David Weiss: Special counsel overseeing Hunter Biden criminal probe | CNN Politics

David Weiss, the Donald Trump-appointed US attorney who on Friday was named a special counsel leading the investigation into President Joe Biden’s son Hunter, has decades of experience as a federal prosecutor.

The appointment marks another dramatic development in the long-running probe into Hunter Biden, which began in 2018 and, at one time, concerned multiple financial and business activities in foreign countries dating to when Joe Biden was vice president.

Attorney General Merrick Garland said Friday that the move stemmed from Weiss’ request earlier this week to be elevated to special counsel – which now gives him more powers than a typical US attorney – and due to the “extraordinary circumstances” of this case and “public interest.”

“I am confident that Mr. Weiss will carry out his responsibility in an evenhanded and urgent manner and in accordance with the highest traditions of this department,” Garland said.

Weiss, the Delaware US attorney, met in April with Biden’s attorneys, who had requested a routine status update on the investigation, and it had appeared in June that the probe was near its end with a plea agreement. Hunter Biden agreed to plead guilty to two tax misdemeanors and struck a deal with federal prosecutors to resolve a felony gun charge.

However, in a court hearing last month, the deal nearly collapsed after a federal judge slammed the intertwined deals as “unprecedented” and asked the Justice Department and Biden’s lawyers to file additional legal briefs defending the constitutionality of the deal. In a court filing Friday, Weiss said the plea talks between the two parties broke down following the court hearing.

The appointment of a special counsel has long been called for by Republicans who have repeatedly criticized the Justice Department’s handling of the probe as being favorable to the president and his son. A senior Justice Department official told CNN that the White House and Biden’s legal team were not informed beforehand about the appointment.

However, House GOP members on Friday questioned whether Weiss could be trusted and reiterated calls for Weiss to testify before Congress.

“This action by Biden’s DOJ cannot be used to obstruct congressional investigations or whitewash the Biden family corruption,” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said in a tweet. “If Weiss negotiated the sweetheart deal that couldn’t get approved, how can he be trusted as a Special Counsel?”

In 2018, the Senate confirmed Weiss to serve as US attorney for the District of Delaware. At the time of his nomination, he was serving as the acting US attorney for the district and was one of nine candidates whom Trump said shared his “vision for ‘Making America Safe Again.’”

The Philadelphia native is a member of the Delaware and Pennsylvania bars.

A Washington University in St. Louis and Widener University School of Law graduate, Weiss began his career in law in 1984 as a clerk to Justice Andrew D. Christie of the Delaware Supreme Court, according to his Justice Department biography.

Following his clerkship, Weiss prosecuted violent crimes and white-collar offenses as an assistant US attorney before joining firm Duane Morris, where he was a commercial litigation associate and eventually became a partner. He later served as chief operating officer and senior vice president at The Siegfried Group, a financial services firm, according to his biography.

He served as the first assistant US attorney starting in 2007.

Weiss’ investigation into Hunter Biden continued into the Biden administration, prompting Garland to stress during a March Senate committee hearing that he would not interfere with the investigation. Weiss, he reiterated at the time, had “full authority” to carry out the investigation and to bring in another jurisdiction if necessary.

Garland said Weiss was “not to be denied anything that he needs.”

This story has been updated with additional developments.

This dude was HAND PICKED by Donald Trump to put Hunter Biden away… he spent FIVE YEARS investigating Hunter Biden. This was the best they got because as we have seen dozens of time the right wing alternative reality slams into actual reality when dealing with the courts

[https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/20/politics/who-is-david-weiss-hunter-biden-investigation/index.html]

Trump’s Baseless Election Contest in Georgia Undermines Democracy

Donald Trump’s campaign has filed an election contest in Georgia, seeking to undermine the results of the November 3, 2020 presidential election. This legal maneuver comes despite the absence of credible evidence supporting his claims of widespread voter fraud. In a troubling display of defiance against democratic norms, Trump’s campaign alleges that tens of thousands of illegal votes were counted, a claim that has been repeatedly debunked by numerous sources.

Ray S. Smith III, the lead counsel for the Trump campaign, echoed the unfounded narrative of election irregularities, stating that the Georgia Secretary of State orchestrated an ineffective election process. This rhetoric not only seeks to delegitimize the election but also stirs public distrust in the electoral system, a dangerous precedent for American democracy.

Accompanying the lawsuit are affidavits from Georgia residents, which Trump’s team claims support their allegations. However, many of these affidavits lack the necessary scrutiny and verification required to substantiate such serious accusations. Claims of voter fraud, including those involving underage voters and individuals casting ballots from out-of-state addresses, have been thoroughly examined and dismissed by election officials.

In the face of overwhelming evidence confirming the legitimacy of the election results, Trump’s insistence on pursuing this course of action has raised alarms about his commitment to democratic principles. Instead of accepting the will of the voters, he continues to rally his supporters around baseless conspiracies that threaten to erode trust in future elections.

This latest move is part of a broader strategy by Trump and his allies to overturn a free and fair election. The implications of this lawsuit extend beyond Georgia, as it reflects a national trend among some Republicans to challenge the integrity of the electoral process. Such actions not only undermine the democratic foundation of the United States but also set a troubling precedent for future political contests.

(h/t: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/trump-campaign-press-release-trump-campaign-files-election-contest-georgia)

William Barr’s Misleading Claims on Voter Fraud Undermine Democracy

Attorney General William Barr has recently echoed the baseless claims of voter fraud and mail-in voting irregularities that have been propagated by President Donald Trump. His misleading assertions have alarmed civil rights advocates who are concerned about the potential erosion of public confidence in the electoral process. Barr’s statements, which include unfounded fears about widespread fraud and foreign interference in mail-in voting, have been thoroughly debunked by election experts. The rhetoric not only mirrors Trump’s unfounded allegations but also jeopardizes the integrity of the Justice Department’s role in protecting voting rights.

In a disconcerting interview, Barr claimed that mail-in voting would lead to the loss of a ‘secret vote’ and suggested that postal workers could be bribed to commit election fraud. This assertion is fundamentally flawed; mail-in ballots are secured through identity verification processes that prevent such misconduct. Experts have pointed out that ballots are tracked and audited to ensure their legitimacy, thus nullifying Barr’s claims of rampant fraud.

Furthermore, Barr’s suggestion that foreign entities could counterfeit mail ballots is equally unfounded. Numerous safeguards are in place to protect the integrity of American elections, including specific paper stock for ballots and signature verification processes. Experts have overwhelmingly dismissed the idea that foreign powers could easily infiltrate the voting system, emphasizing that such operations would be complex and easily detectable.

Additionally, Barr’s claim that the U.S. has not previously engaged in widespread mail voting ignores the reality that several states have successfully conducted elections primarily through mail for years without significant issues. Misleading statements about the reliability of voter rolls and the prevalence of fraud undermine the progress made in expanding voting access, particularly during a pandemic.

The damage done by Barr’s rhetoric is compounded by the fact that it aligns with disinformation campaigns previously launched by foreign adversaries aimed at destabilizing U.S. democracy. As civil rights advocates rally against these baseless claims, they stress the importance of maintaining public trust in the electoral system, which is currently threatened by the Attorney General’s unfounded assertions.

(h/t: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1240144)

Trump’s Dangerous Misinformation About Election Fraud Continues Unchecked on Twitter

In a recent display of his refusal to accept the 2020 election results, former President Donald Trump took to Twitter to falsely proclaim that he had won the election against Joe Biden, despite widespread media confirmation of Biden’s victory. This latest episode is just one in a long line of Trump’s baseless claims regarding election fraud, which he has continuously propagated since the election ended.

Twitter responded to Trump’s misleading tweet by labeling it as ‘disputed,’ but failed to take significant action to restrict its spread among his vast follower base. This inaction raises serious concerns about the platform’s responsibility in combating misinformation, especially from a figure who has repeatedly disseminated falsehoods regarding election integrity.

By asserting that he won despite the official results, Trump is laying the groundwork for future unfounded allegations against any election outcome that does not favor him. This tactic mirrors his comments made at a rally in Michigan, where he suggested that his potential defeat would be the result of widespread cheating, further entrenching his narrative of a rigged electoral system.

Trump’s relentless pursuit of this false narrative not only undermines public trust in democratic institutions but also poses a threat to the political landscape as he continues to promote division and misinformation. His rhetoric has incited both support and backlash, leading to an increasingly polarized environment.

The implications of Trump’s actions are severe, especially as he hints at military action against political adversaries and calls them ‘the enemy within’, suggesting an alarming view of dissent in a democratic society. This dangerous mindset, coupled with the spread of disinformation, threatens the very fabric of American democracy.

(h/t: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/11/07/trump-election-outcome-tweet-label/)

Trump Returns to White House, Downplays COVID-19 Threat

President Donald Trump was discharged from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and returned to the White House on the evening of October 5, 2020, after receiving treatment for COVID-19. Upon his arrival, he displayed a sense of optimism, pumping his fist and giving a thumbs-up to reporters, while also removing his mask. Trump’s physician confirmed that he would continue his treatment at the White House, despite the ongoing nature of his care.

In a video message posted on Twitter, Trump urged the American public not to fear the coronavirus, stating, “Don’t let it dominate your life. We have developed, under the Trump Administration, some really great drugs & knowledge.” This statement comes as the U.S. death toll from COVID-19 surpassed 210,000, raising concerns about the implications of his remarks amidst a public health crisis.

Trump’s medical team had previously indicated that he was given a steroid, dexamethasone, and was undergoing treatment with remdesivir. While they affirmed that he was ready to return to the White House, they did not provide specifics regarding his lung scans or when he last tested negative for the virus.

The president’s health history during his COVID-19 diagnosis has been marked by inconsistencies between official medical briefings and statements from White House officials, leading to questions about transparency. Despite his recent hospitalization, Trump expressed eagerness to resume campaigning, stating he would be back on the trail soon.

(h/t: https://www.npr.org/sections/latest-updates-trump-covid-19-results/2020/10/05/920412187/trump-says-he-will-leave-walter-reed-medical-center-monday-night)

Trump’s Fraud Claims Refuted by Pennsylvania Election Chief

During the recent presidential debate, Donald Trump falsely claimed that nine mail-in ballots from Pennsylvania were evidence of election fraud, alleging they were discarded. However, Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State, Kathy Boockvar, clarified that the discarded ballots were the result of a mistake made by an election worker, not intentional fraud. She emphasized that an investigation is ongoing, led by U.S. Attorney Dave Freed, but initial findings indicate this was simply a procedural error.

Boockvar explained that the incident occurred in Luzerne County, where military and overseas ballots were found in unmarked envelopes. In this case, an unnamed election worker failed to follow proper procedures and did not consult with the elections office before disposing of the ballots. The worker has since been terminated, and the state’s Department of State is implementing further training to prevent similar occurrences in the future.

The Department of Justice has confirmed that the discarded ballots were not evidence of fraud. Seven of the discarded ballots were completed and all were cast for Trump, according to Freed. The FBI also retrieved additional empty absentee ballot envelopes during their investigation. It remains unclear whether those nine votes will be counted.

Critics have pointed out that Trump’s claims serve to further his narrative of widespread voter fraud, a tactic that undermines public confidence in the electoral process. Kristen Clarke, Executive Director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, criticized the investigation as a politicization of the Justice Department in the midst of an active election.

This incident highlights the ongoing tensions surrounding mail-in voting procedures, particularly as the 2020 presidential election approaches. Election experts continue to stress the security of mail-in voting, countering Trump’s unfounded assertions that such voting methods lead to systemic fraud.

(h/t: https://www.forbes.com/sites/elanagross/2020/09/30/pennsylvania-election-chief-refutes-trumps-claim-that-nine-discarded-ballots-were-election-fraud/)

Trump’s Baseless Claims on Mail-in Voting in Debate

During the recent presidential debate, President Donald Trump made several unfounded claims regarding mail-in voting, suggesting that mail carriers are “selling ballots” and that ballots have been “dumped in rivers.” These statements are part of an ongoing campaign to undermine confidence in the electoral process, particularly concerning mail-in ballots.

Election experts have countered Trump’s assertions, emphasizing the security and historical reliability of mail-in voting. Lawrence Norden, director of the Election Reform Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, stated that Trump’s claims are riddled with inaccuracies and that mail-in ballots have been used safely in the U.S. since the Civil War.

In one specific instance, Trump referenced an investigation into discarded military ballots in Pennsylvania, claiming that seven of the nine ballots found were for him. However, the FBI clarified that there was no evidence of a coordinated voter fraud scheme related to this incident. Similarly, Trump’s claims about ballots being found in “creeks” were linked to a non-issue involving trays of mail that were mistakenly misplaced during transit.

West Virginia officials refuted Trump’s claims regarding mail fraud in their state, clarifying that a recent case involved a postal worker altering voter registration applications—not ballots themselves. The state’s Secretary of State reassured voters about the integrity of the election process.

Overall, Trump’s statements regarding mail-in voting are not supported by factual evidence, and experts advise that his rhetoric poses a threat to the democratic process by casting undue doubt on the legitimacy of elections.

(h/t: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/09/30/2020-debate-trump-makes-outrageous-claims-mail-voting/3586836001/)

Trump’s Dangerous Push for a Forever Presidency Threatens American Democracy

During a recent indoor rally in Henderson, Nevada, President Trump made alarming remarks indicating his desire to cling to power indefinitely. He stated, “We’re going to win four more years in the White House, and after we win four more years we’ll ask for maybe another four or so,” underscoring a dangerous notion of a potential “forever presidency.”

This rally violated state health regulations and guidelines intended to curb the spread of COVID-19, with very few attendees wearing masks despite the ongoing pandemic. Trump’s dismissal of the virus’s death toll, which has claimed the lives of nearly 200,000 Americans, highlights his irresponsible approach to leadership and public safety. Nevada’s Governor Steve Sisolak harshly criticized Trump for this reckless gathering, accusing him of ignoring state laws and prioritizing personal aspirations over the health of the people.

Amidst a backdrop of overwhelming disapproval from the public regarding his pandemic response, Trump attempted to redirect the narrative by creating an image of normalcy in America. This is a blatant disregard for the health risks associated with large gatherings, a tactic that prioritizes visual propaganda over genuine concern for American lives. Evidence suggests that previous indoor rallies, such as the one in Tulsa, contributed to spikes in COVID-19 cases, yet Trump continues to host events in direct contradiction to public health recommendations.

Trump seized the opportunity to launch attacks on his opponent, Joe Biden, labeling him “unfit to be president” and spinning conspiracy theories about domestic terrorism. His rhetoric has consistently aimed to divide Americans, using fear and misinformation rather than uniting the country through a sensible platform. This alarming behavior echoes a troubling trend among Republicans who seem increasingly unchallenged by institutional norms and concerned with self-interest rather than the collective good of the nation.

While attempting to woo Latino voters by touting economic progress prior to the pandemic, Trump’s history of racially charged remarks and anti-immigrant policies cannot be overlooked. His duplicity regarding race and immigration indicates a broader failure to earn trust among marginalized communities, further entrenching the GOP’s factionalism. Trump and the Republican Party’s actions pose a significant threat to the tenets of democracy, showcasing an alarming trajectory of chaos, division, and ultimately, the undermining of American values.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-rally-nevada-indoors-henderson-las-vegas/)

Trump’s Dangerous Desire for a Third Term Endangers Democracy

Former President Donald Trump has kicked off his 2024 campaign with incendiary rhetoric, claiming he will pursue a third term due to alleged spying on his 2016 campaign, a baseless assertion contradicted by detailed FBI reports. During a rally in Wisconsin, Trump declared, “We are going to win four more years… and then after that, we’ll go for another four years,” presenting his false narrative as justification for extending his presidency.

Despite the 22nd Amendment explicitly barring any individual from serving more than two terms as president, Trump’s comments reflect a typical defiance of democratic principles. His dismissive attitude toward constitutional limitations signals a troubling desire for autocratic governance, further undermining the democratic values of the United States.

At the same rally, Trump veered into bizarre territory, discussing the economy’s performance before the COVID-19 pandemic with absurd claims about “crummy colleges” and “dumb people.” These ramblings highlight both his lack of coherent policy discussion and a tendency to mislead his supporters, distracting them from crucial issues at hand.

Trump’s behavior is consistent with his history of exaggeration and deviation from the truth, as evidenced by his repeated claims of receiving a “Man of the Year” award in Michigan, a story that has been thoroughly debunked. Such fabrications reflect not only a disregard for factual integrity but an assault on the very trust necessary for a functioning democracy.

Moreover, Trump’s ongoing baseless claims about election rigging set a dangerous precedent, further eroding public trust in the electoral process and contributing to a culture of violence and division among his supporters. This rhetoric is part of a larger strategy utilized by Trump and the Republican Party to maintain control, often at the expense of democratic norms and the rule of law.

(h/t: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-third-term-because-they-spied-on-him-1045743/)

Donald Trump suggests delay to 2020 US presidential election

Donald Trump has suggested November’s presidential election be postponed, saying increased postal voting could lead to fraud and inaccurate results.

He floated a delay until people could “properly, securely and safely” vote.

There is little evidence to support Mr Trump’s claims but he has long railed against mail-in voting which he has said would be susceptible to fraud.

US states want to make postal voting easier due to public health concerns over the coronavirus pandemic.

Under the US constitution, Mr Trump does not have the authority to postpone the election himself. Any delay would have to be approved by Congress. The president does not have direct power over the two houses of Congress.

What did Trump say?

In a series of tweets, Mr Trump said “universal mail-in voting” would make November’s vote the “most inaccurate and fraudulent election in history” and a “great embarrassment to the USA”.

He suggested – without providing evidence – that mail-in voting, as it is known in the US, would be susceptible to foreign interference.

“The [Democrats] talk of foreign influence in voting, but they know that Mail-In Voting is an easy way for foreign countries to enter the race,” he said.

Mr Trump also said postal voting was “already proving to be a catastrophic disaster” in areas where it was being tried out.

In June, New York allowed voters to vote by post in the Democratic primary poll for the party’s presidential candidate. But there have been long delays in counting the ballots and the results are still unknown.

US media report that there are also concerns that many ballots will not be counted because they were not filled in correctly or do not have postmarks on them that show they were sent before voting officially ended.

However, several other states have long conducted votes by post.

Donald Trump can’t delay November’s presidential election without Congress, partially controlled by the Democrats, first approving the decision. If he didn’t already know this, someone has certainly told him by now.

The president also must know that tweeting about a delay – even framed as an “I’m just asking!” question – is sure to ignite a political firestorm, particularly after he has repeatedly refused to say whether he’d accept an adverse result in the upcoming presidential election.

Mr Trump appears to be doing everything in his power to undermine the credibility of November’s vote, in which a record number of Americans are predicted to rely on mail-in voting to avoid the risk of exposure to the coronavirus. He’s repeatedly made false and misleading claims about the reliability of the mail balloting and suggested broad conspiracy theories. Critics warn that he could be laying the groundwork for contesting the results – although the purpose may be simply to give him a scapegoat if he loses.

His tweet could also be an attempt to divert attention away from the truly dismal second-quarter economic numbers just released. He’s been relying on a financial turnaround to breathe life into his re-election campaign, and instead the outlook appears exceedingly gloomy.

Whatever the reason, tweeting about an election delay is not the move of a candidate confident of victory – and could be a sign of more desperate moves to come.

[BBC]

1 9 10 11 12 13 54