Trump Threatens to Occupy Iran Over Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump threatened to occupy Iran entirely if Tehran does not immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz, according to remarks he made to Fox News on Sunday. In an early morning phone call with Iranian officials, Trump stated, “You close the strait and you won’t have a country. You won’t even make it back to your f***** country. We’ll take over the rest of the country,” according to Fox’s Trey Yingst. The threat escalates Trump’s previous consideration of occupying Kharg Island, a major Iranian oil production facility, and marks a dramatic shift from his stated goal of negotiating a way out of the conflict he initiated in February.

Iran announced Saturday it would close the Strait of Hormuz in response to ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon targeting Hezbollah militants, just days after signing a 60-day ceasefire agreement with the Trump administration on Wednesday. The closure demonstrates the extreme fragility of the ceasefire arrangement and highlights the administration’s inability to restrain Israeli military actions, which have killed over 4,000 people in Lebanon since the war began. Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called for Israeli forces to “burn all of Lebanon,” rhetoric that Iran’s foreign minister and others denounced, yet Trump has proven unable to curb such statements or halt the Israeli assault despite public criticism.

Vice President JD Vance traveled to Switzerland this weekend to lead renewed peace negotiations with Iranian officials, while the administration publicly rebuked Israeli policy decisions. Vance warned Israeli officials not to alienate the United States, their closest ally, and previously expressed frustration that Israel cannot “kill” its way out of every problem. Trump echoed similar sentiments, asserting Israel would not exist without his administration’s support, yet his direct threats to Iran reveal his administration will apply far greater pressure on Tehran than on its Israeli counterpart to enforce the ceasefire terms.

The 60-day ceasefire agreement extends existing ceasefires while offering sanctions relief and access to frozen Iranian funds, provided Iran complies with terms including a commitment to forgo nuclear weapons development. The agreement mirrors language from the Obama-era nuclear deal Trump abandoned in 2018, dividing Republican support. Senator Bill Cassidy criticized the deal as a strategic defeat, stating Iran learned that threatening the Strait works and will repeat the tactic, while the administration’s tacit support for a $300 billion economic redevelopment fund for Iran drew opposition from both hawkish Republicans and Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who pledged his caucus would block votes if the fund reached Congress.

The administration indicated it could authorize many terms of the agreement, including sanctions relief, directly without congressional approval, circumventing legislative oversight. Trump’s volatile approach to negotiation, characterized by extreme threats followed by pursuit of agreements, underscores the instability surrounding U.S.-Iran relations and the ceasefire’s uncertain future as Israel continues operations Trump publicly opposes but cannot effectively control.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-iran-threat-hormuz-ceasefire-b2999930.html)

Trump Attacks Meloni Over Iran War Refusal, Invents Photo Claim

President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Sunday, attacking her in a Truth Social post without naming her directly while simultaneously condemning NATO for failing to support his Iran military campaign. Trump claimed he had denied Meloni a photograph at the Group of Seven summit in France because Italy would not permit U.S. military use of its landing strips and runways, and added that Meloni sought to “be friends again in order to get her ‘numbers up.'”

Meloni directly rejected Trump’s characterization of events, calling his attacks “unprovoked” and “senseless.” She stated that her popularity rests on defending Italy’s national interests and that her country remains a sovereign nation whose military base agreements cannot be violated. Meloni emphasized that Trump’s attempts to control her political standing are not her concern, and countered by suggesting he focus on his own popularity instead.

Trump’s repeated false claims about Meloni begging for a photograph represent a continuation of his pattern of fabricating details to demean allied leaders. His invocation of Italy’s refusal to support military action against Iran contradicts his earlier demands that NATO members fund defense spending, revealing inconsistency in how he applies pressure to allied nations.

The deterioration of Trump’s relationship with Meloni marks a significant rupture with what was previously one of his closest European political relationships. Trump had publicly praised Meloni as a “beautiful young woman” during a speech last year, framing the comment as politically risky but worth the exposure. Trump has threatened withdrawal of U.S. troops from Italy and Spain, citing both nations’ refusal to participate in military action against Iran.

Trump’s broader assault on NATO reflects his demand that allied nations comply with military objectives he deems necessary, regardless of their own strategic assessments or international law. The feud with Meloni demonstrates his willingness to weaponize military presence and personal relationships as leverage against leaders who assert their nation’s sovereignty and independent judgment.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/not-good-trump-ramps-up-feud-with-italys-prime-minister-in-scorching-new-post/)

Trump Drops Pair of Bonkers Fan Polls on ICE and ‘Dumocrats’

President Donald Trump posted two fan polls on Truth Social on Saturday while his administration’s Iran agreement deteriorated, with Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz in protest of Israeli airstrikes on Lebanon. Vice President JD Vance confirmed that White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner had arrived in Switzerland for ongoing Iran negotiations, yet Trump diverted attention to trivial social media exercises rather than managing the diplomatic crisis.

Trump’s first poll asked followers to choose between spelling “Dumocrat” or “Dumbocrat” as an insult directed at Democrats, framing the decision as a matter of “very important” strategic communication. His lengthy caption explained the technical differences between the two spellings, consuming presidential attention on a nomenclature preference while international negotiations faltered.

The second poll proposed renaming Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to “NICE” by adding the letter “N” for “National,” claiming this would “totally discombobulate” journalists and media outlets. Trump asserted ICE agents are “Great Patriots” and described the rebrand as a “much more prestigious name,” though he acknowledged that actual ICE agents themselves opposed the change, according to information relayed by Tom Homan.

Trump’s focus on recreational polling and rhetorical games with nomenclature directly coincided with Iran State media announcing closure of the Strait of Hormuz, while CENTCOM issued a contradictory statement claiming the waterway remained open for merchant traffic. The simultaneous deterioration of Trump’s signature foreign policy achievement and his public fixation on trivial wordplay demonstrated the administration’s inability to maintain coherent diplomatic or strategic attention.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-drops-pair-of-bonkers-fan-polls-on-ice-and-dumocrats-as-iran-agreement-falls-apart/)strategic attention.

Trump Berates Vance for Not Repeating Iran Nuclear Line

President Donald Trump reportedly berated Vice President JD Vance for failing to repeat Trump’s specific phrase that a 2025 U.S. military strike had “totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, according to a forthcoming book by New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan titled “Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump.” After the June attack, Vance had stated on ABC News that the strike “severely damaged” Iran’s nuclear program rather than obliterated it, noting that intelligence at the time suggested the program had not been fully destroyed.

Trump’s anger escalated when Vance, a military veteran skeptical of foreign military interventions, suggested the president soften language in his speech about the Iran operation. According to the book, Trump dismissed the vice president’s concerns by declaring, “I know what I’m doing,” then turned his back on Vance without further response. The tension reflected broader friction between the two men over Iran policy, with aides noting Vance appeared anxious following the strike and concerned about potential escalation.

Despite these reported disagreements, Vance has served as a central figure in the administration’s Iran strategy, conducting negotiations and publicly defending a recent memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran aimed at ending the conflict. This week, Vance defended the agreement against criticism from Israeli leaders, cautioning Israel against attacking “the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world.” The deal largely restores pre-war conditions without achieving a finalized peace settlement and defers nuclear negotiations indefinitely.

The book’s publication has sparked concerns within the Trump administration about classified information security. Administration officials believe the book may contain leaked secret recordings from the Situation Room, the highly secured area where the president addresses critical national security matters. An unnamed administration source told Axios, “We’re afraid some of our most sensitive conversations were being recorded, and we have no idea which ones.”

“Regime Change,” releasing Tuesday, also reportedly details internal conflict over handling the Epstein files, including a Situation Room meeting about the administration’s delayed release strategy. The book describes an incident in which then-FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino allegedly attacked then-Attorney General Pam Bondi over what he called the “dumb f***ing charade” of distributing early file batches to right-wing influencers while withholding broader releases for months.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-vance-jd-iran-maggie-haberman-book-b2999402.html)

Trump Invents False G7 Photo Claim to Attack Ally Meloni

President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni by repeating and expanding false claims about her conduct at the Group of Seven summit in France. Trump initially claimed Meloni “begged” him to take a photograph together, stating he “felt sorry for her,” before later telling NBC News she “was a big fan” but was unhelpful regarding the Strait of Hormuz and NATO commitments.

Meloni directly refuted Trump’s fabricated account in a social media video, declaring “Neither I nor Italy ever beg” and calling his statements “completely made up.” She expressed astonishment at Trump’s behavior toward an ally, noting this was not the first instance of such conduct and contrasting it with his lenient treatment of adversarial leaders, as she had previously done when rejecting his fabrications about the G7 encounter.

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani condemned Trump’s remarks as serious and offensive to all of Italy, announcing he would cancel his scheduled U.S. visit for June 21 and 22 in response. The diplomatic breach underscored the damage Trump’s unfounded accusations inflicted on U.S.-Italian relations and NATO cohesion.

The conflict reflects a broader pattern in Trump’s approach to allies. Earlier this year, Meloni criticized Trump’s attacks on Pope Leo XIV as unacceptable, prompting Trump to retaliate by claiming he was “shocked by her” and that he had been wrong about her courage, demonstrating his tendency to turn on supporters who fail to align with him completely.

Trump’s false narrative about Meloni at the G7 summit exemplifies his pattern of inventing interactions to demean political figures. His claims lacked credible basis yet were deployed to undermine a key European partner, revealing how he weaponizes unsubstantiated stories to manage personal grievances regardless of diplomatic consequences.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-meloni-feud-iran-g7-b2999448.html)

Meloni Rejects Trump Fabrication About Begging for G7

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni directly contradicted President Donald Trump’s claim that she begged him for a photograph at the Group of Seven summit in Evian-les-Bains, France on June 17. Trump told Italian broadcaster La7 that Meloni “begged me to take a photo with her” and that “she wanted a photo with me so badly,” adding he “felt sorry for her.” Meloni stated the account was “totally fabricated,” declaring “I and Italy never beg,” and expressed being “stunned” by Trump’s false characterization of their interaction.

Meloni used Trump’s fabricated claim to highlight his pattern of disrespecting longstanding Western allies while treating adversaries with greater deference. “I don’t know why the president of the United States behaves this way with his own allies. It’s not, after all, the first time this has happened,” she said, referencing an April interview where Trump attacked her refusal to support U.S.-Israeli military action against Iran. Video footage from the summit showed the two in an extended seated conversation, contradicting Trump’s framing that he granted her an audience she had desperately sought.

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani condemned Trump’s statements as “serious” and “offensive” to Italy, announcing he would cancel a planned trip to the United States the following week. When Trump doubled down on his false claim in a subsequent phone call with NBC News, he again attacked Meloni for insufficient NATO support during U.S. military operations, conflating the photograph dispute with geopolitical disagreements over the Strait of Hormuz and the Iran conflict.

The escalating conflict marks a sharp reversal between the two right-wing leaders, who were once considered close political allies. Meloni attended Trump’s January 2025 inauguration as the sole European leader present, and Trump previously praised her at his Mar-a-Lago resort as a “fantastic woman” reshaping Europe. Earlier tensions emerged when Meloni publicly defended Pope Leo XIV against Trump’s attacks, prompting Trump to accuse her of lacking courage.

The incident underscores Trump’s pattern of weaponizing false personal narratives against former allies who fail to demonstrate absolute loyalty, particularly when they decline to support his military ventures or defend institutions he attacks. Meloni’s refusal to validate Trump’s fabrication and her public criticism of his treatment of Western partners signal a definitive break in what was marketed as a unified alliance of right-wing populist leaders.



(Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/world/italy/trump-italy-meloni-begged-photo-fabricated-g7-summit-france-rcna350836)

Trump Drops Stunning Quote on Letting Iran Have Missiles

At the G7 Summit in Evian-le-Bains, France on Wednesday, Trump defended allowing Iran to retain missile capability during a press conference closing the summit. Trump stated that missiles "hurt a little location, but they don't blow up the planet," dismissing concerns about Iranian conventional ballistic weapons as part of broader negotiations tied to a leaked 14-point Iran Memorandum of Understanding that includes a $300 billion reconstruction fund.

Trump's comments contradicted established nonproliferation policy by normalizing Iranian missile development. He argued that preventing Iran from possessing missiles while permitting Saudi Arabia to retain them would be inconsistent, claiming "it doesn't work that way," and positioned missile capability as inevitable given that other regional actors possess such weapons.

The statement represents Trump's continued pattern of claiming imminent Iran deal breakthroughs while simultaneously conceding major concessions to Iranian demands. Trump's acknowledgment that Iran would retain missiles—a core non-nuclear component of the disputed agreement—signals capitulation on a key security concern that regional allies and defense analysts have identified as destabilizing.

Trump framed the position through false equivalence, suggesting that allowing a state designated as a terrorism sponsor to develop missiles mirrors regional arms balancing. His dismissal of missile threats as affecting only "a little location" contradicts U.S. military assessments of Iranian ballistic capability and previous rhetoric in which Trump threatened Iran with unspecified consequences following military escalations tied to Iranian missile systems.

The remarks underscore Trump's willingness to abandon longstanding security positions to secure a deal that he has declared imminent repeatedly over recent months, prioritizing a negotiated agreement over substantive limits on Iranian weapons development.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-drops-stunning-quote-in-riff-on-letting-iran-have-missiles-they-hurt-a-little-location-but/)

Trump’s Ignores Russia And China Helped Iran, Thanks Them

Trump claimed to the New York Times that Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian leader Vladimir Putin helped secure a peace deal with Iran, crediting both authoritarian leaders for their cooperation. Trump stated Xi “was a total gentleman” for not interfering with a U.S. blockade of the Strait, while praising Putin’s restraint in the conflict. The White House declined to clarify what Trump meant by their assistance, and neither the Chinese nor Russian embassies responded to requests for comment.

Trump’s praise for Russia and China directly contradicts documented intelligence showing both nations actively aided Iran during the war. The State Department imposed sanctions on companies for sending Chinese arms to Iran, and Russia provided Iran with intelligence on U.S. troop locations and movements using satellite imagery, enabling Iranian targeting of American forces. CNN reported in early March that Russia shared this military intelligence to help Iran locate U.S. troops for retaliation strikes.

The conflict resulted in 13 U.S. service members killed and approximately 370 injured, primarily from Iranian missile strikes on American military bases throughout the Middle East. New York Times diplomatic correspondent Edward Wong highlighted the contradiction, noting that Trump “didn’t mention” Russia’s intelligence aid to Iran or China’s weapon transfers to the regime. Wong documented that the State Department had imposed sanctions specifically for companies sending Chinese military equipment to Iran during the hostilities.

Trump initiated the call from the White House residence on his 80th birthday as family gathered for a celebratory dinner, where he framed the Iran conflict as having “remade the Middle East in America’s favor.” He characterized the deal as a success warranting praise for two authoritarian regimes, despite their documented military support for his stated adversary. The White House and State Department declined to provide substantive responses when pressed on Trump’s claims about Russian and Chinese assistance in brokering the agreement.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-thanks-russia-and-china-for-helping-with-iran-deal-ignores-they-helped-iran-target-us-troops/)The White House and State Department declined to provide substantive responses when pressed on Trump’s claims about Russian and Chinese assistance in brokering the agreement.

Trump Threatens Iran After Escalating Military Strikes

Trump threatened Iran with unspecified consequences for negotiation delays, stating “Iran will pay the price” after weeks of claiming a deal was imminent. His warning followed U.S. military strikes against Iran on Tuesday in response to Iran downing an Army Apache helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz, after which Iran launched retaliatory strikes on American bases in Jordan, Bahrain, and Kuwait early Wednesday. The escalation tested a ceasefire that began April 8, though a Qatari delegation arrived in Tehran Wednesday to attempt bridging remaining gaps between U.S. and Iranian negotiators.

Trump’s threat marked a sharp reversal from his repeated claims over two months that a breakthrough was imminent. Just 48 hours before his “pay the price” post, Trump had claimed 38 times in two months that a deal was days away, and expressed reluctance about renewed military action. Yet after the helicopter incident, he authorized fresh strikes framed as a warning and did not rule out further targeting of Iranian infrastructure, telling Fox News on Wednesday “I may keep going.”

Fundamental disputes block agreement, including control of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program, with the Trump administration’s wil

(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/09/world/live-news/iran-war-trump-israel)lingness to release $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets remaining contested. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman accused the U.S. and Israel of “repeated ceasefire violations” and stated diplomacy cannot “take place in a vacuum,” signaling Tehran’s willingness to continue talks despite the military exchange. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian called for moving beyond the current “state of neither war nor peace,” suggesting negotiations remain the path forward.

The strikes damaged Iranian infrastructure, with at least 20,000 Iranians losing access to drinking water after two reservoirs were struck. Regional condemnation of Iran’s retaliatory action was swift: Egypt’s foreign ministry condemned the strikes “in the strongest terms,” while Qatar described them as a “flagrant breach of international law.” Energy forecasters warned oil prices will remain elevated through at least July, with Brent crude expected to average $105 per barrel, contradicting Trump’s repeated claims that prices will plunge once an Iran deal materializes.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan condemned Israeli military actions in Syria and Lebanon, warning of regional consequences and accusing Israel of pursuing delusions about territorial expansion. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded by attacking Erdogan as an “antisemitic dictator” and reaffirming Israel’s intent to continue military operations against Iran and its proxies. The competing regional dynamics underscore the complexity of achieving a sustainable agreement amid escalating tensions across multiple fronts.

Trump reportedly considers buying Chagos Islands from Mauritius | Donald Trump | The Guardian

Donald Trump is considering purchasing the Chagos Islands from Mauritius to secure US control of the Diego Garcia military base, according to the Telegraph. The proposal would circumvent UK officials by having the US negotiate directly with Mauritius after the islands are first ceded to Mauritian sovereignty, bypassing stalled British plans to transfer the territory. Trump Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent brought the plan to Trump, though it is not described as a leading option among proposals under consideration.

The US previously blocked legislation in April that would have handed the islands to Mauritius, effectively halting the UK’s sovereignty transfer plans. Some Trump administration officials oppose ceding the island to Mauritius due to concerns that China’s alliance with Mauritius could create espionage vulnerabilities. The White House declined to comment on the reported proposal to the Guardian.

The Diego Garcia base, located in the central Indian Ocean approximately 2,360 miles from Iran, houses a US airbase capable of deploying long-range missiles and has been a strategic asset for US-UK security for nearly 60 years. Since the US-Israel war with Iran began in late February, Iran has launched multiple strikes against the joint base, including one in late March that was intercepted by a US warship. In March, the UK authorized the US to launch missile strikes against Iranian targets from Diego Garcia, a decision Trump criticized as “very late.”

A delegation from the Chagos Refugees Group, visiting the UK last week, accused the British government of allowing the issue to be “hijacked within the halls” of UK politics and demanded the right to return to their birthplace. Louis Olivier Bancoult, the delegation leader, stated the government lacks genuine commitment to resolving the displacement of Chagossians, saying “We’re still suffering and our position is clear, we have the right to live in our birthplace.” The refugees expressed support for the UK to finalize an agreement on the islands’ future.

A UK government spokesperson asserted that maintaining operational control of Diego Garcia is essential to prevent adversaries from gaining strategic footing and that the UK-Mauritius agreement was designed to address long-term security risks both nations face. When asked whether the UK would proceed without US support, a government source confirmed: “We’ve always bee

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/07/trump-deal-chagos-islands-mauritius-uk?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAST2hBleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeHcaW3WDWvK8WxGqhkbE9bFsD-8EJdB_Ez3Hb_ltxfL4i85NkOIwJTm_2HI0_aem_AfM_4giNmngx1uXos9_gaw#Echobox=1780860392)n clear we wouldn’t go ahead without US support,” effectively giving the Trump administration veto power over the islands’ sovereignty transfer.

1 2 3 70