Category: Policies

Trump Appoints Snake Oil Salesman Dr. Oz To Run Medicare and Medicaid

Donald Trump has made a shocking decision by appointing Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a role for which he is grossly unqualified. Despite being a well-known television personality, Oz has no real experience managing a large government bureaucracy that oversees critical health services. This appointment exposes Trump’s reckless disregard for the qualifications necessary to run such an important agency and instead continues to prove he is placing Trump loyalists to be his eyes, ears, and hammer in a fascist movement.

Dr. Oz has long been criticized for promoting dubious health treatments and unproven remedies, making him a controversial figure in the medical community. His history of endorsing questionable products and ideas, often labeled as ‘snake oil’, raises significant concerns about his ability to make sound decisions for the health and welfare of millions of Americans. This is the same individual who infamously referred to the reopening of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic as an “appetizing opportunity” that would only result in a 2-3% increase in mortality—an alarming statement that highlights his lack of genuine concern for public health.

In his statement, Trump touted Oz’s ability to ‘Make America Healthy Again’ and promised to cut waste and fraud. However, his track record suggests that Oz’s leadership might lead to further erosion of trust in medical science rather than reinforcing it. The idea that someone with such a dubious reputation in the health sector could be trusted to lead a vital healthcare agency is not just unthinkable—it is a direct threat to the integrity of America’s healthcare system.

Critics argue that this appointment reflects Trump’s pattern of placing loyalty over competency, showcasing a troubling trend where personal connections supersede the need for qualified leadership. With Oz’s questionable medical practices and lack of substantial administrative experience, there is a genuine fear that patient care and critical health services could suffer under his oversight.

As Oz prepares to potentially take the helm at CMS, there are serious implications for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Trump’s choice of Oz signals a further departure from evidence-based medicine and an embrace of celebrity over accountability. The American public deserves leaders who prioritize science and ethics over popularity and personal relationships.

(h/t: https://www.axios.com/2024/11/19/trump-dr-oz-cms-cabinet)

Trump Nominates Project 2025 Author Brendan Carr To FCC

Brendan Carr, President-elect Donald Trump’s appointee to head the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), has openly threatened broadcast media with stricter regulations under the guise of enforcing their public interest obligations. Trump’s choice of Carr, a staunch advocate for conservative media policies, raises alarm bells about potential government overreach into the media landscape. Notably, Carr’s comments come against a backdrop of Trump’s persistent grievances regarding media coverage, particularly following a contentious 60 Minutes interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.

During an appearance on Fox News, Carr indicated that he would closely scrutinize media operations, claiming that legacy media must change due to a loss of public trust. He cited Jeff Bezos’s assertion that Americans consider news media to be the least trusted source, suggesting that this sentiment justifies a shift in FCC policies to hold broadcasters accountable for their content.

Moreover, Carr’s support for a controversial merger between Paramount and Skydance appears contingent on the outcome of an ongoing FCC complaint related to CBS’s coverage of the Harris interview. His remarks signal a willingness to intertwine regulatory actions with political grievances, a move that could further undermine the independence of the FCC and jeopardize journalistic integrity.

In Carr’s view, the FCC should reassess its role in regulating broadcasters, who are granted access to public airwaves in exchange for serving the public interest. His statement about enforcing these obligations raises concerns that the FCC may become a tool for furthering partisan agendas, rather than a neutral body ensuring fair media practices.

With Carr’s history connected to the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025, concerns mount regarding his commitment to unbiased media oversight. His comments align with Trump’s broader narrative of combating perceived censorship and promoting ‘free speech,’ which often translates into silencing dissenting voices under the guise of regulation. The implications of Carr’s leadership at the FCC could reshape the information landscape and pose risks to the foundational principles of a free press.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trumps-fcc-pick-threatens-broadcast-media-promises-to-enforce-their-public-interest-obligation/)

Trump’s Dangerous Move to Target Military Officers for Courts-Martial Reveals Authoritarian Tendencies

In an alarming move, the Trump transition team is reportedly compiling a list of both current and former U.S. military officers for potential courts-martial. This initiative raises serious questions about the motives behind targeting military personnel who may have opposed or criticized the former president’s actions. The list appears to be part of a broader strategy to silence dissent and further consolidate power, echoing tactics often seen in authoritarian regimes.

Reports indicate that this effort is being driven by individuals connected to Trump’s inner circle, including prominent supporters who have openly embraced conspiracy theories. This behavior is reminiscent of fascist regimes, where loyalty to a singular leader is prioritized over democratic principles and accountability.

Among those associated with this troubling initiative is Matt Flynn, a leader in the QAnon conspiracy movement, alongside his brother Michael Flynn, a disgraced former general. Their involvement underscores the disturbing trend of militarizing political loyalty, where questions or criticisms of leadership are treated as acts of treason.

The implications of compiling such a list are profound, signaling a potential crackdown on military personnel who choose to speak out or maintain their integrity. This tactic not only undermines the values of democracy but also threatens the moral fabric of the armed forces.

As Trump and his allies continue to pursue these authoritarian strategies, it is imperative for the American public to remain vigilant and recognize the dangers posed by such actions. The normalization of hate and the silencing of dissent are hallmarks of a regime that prioritizes power over the principles of liberty and justice.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/trump-transition-team-compiling-list-current-former-us-military-office-rcna180489)

President-elect Donald Trump continues to avoid si…

President-elect Donald Trump continues to avoid signing the legally required ethics agreement mandated for a smooth presidential transition, raising serious ethical concerns about his leadership. This agreement is crucial for ensuring that Trump does not engage in conflicts of interest that could arise from his extensive business dealings, a fact that has been a significant point of contention throughout his presidency.

Trump’s reluctance to sign the ethics pledge illustrates his ongoing battle with transparency and accountability, as he attempts to shield his financial interests from scrutiny. Despite the fact that the ethics requirement was established under the Presidential Transition Act—legislation that Trump himself endorsed—his transition team has not prioritized compliance, jeopardizing national security as deadlines for essential agreements are missed.

Transition experts are alarmed by this delay, emphasizing that it could severely impair the incoming administration’s preparedness. The Biden administration’s General Services Administration had set deadlines for agreements that would provide Trump’s team with necessary resources and briefings, which are crucial for national security. The failure to comply with these requirements could leave the future administration unprepared to handle urgent issues from Day 1.

Furthermore, Trump’s ongoing business ventures, including his significant stake in Truth Social and other licensing deals, raise additional ethical questions. This lack of adherence to ethical standards, coupled with his refusal to sign the pledge, suggests a disregard for the foundational principles of governance that are essential for maintaining public trust.

As the transition process hangs in the balance, lawmakers like Rep. Jamie Raskin have expressed deep concerns about the implications of Trump’s actions, stating that ignoring established norms poses a threat to the fundamental institutions of American democracy. Without the necessary agreements in place, the implications for national security are dire, echoing past failures that have had catastrophic consequences.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/09/politics/trump-transition-ethics-pledge-timing/index.html?)

Trump’s Transition Fuels Fears of Mass Deportations Under Miller’s Racist Agenda

Donald Trump’s transition team is gearing up to implement aggressive deportation policies, signaling a return to his administration’s notorious anti-immigrant agenda. With Stephen Miller, an immigration hardliner known for his toxic views, taking the lead on policy planning, the future looks grim for undocumented immigrants as Trump prepares to reignite his campaign promises of mass deportations.

Miller’s promotion comes as Trump announces Thomas Homan as his “border czar,” a move that underscores his administration’s commitment to a harsh immigration stance. Homan previously served as the acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and is expected to play a crucial role in executing Trump’s draconian immigration policies.

The implications of Miller’s influence are troubling, particularly considering his history of promoting racist and xenophobic rhetoric. His past communications reveal a clear agenda to instigate fear around immigration and support for white nationalist narratives, which have no place in a just society. This is a continuation of the harmful ideologies that have been a hallmark of Trump’s policies.

Trump’s hard-line base, including figures like Vice President-elect JD Vance and Donald Trump Jr., are already praising these staffing choices, indicating a strong alignment with extremist views. The administration’s strategy appears focused on pandering to its base while further marginalizing vulnerable communities.

In summary, as Trump gears up for his new term, the combination of Miller’s racist ideologies and Homan’s enforcement experience raises serious concerns about the future of immigration policy in the United States. This transition could usher in another era of fear and division, reminiscent of the darkest days of the previous administration.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/11/us/politics/stephen-miller-trump.html)

Trump’s Demands for Recess Appointments Highlight GOP’s Submission to His Agenda

Donald Trump is once again attempting to exert his influence over Republican senators, demanding their support for recess appointments to expedite the confirmation of his nominees. In a recent post, he insisted that any senator vying for leadership must commit to this controversial tactic, which has been met with skepticism from many in Congress. Recess appointments allow presidents to bypass the Senate when Congress is in recess, a practice that has been blocked by the opposition party in recent years.

Despite the contentious nature of this demand, the leading GOP candidates for the Senate majority leadership have quickly signaled their support for Trump’s wishes. Senators John Thune and John Cornyn, both seen as frontrunners, have expressed their openness to the idea, indicating a troubling trend where the party appears willing to undermine traditional legislative processes to placate Trump and his agenda.

Trump’s insistence on recess appointments highlights a significant power struggle within the Republican Party, as various factions vie for control. While some senators, like Rick Scott, have eagerly endorsed Trump’s approach, others remain cautious, recognizing the risks involved in expanding presidential powers. This clash reflects a broader concern about the erosion of checks and balances in the face of Trump’s demands.

Moreover, Trump’s call for recess appointments is not merely about filling positions; it is a strategic move to prevent the current Democratic-controlled Senate from pushing through judicial appointments. He has urged Republicans to block any such attempts during the leadership transition, revealing his willingness to disrupt the Senate’s functionality for partisan gain.

This situation poses serious implications for the Senate’s future operations, as Trump’s tactics could lead to further polarization and conflict. Recess appointments, once a rare and controversial measure, may become a tool for a party unwilling to engage in genuine legislative negotiations. As the GOP navigates this leadership election, the fallout from Trump’s demands will likely shape the Senate’s dynamics for years to come.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/10/politics/trump-senate-recess-appointments-gop-leader/index.html)

Trump Expresses Regret Over Leaving Office While Peddling Dangerous Lies

In a recent rally held in Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump lamented his departure from the White House, claiming he “shouldn’t have left.” This statement reflects his persistent delusions regarding the legitimacy of the 2020 election and suggests a troubling unwillingness to accept defeat in future elections.

Throughout his speech, Trump escalated his baseless assertions of widespread voter fraud, insinuating that the only way he could lose again in 2024 would be through Democratic cheating. This rhetoric continues to undermine the integrity of the electoral process and incites division among his supporters.

Trump’s remarks also hinted at a dangerous attitude towards violence, as he expressed indifference to the idea of reporters being shot at while criticizing the media. Such comments are alarming, especially considering the violent events that occurred on January 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters stormed the Capitol based on his false claims.

Despite a clear lack of evidence for his claims, Trump continues to capitalize on fear and division as he campaigns for the upcoming election, labeling the Democratic Party as “demonic.” This kind of inflammatory language is reminiscent of his previous tactics that incited unrest and violence.

As the election draws near, Trump’s unwillingness to concede and his promotion of dangerous rhetoric raise significant concerns about the future of democracy in America. It is evident that should Trump regain power, he would likely resist leaving the White House again, posing a serious threat to democratic norms.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/03/us/politics/trump-pa-rally-election.html)

Trump Regrets Leaving White House as He Peddles Lies About Voter Fraud

In a recent rally in Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump expressed regret over leaving the White House, stating he “shouldn’t have left” as he continues to push his baseless claims of widespread voter fraud. This rhetoric not only signals his persistent delusions about the 2020 election outcome but also hints at his unwillingness to accept potential defeat in the upcoming 2024 elections. His remarks come just days before the election, showcasing a campaign centered around grievance rather than policy.

Trump’s comments during the rally reflected a tone of resentment and self-pity as he lamented his departure from office. Significantly, he implied that the Democratic Party is “demonic,” illustrating his descent into extreme rhetoric that has characterized his political narrative. This kind of language not only alienates moderate voters but also stokes unnecessary hostility among his supporters.

Moreover, Trump’s continued insinuations that he will not recognize the election results unless he deems them “fair” raises alarms about the potential for further political unrest. His previous behavior, culminating in the January 6 Capitol riots, serves as a stark reminder of the dangers inherent in his rhetoric. His insistence on the presence of “hundreds of lawyers” at polling booths further exemplifies his unfounded paranoia surrounding electoral integrity.

Additionally, Trump’s sluggish and hoarse delivery during the rally indicates a lack of vigor that many observers may interpret as a fading influence. His obsession with personal grievances, rather than engaging in a constructive dialogue about the future, suggests that he is increasingly out of touch with the needs and concerns of American voters.

As he marches toward the 2024 election, Trump’s fixation on his past grievances over substantive policies highlights a troubling trend in his leadership style. With the specter of his divisive presidency still looming, voters must consider whether embracing such a figure is beneficial for the nation moving forward.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/03/us/politics/trump-pa-rally-election.html)

Trump Says OK If An Assassin Shoots Through The Press

During a recent rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump made shocking remarks suggesting he would not mind if someone attempted to shoot through the media to reach him. This statement, made while he was critiquing the bulletproof glass shielding him, raises serious concerns about his attitude towards violence and the press.

Trump, who has a history of inflammatory rhetoric, referred to the media as “fake news” and “bloodsuckers” while gesturing towards the protective glass. His comments come in the wake of multiple assassination attempts against him, including a recent incident where a bullet grazed his ear and resulted in the death of an audience member.

The former president’s reckless comments not only trivialize the threats against his life but also serve to incite his supporters against the press. By implying that the media is a barrier to him, he dangerously promotes the idea that violence against journalists is acceptable.

Trump’s spokesperson attempted to clarify his remarks, claiming he was trying to protect the media. However, this belies the reality of Trump’s consistent pattern of hostility towards journalists who challenge him. His rhetoric has been known to embolden extremist behavior among his followers, leading to increased violence against the press.

This incident is a stark reminder of the toxic environment Trump has cultivated, where incitement and division take precedence over respect and dignity. As he continues his campaign for the presidency, the implications of his words and their potential effects on public safety and discourse cannot be overstated.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-lititz-pennsylvania-rally-shoot-through-media-bulletproof-glass/)

Trump’s Lies About Schools and Transgender Surgeries Exposed

Former President Donald Trump has once again spread the harmful falsehood that schools in the U.S. are sending children for gender-affirming surgeries without parental consent. This baseless claim, first made during a rally in late August, has been thoroughly debunked by multiple reputable sources, including CNN, which revealed that Trump’s own campaign could not provide a single instance to support this outrageous assertion.

Despite being discredited, Trump has doubled down on his narrative, repeating it during discussions filmed by Fox News and on a podcast with Joe Rogan. He insists that there are places where children leave for school and return having undergone surgical changes, a claim that is not only misleading but also entirely fabricated. He fails to specify any such locations, exposing the lack of evidence behind his outlandish claims.

Experts in transgender healthcare have unequivocally stated that Trump’s assertions are false. There are no instances of schools facilitating gender-affirming surgeries, and any medical intervention for minors must involve parental consent. Leading medical professionals emphasize that surgeries, whether gender-affirming or otherwise, cannot be performed in school settings and require a qualified medical center.

Moreover, the process for minors seeking gender-affirming care is comprehensive and involves careful evaluation by medical professionals. Parental consent is not just a formality; it is a legal requirement that ensures informed decision-making regarding a child’s health. The American Academy of Pediatrics and other authoritative bodies have made it clear that no healthcare provider would perform surgery on a minor without the involvement and consent of parents.

Trump’s continued propagation of this false narrative reflects a dangerous trend of misinformation that undermines trust in educational and healthcare institutions. The overwhelming consensus among experts is that these surgeries are not performed in schools, and the claims made by Trump serve only to stoke fear and division as he aims to mobilize his base ahead of the upcoming elections.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/26/politics/fact-check-trump-rogan-children-gender-affirming-surgeries/index.html)

1 2 3 … 246