Category: Foreign Policy

Rubio Controls Venezuela as De Facto Viceroy

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has established de facto control over Venezuela since U.S. forces captured President Nicolás Maduro in January 2026, functioning as what officials call a “viceroy” over the nation. Rubio oversees Venezuela’s finances, natural resource distribution, government appointments, and foreign policy from Washington without visiting the country in person, maintaining close contact with acting president Delcy Rodríguez through WhatsApp messages where he directs her decisions on defense ministers, business licenses, and public statements.

The U.S. Treasury receives revenue from Venezuela’s oil exports and disburses funds to the country through its banking system, giving Rubio’s team control over spending priorities and conditions. Rubio sets the terms for international business licenses, decides which companies can operate in Venezuela, and has prioritized American oil firms over European competitors while pressuring Rodríguez to abandon partnerships with U.S. adversaries like Russia’s Rosneft. This financial leverage compels Rodríguez to comply with his directives to maintain her government’s ability to pay workers and stabilize the currency.

On taking power, Trump told Rodríguez she could either cooperate with the United States or face attacks on Venezuela’s infrastructure and military bases. When Rodríguez sought assurances after the Justice Department began investigating her, Rubio texted her a Trump social media post praising her performance, then approved her thank-you response before she posted it. The Trump administration halted prosecution of Rodríguez, demanded she extradite Maduro ally Alex Saab for extradition to the U.S., and directed her to remove a foreign minister’s post criticizing the American attack on Iran, effectively stripping Venezuela of independent foreign policy.

Trump has explicitly stated he intends to “run the country” for years and has suggested Venezuela could become the 51st state, framing the arrangement as part of his broader agenda for American expansionism in Greenland, Canada, and the Panama Canal. The administration has deployed 900 military personnel to Venezuela, committed nearly $400 million in aid, and delivered cash following recent earthquakes, using disaster relief to strengthen Rodríguez’s interim government while indefinitely postponing democratic elections.

Rubio has abandoned his previous advocacy for Latin American democracy to enforce what the article describes as “Trump-era American power, in which the winner takes all regardless of sovereignty and international law.” Representative Sean Casten questioned Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about the constitutional authority for controlling Venezuelan assets, but received no substantive answer, exposing the absence of legal justification for this colonial arrangement.



(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/11/us/politics/how-marco-rubio-runs-venezuela.html?fbclid=IwVERDUATAoTpwZG9mA2ZkaWQWUKYQUlJUuA-60cymLc92kaDcnOpodWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR75FDCaExV3rlk91kk5_b8v36cHEzSx3Qwf3JsS6cVvp7BbQIB_JyAgCH6pqQ_aem_WS82o4yXRWvIVoDhBvB24A)

Trump Strikes Back At Iran After Strait of Hormuz Is Closed

Trump ordered U.S. military strikes against Iranian targets in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday after Revolutionary Guard forces fired on a Cyprus-flagged container ship and declared the strategic waterway closed. U.S. Central Command confirmed the strikes targeted air surveillance radars, missile and drone storage facilities, launch sites, and ground-to-air missile systems, marking the third round of American military action against Iran this week. The attack on the merchant vessel left one civilian crew member missing and caused significant damage, according to CENTCOM.

Iran’s state media claimed the IRGC fired “warning shots” at a vessel traveling an unapproved route, escalating tensions after Trump had threatened to occupy Iran entirely if Tehran did not reopen the strait. The blockade directly threatens global trade and fuel prices, with CNN military analyst Cedric Leighton warning the latest Iranian action could trigger further increases in gasoline costs and disrupt international commerce. Trump has previously threatened Iran with total occupation over the strait closure.

U.S. officials told CNN that diplomatic negotiations cannot resume until the strait is secured, even as mediators attempt to return both nations to the negotiating table. Leighton cited Trump’s past interest in seizing Kharg Island, a major Iranian oil hub, as potential military leverage, though he cautioned such ground operations could trigger broader escalation and economic damage Trump wants to avoid. A senior Iranian lawmaker warned that “not a single American soldier will return alive” if the United States attempted an invasion of the island.

The cycle of attacks underscores Trump’s pattern of military confrontation with Iran, following his earlier threats to annihilate Iran over ceasefire violations and his demands that gas retailers cut prices amid the conflict-driven energy crisis. Trump authorized the strikes directly, positioning himself as commander-in-chief while claiming to avoid economic damage from further escalation. The standoff demonstrates how Trump’s aggressive foreign policy and military orders are directly driving consequences for American consumers and global stability.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-strikes-back-at-iran-after-irgc-declares-strait-of-hormuz-is-closed-again/)

Trump Commerce Grants UAE AI Chip Access After Sheikh’s Investment

The Trump administration’s Commerce Department granted the United Arab Emirates license-free access to critical U.S. artificial intelligence technology, including advanced semiconductor chips. The decision follows a $500 million investment by Abu Dhabi royal Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan in World Liberty Financial, a Trump family cryptocurrency venture, which Eric Trump finalized four days before the president’s inauguration.

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren condemned the arrangement as a “corrupt deal” and demanded testimony from Commerce Department officials, citing direct national security threats. Warren argued that the preferential export control change violates U.S. security protocols and creates vulnerability to foreign adversaries, particularly China, given G42’s documented past collaborations with sanctioned technology firm Huawei.

The financial arrangement between the Trump family and the UAE official represents a direct conflict of interest, with Trump personally benefiting from cryptocurrency holdings tied to Tahnoon’s substantial investments. This deal follows the Trump family’s sale of a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million to representatives of the same Sheikh, demonstrating a pattern of financial entanglement between Trump’s personal wealth and U.S. technology policy decisions.

The Commerce Department’s action undermines established national security safeguards by providing a foreign nation unrestricted access to sensitive semiconductor technology without standard licensing requirements. This preferential treatment contradicts standard U.S. export control frameworks designed to prevent advanced chip technology from reaching potential adversaries.

The deal exemplifies how Trump uses presidential authority to enrich himself and his family while simultaneously compromising national security. The administration’s decision to grant technological privileges to a foreign investor who directly funded Trump family business interests demonstrates the weaponization of government power for personal financial gain.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-uae-investor-license-free-crypto-ai-chips-b3013179.html)

Trump Confuses Zelensky With Putin at NATO Summit

During a NATO summit press conference in Ankara, Turkey on Wednesday, President Trump directly confused Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Russian President Vladimir Putin while standing beside Zelensky. Trump gestured toward Zelensky and asked reporters, “You have a question for President Putin, please?” demonstrating a fundamental failure to distinguish between the leaders of a U.S. ally and an adversary engaged in active conflict.

When reporters reacted with visible confusion, Trump attempted to obscure his error by speaking in circles rather than acknowledging the mistake. He repeated the request multiple times, saying “Do you have a question for President Putin — not Zelensky — Putin,” while continuing to gesture in a manner that suggested disorientation about who stood before him. This verbal scrambling revealed an inability or unwillingness to admit a basic cognitive lapse about two of the world’s most consequential geopolitical figures.

Trump then claimed to speak frequently with Putin about ending the Ukraine war, stating “I talk to him a lot” and asserting that Putin “wants to end the war.” This remark underscored Trump’s documented alignment with Russia’s strategic interests, consistent with his Ukraine peace plan acknowledged as a Russian wish list by U.S. senators who reviewed it. Trump contrasted his frequent Putin contact with minimal engagement with Zelensky, the leader of an invaded nation requesting American support.

The Zelensky-Putin confusion followed another severe gaffe minutes earlier in the same press conference, where Trump referred to “the Islamic Republic of Japan” firing missiles at a U.S. aircraft carrier. These compounded errors at a NATO summit involving direct diplomatic engagement illustrated Trump’s erratic handling of critical international affairs and his apparent unfamiliarity with fundamental geopolitical facts, mirroring a pattern documented during previous NATO diplomatic engagements.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-appears-to-mistake-zelensky-for-putin-then-scrambles-to-cover-it-in-bizarre-moment/)

Trump Dementia Gaffes On Full Display At NATO Summit

During a NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey on Wednesday, Trump committed multiple significant verbal errors that underscored both his cognitive fitness and his dangerous mishandling of international affairs. Trump falsely claimed to have destroyed “every single bridge in Iran” and threatened Iranian infrastructure including electric plants and desalination facilities, escalating threats against a nation without congressional authorization or clear strategic justification. These statements contradicted established rules of engagement and revealed reckless military posturing at a critical diplomatic moment.

Trump confused Japan with Iran when recounting a military incident, stating the “Islamic Republic of Japan” fired 111 missiles at the USS Abraham Lincoln. He also appeared to confuse Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with Russian President Vladimir Putin during a press conference, asking Zelensky “You have a question for President Putin, please?” before correcting himself after media laughter. Both errors demonstrated alarming confusion about fundamental international relationships during active military conflict.

Trump misnamed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the Iran nuclear agreement, as the “JCPOC” while attacking it as the “Obama Nuclear Waste Deal.” He repeated a false claim about his TikTok prominence, asserting he was “number one” on the platform and more popular than Taylor Swift, when Trump has 16 million followers compared to Swift’s 30 million and neither ranks in the platform’s top 10. Trump also referred to TikTok as “Tic Tac” despite using the correct name multiple times in the same remarks.

These gaffes mirror Trump’s established pattern of attacking NATO spending while courting authoritarian leaders and abandoning U.S. allies to appease despots. At 80 years old, Trump’s cognitive lapses during high-stakes diplomacy represent a direct threat to American security and international stability, compounding his documented history of reckless military decisions and alliance sabotage.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/watch-4-most-embarrassing-gaffes-from-trumps-nato-visit/)

Trump Vows F-35 Sale to Turkey, Attacks NATO Spending

President Donald Trump attacked NATO during a meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Ankara on Tuesday, claiming the alliance failed to support the United States in an Iran military operation and questioning why America invests trillions defending European nations. Trump stated, "We've invested trillions of dollars in NATO. Why? To protect European countries and others, Canada, etc.," while accusing NATO members of refusing assistance despite his requests.

During the same meeting, Trump declared his willingness to sell F-35 fighter jets to Turkey despite explicit U.S. law prohibiting the sale until Turkey removes its Russian S-400 missile system. Trump told reporters, "We have a better relationship with Turkey, and Turkey has been more loyal than other countries that we think would be loyal. So yeah, it is something certainly we would consider," directly contradicting existing legal restrictions designed to prevent advanced weapons transfers to nations with Russian military equipment.

Trump's statements demonstrate his pattern of subordinating national security policy and legal constraints to personal relationships and transactional loyalty calculations. Trump has repeatedly demonstrated fundamental misunderstandings about F-35 capabilities, falsely claiming the jets are invisible to the naked eye when they are only radar-stealthy, undermining confidence in his judgment on weapons systems decisions.

Trump specifically criticized British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for NATO's lack of support during the Iran operation, personalizing geopolitical strategy rather than addressing structural alliance commitments. His trip to the NATO Summit in Ankara came only after initially refusing to attend, reversing course out of personal regard for Erdoğan, whom he repeatedly referred to as his "friend." The New York Times had reported Trump intended to signal willingness to sell F-35s to Turkey before the meeting occurred.

Trump's willingness to circumvent federal law governing weapons sales, his weaponization of alliance relationships based on personal loyalty, and his dismissal of collective security obligations in favor of transactional deals violate established foreign policy frameworks and subordinate institutional checks to executive preference. His pressure on NATO and simultaneous cultivation of authoritarian-friendly Turkey positions the U.S. strategic interests against democratic alliance structures.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-bashes-nato-debates-selling-fighter-jets-to-loyal-turkey-despite-restrictions/)

Trump Threatens Iran’s Annihilation Over Ceasefire Violations

President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that U.S. aircraft struck Iranian missile, drone storage, and coastal radar sites on Saturday in response to Iran violating a ceasefire agreement. Trump stated the United States was prepared to be “forced” to complete military operations against Iran if additional violations occurred, declaring that “the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist” if the country continues its aggression. Trump’s threat escalated rhetoric surrounding the ongoing conflict, as U.S. Central Command confirmed strikes were conducted in direct response to Iranian attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

According to Fox News correspondent Jennifer Griffin, Iranian forces launched one-way attack drones targeting U.S. naval assets, including the Navy’s regional headquarters and the 5th Fleet based in Bahrain. The strikes hit a commercial vessel carrying approximately 200,000 barrels of oil in the Strait of Hormuz early Saturday morning, marking the second ship attacked in two days. Griffin reported the U.S. military response was substantially larger than previous night strikes and included targeting air defense systems, drone storage facilities, cruise missiles, and minelaying capabilities.

Trump has repeatedly employed annihilation rhetoric throughout the conflict with Iran. Previously, Trump threatened that “a whole civilization will die tonight” unless Iran reopened the Strait of Hormuz, following which a two-week ceasefire was announced and Trump withdrew the threat. His pattern of catastrophic ultimatums paired with tactical concessions demonstrates a strategy of escalating military pressure while maintaining negotiating leverage, though his latest statements suggest willingness to pursue total military conquest if Iran continues its maritime operations.

The escalating military exchanges occurred as ongoing negotiations to end the war continued. U.S. officials stated Iran was given an opportunity to honor the ceasefire agreement but “elected not to” when its forces conducted the drone attack. The cycle of Iranian aggression and American military retaliation underscores the fragility of the ceasefire arrangement and the potential for broader regional conflict if either side abandons restraint. Trump’s threats to occupy Iran over the Strait of Hormuz reflect his consistent maximalist positioning in the conflict.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-warns-usa-is-getting-forced-to-wipe-out-iran-once-and-for-all/)

Trump Defies Congress And Blocks Humdreds of Millions For Foreign Aid

The Trump administration is systematically defying congressional mandates on foreign aid spending, blocking $500 million in global health funds and delaying humanitarian assistance despite President Trump signing legislation that explicitly required these expenditures. Russell Vought's Office of Management and Budget has labeled funds as "unallocated" to maintain control over spending, a tactic legal scholars say violates the Impoundment Control Act and undermines Congress's constitutional power of the purse.

Eight months into the fiscal year, the State Department has obligated only $190 million of the $9.4 billion Congress directed for global health, representing just 5% of typical spending levels for the same period. Programs explicitly funded by Congress for family planning ($524 million), nutrition ($165 million), and neglected tropical diseases ($109 million) have seen little or no implementation, while PEPFAR, the HIV/AIDS program credited with saving 26 million lives globally, has been restricted to half its available budget despite congressional appropriation of $4.6 billion.

Jeremy Lewin, a 29-year-old lawyer with no prior humanitarian experience who arrived via Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, controls foreign aid policy as an unconfirmed acting undersecretary. Lewin refuses to meet with career staff, withholds information about implementation plans, and demands personal approval for routine payments, creating a bottleneck that has left Congress unable to obtain basic answers about administration spending despite repeated requests for required reports and briefings.

The administration's defiance mirrors its 2025 use of "pocket rescissions," an illegal maneuver under the Impoundment Control Act that clawed back $13 billion in foreign aid Congress had approved. Though a federal court initially blocked the tactic, the Supreme Court issued an emergency ideological split decision allowing it to continue without ruling on its legality. Constitutional scholars and legal experts warn that continued withholding of appropriated funds constitutes a fundamental assault on the separation of powers, threatening U.S. democracy itself.

The State Department has denied withholding funds while simultaneously announcing bilateral deals requiring recipient nations to provide health data as a condition for receiving medications the United States previously donated. Additionally, the administration funneled $3.8 billion to a small U.N. office without allowing independent U.S. audits, and has delayed $661 million in required contributions to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, forcing the organization to reduce support to nations that depend on American funding for lifesaving treatments.

(Source: https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-defying-congress-foreign-aid-usaid-vought-rubio-constitutional-crisis?utm_campaign=propublica-sprout&utm_content=1782567906&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleASs8iRwZG9mA2ZkaWQWUJdPWI_QwoRxn6jpTg7VaYtDYAhPDmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR5zL9Tu-THjlQ6p44jYmgmO5iK178eT2QOztVFD-z51WyPduid3hOBL41yaDA_aem_pkPqY5Bc-FMN9QGc-i5Kdw)

Trump Threatens to Occupy Iran Over Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump threatened to occupy Iran entirely if Tehran does not immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz, according to remarks he made to Fox News on Sunday. In an early morning phone call with Iranian officials, Trump stated, “You close the strait and you won’t have a country. You won’t even make it back to your f***** country. We’ll take over the rest of the country,” according to Fox’s Trey Yingst. The threat escalates Trump’s previous consideration of occupying Kharg Island, a major Iranian oil production facility, and marks a dramatic shift from his stated goal of negotiating a way out of the conflict he initiated in February.

Iran announced Saturday it would close the Strait of Hormuz in response to ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon targeting Hezbollah militants, just days after signing a 60-day ceasefire agreement with the Trump administration on Wednesday. The closure demonstrates the extreme fragility of the ceasefire arrangement and highlights the administration’s inability to restrain Israeli military actions, which have killed over 4,000 people in Lebanon since the war began. Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called for Israeli forces to “burn all of Lebanon,” rhetoric that Iran’s foreign minister and others denounced, yet Trump has proven unable to curb such statements or halt the Israeli assault despite public criticism.

Vice President JD Vance traveled to Switzerland this weekend to lead renewed peace negotiations with Iranian officials, while the administration publicly rebuked Israeli policy decisions. Vance warned Israeli officials not to alienate the United States, their closest ally, and previously expressed frustration that Israel cannot “kill” its way out of every problem. Trump echoed similar sentiments, asserting Israel would not exist without his administration’s support, yet his direct threats to Iran reveal his administration will apply far greater pressure on Tehran than on its Israeli counterpart to enforce the ceasefire terms.

The 60-day ceasefire agreement extends existing ceasefires while offering sanctions relief and access to frozen Iranian funds, provided Iran complies with terms including a commitment to forgo nuclear weapons development. The agreement mirrors language from the Obama-era nuclear deal Trump abandoned in 2018, dividing Republican support. Senator Bill Cassidy criticized the deal as a strategic defeat, stating Iran learned that threatening the Strait works and will repeat the tactic, while the administration’s tacit support for a $300 billion economic redevelopment fund for Iran drew opposition from both hawkish Republicans and Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who pledged his caucus would block votes if the fund reached Congress.

The administration indicated it could authorize many terms of the agreement, including sanctions relief, directly without congressional approval, circumventing legislative oversight. Trump’s volatile approach to negotiation, characterized by extreme threats followed by pursuit of agreements, underscores the instability surrounding U.S.-Iran relations and the ceasefire’s uncertain future as Israel continues operations Trump publicly opposes but cannot effectively control.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-iran-threat-hormuz-ceasefire-b2999930.html)

Trump Attacks Meloni Over Iran War Refusal, Invents Photo Claim

President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Sunday, attacking her in a Truth Social post without naming her directly while simultaneously condemning NATO for failing to support his Iran military campaign. Trump claimed he had denied Meloni a photograph at the Group of Seven summit in France because Italy would not permit U.S. military use of its landing strips and runways, and added that Meloni sought to “be friends again in order to get her ‘numbers up.'”

Meloni directly rejected Trump’s characterization of events, calling his attacks “unprovoked” and “senseless.” She stated that her popularity rests on defending Italy’s national interests and that her country remains a sovereign nation whose military base agreements cannot be violated. Meloni emphasized that Trump’s attempts to control her political standing are not her concern, and countered by suggesting he focus on his own popularity instead.

Trump’s repeated false claims about Meloni begging for a photograph represent a continuation of his pattern of fabricating details to demean allied leaders. His invocation of Italy’s refusal to support military action against Iran contradicts his earlier demands that NATO members fund defense spending, revealing inconsistency in how he applies pressure to allied nations.

The deterioration of Trump’s relationship with Meloni marks a significant rupture with what was previously one of his closest European political relationships. Trump had publicly praised Meloni as a “beautiful young woman” during a speech last year, framing the comment as politically risky but worth the exposure. Trump has threatened withdrawal of U.S. troops from Italy and Spain, citing both nations’ refusal to participate in military action against Iran.

Trump’s broader assault on NATO reflects his demand that allied nations comply with military objectives he deems necessary, regardless of their own strategic assessments or international law. The feud with Meloni demonstrates his willingness to weaponize military presence and personal relationships as leverage against leaders who assert their nation’s sovereignty and independent judgment.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/not-good-trump-ramps-up-feud-with-italys-prime-minister-in-scorching-new-post/)

1 2 3 … 70