falsely claimed to have closed the strait.

Trump told Fox News the U.S. will “keep” and “probably run” the strait, extracting substantial revenue from global commerce while positioning American forces as enforcers. He claimed the United States had negotiated “a done deal” with Iran before Iran violated a ceasefire agreement over the weekend, stating “we’re just going to hit them very hard and keep the strait, and probably run it.” Trump asserted that Iran has a pattern of breaking agreements, citing ten previous deals he said the regime had violated.

The unilateral seizure of control over an internationally recognized waterway through which approximately one-third of global seaborne oil passes represents Trump’s assertion of military dominance over a crucial global chokepoint. By imposing a 20% toll and explicitly blocking Iranian commerce, Trump transforms a shared international passage into a revenue-generating American territory, a move that contradicts international maritime law and conventions governing freedom of navigation. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed U.S. military strikes followed Iran’s attack on the merchant vessel, but Trump’s subsequent assertion of permanent control expands the conflict beyond defensive response.

Trump’s escalation abandons the pretense of negotiation in favor of direct territorial and economic control, structuring the international order around American military power and financial extraction. Trump previously claimed the strait was open following overnight military strikes, but his Monday declarations reveal intent to monopolize control and profit from global energy transit. The president’s rhetoric conflates security provision with commercial exploitation, justifying American toll collection on international commerce as compensation for military operations initiated at his direction.

This consolidation of control over a vital international waterway exemplifies Trump’s model of authoritarian resource extraction, in which the U.S. military apparatus becomes an instrument for enriching American leadership and subordinating global commerce to Trump’s financial interests. The blockade of Iranian vessels and imposition of cargo fees establish a de facto American empire over a region critical to global trade, enforced by military force and defended through nationalist framing that obscures the seizure of international territory.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-dubs-usa-guardian-of-the-hormuz-strait-and-relaunches-blockade-against-iran/)financial interests. The blockade of Iranian vessels and imposition of cargo fees establish a de facto American empire over a region critical to global trade, enforced by military force and defended through nationalist framing that obscures the seizure of international territory.

Trump Claims Strait of Hormuz Open After Iran War

President Trump claimed during a Sunday NBC News appearance that the Strait of Hormuz remains open, contradicting Iran’s assertion that it had closed the waterway. When host Kristen Welker pressed Trump on the conflicting statements following overnight U.S. military strikes on Iranian targets, Trump stated the strait was open but refused further discussion, citing a desire to honor the memory of late Senator Lindsey Graham.

Trump’s account of recent events with Iran contradicts the pattern of escalation documented by U.S. Central Command. Trump asserted that Iran had agreed to a ceasefire deal the previous day before launching a drone attack on a commercial vessel within an hour, describing Iranian officials as “sick people.” According to CENTCOM, the United States completed a third round of strikes against Iran on July 11, targeting approximately 140 Iranian military positions with precision munitions launched from fighter aircraft, drones, and naval vessels.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed Saturday that U.S. military strikes followed Iran’s attack on a Cyprus-flagged container ship, which resulted in a missing crew member and significant vessel damage. The escalation marks a third military engagement between the two nations in one week, with Trump ordering strikes after Iran violated a ceasefire agreement.

Trump’s dismissal of substantive discussion about the military conflict and the Strait of Hormuz underscores his pattern of deploying military force while avoiding detailed accountability for the consequences. His refusal to engage with Welker’s direct questions about the strategic waterway’s status and his response strategy reflects his authoritarian approach to governance, where military decisions operate outside meaningful public scrutiny or democratic oversight.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-claims-the-strait-of-hormuz-is-open-in-testy-retort-to-nbcs-welker/)

Hegseth Confirms U.S. Military Strikes Iran Over Hormuz

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed Saturday that the U.S. military launched retaliatory strikes against Iran after the country attacked a Cyprus-flagged container ship and declared the Strait of Hormuz closed. According to U.S. Central Command, Iran’s attack on the merchant vessel resulted in a missing civilian crew member and significant damage that left the ship unable to continue its journey. Hegseth posted on X that “Iran made a poor choice. Now they pay,” following Trump’s orders to execute the strikes at 4:15 p.m. ET.

CENTCOM identified Iran’s actions as a violation of a 14-point Memorandum of Understanding both nations agreed to in mid-June, which provided a 60-day window for negotiating a long-term peace accord. Vice President JD Vance had been sent to Switzerland shortly after the agreement to lead negotiations, claiming progress was being made despite describing the Iranians as “extremely confusing.” The latest Iranian assault demonstrates the deal’s collapse and Iran’s continued breach of the fragile ceasefire through multiple violations.

U.S. military operations targeted Iran’s air surveillance radars, missile and drone storage facilities, launch sites, and ground-to-air missile systems, according to a senior American official cited by Axios journalist Barak Ravid. CENTCOM stated the strikes imposed “a heavy cost” to degrade Iran’s capacity to attack civilian vessels and commercial shipping in the strategically vital waterway. This marks the third round of American military action against Iranian targets in recent weeks.

Trump’s rhetoric toward Iran has intensified as diplomatic efforts deteriorated. The president called Iran’s theocratic leaders “scum” last week and warned Friday night that the U.S. has 1,000 missiles “Locked and Loaded” if Iran attempts to kill him. Trump’s escalating language and military strikes reflect his abandonment of negotiation as the administration authorizes direct military confrontation with Iran over control of critical shipping lanes.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/pete-hegseth-vows-us-will-make-iran-pay-for-attacking-ship-and-closing-strait-of-hormuz/)

Trump Strikes Back At Iran After Strait of Hormuz Is Closed

Trump ordered U.S. military strikes against Iranian targets in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday after Revolutionary Guard forces fired on a Cyprus-flagged container ship and declared the strategic waterway closed. U.S. Central Command confirmed the strikes targeted air surveillance radars, missile and drone storage facilities, launch sites, and ground-to-air missile systems, marking the third round of American military action against Iran this week. The attack on the merchant vessel left one civilian crew member missing and caused significant damage, according to CENTCOM.

Iran’s state media claimed the IRGC fired “warning shots” at a vessel traveling an unapproved route, escalating tensions after Trump had threatened to occupy Iran entirely if Tehran did not reopen the strait. The blockade directly threatens global trade and fuel prices, with CNN military analyst Cedric Leighton warning the latest Iranian action could trigger further increases in gasoline costs and disrupt international commerce. Trump has previously threatened Iran with total occupation over the strait closure.

U.S. officials told CNN that diplomatic negotiations cannot resume until the strait is secured, even as mediators attempt to return both nations to the negotiating table. Leighton cited Trump’s past interest in seizing Kharg Island, a major Iranian oil hub, as potential military leverage, though he cautioned such ground operations could trigger broader escalation and economic damage Trump wants to avoid. A senior Iranian lawmaker warned that “not a single American soldier will return alive” if the United States attempted an invasion of the island.

The cycle of attacks underscores Trump’s pattern of military confrontation with Iran, following his earlier threats to annihilate Iran over ceasefire violations and his demands that gas retailers cut prices amid the conflict-driven energy crisis. Trump authorized the strikes directly, positioning himself as commander-in-chief while claiming to avoid economic damage from further escalation. The standoff demonstrates how Trump’s aggressive foreign policy and military orders are directly driving consequences for American consumers and global stability.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-strikes-back-at-iran-after-irgc-declares-strait-of-hormuz-is-closed-again/)

Trump Dementia Gaffes On Full Display At NATO Summit

During a NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey on Wednesday, Trump committed multiple significant verbal errors that underscored both his cognitive fitness and his dangerous mishandling of international affairs. Trump falsely claimed to have destroyed “every single bridge in Iran” and threatened Iranian infrastructure including electric plants and desalination facilities, escalating threats against a nation without congressional authorization or clear strategic justification. These statements contradicted established rules of engagement and revealed reckless military posturing at a critical diplomatic moment.

Trump confused Japan with Iran when recounting a military incident, stating the “Islamic Republic of Japan” fired 111 missiles at the USS Abraham Lincoln. He also appeared to confuse Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Russian President Vladimir Putin during a press conference, asking Zelensky “You have a question for President Putin, please?” before correcting himself after media laughter. Both errors demonstrated alarming confusion about fundamental international relationships during active military conflict.

Trump misnamed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the Iran nuclear agreement, as the “JCPOC” while attacking it as the “Obama Nuclear Waste Deal.” He repeated a false claim about his TikTok prominence, asserting he was “number one” on the platform and more popular than Taylor Swift, when Trump has 16 million followers compared to Swift’s 30 million and neither ranks in the platform’s top 10. Trump also referred to TikTok as “Tic Tac” despite using the correct name multiple times in the same remarks.

These gaffes mirror Trump’s established pattern of attacking NATO spending while courting authoritarian leaders and abandoning U.S. allies to appease despots. At 80 years old, Trump’s cognitive lapses during high-stakes diplomacy represent a direct threat to American security and international stability, compounding his documented history of reckless military decisions and alliance sabotage.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/watch-4-most-embarrassing-gaffes-from-trumps-nato-visit/)

Trump Threatens Iran’s Annihilation Over Ceasefire Violations

President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that U.S. aircraft struck Iranian missile, drone storage, and coastal radar sites on Saturday in response to Iran violating a ceasefire agreement. Trump stated the United States was prepared to be “forced” to complete military operations against Iran if additional violations occurred, declaring that “the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist” if the country continues its aggression. Trump’s threat escalated rhetoric surrounding the ongoing conflict, as U.S. Central Command confirmed strikes were conducted in direct response to Iranian attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

According to Fox News correspondent Jennifer Griffin, Iranian forces launched one-way attack drones targeting U.S. naval assets, including the Navy’s regional headquarters and the 5th Fleet based in Bahrain. The strikes hit a commercial vessel carrying approximately 200,000 barrels of oil in the Strait of Hormuz early Saturday morning, marking the second ship attacked in two days. Griffin reported the U.S. military response was substantially larger than previous night strikes and included targeting air defense systems, drone storage facilities, cruise missiles, and minelaying capabilities.

Trump has repeatedly employed annihilation rhetoric throughout the conflict with Iran. Previously, Trump threatened that “a whole civilization will die tonight” unless Iran reopened the Strait of Hormuz, following which a two-week ceasefire was announced and Trump withdrew the threat. His pattern of catastrophic ultimatums paired with tactical concessions demonstrates a strategy of escalating military pressure while maintaining negotiating leverage, though his latest statements suggest willingness to pursue total military conquest if Iran continues its maritime operations.

The escalating military exchanges occurred as ongoing negotiations to end the war continued. U.S. officials stated Iran was given an opportunity to honor the ceasefire agreement but “elected not to” when its forces conducted the drone attack. The cycle of Iranian aggression and American military retaliation underscores the fragility of the ceasefire arrangement and the potential for broader regional conflict if either side abandons restraint. Trump’s threats to occupy Iran over the Strait of Hormuz reflect his consistent maximalist positioning in the conflict.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-warns-usa-is-getting-forced-to-wipe-out-iran-once-and-for-all/)

Trump Threatens to Occupy Iran Over Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump threatened to occupy Iran entirely if Tehran does not immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz, according to remarks he made to Fox News on Sunday. In an early morning phone call with Iranian officials, Trump stated, “You close the strait and you won’t have a country. You won’t even make it back to your f***** country. We’ll take over the rest of the country,” according to Fox’s Trey Yingst. The threat escalates Trump’s previous consideration of occupying Kharg Island, a major Iranian oil production facility, and marks a dramatic shift from his stated goal of negotiating a way out of the conflict he initiated in February.

Iran announced Saturday it would close the Strait of Hormuz in response to ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon targeting Hezbollah militants, just days after signing a 60-day ceasefire agreement with the Trump administration on Wednesday. The closure demonstrates the extreme fragility of the ceasefire arrangement and highlights the administration’s inability to restrain Israeli military actions, which have killed over 4,000 people in Lebanon since the war began. Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called for Israeli forces to “burn all of Lebanon,” rhetoric that Iran’s foreign minister and others denounced, yet Trump has proven unable to curb such statements or halt the Israeli assault despite public criticism.

Vice President JD Vance traveled to Switzerland this weekend to lead renewed peace negotiations with Iranian officials, while the administration publicly rebuked Israeli policy decisions. Vance warned Israeli officials not to alienate the United States, their closest ally, and previously expressed frustration that Israel cannot “kill” its way out of every problem. Trump echoed similar sentiments, asserting Israel would not exist without his administration’s support, yet his direct threats to Iran reveal his administration will apply far greater pressure on Tehran than on its Israeli counterpart to enforce the ceasefire terms.

The 60-day ceasefire agreement extends existing ceasefires while offering sanctions relief and access to frozen Iranian funds, provided Iran complies with terms including a commitment to forgo nuclear weapons development. The agreement mirrors language from the Obama-era nuclear deal Trump abandoned in 2018, dividing Republican support. Senator Bill Cassidy criticized the deal as a strategic defeat, stating Iran learned that threatening the Strait works and will repeat the tactic, while the administration’s tacit support for a $300 billion economic redevelopment fund for Iran drew opposition from both hawkish Republicans and Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who pledged his caucus would block votes if the fund reached Congress.

The administration indicated it could authorize many terms of the agreement, including sanctions relief, directly without congressional approval, circumventing legislative oversight. Trump’s volatile approach to negotiation, characterized by extreme threats followed by pursuit of agreements, underscores the instability surrounding U.S.-Iran relations and the ceasefire’s uncertain future as Israel continues operations Trump publicly opposes but cannot effectively control.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-iran-threat-hormuz-ceasefire-b2999930.html)

Trump Attacks Meloni Over Iran War Refusal, Invents Photo Claim

President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Sunday, attacking her in a Truth Social post without naming her directly while simultaneously condemning NATO for failing to support his Iran military campaign. Trump claimed he had denied Meloni a photograph at the Group of Seven summit in France because Italy would not permit U.S. military use of its landing strips and runways, and added that Meloni sought to “be friends again in order to get her ‘numbers up.'”

Meloni directly rejected Trump’s characterization of events, calling his attacks “unprovoked” and “senseless.” She stated that her popularity rests on defending Italy’s national interests and that her country remains a sovereign nation whose military base agreements cannot be violated. Meloni emphasized that Trump’s attempts to control her political standing are not her concern, and countered by suggesting he focus on his own popularity instead.

Trump’s repeated false claims about Meloni begging for a photograph represent a continuation of his pattern of fabricating details to demean allied leaders. His invocation of Italy’s refusal to support military action against Iran contradicts his earlier demands that NATO members fund defense spending, revealing inconsistency in how he applies pressure to allied nations.

The deterioration of Trump’s relationship with Meloni marks a significant rupture with what was previously one of his closest European political relationships. Trump had publicly praised Meloni as a “beautiful young woman” during a speech last year, framing the comment as politically risky but worth the exposure. Trump has threatened withdrawal of U.S. troops from Italy and Spain, citing both nations’ refusal to participate in military action against Iran.

Trump’s broader assault on NATO reflects his demand that allied nations comply with military objectives he deems necessary, regardless of their own strategic assessments or international law. The feud with Meloni demonstrates his willingness to weaponize military presence and personal relationships as leverage against leaders who assert their nation’s sovereignty and independent judgment.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/not-good-trump-ramps-up-feud-with-italys-prime-minister-in-scorching-new-post/)

Two months after Hegseth’s regressive move, Air Force base faces major flu outbreak

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth eliminated the Pentagon’s mandatory flu vaccination requirement for service members in April 2026, reversing a longstanding military policy. Hegseth justified the change by invoking “medical autonomy,” despite the military’s historical practice of requiring up to 17 vaccinations depending on deployment location.

Less than two months after Hegseth’s policy reversal, a major flu outbreak sickened nearly 160 troops at Lackland Air Force Base in Texas, with one trainee in basic training dying after falling ill. The outbreak spread rapidly through a basic military training wing where recruits sleep in open bays and share communal dining facilities, creating ideal conditions for disease transmission.

Only approximately 40% of Air Force trainees at Lackland opted to receive the flu vaccine following Hegseth’s change, compared to the previous 100% compliance rate under the mandatory policy. In response to the outbreak, Lackland received an exception from Hegseth’s directive and reinstated the flu vaccine requirement for its recruits.

Military readiness has depended on disease prevention for centuries. General George Washington mandated smallpox inoculation for all troops in 1777, a decision that historian Craig Bruce Smith credited with saving countless lives and helping ensure American survival. The Atlantic’s Adam Serwer noted that disease has killed more soldiers throughout human history than any other cause.

Despite the outbreak at Lackland, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman stated the department stands by Hegseth’s decision to end the universal flu vaccine mandate across all military bases. The contradiction between revoking the policy and then reinstating it at a single base reveals the incoherence of an approach that prioritizes ideological framing over military health and operational readiness.



(Source: https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/hegseth-vaccines-air-force-base-flu-outbreak?cid=sm_fb_maddow&fbclid=IwdGRjcAShbURleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeL1WX56j9Hl6vJjx4fJIoH6eujjAQJaCRwTXs_bVGbG2BkkjAtjSxmHL_Nsk_aem_S_8AggQzLGIGLQ18Eg7R2w)of an approach that prioritizes ideological framing over military health and operational readiness.

Trump Drops Stunning Quote on Letting Iran Have Missiles

At the G7 Summit in Evian-le-Bains, France on Wednesday, Trump defended allowing Iran to retain missile capability during a press conference closing the summit. Trump stated that missiles "hurt a little location, but they don't blow up the planet," dismissing concerns about Iranian conventional ballistic weapons as part of broader negotiations tied to a leaked 14-point Iran Memorandum of Understanding that includes a $300 billion reconstruction fund.

Trump's comments contradicted established nonproliferation policy by normalizing Iranian missile development. He argued that preventing Iran from possessing missiles while permitting Saudi Arabia to retain them would be inconsistent, claiming "it doesn't work that way," and positioned missile capability as inevitable given that other regional actors possess such weapons.

The statement represents Trump's continued pattern of claiming imminent Iran deal breakthroughs while simultaneously conceding major concessions to Iranian demands. Trump's acknowledgment that Iran would retain missiles—a core non-nuclear component of the disputed agreement—signals capitulation on a key security concern that regional allies and defense analysts have identified as destabilizing.

Trump framed the position through false equivalence, suggesting that allowing a state designated as a terrorism sponsor to develop missiles mirrors regional arms balancing. His dismissal of missile threats as affecting only "a little location" contradicts U.S. military assessments of Iranian ballistic capability and previous rhetoric in which Trump threatened Iran with unspecified consequences following military escalations tied to Iranian missile systems.

The remarks underscore Trump's willingness to abandon longstanding security positions to secure a deal that he has declared imminent repeatedly over recent months, prioritizing a negotiated agreement over substantive limits on Iranian weapons development.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-drops-stunning-quote-in-riff-on-letting-iran-have-missiles-they-hurt-a-little-location-but/)

1 2 3 … 16