No H.I.V. Aid Without More Access to Minerals: U.S. Ponders ‘Sticks’ Against Zambia – The New York Times

The Trump administration is considering withholding lifesaving H.I.V. treatment and tuberculosis and malaria medications from 1.3 million Zambians as leverage to force the southern African nation to grant the United States greater access to its mineral resources, particularly copper, lithium, and cobalt. A State Department memo obtained by The New York Times states the administration will “only secure our priorities by demonstrating willingness to publicly take support away from Zambia on a massive scale,” with potential cuts to aid through PEPFAR beginning as soon as May.

Zambia’s critical minerals are central to the green energy transition globally, and the Trump administration views China’s access to these resources as a strategic threat. Unlike agreements with other nations that focus primarily on health spending commitments, the administration is attempting to weaponize health aid to coerce Zambia into signing a deal that prioritizes U.S. mineral access over public health needs.

This tactic follows the Trump administration’s broad cuts to foreign aid announced last year. The State Department has been pressuring countries to sign new agreements, with 24 nations having signed deals worth $20 billion in health aid over five years, though most agreements simply require recipient governments to increase their own health spending rather than serve geopolitical extraction goals.

Other African nations are resisting similar demands tied to aid. Zimbabwe’s government recently rejected negotiations, citing demands about data and biological sample sharing as intolerable sovereignty violations. Activists in Kenya have taken their country’s agreement to court over comparable concerns, signaling widespread resistance to conditioning essential health assistance on unfavorable terms.

The abuse of power represented by weaponizing H.I.V. treatment demonstrates how the Trump administration subordinates human life to resource extraction and geopolitical positioning, directly sacrificing the health and survival of vulnerable populations in service of mineral interests and competition with China.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/16/health/zambia-hiv-aid-minerals-trump.html)

Trump Admin Investigates 13 States Over Abortion Coverage

The Trump administration launched investigations into 13 states requiring health insurance coverage of abortion, claiming these policies violate the Weldon Amendment, a federal provision that protects health entities from being forced to cover or refer for abortion services. The targeted states are California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington, with all but Vermont led by Democratic governors. The administration reinterpreted the Weldon Amendment to apply to employers and health plan sponsors, a position the Biden administration rejected.

Paula M. Stannard, director of the HHS civil rights office, stated the investigations aim to address states’ “alleged disregard of, or confusion about, compliance with the Weldon Amendment,” asserting that health care entities are protected from state discrimination for refusing abortion coverage based on conscience. The Trump administration sent letters to the states demanding information to support its legal theory that state abortion coverage mandates violate federal law by preventing employers and insurers from opting out.

New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill characterized the investigation as “nothing but a fishing expedition wasting taxpayers’ money,” defending her state’s requirement that health insurance plans comply with all applicable laws protecting reproductive freedom. Legal experts note the Weldon Amendment’s text does not explicitly mention employers or plan sponsors among protected health care entities, potentially undermining the administration’s interpretation. Elizabeth Sepper, a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin, identified the investigations as fulfillment of commitments made to the religious right through Project 2025.

The dispute reflects a partisan pattern in interpreting conscience laws. During Trump’s first term in 2020, his administration attempted to withhold federal health care funding from California over Weldon Amendment violations, but the Biden administration reversed that decision upon taking office. The question of whether the amendment applies to employers and plan sponsors has never been definitively resolved in court, leaving the legal interpretation contested.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-administration-launches-investigation-states-170346571.html)

Ex-Counterterrorism Chief Says Trump Blocked Iran War Concerns

Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, resigned this week over abuse of power in Trump’s decision to strike Iran on February 28. Speaking on Tucker Carlson’s program, Kent stated that he and other senior officials opposed to the airstrikes were deliberately prevented from presenting their concerns directly to Trump, who relied instead on a narrow circle of advisers.

Kent, who led an agency responsible for analyzing terrorist threats, said no intelligence supported claims that Iran posed an imminent threat to the United States or was developing nuclear weapons. He alleged that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli officials personally lobbied Trump with information that contradicted U.S. intelligence channels, effectively forcing the American decision to attack.

Kent’s statements underscore divisions within the Trump administration over the Iran war and highlight the authoritarian decision-making process that excluded qualified officials from deliberation. His resignation and public criticism indicate that concerns about the strikes existed at senior levels but were systematically suppressed, demonstrating Trump’s preference for unquestioned loyalty over informed counsel on matters of national security and military action.

Trump dismissed Kent’s concerns on Tuesday, calling him “weak on security” and stating that anyone in his administration doubting Iran’s threat status had no place in government. The White House did not respond to Kent’s allegations about being blocked from accessing the president or about the Israeli influence on the war decision.

Kent, a 45-year-old former Green Beret with 11 combat deployments and prior CIA service, decided to resign after concluding his objections would be ignored. His decision to resign “in good conscience” rather than participate in what he viewed as a flawed military decision reflects the cost of Trump’s demand for absolute loyalty over expertise and deliberative governance.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/ex-counterterrorism-official-says-wasnt-004218298.html)

Trump Demands Treason Charges Against Media Over Iran War

President Trump demanded that media outlets face treason charges for reporting on military incidents during the Iran war, specifically criticizing coverage of alleged strikes on U.S. naval vessels and air bases. In a Truth Social post on March 15, Trump accused Iran of spreading disinformation through artificial intelligence and claimed that American news organizations knowingly amplified false information about the USS Abraham Lincoln and Air Force refueling planes struck at Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia.

Trump alleged that reports showing the USS Abraham Lincoln on fire were fabricated and generated by AI, stating the carrier was neither burning nor targeted. He wrote that media outlets distributing these false reports “should be brought up on Charges for TREASON for the dissemination of false information,” directly calling for criminal prosecution of journalists and news organizations.

CNN’s Daniel Dale documented that when the White House provided examples of outlets spreading the Lincoln story, none were American—one was Israeli, one Saudi, one Turkish. Trump had strongly suggested he was addressing U.S. media when calling for treason charges, contradicting the White House’s own evidence and demonstrating the false basis for his accusations.

Trump praised FCC Chair Brendan Carr for threatening to revoke broadcast licenses, describing news organizations as “Corrupt and Highly Unpatriotic” and claiming they abuse free airwaves. The attack on media freedom follows recent threats from Carr to strip licenses from broadcasters over war coverage and reflects a pattern of abuse of power against journalists who report on Trump’s military operations.

Trump’s assault on press freedom extends beyond coverage of the Iran conflict. He recently attacked New York Times correspondent Maggie Haberman as a “SLEAZEBAG,” threatened to sue her and “associates,” and previously insulted CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, the Washington Post’s Natalie Allison, CBS’s Nancy Cordes, and others, weaponizing his office to silence critical reporting and establish authoritarian control over information.

(Source: https://people.com/donald-trump-wants-some-media-outlets-face-charges-treason-latest-rant-journalists-11926939)

Trump’s Unilateral Iran War Backfires as Allies Reject Strait Coalition

Trump launched military strikes on Iran alongside Israel without coordinating diplomatically with allies, then scrambled to pressure nations to help manage the fallout. After initiating the conflict unilaterally, he requested roughly a half-dozen countries deploy warships to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping passage through which one-fifth of global oil trades. Trump signaled he would leverage his scheduled trip to China to coerce Beijing into joining a coalition to restore tanker traffic, though his treasury secretary later attempted damage control on that statement.

Trump’s pressure campaign has failed to generate commitments from potential partners. China remains noncommittal, France offered conditional participation only when “circumstances permit,” and Britain declined to deploy a warship, instead discussing limited mine-hunting drone assistance. Australia’s transport minister stated the country will not send a ship, and Italy rejected expanding naval missions to include the Strait. Trump’s insistence that the United States does not need the waterway due to domestic oil access contradicted his simultaneous demand that other nations sacrifice resources to secure it.

The oil price surge resulting from Trump’s unilateral war decision has driven up gas prices domestically as midterm election season accelerates. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent downplayed war-related economic disruption and accused media outlets of manufacturing a crisis, claiming prices would stabilize after the conflict concludes. Trump dismissed advisers’ assessments of fuel price duration, stating he relies on personal instinct rather than expert counsel.

Trump’s willingness to delay his late-March summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping to pressure Beijing on the strait situation carries substantial economic risk, as tensions between the world’s largest economies remain strained over tariffs. Bessent explicitly discouraged negative market reaction to a potential postponement, framing any reschedule as logistical rather than strategic. China’s slowed growth projection to 4.5-5% for 2026, the lowest since 1991, means prolonged strait disruptions could inflict long-term damage on Beijing’s economy as well.

Trump’s approach mirrors his pattern of unilateral decision-making followed by attempts to extract concessions from allies. The Republican president previously leveraged tariffs and accusations of NATO freeloading to secure increased defense spending commitments, but global resistance to his Strait of Hormuz coalition reveals limits to coercive tactics when nations perceive no direct benefit or mutual agreement. His administration continues the pressure campaign despite repeated rejections, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt arguing that securing Iran’s disarmament serves the entire Western world regardless of countries’ voluntary participation.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-suggests-may-delay-china-043633731.html)

Trump Threatens Seizure of Cuba as Failed Nation

President Trump declared on Monday that he will soon “be taking Cuba” and stated he can “do anything I want with it,” describing the island nation as weakened and failed. Trump said he would take Cuba “in some form,” either by “freeing it” or seizing it outright, characterizing the action as “a big honor.” He claimed Cuba’s communist government has governed through violence and that the country faces severe economic collapse with no money, oil, or energy resources.

Trump’s remarks followed reports that his administration is conducting secret negotiations with Cuban officials as the island faces a fuel shortage and unstable power grid. The president indicated that a “friendly takeover” may occur, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio potentially leading the effort. Trump argued Rubio is suited for the role because Cuban exiles “trust” him and he speaks Spanish, while emphasizing the administration’s stated goal of helping Cuban exiles in the United States.

Trump declined to specify whether any military operation against Cuba would resemble recent strikes on Iran or the capture of Nicolás Maduro from Venezuela. He stated his administration is “talking” to Cuba about making a deal but offered no details on terms or conditions. Trump’s comments came after describing Cuba as having “great people” and a “nice landscape,” even as he characterized the nation as completely devoid of economic viability.

The president has escalated rhetoric on Cuba in recent weeks following military operations in the region. His framing of potential intervention as necessary humanitarian assistance and an “honor” masks what amounts to a claim of imperial authority to seize a sovereign nation. The Trump administration has simultaneously expanded U.S. military presence across Latin America through security agreements that authorize troop deployments and armed operations throughout the region.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-threatens-cuba-i-can-take-it-and-do-anything-i-want-with-it/)

Pentagon Restricts Stars and Stripes Military Newspaper Editorial

The Pentagon announced “modernization” changes to Stars and Stripes on March 9, immediately restricting the independent military newspaper’s editorial operations weeks after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s spokesman called the publication “woke.” The memo prohibits the newspaper from publishing wire service content from organizations like the Associated Press and Reuters, eliminating coverage of war zones including the new conflict in Iran where military readers may be deployed, and bans lighter content such as March Madness coverage and comic strips.

The memo requires Stars and Stripes content to be “consistent with good order and discipline,” military justice language that threatens military staff reporters with court-martial if they publish stories the Defense Department opposes. Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin stated the Pentagon did not directly communicate the memo to his newsroom, which discovered it three days after implementation on a Defense Department website, leaving staff uncertain about compliance requirements and legal exposure for uniformed journalists.

The Pentagon claims the changes return Stars and Stripes to serving “the warfighter” while denying the newspaper will lose editorial independence. However, the memo redirects the newspaper’s ombudsman to send Congressional information to the Defense Department first rather than directly to legislators, dismantling a Congressional mandate protecting the publication’s autonomy since the 1990s. The Trump administration withdrew the federal regulation underpinning that mandate in January.

Stars and Stripes has operated independently under Congressional mandate since World War II and historically received bipartisan support, including from Trump during his first term. Applicants for Stars and Stripes positions are now being screened based on loyalty to the president’s policy priorities, representing direct assault on institutional independence. Press freedom organizations condemned the memo; PEN America stated service members rely on Stars and Stripes for independent reporting, not material dictated by officials the newspaper should hold accountable.

The Defense Department’s restrictions on Stars and Stripes follow Hegseth’s broader campaign against diversity initiatives across military institutions. In September, Hegseth imposed a policy requiring media outlets to pledge not to gather information without formal authorization from defense officials, forcing established news organizations including NPR to surrender press credentials rather than comply. Hegseth has similarly pressured Scouting America to implement transgender youth restrictions under Pentagon direction, demonstrating systematic institutional control efforts.

(Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/03/14/nx-s1-5748020/pentagon-tightens-controls-over-stars-and-stripes-after-calling-it-woke?utm_term=nprnews&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=npr&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwdGRleAQizGFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEej7qKf0rpz1enHZ43OdilQAgGvWjeko5o_ISNz39QoXq-4KFvlQTe_B7X9SU_aem_LmcSZMI9L6Q3yyss_RUeAA)

FCC Chair Carr Threatens License Revocation Over Trump Coverage

FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened to revoke broadcast licenses on Saturday, directly echoing Trump’s criticism of media coverage of the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran. Carr stated on social media that broadcasters running “hoaxes and news distortions” would “lose their licenses” during renewal periods, though he cited no specific networks or stories. The threat followed Trump’s Truth Social post attacking news coverage of five U.S. tanker aircraft in Saudi Arabia, claiming networks falsely reported damage when “four of the five had virtually no damage.”

Trump has repeatedly demanded license revocation for negative coverage, telling reporters in September 2025 that networks covering him negatively should “maybe” have their licenses revoked and that the decision would be “up to” Carr, whom he appointed. In August, Trump said NBC and ABC “give me 97% BAD STORIES” and he would be “totally in favor” of revoking their licenses. This pattern mirrors earlier instances where Trump administration pressure preceded consequences, such as when Carr demanded patriotic content from broadcasters and Kimmel’s show was pulled from air in mid-September after Carr called Kimmel’s remarks “a very, very serious issue.”

The FCC’s own website states that the “First Amendment and the Communications Act expressly prohibit the Commission from censoring broadcast matter” and that its role in overseeing broadcast content “is very limited.” The agency issues eight-year licenses to individual broadcast stations, not to television networks themselves. Carr did not identify which specific stories he believed were distorted or provide evidence contradicting any reporting.

Some Republicans including Texas Sen. Ted Cruz stated Carr went too far, yet Trump defended his appointee, saying “I think Brendan Carr is doing a great job.” Trump’s direct control over agency actions targeting his media critics demonstrates the weaponization of federal authority against news organizations that report unfavorably on his administration.

(Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/fcc-brendan-carr-threat-news-networks-broadcast-license/)

Trump Attacks Press For Questioning Iran War Duration

President Trump attacked journalists who questioned the duration of his Iran military campaign, falsing claiming media outlets report Iran is “doing wonderfully” when coverage has documented severe humanitarian costs. As the second week of Operation Epic Fury concluded, 13 U.S. service members had been killed, a preliminary military investigation determined the U.S. was responsible for a strike on an elementary school that killed at least 160 children, and attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz destabilized global energy markets and stock prices.

When asked directly how long the war would last, Trump refused to provide a timeline but stated it would continue “as long as it’s necessary” while claiming the U.S. was “way ahead of schedule.” He characterized media reporting as “fake news” for suggesting Iran was functioning normally, insisting instead that the country was “collapsing” and “doing as bad as you can have.”

Trump’s conflicting statements about the war’s progress—simultaneously declaring victory while justifying ongoing military operations—have drawn heavy criticism. His administration has issued contradictory messaging on the Iran war, stating both that the U.S. has already won and that operations must continue until conditions feel right.

The president’s dismissal of critical reporting exemplifies his pattern of attacking the press when coverage documents human costs or strategic ambiguity in his foreign military actions. Trump previously characterized the deaths of U.S. service members as components of a beneficial transaction, demonstrating indifference to casualty figures even as they mounted.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-confronted-by-reporter-on-when-war-will-end-claims-media-says-iran-doing-wonderfully/)

Trump Fires Kennedy Center President Grenell After Institutional

Trump announced Friday that Richard Grenell, his appointed Kennedy Center president, is stepping down after more than a year marked by institutional chaos and mass artist defections. Grenell will be replaced by Matt Floca, the center’s vice president of facilities operations. The leadership change follows the board’s decision to rename the venue the Trump-Kennedy Center, which triggered widespread performance cancellations by major artists including composer Philip Glass and the Washington National Opera.

Grenell’s tenure was defined by confrontation with the arts community and selective media engagement. He attacked artists who criticized the center’s decisions and granted interviews exclusively to right-leaning news organizations, refusing to speak with outlets he deemed unfriendly. His defense of the Trump-branded renaming involved assailing major news outlets rather than addressing substantive concerns about the center’s new business model, which now requires performers to fund productions entirely in advance, departing from standard industry practice.

Trump’s control of the Kennedy Center has been absolute since he fired the entire board in early February 2025 and appointed himself chairman. Within a week, he named Grenell interim executive director as prominent artists including Shonda Rhimes and Renée Fleming withdrew from performances. The center announced an imminent two-year closure for renovations, a development that surprised employees and arts stakeholders still processing the institutional upheaval.

Trump praised Grenell’s work in a Truth Social post, calling him an “excellent” coordinator during the “transition period” and touting plans for the renovated center to become “the finest facility of its kind anywhere in the World.” The Kennedy Center declined to comment on Grenell’s departure, maintaining silence amid continued institutional turmoil driven by Trump’s takeover of the nation’s premier performing arts venue.

(Source: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2026-03-13/kennedy-center-president-richard-grenell-replaced-matt-floca)

1 2 3 4 5 165