Category: Racist: Middle-Eastern

Trump’s Faulty Claims on FAA Diversity Policies Mislead Public After Plane Crash

Former President Donald Trump’s recent claims linking air traffic control diversity programs to a tragic plane crash are not just misleading but also factually inaccurate. The diversity hiring program that Trump criticized was actually initiated during his own presidency, specifically in 2019. This revelation comes from fact-checking by The Washington Post, which clarified that Trump’s narrative is an attempt to scapegoat policies he put in place.

In a press conference aimed at exploiting the emotional aftermath of a plane crash, Trump suggested various medical conditions that should disqualify individuals from being air traffic controllers—claims that have been met with backlash due to their unfounded nature. These remarks dismiss the capabilities of countless individuals who can thrive in such roles despite having disabilities. Trump’s definition of disqualification starkly contrasts with the inclusive hiring practices that were established for the FAA during his own administration and have been consistent since.

Trump also falsely claimed he rolled back diversity initiatives from the Obama administration regarding air traffic control hiring. In reality, the programs were left intact throughout Trump’s term and were the subject of legal challenges from conservative groups. His assertion that he altered these standards for the better lacks any substantial evidence; instead, it highlights the disingenuous and corrupt tactics characteristic of Republican rhetoric.

This is not the first instance of Trump deflecting responsibility, as he has previously made baseless claims regarding various issues, including public health decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic and national security purges. His pattern of blaming policies initiated by his opponents or his administration itself serves to distract from his own failures and maintain his grip on the right-wing narrative.

Furthermore, influential figures like Elon Musk have echoed Trump’s sentiments, misleading the public about the qualifications of personnel in regulatory agencies while ignoring the fact that Trump’s administration laid the groundwork for the current situation. This aligns with a broader Republican agenda that seeks to undermine diversity initiatives while appealing to a base that thrives on negative framing of progress, ultimately undermining fairness and equality in the workforce and advancing corporate interests over public safety.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/news/faa-diversity-program-trump-blames-for-air-crash-was-started-in-first-trump-administration-reveals-the-washington-post/)

Trump’s Ethnic Cleansing Rhetoric Threatens Palestinian Lives and U.S. Diplomacy

Donald Trump has made alarming statements suggesting that he wants to “clean out” Gaza and relocate Palestinians to neighboring countries, such as Jordan and Egypt. This rhetoric, which echoes sentiments of ethnic cleansing, indicates a chilling disregard for the rights and dignity of an already beleaguered population. Trump’s comments follow a humanitarian crisis in the region as thousands of Palestinians await possible return to their homes in northern Gaza, following Israeli accusations that Hamas violated ceasefire agreements.

The former president proposed that Jordan’s King Abdullah accept more Palestinian refugees and indicated he would discuss similar arrangements with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi. Trump’s assertion that the displacement of “probably a million and a half people” is a viable solution underscores a shocking level of insensitivity and detachment from the realities faced by those in Gaza, who are enduring widespread devastation.

Reactions to Trump’s incendiary remarks have been predictably mixed. Far-right Israeli politicians like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich have embraced the idea of resettling Gaza residents elsewhere, framing it as “out-of-the-box” thinking conducive to peace and security. Conversely, Palestinian leaders, including a senior Hamas spokesperson, have firmly rejected any notion of resettlement, affirming their attachment to their homeland despite enduring immense suffering.

The United Nations has condemned Trump’s suggestions, labeling them as tantamount to ethnic cleansing. Francesca Albanese, a UN Special Rapporteur, stated that such proposals are neither novel nor acceptable, reinforcing the belief that plans to forcibly relocate ethnic populations reflect a significant moral failing. This rhetoric serves not only to dehumanize the Palestinian people but also aligns with a broader pattern of authoritarian and nationalist ideologies dominating contemporary Republican politics.

Additionally, Trump’s administration has resumed military support for Israel, including shipments of bombs, further complicating an already fragile ceasefire and raising alarm over potential civilian casualties. This political maneuvering reflects an alarming trend among Republican leaders who prioritize military action over diplomatic solutions, thereby perpetuating cycles of violence and instability in the region. The consequences of these actions are dire, underscoring the need for a critical reassessment of U.S. foreign policy that centers on the basic rights and humanity of all people.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna189317)

Trump’s Agenda Undermines Diversity and Inclusion, Promotes White Supremacy

The Trump administration has taken aggressive steps to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) efforts within federal agencies. In a memo from the Office of Personnel Management, officials were ordered to place D.E.I. staff on paid administrative leave and to plan the closure of their offices by Wednesday evening. This directive underscores Trump’s commitment to a regressive agenda that privileges a narrow definition of merit over inclusive practices.

The memo specifies that agencies must strip any language or materials related to D.E.I. initiatives and withdraw pending documents that could contradict these new mandates. Trump’s executive order characterizes D.E.I. efforts as detrimental to national unity, framing them unjustly as a “spoils system” that undermines traditional American values such as hard work and individual achievement. Such rhetoric is a notorious tactic used by Trump and his allies to promote a divisive and exclusionary vision of America.

The implications of this directive extend into the private sector, as Trump encouraged corporations to follow suit, potentially rolling back initiatives at major companies like Meta and McDonald’s. Although federal oversight of private sector employment practices is limited, compliance could still affect businesses that contract with the government, creating a ripple effect that jeopardizes progress made in workplace diversity and equity.

This abrupt dismantling of D.E.I. efforts reflects a broader systematic action against social progress underlining the Trump administration’s values. By targeting structures designed to advance inclusion, the administration seeks to affirm the dominance of a white, male-centric narrative, effectively erasing the contributions and identities of marginalized groups. Such tactics are inherently unethical and serve to entrench existing inequalities.

This maneuvering not only erodes decades of civil rights achievements but also signals a shift towards authoritarian governance, reminiscent of tactics utilized by far-right regimes. As Trump and his Republican allies continue to pursue policies that prioritize elitism and exclusion over equity and justice, they further threaten the foundational tenets of American democracy.

Trump’s Phoenix Speech: A Dangerous Return to Authoritarian Rhetoric

Donald Trump’s recent speech in Phoenix showcased his continued efforts to appeal to far-right conservatives while promoting regressive and dangerous ideologies. In a move that echoed his previous rhetoric, Trump threatened to reclaim the Panama Canal, claiming unfair treatment by Panama and reiterating his belief in American exceptionalism. This statement reflects a troubling shift towards authoritarianism and a disregard for international agreements, as he disregards the 1977 treaty that granted control of the canal to Panama.

Trump’s comments about potentially meeting with Vladimir Putin to discuss the war in Ukraine reveal a dangerous inclination to legitimize a dictator who has committed egregious acts of aggression. By prioritizing personal diplomacy with Putin over the established diplomatic channels, Trump undermines the United States’ standing in the global community and disregards the suffering of those affected by the war.

Additionally, Trump dismissed concerns about Elon Musk’s influence over his administration, insisting that Musk is not taking over the presidency. This denial comes as Trump has increasingly relied on Musk’s platform to bolster his political power, showcasing a concerning trend of blurring the lines between corporate influence and government.

In a misguided attempt to rewrite history, Trump called for the restoration of the name Mount McKinley, suggesting it is an affront to American values to honor indigenous history. This revisionist approach to history is part of a larger trend of promoting a ‘culture war,’ which serves to distract from pressing issues facing the nation.

Trump’s endorsement of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Health and Human Services secretary, despite Kennedy’s baseless claims linking vaccines to autism, raises serious ethical concerns. By promoting vaccine skepticism, Trump is endangering public health and undermining the scientific consensus that vaccines are safe and effective.

The former president’s comments on TikTok reveal a contradictory stance. While he acknowledges the app’s potential to connect with young voters, his administration previously sought to ban it over national security concerns. This inconsistency highlights the opportunistic nature of Trump’s politics.

Trump’s rhetoric demonstrates a blatant disregard for facts, as he continues to perpetuate lies about the 2020 election and inflame divisive issues. This approach not only threatens the integrity of American democracy but also emboldens extremist factions within the Republican Party.

Overall, Trump’s speech encapsulated a troubling trajectory towards authoritarianism, fueled by misinformation and a rejection of democratic norms. His continued embrace of controversial figures and ideas raises alarms about the future of American governance and the potential for further erosion of civil liberties.

As Trump continues to rally his base with incendiary language and policies that cater to wealthy elites, it is crucial to recognize the dangers posed by his brand of politics. The American public must remain vigilant against these threats to democracy and work towards a more equitable and just society.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/22/politics/trump-turning-point-rally-key-lines/index.html)

Trump Defends Laura Loomer Amid Controversy Over Racist Comments

Former President Donald Trump recently addressed questions regarding his relationship with far-right activist Laura Loomer, whom he described as a “free spirit” and supporter. During a news conference in Southern California, Trump emphasized that he does not control Loomer and acknowledged her as a longtime supporter of his campaign. This statement came in response to concerns raised by his allies about their close association.

Hours later, Trump attempted to distance himself from Loomer by expressing disagreement with some of her statements on social media, though he refrained from specifying which remarks he found objectionable. He characterized her as a private citizen and reiterated that she shares frustrations with what he termed the “Radical Left Marxists and Fascists” attacking him.

Loomer is known for her controversial views, including her self-identification as a “proud Islamophobe” and her promotion of conspiracy theories, such as the claim that the 9/11 attacks were an “inside job.” Despite her assertions that she is not anti-Muslim, her history of incendiary comments has led to her bans from major social media platforms.

Trump’s rhetoric and support for Loomer reflect a broader pattern in his political behavior, where he has aligned himself with conspiracy theorists and controversial figures as long as they support him. At a recent rally, Trump echoed Loomer’s unfounded claims about Vice President Kamala Harris, further fueling the political narrative surrounding conspiracy theories.

Criticism of Loomer’s remarks has come from various quarters, including Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who labeled them as “appalling and extremely racist.” Trump’s acknowledgment of Loomer’s presence on his private plane during a debate with Harris has raised eyebrows, as it suggests a deeper connection with figures who have promoted divisive rhetoric.

(h/t: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/09/13/politics/donald-trump-laura-loomer)

Donald Trump Claims Some Races Have ‘Murder Gene’ in Eugenics Rant

In a recent interview on The Hugh Hewitt radio show, Donald Trump made controversial claims suggesting that certain migrants possess “bad genes” that predispose them to violence and murder. He asserted that there are numerous criminals entering the U.S. due to lax immigration policies, specifically targeting Vice President Kamala Harris’s approach to immigration.

Trump’s comments included a sweeping accusation that Harris is responsible for allowing individuals with violent tendencies into the country, stating, “How about allowing people to come to an open border, 13,000 of which were murders, many of them murdered far more than one person.” He went on to state, “We got a lot of bad genes in our country right now,” implying a genetic basis for criminal behavior.

This rhetoric aligns with Trump’s previous remarks associating genetics with racial superiority. During his 2020 campaign, Trump suggested that he and his supporters had “good genes,” indicating a belief that genetics play a role in societal issues like crime and immigration. Such comments have drawn parallels to eugenics ideologies, which have historically been associated with racism and discrimination.

The backlash against Trump’s statements has been significant, with many social commentators and political opponents denouncing his views as dangerous and unfounded. Experts in genetics and social sciences have criticized the notion that criminality can be linked to genetics, emphasizing the role of socio-economic factors and systemic issues.

Trump’s remarks not only reflect his ongoing campaign strategy that includes targeting immigrant populations but also highlight a broader trend within certain political circles that seek to frame immigration issues through a lens of racial and genetic determinism. Such assertions raise concerns about the potential for increased stigmatization of minority groups and the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes.

 

Trump Speeds Up Plans To Force Foreign Students, Others Out Of U.S.

Faced with the prospect of losing the power to make immigration policy after the November 2020 presidential election, Trump administration officials are speeding up efforts to force foreign nationals to leave the United States, including a new policy that could push out many international students. The latest policy should be seen in the context of the June 22, 2020, presidential proclamation that blocked the entry of foreign-born professionals and encouraged them to depart the country by preventing the entry of many family members. The proclamation also included a plan, if implemented, that could drive many long-time H-1B visa holders out of America.

“The Trump administration seems to be doing everything it can to stop all immigration to the United States,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, a Cornell Law School professor and an advisor to the National Foundation for American Policy, in an interview. “Families are separated and employers can’t bring in needed workers. These latest actions are hurting, not helping, our economy.”

On July 6, 2020, the Trump administration announced that international students at U.S. universities “operating entirely online may not take a full online course load and remain in the United States,” according to the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). “The U.S. Department of State will not issue visas to students enrolled in schools and/or programs that are fully online for the fall semester nor will U.S. Customs and Border Protection permit these students to enter the United States. Active students currently in the United States enrolled in such programs must depart the country or take other measures, such as transferring to a school with in-person instruction to remain in lawful status. If not, they may face immigration consequences including, but not limited to, the initiation of removal proceedings.” (Emphasis in original.)

The announcement sent shockwaves through U.S. universities, many of which decided for health and safety reasons to offer classes exclusively online in the fall. Public universities facing state budget crises already expected to be harmed financially by the near absence of new international students, who often pay full tuition. Administration policies that may drive out existing international students as well will be a further financial blow and are likely to crush the dreams of many students, note analysts.

“By not allowing continuing international students who are studying at institutions that make the decision to continue with online classes, rather than moving to in-person or hybrid models, SEVP has made it more difficult for both these students and institutions. This is very unfortunate,” said Miriam Feldblum, executive director of the Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, in an interview. She recommends the administration, at minimum, to continue the current flexibility from the spring on allowing all online classes, which was extended into the summer. Feldblum would also like to see online fall semester enrollment count towards eligibility to participate in Curricular Practical Training (CPT).

The Department of Homeland Security plans to publish a new regulation on the policy as a temporary final rule, allowing it to take effect immediately, though it is expected to be challenged in court. “The policy forces schools to pick a model and stick to it, despite the fact that Covid-19 is a moving target,” said Dan Berger, a partner at Curran, Berger & Kludt, in an interview. “Depending on how the virus progresses, schools with hybrid models [in-person and online classes] may go online this fall. The administration’s message does not allow much-needed flexibility based on public health as the Covid-19 situation plays out.” 

“The policy also forces some students to leave who are here and safe, even if the country they are going to has a Covid-19 outbreak or closed borders,” said Berger. “Schools offer more than just classes. There is support here for students who have nowhere to go, even if the students are taking classes online. And forcing schools that were online to add an in-person class to meet the ‘hybrid’ definition would mean bringing students into contact with each other just for immigration purposes.”

The new Trump administration policy may force international students currently enrolled at Harvard University to leave the United States. Harvard recently announced that “all course instruction (undergraduate and graduate) for the 2020-21 academic year will be delivered online.”

“We are deeply concerned that the guidance issued today by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement imposes a blunt, one-size-fits-all approach to a complex problem, giving international students, particularly those in online programs, few options beyond leaving the country or transferring schools,” said Harvard President Larry Bacow in a statement. “This guidance undermines the thoughtful approach taken on behalf of students by so many institutions, including Harvard, to plan for continuing academic programs while balancing the health and safety challenges of the global pandemic. We must do all that we can to ensure that our students can continue their studies without fear of being forced to leave the country mid-way through the year, disrupting their academic progress and undermining the commitments – and sacrifices – that many of them have made to advance their education.” (Note: On July 8, 2020, Harvard and MIT filed a lawsuit seeking to block the upcoming rule on international students.)

In response to the question, “Does it look like Harvard will have international students on campus in the fall?” William Stock of Klasko Immigration Law Partners said, “Apparently not.”

The new policy may upend hundreds of thousands of lives, but for Trump administration officials, who fear this is their final chance to institute lasting changes to U.S. immigration policy, it is just one of many measures designed to discourage international students and others to follow their dreams to America. Attorney Dan Berger said, “The chilling effect of this new policy on international students coming to the United States will be tremendous.” That is the point.

[Forbes]

Trump Retweets Image of Speaker Pelosi and Senator Schumer in Traditional Islamic Clothing Before Iranian Flag

President Donald Trump took his attacks on Speaker Nancy Pelosi Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to a whole new level Monday morning, by retweeting a photoshopped image of the two in traditional Muslim garb before an Iranian flag.

The tweet came in a flurry of frenzied presidential tweets (and retweets) critical of Speaker Pelosi’s criticism of the Trump administrations handling of Iranian foreign relations, in particular, that following the deadly drone strike that took the life of Quds force leader and Iranian Republican Guard Major General Qasam Soleimani.

In the days that followed Soleimani’s death, a million Iranians reportedly flooded the streets of Teheran to protest the U.S. killing of the number two leader of Iran. But as Iran eventually admitted to shooting down a Ukranian airliner and killing 167 civilians, protests have started against the Iranian regime.

[Mediaite]


Trump: Erdoğan has ‘great relationship with the Kurds’

President Trump on Wednesday said his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has a “great relationship with the Kurds” amid concerns of possible ethnic violence against the minority group in northern Syria.

The two leaders met for the first time in Washington one month after Turkey launched its offensive into northeastern Syria against Kurdish forces allied with the U.S. in the fight against ISIS. Turkey claims the Kurdish group is an offshoot of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, which is designated as a terrorist group by both Ankara and Washington.

“I think the president has a great relationship with the Kurds,” Trump said. “Many Kurds live currently in Turkey, and they’re happy, and they’re taken care of, including health care — we were talking about it before — including health care and education and other things, so that’s really a misnomer.”

The question came from reporter Rahim Rashidi of the Iraqi Kurdistan network K24, who was dubbed “Mr. Kurd” by Trump during a press conference last year when discussing the fight against ISIS. Rashidi has adopted the nickname, putting it on business cards and introducing himself that way when interviewing the president and other lawmakers.

Erdoğan reasserted that Turkey’s offensive is rooting out “terrorist organizations.”

“We have no problems with the Kurds. We have problems with terrorist organizations, and of course you’re not going to own up to the terrorists, are you?” he asked.

Turkey is home to one of the largest populations of Kurdish minorities, about 19 percent of its population.

[The Hill]

Trump approves plan for record low number of refugee admissions

President Trump has approved a plan to reduce the cap for refugee admissions to the country for fiscal 2020 to 18,000, the lowest level on record since the program began more than three decades ago. 

In a statement announcing the move this weekend, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that “the core of the Trump Administration’s foreign policy is a commitment to make decisions based on reality, not wishes, and to drive optimal outcomes based on concrete facts.” 

Pompeo went on to say that “this year’s determination on refugee admissions does just that, even as we sustain our longstanding commitment to help vulnerable populations and our leadership as the world’s most generous nation.” 

The plan, which was announced in late September, has drawn pushback from Democratic lawmakers, including governors who have said they will continue to welcome refugees to their states despite the steep reduction.

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown (D) said last month that her state is a “sanctuary state” and that Oregon will continue to “stand with refugees” in light of the executive order issued by the Trump administration, which allows states to turn away refugees. 

“These are people who cannot return home because they fear for their lives and their families. And to make matters worse, the Trump administration wants to slash the number of refugees our country will welcome this coming year to 18,000, the lowest ever on record,” she said then.

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) said in a letter to Trump last month that his state will continue to accept refugees fleeing violence and added that he was “dismayed” by the administration’s plans to drastically reduce the refugee cap to 18,000 — a significant jump from former President Obama’s proposed cap of 116,000 refugees in 2016.

“To reject refugees outright emboldens the message of those who seek to inspire hatred by saying that we, as Americans, do not have compassion or care for specific groups of people in the world facing persecution or worse,” Wolf wrote in the letter.

According to The New York Times, under the new move by the Trump administration, only 5,000 people who wish to flee their home countries for fear of persecution due to their religion will be allowed admission into the U.S. as part of the refugee program.

Fewer than 2,000 Central Americans will reportedly be allowed admission under the program going forward as well as 4,000 Iraqis who aided the United States military during the Iraq War.

The new cap for Iraqi refugees is reportedly less than half of the 9,829 who were admitted under the Obama administration in fiscal 2014. Under the Trump administration during fiscal 2019, just 153 Iraqi refugees whose applications were given high priority were admitted into the country. 

[The Hill]

1 2 3 4 … 8