Category: Racist: African-American

University of Michigan Closes DEI Office Amid Trump Pressure

The University of Michigan, known for its commitment to progressive values, is shutting down its Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ODEI) following pressure from the Trump administration. This decision reflects the broader trend of Republican policies undermining diversity initiatives across educational institutions. University President Santa Ono announced that this closure comes in response to recent executive orders targeting DEI programs nationwide, particularly those promoted under the Trump regime.

In a statement, the university indicated that services previously provided by the ODEI will be redistributed to other offices dedicated to student access and opportunity. The DEI 2.0 Strategic Plan and associated programming will also be discontinued. This retreat from the university’s previous support for diversity is alarming to faculty and advocates, who see it as a compliance with federal pressures aimed at enforcing a culture of white supremacy.

Rebekah Modrak, chair of the Faculty Senate, criticized the decision in an email, asserting that the federal government is working to erode the foundations of higher education by fostering a more homogeneous and inequitable environment. Her comments highlight the potential dangers of this shift, noting that similar initiatives in other states like Texas and Ohio have led to censorship and diminished academic freedom.

Despite the announced changes, there are efforts to maintain some degree of diversity programming, including mental health support and programs for historically underrepresented students. However, the overall trend of scaling back DEI initiatives raises concerns about the university’s commitment to fostering a truly inclusive campus. Critics warn that the administration’s decisions will ultimately diminish the educational experience and alter how equitable opportunities are administered.

U.S. Representative Rashida Tlaib sharply condemned the decision, stating that University of Michigan students deserve an administration that defends their rights against Trump’s regressive attacks on academic integrity and freedoms. The move to dissolve DEI efforts represents a significant setback not only for the University of Michigan but also for higher education institutions navigating Trump’s divisive policies.

(h/t: https://www.freep.com/story/news/education/2025/03/27/university-michigan-dei-office-closing/82690676007/)

Trump’s Policies Threaten NASA’s Diversity Initiatives and Scientific Progress

A wave of anxiety and uncertainty has swept through the space science community as the Trump administration sets its sights on slashing NASA funding and dismantling vital diversity initiatives. Under President Trump’s leadership and with the influence of Elon Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service, researchers are grappling with an environment threatening to reverse decades of progress in scientific leadership and inclusivity.

The Trump administration’s assault on science began early in his presidency. This included basketball-sized executive orders that diverted funding from critical research and initiated a series of layoffs, particularly targeting diversity programs in civil service roles. While a court briefly halted the funding freeze, the chaos persists, leaving grant evaluations in a state of disarray and creating uncertainty among researchers reliant on federal support.

NASA has already begun to suffer from these policies, noticeably pulling essential data from its public websites and halting operations of advisory groups crucial for scientific progress. The impending threat of budget cuts, rumored to reach as high as 50%, has sent shockwaves through the community. One researcher expressed intense concern for colleagues, emphasizing the stress and fear permeating the workforce.

Among the programs at risk is the Here to Observe initiative, which connected underrepresented students with NASA mission teams, fostering diversity and innovation in science education. The cutting of this program illustrates Trump’s broader agenda of undermining diversity for the sake of a regressive vision that aligns with white supremacy ideals.

As scientists rally to voice their concerns, they express not only fear for their careers but also for the future of American science. The budget slashes threaten longstanding missions and the development of new talent, imperiling not only NASA’s ongoing projects but also America’s standing in the global scientific community. Unless addressed, these cuts promise an extinction-level event for space science.

(h/t: https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/space-scientists-fearful-as-trump-administration-targets-science-and-mulls-nasa-cuts/)

PBS Closes DEI Office Under Trump Pressure Threatening Media Diversity

PBS has shut down its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) office in direct response to a recent executive order from Donald Trump. This closure affects staff members who worked in the DEI unit, previously led by Cecilia Loving. In a statement, PBS vowed to continue reflecting America’s diversity in its workforce despite this setback.

This decision follows a series of Trump’s executive orders designed to dismantle DEI programs across both federal entities and private organizations. PBS is currently under scrutiny from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which is investigating potential violations regarding sponsorship disclosures. This inquiry has been instigated by Trump-appointed FCC Chair Brendan Carr, who has repeatedly targeted public broadcasters like PBS and NPR.

Before this closure, PBS had been actively expanding its DEI initiatives, having established a dedicated DEI office in 2022. Their recent reports indicated a record high of 44 percent BIPOC representation in their workforce. However, with the Trump administration’s aggressive stance against DEI efforts, PBS now faces significant challenges in continuing these programs.

The closure of the DEI office represents a worrying trend of undermining efforts to foster diversity and equality in public institutions, echoing broader Republican agendas aimed at eroding inclusive practices. As public broadcasting faces external pressures, the rollback of such initiatives serves to reinforce the exclusionary tactics of Trump and his allies, who are determined to reshape America’s media landscape.

This move not only affects the staff involved but also threatens the integrity of public broadcasting as a space for diversity in representation and perspective. Trump’s regime continues to implement authoritarian tactics aimed at stifling dissent and manipulating media narratives, reminiscent of the strategies employed by populist leaders around the world.

JD Vance Defends Elon Musk Staffer Over Racist Tweets

JD Vance, the current Vice President, has expressed support for Marko Elez, an Elon Musk staffer who recently resigned from the Department of Government Efficiency after his racist social media posts were uncovered. Elez had connections to a Twitter account that endorsed eugenics, racism, and extreme views against certain ethnic groups, sparking ethical concerns about Musk’s influence in government appointments.

The Wall Street Journal highlighted Elez’s problematic statements, which included advocating for the annihilation of both Gaza and Israel, expressing a desire to repeal the Civil Rights Act, and promoting a “eugenic immigration policy.” Following the revelation of these posts, Musk criticized the journalist who reported on Elez, claiming the investigation was an attack on him and his team.

In a recent post on social media platform X, Vance defended Elez, stating he disagreed with some of his posts but believed that “stupid social media activity should not ruin a kid’s life.” He called for Elez to be reinstated, arguing against rewarding journalists who expose harmful online behaviors. This statement comes across as a clear dismissal of the serious implications of Elez’s views.

Vance’s disregard for the severity of Elez’s past remarks mirrors a broader troubling trend within Republican ideology, where defensive posturing against critical media is prioritized over accountability for racist and unethical behavior. The growing normalization of hate within the GOP reflects their ongoing abandonment of core democratic values, as they seek to protect their own over promoting justice and equality.

With this incident, Vance and Musk reinforce a dangerous narrative that tolerates bigotry under the guise of free speech, undermining the very fabric of a diverse society. Their actions serve to embolden extremist views and further position Republican leadership as enablers of racism and injustice within the governmental framework.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/news/jd-vance-goes-to-bat-for-25-year-old-kid-elon-musk-staffer-who-resigned-over-racist-tweets-bring-him-back/)

Trump’s Faulty Claims on FAA Diversity Policies Mislead Public After Plane Crash

Former President Donald Trump’s recent claims linking air traffic control diversity programs to a tragic plane crash are not just misleading but also factually inaccurate. The diversity hiring program that Trump criticized was actually initiated during his own presidency, specifically in 2019. This revelation comes from fact-checking by The Washington Post, which clarified that Trump’s narrative is an attempt to scapegoat policies he put in place.

In a press conference aimed at exploiting the emotional aftermath of a plane crash, Trump suggested various medical conditions that should disqualify individuals from being air traffic controllers—claims that have been met with backlash due to their unfounded nature. These remarks dismiss the capabilities of countless individuals who can thrive in such roles despite having disabilities. Trump’s definition of disqualification starkly contrasts with the inclusive hiring practices that were established for the FAA during his own administration and have been consistent since.

Trump also falsely claimed he rolled back diversity initiatives from the Obama administration regarding air traffic control hiring. In reality, the programs were left intact throughout Trump’s term and were the subject of legal challenges from conservative groups. His assertion that he altered these standards for the better lacks any substantial evidence; instead, it highlights the disingenuous and corrupt tactics characteristic of Republican rhetoric.

This is not the first instance of Trump deflecting responsibility, as he has previously made baseless claims regarding various issues, including public health decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic and national security purges. His pattern of blaming policies initiated by his opponents or his administration itself serves to distract from his own failures and maintain his grip on the right-wing narrative.

Furthermore, influential figures like Elon Musk have echoed Trump’s sentiments, misleading the public about the qualifications of personnel in regulatory agencies while ignoring the fact that Trump’s administration laid the groundwork for the current situation. This aligns with a broader Republican agenda that seeks to undermine diversity initiatives while appealing to a base that thrives on negative framing of progress, ultimately undermining fairness and equality in the workforce and advancing corporate interests over public safety.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/news/faa-diversity-program-trump-blames-for-air-crash-was-started-in-first-trump-administration-reveals-the-washington-post/)

Trump’s Agenda Undermines Diversity and Inclusion, Promotes White Supremacy

The Trump administration has taken aggressive steps to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) efforts within federal agencies. In a memo from the Office of Personnel Management, officials were ordered to place D.E.I. staff on paid administrative leave and to plan the closure of their offices by Wednesday evening. This directive underscores Trump’s commitment to a regressive agenda that privileges a narrow definition of merit over inclusive practices.

The memo specifies that agencies must strip any language or materials related to D.E.I. initiatives and withdraw pending documents that could contradict these new mandates. Trump’s executive order characterizes D.E.I. efforts as detrimental to national unity, framing them unjustly as a “spoils system” that undermines traditional American values such as hard work and individual achievement. Such rhetoric is a notorious tactic used by Trump and his allies to promote a divisive and exclusionary vision of America.

The implications of this directive extend into the private sector, as Trump encouraged corporations to follow suit, potentially rolling back initiatives at major companies like Meta and McDonald’s. Although federal oversight of private sector employment practices is limited, compliance could still affect businesses that contract with the government, creating a ripple effect that jeopardizes progress made in workplace diversity and equity.

This abrupt dismantling of D.E.I. efforts reflects a broader systematic action against social progress underlining the Trump administration’s values. By targeting structures designed to advance inclusion, the administration seeks to affirm the dominance of a white, male-centric narrative, effectively erasing the contributions and identities of marginalized groups. Such tactics are inherently unethical and serve to entrench existing inequalities.

This maneuvering not only erodes decades of civil rights achievements but also signals a shift towards authoritarian governance, reminiscent of tactics utilized by far-right regimes. As Trump and his Republican allies continue to pursue policies that prioritize elitism and exclusion over equity and justice, they further threaten the foundational tenets of American democracy.

Trump’s Disturbing Comments on Race and Privilege Highlight His Inadequacy as a Leader

In a recent rally in Michigan, former President Donald Trump made headlines by boasting about his “beautiful white skin” immediately after disparaging Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump’s comments come amid a contentious election campaign where he has frequently insulted Harris, whom he labeled as a “low I.Q. individual” and previously questioned her racial identity at a conference of Black journalists.

Trump’s remarks about Harris reflect his ongoing strategy of using personal attacks to undermine his opponents. His history of offensive comments regarding race, such as questioning Harris’s Blackness, demonstrates a troubling pattern of behavior that raises serious concerns about his fitness for office. As he continues to escalate his rhetoric, it becomes clear that Trump is not only out of touch but also dangerously divisive.

During his speech, Trump lamented that his presidential duties have kept him from enjoying leisure activities, specifically hitting the beach. This self-indulgent complaint underscores his detachment from the everyday struggles of average Americans, who are facing economic hardships and uncertainty. Instead of addressing significant issues, Trump chose to focus on his personal experiences, further highlighting his privilege.

By lamenting his lack of a tan while insisting he has the “whitest skin,” Trump attempted to inject humor into his speech. However, this remark only served to reinforce the perception of him as a superficial figure more concerned with appearances than policy. His fixation on skin color in the context of a political campaign is not only inappropriate but also reflects a deeper insensitivity to the complexities of race in America.

As Trump rallies support for his campaign, it is crucial to recognize the implications of his words and actions. His continuous belittling of opponents, particularly women and people of color, undermines the values of respect and inclusivity that are essential for a healthy democratic process. Voters must critically assess the character and integrity of candidates as they head to the polls.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-boasts-he-has-beautiful-white-skin-right-after-slamming-kamala-harris/)

Trump’s Baseless Claims About Immigrants Eating Pets Debunked by Fox Host

Former President Donald Trump engaged in a contentious dialogue with Fox News host Howard Kurtz regarding his unfounded claims about Haitian immigrants allegedly consuming pets in Springfield, Ohio. During the broadcast of Media Buzz, Kurtz pressed Trump on his reluctance to retract these statements, which have been broadly discredited. Kurtz reminded Trump that his assertions about animals being eaten had gained notoriety but were proven false, highlighting the harmful stereotypes perpetuated by such rhetoric.

In a puzzling defense, Trump responded with confusion, stating, “I don’t know if it’s true or not true,” despite the overwhelming evidence contradicting his claims. This denial of accountability illustrates a troubling trend where Trump dismisses factual information, instead insisting on the validity of his narrative. Kurtz, aiming to clarify, reiterated that local officials had debunked Trump’s claims, emphasizing the detrimental impact of spreading misinformation.

Trump’s insistence on the existence of missing geese as a point of argument only further showcased his disregard for factual accuracy. Rather than addressing the evidence presented by Kurtz, Trump deflected responsibility by shifting blame to media outlets, displaying a familiar tactic of evasion. This interaction underscores the former president’s commitment to promoting divisive and false narratives, often rooted in racism.

This incident is not an isolated case; Trump’s rhetoric aligns with extremist views often propagated by alt-right figures, including the promotion of the idea that immigrants threaten American culture. Such statements not only dehumanize minority communities but also echo sentiments expressed by known white supremacists. Trump’s position feeds into a damaging discourse that fosters intolerance and fear regarding immigration.

The exchange ultimately highlights the growing concerns surrounding misinformation and its implications for public discourse. Trump’s unwillingness to acknowledge the truth demonstrates a broader issue of accountability among political leaders. As the 2024 elections approach, the need for accurate representation of immigrant communities becomes increasingly vital in combating harmful stereotypes.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/what-about-the-geese-trump-snipes-at-howard-kurtz-after-fox-host-tells-him-flat-out-that-his-migrant-pet-eating-claims-have-been-debunked/)

Donald Trump Claims Some Races Have ‘Murder Gene’ in Eugenics Rant

In a recent interview on The Hugh Hewitt radio show, Donald Trump made controversial claims suggesting that certain migrants possess “bad genes” that predispose them to violence and murder. He asserted that there are numerous criminals entering the U.S. due to lax immigration policies, specifically targeting Vice President Kamala Harris’s approach to immigration.

Trump’s comments included a sweeping accusation that Harris is responsible for allowing individuals with violent tendencies into the country, stating, “How about allowing people to come to an open border, 13,000 of which were murders, many of them murdered far more than one person.” He went on to state, “We got a lot of bad genes in our country right now,” implying a genetic basis for criminal behavior.

This rhetoric aligns with Trump’s previous remarks associating genetics with racial superiority. During his 2020 campaign, Trump suggested that he and his supporters had “good genes,” indicating a belief that genetics play a role in societal issues like crime and immigration. Such comments have drawn parallels to eugenics ideologies, which have historically been associated with racism and discrimination.

The backlash against Trump’s statements has been significant, with many social commentators and political opponents denouncing his views as dangerous and unfounded. Experts in genetics and social sciences have criticized the notion that criminality can be linked to genetics, emphasizing the role of socio-economic factors and systemic issues.

Trump’s remarks not only reflect his ongoing campaign strategy that includes targeting immigrant populations but also highlight a broader trend within certain political circles that seek to frame immigration issues through a lens of racial and genetic determinism. Such assertions raise concerns about the potential for increased stigmatization of minority groups and the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes.

 

Asked why Black Americans are killed by police, Trump responds, “So are White people”

In an interview with CBS News on Tuesday, President Trump said the killing of George Floyd was “terrible” but appeared to bristle when asked why Black Americans are “still dying at the hands of law enforcement in this country.”

“So are White people. So are White people. What a terrible question to ask. So are White people,” Mr. Trump told CBS News senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge at the White House. “More White people, by the way. More White people.”

Police departments are not required to report comprehensive data on police killings, but researchers have compiled statistics showing Black Americans are more likely to die at the hands of law enforcement than White people. One study published in 2018 found that Black men are roughly 3.5 times more likely to be killed by law enforcement than White men. Another study released in 2019 found that one in 1,000 Black men in the U.S. can expect to die at the hands of police over the course of their lifetimes.

A study by Harvard researchers published in late June found that the number of White people killed by the police between 2013 and 2017 was higher than any other demographic. But White people constitute a larger portion of the population than Black people, and the study also showed that Black people were three times more likely to be killed by law enforcement officers than White Americans.

Mr. Trump’s comments come after weeks of nationwide protests against police brutality and racial violence instigated by the death of Floyd, an unarmed Black man who was killed in Minneapolis after a White police officer pressed a knee to his neck for almost nine minutes. Mr. Trump said he believed Floyd’s death was “terrible” in the interview with Herridge.

Mr. Trump’s critics have accused him of overtly appealing to white supremacists through his continued defense of the Confederate flag and statues of Confederate officials. Mr. Trump said in Tuesday’s interview that he believed the debate over the flag is a freedom of speech issue.

“All I say is freedom of speech. It’s very simple. My attitude is freedom of speech. Very strong views on the Confederate flag. With me, it’s freedom of speech. Very simple. Like it, don’t like it, it’s freedom of speech,” Mr. Trump said. He previously said in 2015 that he believed the Confederate flag should be in a museum.

When asked if he would be “comfortable” with supporters displaying the Confederate flag at his campaign events, Mr. Trump demurred.

“You know, it depends on what your definition is. But I am comfortable with freedom of speech. It’s very simple,” Mr. Trump said.

Herridge pressed the president on whether he understood “why the flag is a painful symbol for many people because it’s a reminder of slavery.”

“Well, people love it and I don’t view — I know people that like the Confederate flag and they’re not thinking about slavery. I look at NASCAR — you go to NASCAR, you had those flags all over the place. They stopped it,” Mr. Trump said, referring to the decision by NASCAR to ban the Confederate flag from its events. The president has also criticized Bubba Wallace, NASCAR’s only Black full-time driver, saying Wallace should apologize for an incident involving a noose that was discovered in his garage stall at a speedway in Alabama.

“I just think it’s freedom of speech, whether it’s freedom of speech, whether it’s Confederate flags or Black Lives Matter or anything else you want to talk about. It’s freedom of speech,” Mr. Trump continued.

[CBS News]

Media

1 2 3 … 14