Trump’s Education Secretary Pick Linked to Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Linda McMahon, the education secretary pick by President Donald Trump, faces serious allegations in a recently filed sexual abuse lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that during her tenure at World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), McMahon ignored credible reports of sexual abuse involving children at the hands of an employee, Melvin Phillips Jr., who was a ringside announcer and ring crew chief. The plaintiffs, five former ‘ring boys’ from the 1980s, accuse the McMahons of criminal negligence for allowing Phillips to remain at the company despite knowing of the abuse.

The lawsuit was filed in October in Maryland and includes accusations against both Linda and her husband, Vince McMahon, co-founders of the WWE. It highlights a disturbing culture that allegedly permitted the exploitation of vulnerable young boys while they were working for the organization. The claims are supported by a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, who stated that many within the company were aware of the abuse but failed to take action against it.

Despite the severe nature of these allegations, McMahon has not been personally accused of sexual misconduct. However, the lawsuit paints a grim picture of a wrestling empire that prioritized its success over the safety and well-being of its young employees. Critics of the Trump administration will likely view this nomination as indicative of a troubling disregard for accountability and ethical leadership.

As the case unfolds, the implications could extend beyond McMahon’s nomination, potentially impacting the Trump administration’s reputation. The legal proceedings may shine a light on systemic issues within powerful organizations and raise questions about the moral compass of those in leadership positions.

In the face of such serious allegations, it remains to be seen how the Trump administration will respond. The appointment of an education secretary linked to a lawsuit of this nature raises concerns about the values that are being promoted at the highest levels of government.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/21/us/linda-mcmahon-sexual-abuse-lawsuit-trump-education-secretary.html)

Trump Repeats QAnon-Based Lie Schools Are Performing Forced Gender Reassignment Surgery

Donald Trump, during a recent visit to the Bronx, displayed his alarming views on education and gender identity, claiming that schools should not allow transgender identities and asserting that children are being manipulated by schools into changing their gender without parental consent. His statements, which echo far-right conspiracy theories, are not only misleading but also indicative of a dangerous agenda that seeks to undermine LGBTQ+ rights and education.

In a segment aired on Fox News, Trump proposed drastic cuts to the federal Department of Education, suggesting it should operate with minimal staff dedicated solely to teaching English. This radical approach to education reflects a broader Republican strategy aimed at dismantling federal support for public schools, which could severely impact educational quality across the nation.

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1848349656738066753

Furthermore, Trump’s comments about transgender students reveal an alarming ignorance about the realities faced by these individuals. There is no evidence to support his claim that schools are secretly conducting gender transition procedures without parental knowledge. Such assertions have been debunked and are rooted in the toxic narratives propagated by extremist groups.

Trump’s remarks align with the anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric that has gained traction among conservatives, particularly as they rally against perceived threats to traditional values. This rhetoric not only alienates vulnerable communities but also serves to distract from more pressing issues within public education, such as funding and resource allocation.

As the 2024 election approaches, it is crucial for voters to recognize the implications of Trump’s education policies and the broader Republican agenda that seeks to marginalize LGBTQ+ individuals. Supporting candidates who advocate for inclusive and equitable education is essential to ensuring the rights and dignity of all students.

(h/t: https://newrepublic.com/post/187360/trump-fix-schools-disturbing-answer)

Trump’s Dangerous Lies: Kids Aren’t Having Transgender Surgeries in Schools

Former President Donald Trump has once again propagated the false narrative that children are undergoing transgender surgeries during school hours. In a recent rally, he made misleading claims that schools are facilitating surgical procedures for minors without parental consent, a narrative that has no basis in fact. This rhetoric not only misrepresents the reality of transgender healthcare but also contributes to the stigmatization of LGBTQ+ youth.

Trump’s statements reflect a broader trend among Republicans to misinform the public about transgender issues, often using sensationalized claims to rally support among their base. Medical professionals and credible organizations have refuted these claims, clarifying that gender-affirming surgeries, when appropriate, are typically not performed on minors and require extensive evaluation and parental involvement.

The former president’s comments come in the wake of his administration’s previous attempts to undermine LGBTQ+ rights, including a ban on transgender individuals serving in the military and proposals that would allow healthcare providers to refuse treatment based on gender identity. This pattern showcases a consistent effort to marginalize transgender individuals and restrict their access to necessary medical care.

Moreover, Trump’s rhetoric has serious implications. By spreading misinformation about transgender youth, he further endangers an already vulnerable population, which faces higher rates of mental health issues and discrimination. His statements not only distort the truth but also contribute to a hostile environment for LGBTQ+ individuals.

In conclusion, Trump’s repeated falsehoods about transgender surgeries in schools are a deliberate attempt to mislead the public and incite fear. It is crucial to challenge these lies and promote accurate information about transgender healthcare and rights to ensure the safety and dignity of all individuals.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/trump-false-claims-schools-transgender-surgeries-rcna170217)

Offensive Emails Among Businessmen, Donald Trump Jr. Spark Fight in Hedge Fund Case – WSJ

Skip to Main Content Explore Our Brands WSJ Barron’s MarketWatch IBD Offensive Emails Among Businessmen, Donald Trump Jr. Spark Fight in Hedge Fund Case Share Resize Listen (2 min) Subscribe Sign In SubscribeSign In English Edition Edition English中文 (Chinese)日本語 (Japanese) Print Edition Video Audio Latest Headlines More MoreOther Products from WSJBuy Side from WSJWSJ ShopWSJ Wine Latest World Topics Africa Americas Asia China Europe Middle East India Oceania Russia U.K. More Science Archaeology Biology Environment Physics Space & Astronomy World Video Business Topics Airlines Autos C-Suite Deals Earnings Energy & Oil Entrepreneurship Telecom Retail Hospitality Logistics Media C-Suite CFO Journal CIO Journal CMO Today Logistics Report Risk & Compliance WSJ Professional WSJ Pro Bankruptcy WSJ Pro Central Banking WSJ Pro Cybersecurity WSJ Pro Private Equity WSJ Pro Sustainable Business WSJ Pro Venture Capital More Heard on the Street Journal Reports Business Video Business Podcast U.S. Topics Climate & Environment Education Law College Rankings 2024 More U.S. Video What’s News Podcast Politics Topics Elections National Security Policy More Politics Video Economy Topics Central Banking Consumers Housing Jobs Trade Global WSJ Professional WSJ Pro Bankruptcy WSJ Pro Central Banking WSJ Pro Private Equity WSJ Pro Venture Capital More Capital Account Economic Forecasting Survey Economy Video Tech Topics AI Biotech Cybersecurity Personal Technology More Christopher Mims Joanna Stern Julie Jargon Nicole Nguyen CIO Journal The Future of Everything Tech Video Tech Podcast Finance Topics Banking Commodities & Futures Currencies Investing Regulation Stocks More Heard on the Street Greg Ip Jason Zweig Laura Saunders James Mackintosh CFO Journal Markets Video Your Money Briefing Podcast Market Data Market Data Home Companies U.S. Stocks Commodities Bonds & Rates Currencies Market Data Mutual Funds & ETFs Opinion Columnists Gerard Baker Sadanand Dhume Allysia Finley James Freeman William A. Galston Daniel Henninger Holman W. Jenkins Andy Kessler William McGurn Walter Russell Mead Peggy Noonan Mary Anastasia O’Grady Jason Riley Joseph Sternberg Kimberley A. Strassel More Editorials Commentary Future View Houses of Worship Cross Country Letters to the Editor The Weekend Interview Potomac Watch Podcast Foreign Edition Podcast Free Expression Podcast Opinion Video Notable & Quotable Arts & Culture Topics Books Film Fine Art Food & Cooking History Music Television Theater Reviews Architecture Review Art Reviews Film Reviews Television Reviews Theater Reviews Masterpiece Series Music Reviews Dance Reviews Opera Reviews Exhibition Reviews Cultural Commentary More WSJ Puzzles What To Watch Arts Calendar Lifestyle Topics Careers Cars Fitness Relationships Travel Workplace More On Wine Work & Life Carry On On The Clock Elizabeth Bernstein Turning Points WSJ Puzzles Recipes Real Estate Topics Commercial Real Estate Luxury Homes Personal Finance Topics Retirement Savings Credit Taxes Mortgages More Jason Zweig Laura Saunders James Mackintosh Health Topics Healthcare Pharma Wellness More Your Health Style Topics Beauty Design Fashion More Off Brand On Trend My Monday Morning Sports Topics Baseball Basketball Football Golf Hockey Olympics Soccer Tennis More Jason Gay English Edition EditionEnglish中文 (Chinese)日本語 (Japanese) Print Edition Video Audio Latest Headlines More MoreOther Products from WSJBuy Side from WSJWSJ ShopWSJ Wine Latest World Topics Africa Americas Asia China Europe Middle East India Oceania Russia U.K. More Science Archaeology Biology Environment Physics Space & Astronomy World Video Business Topics Airlines Autos C-Suite Deals Earnings Energy & Oil Entrepreneurship Telecom Retail Hospitality Logistics Media C-Suite CFO Journal CIO Journal CMO Today Logistics Report Risk & Compliance WSJ Professional WSJ Pro Bankruptcy WSJ Pro Central Banking WSJ Pro Cybersecurity WSJ Pro Private Equity WSJ Pro Sustainable Business WSJ Pro Venture Capital More Heard on the Street Journal Reports Business Video Business Podcast U.S. Topics Climate & Environment Education Law College Rankings 2024 More U.S. Video What’s News Podcast Politics Topics Elections National Security Policy More Politics Video Economy Topics Central Banking Consumers Housing Jobs Trade Global WSJ Professional WSJ Pro Bankruptcy WSJ Pro Central Banking WSJ Pro Private Equity WSJ Pro Venture Capital More Capital Account Economic Forecasting Survey Economy Video Tech Topics AI Biotech Cybersecurity Personal Technology More Christopher Mims Joanna Stern Julie Jargon Nicole Nguyen CIO Journal The Future of Everything Tech Video Tech Podcast Finance Topics Banking Commodities & Futures Currencies Investing Regulation Stocks More Heard on the Street Greg Ip Jason Zweig Laura Saunders James Mackintosh CFO Journal Markets Video Your Money Briefing Podcast Market Data Market Data Home Companies U.S. Stocks Commodities Bonds & Rates Currencies Market Data Mutual Funds & ETFs Opinion Columnists Gerard Baker Sadanand Dhume Allysia Finley James Freeman William A. Galston Daniel Henninger Holman W. Jenkins Andy Kessler William McGurn Walter Russell Mead Peggy Noonan Mary Anastasia O’Grady Jason Riley Joseph Sternberg Kimberley A. Strassel More Editorials Commentary Future View Houses of Worship Cross Country Letters to the Editor The Weekend Interview Potomac Watch Podcast Foreign Edition Podcast Free Expression Podcast Opinion Video Notable & Quotable Arts & Culture Topics Books Film Fine Art Food & Cooking History Music Television Theater Reviews Architecture Review Art Reviews Film Reviews Television Reviews Theater Reviews Masterpiece Series Music Reviews Dance Reviews Opera Reviews Exhibition Reviews Cultural Commentary More WSJ Puzzles What To Watch Arts Calendar Lifestyle Topics Careers Cars Fitness Relationships Travel Workplace More On Wine Work & Life Carry On On The Clock Elizabeth Bernstein Turning Points WSJ Puzzles Recipes Real Estate Topics Commercial Real Estate Luxury Homes Personal Finance Topics Retirement Savings Credit Taxes Mortgages More Jason Zweig Laura Saunders James Mackintosh Health Topics Healthcare Pharma Wellness More Your Health Style Topics Beauty Design Fashion More Off Brand On Trend My Monday Morning Sports Topics Baseball Basketball Football Golf Hockey Olympics Soccer Tennis More Jason Gay Offensive Emails Among Businessmen, Donald Trump Jr. Spark Fight in Hedge Fund Case Share Resize Listen (2 min) Trump’s Legal Woes 2020 Election CaseDocuments CaseGeorgia CaseInvestigation Timeline This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/offensive-emails-among-businessmen-donald-trump-jr-spark-fight-in-hedge-fund-case-f14fa05b U.S. Offensive Emails Among Businessmen, Donald Trump Jr. Spark Fight in Hedge Fund Case A judge will decide whether to release unredacted emails that included derogatory remarks about Jews and Mexicans By Corinne Ramey and James Fanelli Updated June 15, 2023 5:39 pm ET Share Resize Listen (2 min) Donald Trump Jr. at a rally held for his father in Ohio last year. Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images The Texas financier Gentry Beach has made no secret of having close ties to Donald Trump Jr., serving as a groomsman at his wedding, fundraising for his father and once boasting to a former boss about his friendship with the former president’s eldest son. Now Beach is seeking to keep the Trump name out of a long and bitter court fight with his former hedge-fund employer, litigation that has spawned a side battle over whether a judge should allow full public access to offensive emails exchanged among a group that included the two men and others who worked at prominent real-estate and financial firms. Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8 Continue reading your article with a WSJ subscription Subscribe Now Already a subscriber? Sign In What to Read Next Sponsored Offers TurboTax: Save up to $15 with TurboTax coupon 2023 The Motley Fool: Epic Bundle – 3x Expert Stock Recommendations H&R Block Tax: Get 20% off H&R Block tax software products Top Resume: Top Resume Coupon: 10% off professional resume writing eBay: eBay coupon: Get extra 10% off $50+ Groupon: Up to $50 off any order with Groupon promo code Most Popular news Most Popular opinion Most Popular Opinion Recommended Videos The Wall Street Journal English Edition EditionEnglish中文 (Chinese)日本語 (Japanese) Subscribe Now Sign In Back to Top « WSJ Membership Buy Side Exclusives Subscription Options Why Subscribe? Corporate Subscriptions WSJ Higher Education Program WSJ High School Program Public Library Program WSJ Live Commercial Partnerships Customer Service Customer Center Contact Us Cancel My Subscription Tools & Features Newsletters & Alerts Guides Topics My News RSS Feeds Video Center Watchlist Podcasts Visual Stories Ads Advertise Commercial Real Estate Ads Place a Classified Ad Sell Your Business Sell Your Home Recruitment & Career Ads Coupons Digital Self Service More About Us Content Partnerships Corrections Jobs at WSJ News Archive Register for Free Reprints & Licensing Buy Issues WSJ Shop WSJ Membership Benefits Customer Center Cancel My Subscription Legal Policies Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Podcasts Snapchat Google Play App Store Dow Jones Products Barron’s BigCharts Dow Jones Newswires Factiva Financial News Mansion Global MarketWatch Risk & Compliance Buy Side from WSJ WSJ Pro WSJ Video WSJ Wine Privacy Notice Cookie Notice Copyright Policy Data Policy Subscriber Agreement & Terms of Use Your Ad Choices Accessibility Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Back to Top « English Edition EditionEnglish中文 (Chinese)日本語 (Japanese) Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Podcasts Snapchat WSJ Membership Buy Side Exclusives Subscription Options Why Subscribe? Corporate Subscriptions WSJ Higher Education Program WSJ High School Program Public Library Program WSJ Live Commercial Partnerships Customer Service Customer Center Contact Us Cancel My Subscription Tools & Features Newsletters & Alerts Guides Topics My News RSS Feeds Video Center Watchlist Podcasts Visual Stories Ads Advertise Commercial Real Estate Ads Place a Classified Ad Sell Your Business Sell Your Home Recruitment & Career Ads Coupons Digital Self Service More About Us Content Partnerships Corrections Jobs at WSJ News Archive Register for Free Reprints & Licensing Buy Issues WSJ Shop WSJ Membership Benefits Customer Center Cancel My Subscription Legal Policies Google Play App Store Sign In Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.

What? Donald Trump Jr. sent highly offensive, antisemitic, and racist messages? You don’t say.

[https://www.wsj.com/articles/offensive-emails-among-businessmen-donald-trump-jr-spark-fight-in-hedge-fund-case-f14fa05b]

Trump pick for education board writes Illuminati self-help books

President Trump‘s pick for a federal education board authors self-help Illuminati books.

The Commission of Presidential Scholars awards high school seniors in the country annually, and its board is comprised of education experts like the 2019 National Teacher of the Year. Trump’s nominee to this board, George Mentz, was announced last week, The Denver Post reported

Mentz, a lawyer and online professor of wealth management at the Texas A&M University School of Law, has written books called “The Illuminati Secret Laws of Money,” “The Illuminati Handbook,” “50 Laws of Power of the Illuminati” and “100 Secrets and Habits of the Illuminati for Life Success.”

“If you conceive of your desire, you can then imagine that your goal will take place with belief, and then you will be able [to] retrieve the opportunity from the world’s storehouse of riches,” he wrote in his book “Spiritual Wealth Management.”

The nominee said he uses the word “Illuminati” in his books about money and wealth partly for marketing reasons.

“Just because I use the word Illuminati, don’t let that get you too excited,” Mentz told The Denver Post. “If you look the word up, it means ‘illumination.’ How to be more aware, conscious, a better person.”

Mentz has donated thousands of dollars to Trump’s campaign and political action committee, after supporting him for three decades, The Denver Post report said.

[The Hill]

Betsy DeVos Just Made It Harder for Defrauded Students to Get Their Debt Canceled

Just in time for the start of a new school year, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos on Friday finalized a new suite of changes to an Obama-era policythat targeted fraud at for-profit colleges. The new DeVos rule significantly raises the bar students have to clear in order to qualify for debt forgiveness when their schools close while they’re enrolled.

After state and federal investigations into fraud at some of the country’s biggest for-profit college operators caused the schools to shutter, thousands of students found themselves deep in debt for incomplete degrees. As my colleague Eddie Rios reported last year:

The Century Foundation, a Washington-based think tank, found in May that more than 127,000 debt relief claims were filed to the Education Department by March 2018, up 29 percent from August 2017….More than 98 percent of those claims came from students who attended for-profit colleges. 

The Obama program has cleared $222 million in loans from nearly 20,000 borrowers since 2016, according to the New York TimesBut as a result of the new DeVos rule, after July 2020, students filing for debt relief will have to prove their colleges intentionally deceived them, that it influenced their decision to enroll, and that it made them financially suffer. The change also sets a three-year deadline for filing a claim; the Obama rule had no deadline and automatically relieved their debts if they didn’t enroll elsewhere within three years. 

Just in time for the start of a new school year, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos on Friday finalized a new suite of changes to an Obama-era policythat targeted fraud at for-profit colleges. The new DeVos rule significantly raises the bar students have to clear in order to qualify for debt forgiveness when their schools close while they’re enrolled.

After state and federal investigations into fraud at some of the country’s biggest for-profit college operators caused the schools to shutter, thousands of students found themselves deep in debt for incomplete degrees. As my colleague Eddie Rios reported last year:

The Century Foundation, a Washington-based think tank, found in May that more than 127,000 debt relief claims were filed to the Education Department by March 2018, up 29 percent from August 2017….More than 98 percent of those claims came from students who attended for-profit colleges. 

The Obama program has cleared $222 million in loans from nearly 20,000 borrowers since 2016, according to the New York TimesBut as a result of the new DeVos rule, after July 2020, students filing for debt relief will have to prove their colleges intentionally deceived them, that it influenced their decision to enroll, and that it made them financially suffer. The change also sets a three-year deadline for filing a claim; the Obama rule had no deadline and automatically relieved their debts if they didn’t enroll elsewhere within three years. 

The Trump administration has repeatedly tried to delay rules for for-profit colleges and student loan forgiveness. Last year, a federal court called the delay “arbitrary and capricious,” ordering DeVos to implement the Obama-era rule. Student and consumer advocates plan to legally challenge DeVos’ latest replacement, as well. 

Student loans and Devos’ unpopular run as secretary of education have become a centerpiece of Democratic presidential politics. The 2020 field quickly condemned DeVos over the weekend.

[Mother Jones]

Betsy DeVos’ answer to school shooters is to mandate more unfair discipline for minorities

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos will be rolling back protections against unfair discipline for minority students, instead of pursuing gun control, The New York Times reported Monday.

“The Trump administration is planning to roll back Obama-era policies aimed at ensuring that minority children are not unfairly disciplined, arguing that the efforts have eased up on punishment and contributed to rising violence in the nation’s schools,” The Timesexplained.

In the wake of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School massacre in Parkland, Trump had a “brief flirtation with gun control” before rejecting that approach and starting a school safety commission.

The commission was lead by DeVos and included former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex M. Azar II and Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen.

“Almost immediately, the commission turned away from guns, and instead scrutinized the Obama administration’s school discipline policies, though none of the most high-profile school shootings were perpetrated by black students,” The Times noted. “The documents obtained by The Times — a draft letter and a draft chapter of the safety commission’s research — focus significantly on race and promote the idea that the federal crackdown on potentially discriminatory practices has made schools more dangerous.”

Six documents included in the Obama administration’s “Rethink Discipline” approach are expected to be rescinded on Tuesday.

“The Obama administration policies were adopted after strong evidence emerged that minority students were receiving more suspensions and tougher punishments than white students for the same or lesser offenses, while disabled students were too quickly being shunted into remedial or special-education programs,” The Times added.

[Raw Story]

Betsy DeVos sued for allegedly refusing to follow court order

Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is being sued for refusing to follow a judge’s order to implement Obama-era regulations. The lawsuit claims DeVos was required to “discharge,” or stop collecting on loans of students who attended for-profit schools and colleges if the institution or their campus had shut down, as The Hill reports.

“It has been nearly two years since these rules should have taken effect, and Secretary DeVos is still dragging her feet and hurting tens of thousands of borrowers through her inaction,” National Student Legal Defense Network (NSLDN) President Aaron Ament said in a statement.

“The students we are trying to help have been doubly victimized – first by the for-profit colleges that deceived them, and now by the federal government that refuses to help.”

The lawsuit says the Education Dept. continues to collect on debts the students should not owe.

The Hill adds that a federal court in October “ruled that the Obama-era debt regulations had to be implemented after over a year of delays by DeVos.”

The Washington Post notes that Secretary DeVos “said that the rule made it too easy for students to cancel their debts and that she intended to replace it with her own version to take effect next year.”

In August the LA Times Editorial Board charged that DeVos “sides with predatory for-profit colleges over America’s students.”

[Raw Story]

DeVos prepping new rules on sexual misconduct standards for campuses

Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is formulating new policies regarding how universities handle sexual assault and harassment cases.

The new rules would increase protections for students accused of sexual misconduct, reduce liability for colleges and universities and encourage schools to broaden their support networks for victims, according to The New York Times.

The rules would reportedly limit accountability for schools to complaints that happened on campus and were filed through proper authorities. They would also raise the bar legally for proving a school mishandled a complaint, according to the Times.

The move comes while multiple universities are facing allegations that staff members failed to properly act when made aware of sexual misconduct.

“We are in the midst of a deliberative process. Any information the New York Times claims to have is premature and speculative, and therefore we have no comment.” Liz Hill, press secretary for the Department of Education, told The Hill in a statement.

Last year, DeVos rescinded Obama-era guidelines for universities handling sexual assault complaints. Rescinding the requirements did not have the force of law, while the new rules would, according to the Times.

The move comes while multiple universities are facing allegations that staff members failed to properly act when made aware of sexual misconduct.

“We are in the midst of a deliberative process. Any information the New York Times claims to have is premature and speculative, and therefore we have no comment.” Liz Hill, press secretary for the Department of Education, told The Hill in a statement.

Last year, DeVos rescinded Obama-era guidelinesfor universities handling sexual assault complaints. Rescinding the requirements did not have the force of law, while the new rules would, according to the Times.

DeVos claimed the guidelines represented federal overreach.

“The truth is that the system established by the prior administration has failed too many students,” she said at the time. “Survivors, victims of a lack of due process and campus administrators have all told me that the current approach does a disservice to everyone involved.”

[The Hill]

Student Loan Watchdog Quits; Blames Trump Administration

The federal official in charge of protecting student borrowers from predatory lending practices has stepped down.

In a scathing resignation letter, Seth Frotman, who until now was the student loan ombudsman at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, says current leadership “has turned its back on young people and their financial futures.” The letter was addressed to Mick Mulvaney, the bureau’s acting director.

In the letter, obtained by NPR, Frotman accuses Mulvaney and the Trump administration of undermining the CFPB and its ability to protect student borrowers.

“Unfortunately, under your leadership, the Bureau has abandoned the very consumers it is tasked by Congress with protecting,” it read. “Instead, you have used the Bureau to serve the wishes of the most powerful financial companies in America.”

The letter raises serious questions about the federal government’s willingness to oversee the $1.5 trillion student loan industry and to protect student borrowers.

Frotman has served as student loan ombudsman for the past three years. Congress created the position in 2010, in the wake of the financial crisis, as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. As ombudsman and assistant director, Frotman oversaw the CFPB’s Office for Students and Young Consumers and reviewed thousands of complaints from student borrowers about the questionable practices of private lenders, loan servicers and debt collectors.

Since 2011, the CFPB has handled more than 60,000 student loan complaints and, through its investigations and enforcement actions, returned more than $750 million to aggrieved borrowers. Frotman’s office was central to those efforts. It also played a role in lawsuits against for-profit giants ITT Tech and Corinthian Colleges and the student loan company Navient.

Over the past year, the Trump administration has increasingly sidelined the CFPB’s student loan office. Last August, the U.S. Department of Education announced it would stop sharing information with the bureau about the department’s oversight of federal student loans, calling the CFPB “overreaching and unaccountable” and arguing that the bureau’s actions were confusing borrowers and loan servicers alike. Of the move, Frotman writes, “the Bureau’s current leadership folded to political pressure … and failed borrowers who depend on independent oversight to halt bad practices.”

In May, Mulvaney called for a major shake-up in Frotman’s division. The Office for Students and Young Consumers would be folded into the bureau’s financial education office, signaling a symbolic shift in mission from investigation to information-sharing. While the CFPB told NPR at the time that the move was “a very modest organizational chart change,” consumer advocates reacted with alarm.

Christopher Peterson, director of financial services at the nonprofit Consumer Federation of America, called the move “an appalling step in a longer march toward the elimination of meaningful American consumer protection law.”

In his resignation, Frotman also accuses the CFPB’s leadership of suppressing a report, prepared by his office, revealing new evidence that some of the nation’s largest banks were “saddling [students] with legally dubious account fees.”

The Trump administration has also taken steps outside the CFPB to curb oversight of the student loan industry. The Justice and Education departments have argued that debt collectors should be protected from state efforts to regulate them. And, earlier this month, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos moved to scrap a rule meant to punish schools where graduates struggle with poor earnings and deep debt. The department defended its decision, saying it would instead give borrowers school performance data so they can decide for themselves what colleges offer the best value.

Mick Mulvaney was tapped to run the CFPB while also serving as director of the Office of Management and Budget. Before joining the Trump administration, he was a Republican congressman from South Carolina and a fierce critic of the bureau he now manages. He once called the CFPB “a joke … in a sick, sad kind of way” because, Mulvaney argued, it often acted above the law with no accountability to Congress.

Frotman has served at the CFPB for seven years, since its inception. He arrived in early 2011 as part of the Treasury Department’s implementation team. Frotman began in the Office of Servicemember Affairs as senior adviser to Holly Petraeus. That office was instrumental in expanding service member protections under the Military Lending Act and in cracking down on lenders and retailers that preyed on service members.

Petraeus, now retired, tells NPR she felt “privileged” to have worked with Frotman at the CFPB. “Seth is a true public servant. I think he’s leaving for the purest of motives: He wants to help student borrowers.”

In response to a request for comment, the CFPB issued this statement: “The Bureau does not comment on specific personnel matters. We hope that all of our departing employees find fulfillment in other pursuits and we thank them for their service.”

[NPR]

 

1 2 3