Category: Authoritarian

Trump Says OK If An Assassin Shoots Through The Press

During a recent rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made shocking remarks suggesting he would not mind if someone attempted to shoot through the media to reach him. This statement, made while he was critiquing the bulletproof glass shielding him, raises serious concerns about his attitude towards violence and the press.

Trump, who has a history of inflammatory rhetoric, referred to the media as “fake news” and “bloodsuckers” while gesturing towards the protective glass. His comments come in the wake of multiple assassination attempts against him, including a recent incident where a bullet grazed his ear and resulted in the death of an audience member.

The former president’s reckless comments not only trivialize the threats against his life but also serve to incite his supporters against the press. By implying that the media is a barrier to him, he dangerously promotes the idea that violence against journalists is acceptable.

Trump’s spokesperson attempted to clarify his remarks, claiming he was trying to protect the media. However, this belies the reality of Trump’s consistent pattern of hostility towards journalists who challenge him. His rhetoric has been known to embolden extremist behavior among his followers, leading to increased violence against the press.

This incident is a stark reminder of the toxic environment Trump has cultivated, where incitement and division take precedence over respect and dignity. As he continues his campaign for the presidency, the implications of his words and their potential effects on public safety and discourse cannot be overstated.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-lititz-pennsylvania-rally-shoot-through-media-bulletproof-glass/)

Trump’s Dangerous Request to Murdoch: Censor Negative Ads and Free Speech

Donald Trump recently declared his intention to ask Rupert Murdoch to intervene at Fox News, demanding that the network stop airing negative advertisements against him for 21 days leading up to the election. This request, made during his appearance on the Fox & Friends show, exemplifies Trump’s continued efforts to control the narrative surrounding his campaign. Trump, who claimed to be ‘the most stable human being’ during the segment, expressed his frustration over the perceived unfairness of negative ads from opponents, particularly those targeting him.

In his complaints, Trump noted that he has seen a surge of advertisements attacking him while his own campaign is underrepresented. He indicated that he believes this imbalance in advertising could harm his chances in the upcoming election. Trump’s plea to Murdoch to halt negative ads highlights a troubling trend of political figures seeking to censor dissenting views, a move that undermines the fundamental principles of free speech.

The irony of Trump’s request is striking, particularly considering the Republican Party’s long-standing narrative about protecting free speech. Their hypocrisy is evident when contrasting Trump’s demands with their previous claims regarding the censorship of conservative voices. For instance, the uproar over the purported suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story demonstrates how Republicans selectively champion free speech only when it aligns with their interests.

Trump’s desire to control what the media reports about him extends beyond Fox News. He has previously suggested shutting down networks like CBS, ABC, NPR, and CNN, all of which have been critical of his actions and statements. This alarming trend shows a blatant disregard for journalistic integrity and an authoritarian approach to governance, as he attempts to silence critics and control the flow of information.

As Trump continues to express his grievances regarding media coverage, it becomes increasingly clear that his agenda involves not just winning an election but also shaping the media landscape to serve his narrative. This manipulation of media and free speech raises significant concerns about the future of democratic discourse in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/donald-trump-rupert-murdoch-negative-fox-news-ads-1236035125/)

Trump Blames Zelensky for Ukraine War in Recent Interview

In a recent podcast interview, former President Donald Trump attributed blame for the ongoing war in Ukraine to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, rather than Russian President Vladimir Putin. This statement contradicts the established timeline and facts surrounding the invasion, which began with Russia’s troop buildup and subsequent attack on Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

Trump’s remarks came as he critiqued President Biden’s foreign policy and military support for Ukraine. He described Zelensky as an effective salesman for securing U.S. aid, asserting that Ukraine has received unprecedented financial support during the conflict. Trump claimed that Zelensky should have negotiated with Putin to prevent the war, framing the situation as a failure on Zelensky’s part.

During the interview, Trump said, “He should never have let that war start. That war is a loser,” highlighting his view that the responsibility for the destruction caused by the invasion lies with the Ukrainian leadership. This is not the first time Trump has expressed skepticism about Zelensky’s role in the crisis.

In previous statements, Trump suggested that a deal could have been reached to stave off the conflict, implying that Zelensky’s actions contributed to the current devastation. His comments reflect a continued strategy of blaming Ukrainian officials while minimizing the responsibility of Russia for its aggressive military actions.

This narrative aligns with certain viewpoints promoted by Russian state media, which often seeks to blame Ukraine for the consequences of the invasion. Trump’s remarks serve as a notable example of disinformation that distorts the events leading to the war, undermining the clear responsibility of Putin’s regime in initiating the conflict.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/17/us/politics/trump-zelensky-putin-ukraine-war.html)

Trump’s Call for Military Action Against Political Opponents Sparks Outrage

Donald Trump has ignited significant backlash from Democrats following his recent comments suggesting that the U.S. military should be deployed against political adversaries during the upcoming presidential election. In a Fox News interview, Trump referred to his opponents as ‘the enemy within,’ indicating that this group poses a greater threat to democracy than foreign entities or illegal immigrants.

During the interview, Trump singled out Congressmember Adam Schiff, asserting that he represents a danger to fair elections. Trump’s rhetoric has raised alarms among political analysts and historians, who draw parallels between his proposed actions and authoritarian regimes led by figures like Viktor Orbán and Vladimir Putin.

Kamala Harris’s campaign responded sharply, comparing Trump’s remarks to his previous threats to act as a dictator should he regain the presidency. Harris’s campaign pointed out that these statements reflect a serious threat to democratic norms, calling for vigilance among Americans who value their freedoms.

In addition to targeting Schiff, Trump has reiterated claims of widespread voter fraud without evidence, furthering fears that he may incite violence or unrest if he perceives electoral outcomes as unfavorable. Schiff himself has condemned Trump’s comments, likening them to the incitement of the January 6 Capitol attack and warning of the potential for political violence.

(h/t: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/14/trump-military-enemy-within-armed-forces-election-day)

Trump Promises Mass Deportation Using 1798 Law Amid Controversy

During a recent rally in Aurora, Colorado, former President Donald Trump announced plans to use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to initiate mass deportations of immigrants. Trump described immigrants as “the worst criminals in the world” and vowed to expedite the removal of individuals he referred to as “savage gangs”. This law, historically associated with the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, would empower the president to enact broad deportation measures.

Trump’s rhetoric included specific threats to Haitian-American immigrants, whom he stated would need to return to Haiti regardless of their legal status in the U.S. He asserted that local police would receive immunity from prosecution for actions taken under this mass deportation scheme, which he claimed would affect up to 20 million people.

The former president’s comments have elicited pushback from local officials, including Aurora’s Republican mayor Mike Coffman, who stated that the city is not overrun by gangs, contrary to Trump’s claims. The mayor emphasized that Aurora is a safe city, countering Trump’s characterization of the area as a “war zone”.

Critics have highlighted the potential human rights implications and economic consequences of Trump’s proposed deportations, warning that it could lead to widespread suffering among immigrant communities. Trump’s approach reflects a continuation of his administration’s hardline stance on immigration, aiming to galvanize support among his base by invoking fear related to crime and safety.

As Trump seeks to re-establish his influence in the political landscape, his latest remarks signal a return to familiar themes of fear and division surrounding immigration policy. The potential implementation of the Alien Enemies Act raises significant concerns about civil liberties and the treatment of immigrant populations in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.salon.com/2024/10/11/theyre-animals-vows-mass-deportation-under-law-used-to-justify-japanese-internment-camps/)

Trump Calls On FCC To Revoke CBS’ Broadcast License, From The Authoritarian Playbook

Donald Trump is calling on the FCC to revoke the license of CBS after 60 Minutes was found to have (dun dun dun) edited down one of Kamala Harris’ answers for time, something that happens quite regularly when Trump runs to his safe space Fox News.

The FCC obviously pushed back, but the people leading the FCC now pointing out Trump’s wishes obviously is anti-constitutional, will not be there once Donald Trump retakes power.

As I’ve said before, the First Amendment is a cornerstone of our democracy. The FCC does not and will not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because a political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage. – FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel

In the authoritarian playbook, clamping down on independent media will happen quick and we’ll never get it back. Recall when Hugo Chavez in Venezuela sent forces to take over independent private news agencies and brought them back online as propaganda outlets.

It wasn’t that long ago that the last independent news agency in Hungry was kicked off the air when Viktor Orban revoked all broadcast licenses of a free and open press, and now all Hungry has is pro-Orban propaganda outlets. Orban was recently a featured speaker at CPAC, the largest gathering of conservatives, on how to successfully import authoritarianism in a Western democracy.

So far Trump has previously threatened the broadcast licenses of ABC, NBC, PBS, NPR and simply for reporting on the things he says and does. And now Trump is threatening CBS because he ducked out of 60 Minutes like the pussybitch he is because they wouldn’t agree to not fact check him.

It will happen here. If not with Trump, then the next Republican because the authoritarian model has been fully adopted by the GOP.

Trump’s Rally Remarks Draw Parallels to ‘The Purge’, Spark Outrage

 

Donald Trump proposed a controversial policy during a rally in Pennsylvania, which many critics have likened to legalizing “The Purge.” This remark drew significant backlash on social media, with commentators and journalists drawing parallels to the dystopian film series that portrays a government-sanctioned free-for-all of crime for a 12-hour period.

At the rally, Trump expressed dissatisfaction with current policing practices, claiming that police are not permitted to effectively perform their duties. He suggested that to curb crime, a singular day of extreme violence would be necessary, stating, “one really violent day” would send a message to deter criminal activity.

Responses to Trump’s comments were swift and critical. Political analysts and media figures noted the alarming nature of his suggestion, with some questioning whether he had been inspired by the film series itself or independently arrived at such an idea.

Among the critics was University of Texas law professor Lee Kovarsky, who highlighted the distinction between asserting hard truths and making reckless statements. The overall sentiment on social media reflected deep concern about Trump’s call for what many interpreted as an endorsement of police brutality.

Former presidential speechwriter Dan Cluchey remarked on the gravity of the situation, suggesting that a presidential candidate calling for a violent day of police action should warrant significant media attention. The implications of Trump’s rhetoric sparked discussions about law enforcement practices and the potential consequences of such extreme proposals.

The rally further illustrated the challenges Trump faces in maintaining audience engagement, as reports indicated that some attendees were leaving during his speech, suggesting a disconnect between his messaging and public interest. Overall, the incident raised serious questions about the direction of political discourse in the United States.

 

Trump Calls for Investigation of Pelosi Amid Stock Sale Controversy

 

Former President Donald Trump has urged attorneys general in Republican-controlled states to investigate Nancy Pelosi following a stock sale by her husband, Paul Pelosi. The request stems from a report that Paul Pelosi sold 2,000 shares of Visa just before the federal government announced an antitrust lawsuit against the credit company. Trump inaccurately claimed during a rally that the sale occurred the day before the lawsuit was made public, asserting a need for investigation.

Paul Pelosi sold the Visa shares on July 1 for approximately $500,000. However, there is no clarity on whether he profited from this transaction, as the details surrounding the sale remain ambiguous. The Justice Department’s lawsuit against Visa was made public shortly after the sale.

Trump’s call for investigation highlights a growing trend among his supporters and Republican leaders to scrutinize and challenge the actions of Democratic figures, often without substantial evidence. This demand for investigations appears to be part of a broader effort to politically undermine opponents, particularly as Trump seeks to galvanize his base ahead of the upcoming elections.

The former president’s comments reflect a pattern of behavior where he leverages misinformation to create political narratives that serve his interests, a tactic he has employed throughout his career. His rhetoric often relies on unfounded accusations, which can further polarize political discourse and incite his followers.

Critics argue that such demands for investigations are not only unfounded but also serve to distract from Trump’s own controversies and legal challenges. By shifting the focus onto Pelosi, Trump aims to divert attention from his record and ongoing issues within his political sphere, including previous investigations into his conduct during his presidency.

 

Trump Lays the Groundwork for More Bogus Stolen Election Claims: ‘They Cheat’

 

Former President Donald Trump has begun laying the groundwork for future claims of a rigged election ahead of the upcoming November elections. Speaking at a rally in Walker, Michigan, Trump expressed doubts about a potential loss, asserting that any defeat would be due to widespread cheating, a claim he has made numerous times since the 2020 elections. He stated, “If we lose, the next time we’re gonna have the same group of people in Caracas, Venezuela because it’s much safer than any place in our country if she wins. Much safer,” referencing Vice President Kamala Harris and continuing his pattern of baseless allegations against immigrants and crime rates.

Trump’s assertion that he could only lose due to cheating resonates with his supporters, who have previously engaged in violent acts, such as the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. His rhetoric at the rally reflects a longstanding narrative that he has pushed since 2016, where he claimed that illegal voting had deprived him of the popular vote victory. This pattern of rhetoric is critical to understanding Trump’s ongoing influence within the Republican Party and among his voter base.

As he continues to propagate these unfounded claims, Trump has also been encouraging law enforcement to be vigilant against alleged voter fraud. At another event, he urged police officers to monitor polling places, suggesting that their presence could intimidate potential fraud. This approach raises significant concerns about the implications for voter intimidation and the integrity of the electoral process.

Critics argue that Trump’s rhetoric not only undermines trust in democratic institutions but also poses a threat to public safety. The Attorney General of Michigan has initiated legal proceedings against individuals involved in a fake elector scheme stemming from the 2020 election, highlighting the ongoing repercussions of Trump’s claims and the organized efforts to challenge legitimate electoral outcomes.

In summary, Trump’s continued allegations about election fraud are not only a repeat of his past rhetoric but also serve to mobilize his base ahead of the upcoming elections. This strategy has far-reaching implications for the political landscape, as it fosters an environment of distrust and potential violence, reminiscent of the events that transpired on January 6, 2021. The responsibility lies not only with Trump but also with Republican leaders and media outlets, such as Fox News, that amplify these narratives without scrutiny.

 

Trump Advocates for Criminalizing Criticism of Judges, Threatening Free Speech

 

Donald Trump has recently made statements suggesting that criticizing judges should be illegal, which raises concerns about free speech and authoritarianism. At a rally in Pennsylvania, he claimed for the fourth time that people who criticize judges ought to face jail time. This stance contradicts his own history of attacking judges and attempting to sway judicial decisions to align with his interests.

Trump’s remarks signify a dangerous precedent in which he implies that dissent against the judiciary should be criminalized. He has previously referred to the notion of fines for such criticisms but has escalated his rhetoric to include potential jail sentences. This shift in language from vague threats to explicit calls for incarceration suggests a troubling evolution of his views on dissent.

Critics have noted that Trump’s attacks on the judiciary have been extensive and personal, often targeting judges who rule against him. His comments about judges influencing their decisions as akin to “playing the ref” not only undermine the independence of the judiciary but also create an environment of intimidation. This is particularly concerning given that attempts to influence judges and justices have been historically condemned in a democratic society.

Throughout his presidency, Trump has launched numerous personal attacks against judges, including those who ruled against his policies, and has even implied that tragic events could occur as a result of unfavorable rulings. Such rhetoric is unprecedented for a sitting president and poses a risk to the integrity of the judicial system.

In summary, Trump’s recent calls to criminalize the criticism of judges reflect a broader pattern of authoritarian behavior and an attempt to stifle dissent. This poses serious implications for democracy and the rule of law, as it not only threatens free speech but also discourages judicial independence.

(h\t: Washington Post)

1 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 115