Category: Climate Change Denial

Rejecting scientific consensus on global warming.

Trump’s Offshore Wind Energy Ban: A Corruption of Clean Energy for Fossil Fuel Profits

President Donald Trump has issued an executive order that halts new leases for offshore wind energy projects on the outer continental shelf. This decision, characterized by many as a desperate attempt to bolster the fossil fuel industry at the expense of renewable energy development, exemplifies Trump’s continual disregard for sustainable solutions and the environment.

The executive order specifically stops both new and renewal offshore wind leases while excluding ongoing oil and gas development leases from its scope. The directive also mandates a review of the environmental implications of offshore wind expansion by various departments, despite substantial scientific evidence supporting the safety and efficiency of wind energy. Trump’s past remarks against wind turbines, including unfounded claims that they kill wildlife and contribute to environmental harm, demonstrate an alarming trend of misinformation aimed at sabotaging clean energy initiatives.

Rep. Jeff van Drew, a New Jersey Republican, has also publicly supported anti-wind power measures, demonstrating a broader Republican strategy to undermine renewable energy innovation in favor of fossil fuels. This move, criticized by renewable energy advocates, risks significant delays and increased costs for projects that have already undergone extensive reviews and approvals, stifling economic growth and job creation in a vital sector.

Industry experts, including those from the National Ocean Industries Association, have articulated concerns that this order could disrupt the emerging offshore wind industry, which has considerable potential for growth and environmental benefits. The fossil fuel focus of Trump and the GOP only serves to protect the interests of wealthy elites, while endangering the future of sustainable energy and the planet.

This order represents yet another instance of Trump’s corrupted agenda, prioritizing profits for polluters over the well-being of the environment and the American public. The far-reaching impacts of this decision will resonate beyond environmental concerns and into economic factors, exposing the GOP’s dangerous trend of sabotaging progress in the clean energy sector.

Trump’s Climate Denial Threatens Planet with Eco-Destroying Executive Orders

Donald Trump has signed a series of executive orders that blatantly prioritize the interests of the oil and gas industry over environmental protections and the long-term well-being of the planet. One order specifically targets oil drilling in the contentious Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, areas that have been safeguarded for decades due to their ecological significance.

In a stark display of his anti-environmental agenda, Trump is not only opening these protected lands to drilling but also intends to dismantle key policies enacted during the Biden administration aimed at combating climate change. This includes an aggressive move to eliminate the electric vehicle mandate, further demonstrating his commitment to fossil fuel dependence at the expense of sustainable alternatives.

Trump’s administration has consistently shown a disregard for environmental regulations, having previously appointed lobbyists from the fossil fuel sector to key positions within the government. The push for increased drilling and energy production seems less about energy independence and more about lining the pockets of wealthy oil executives who back Trump’s political ambitions.

These actions contribute directly to the ongoing climate crisis, further eroding decades of environmental protections put in place to mitigate disastrous climate effects. By promoting drilling and rejecting electrification of transportation, Trump not only defies scientific consensus on climate change but also exemplifies the Republican party’s broader embrace of fossil fuel interests over public health and welfare.

The implications of these orders are severe, threatening to undo significant progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and protecting vulnerable ecosystems. Trump’s blatant pandering to corporate elites underlines an alarming trend of prioritizing short-term economic gain over the survival of the planet, effectively placing profits ahead of the future of humanity.

Trump Exploits California Wildfires for Political Gain

As wildfires wreak havoc across Southern California, Donald Trump chose to channel his energy into scapegoating California Governor Gavin Newsom instead of addressing the real issues at hand. Trump’s phony claims fail to acknowledge that climate change is a significant factor contributing to the destructive fires. Instead, he mockingly dubbed Newsom “Gavin Newscum” and accused him of sacrificing public safety for environmental concerns, showcasing his lack of empathy for the victims affected by the crisis.

In a ludicrous attempt to shift blame away from his administration’s failures, Trump asserted that Newsom had refused to sign a fictional “water restoration declaration.” This nonsensical declaration purportedly would have directed water resources to the areas now engulfed in flames. However, Newsom’s office debunked this claim, emphasizing that no such document exists. Furthermore, environmental experts have confirmed that the real problem lies not in water management—which is adequate—but in the extreme drought conditions exacerbated by climate change, rendering Trump’s accusations baseless.

Trump’s irresponsible rhetoric extended to claiming that fire hydrants were devoid of water during the crisis, fueling misinformation instead of providing thoughtful insights. Los Angeles officials clarified that certain water tanks had indeed run dry due to heavy usage during firefighting efforts, but this was not indicative of a systemic failure. The issues faced during the wildfires highlighted the limits of municipal water systems designed for everyday use, not for battling extensive wildfires exacerbated by climate conditions.

Further compounding his misrepresentations, Trump spread misinformation regarding FEMA’s funding for disaster relief. He claimed there was “no money in FEMA,” implying ineptitude in the Biden administration’s handling of disaster recovery efforts. This statement is easily dispelled; FEMA currently has a substantial amount in its Disaster Relief Fund, which was recently bolstered by bipartisan legislation aimed at ensuring adequate resources for such emergencies.

Trump’s incendiary comments serve to distract from his failure to acknowledge the urgent issue of climate change and the need for comprehensive policies to combat it. By engaging in petty politicking and casting unfounded blame, Trump continues to exemplify the Republican Party’s reluctance to accept responsibility or pursue solutions that benefit the public. His behavior during this disaster not only undermines those directly affected but also showcases a troubling trend of dishonesty and exploitation of crises for political gain, threatening the very fabric of American democracy.

(h/t: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fact-checking-trump-claims-los-angeles-california-wildfires/)

Trump Exploits L.A. Wildfires to Attack Newsom Amid Crisis

As devastating wildfires ravaged Los Angeles, former President Donald Trump chose not to express sympathy or solidarity with the affected communities. Instead, he exploited the crisis to target California Governor Gavin Newsom, labeling him “Gavin Newscum” and assigning blame for the catastrophic fires. This reckless rhetoric distracts from the real factors contributing to the fires, such as climate change and seasonal Santa Ana winds, and demonstrates Trump’s pattern of using disasters as political tools.

The Los Angeles fires have caused immense destruction, resulting in at least 11 fatalities and the loss of thousands of homes, covering over 36,000 acres. In any sane political environment, such a disaster could unite leaders across party lines to address the crisis and support recovery efforts. However, Trump’s actions highlight his refusal to engage in bipartisan cooperation and his relentless pursuit of personal and political advantage, even amid tragedies impacting countless lives.

Critics assert that this approach is far from surprising given Trump’s long history of divisive and incendiary remarks, particularly regarding adversity experienced in Democratic-run areas. Carmen Yulín Cruz, former mayor of San Juan, Puerto Rico, emphasized that Trump’s behavior remains unchanged since his response to Hurricane Maria in 2017, indicating a continuous pattern of antagonism rather than empathy. His tactic of portraying opponents as scapegoats undermines meaningful discussions on disaster management and recovery.

Trump’s strategy reflects a broader trend among Republicans, who prioritize political expedience over genuine support for communities devastated by climate-related disasters. Such behavior not only reveals a lack of compassion but also promotes a dangerous culture of blame and division, undermining collaborative recovery efforts essential for rebuilding lives and infrastructure.

The situation in Los Angeles serves as a stark reminder of the need for responsible leadership during times of crisis. By failing to acknowledge the real reasons behind the wildfires and instead choosing to vilify political opponents, Trump and his supporters continue to propagate a culture of fear and mistrust that ultimately hinders progress in addressing urgent issues like climate change and disaster preparedness.

(h/t: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/us/politics/trump-wildfires-los-angeles.html)

Trump’s Fossil Fuel Fanaticism Threatens Climate Progress and Public Health

Donald Trump’s potential return to the White House paints a grim picture for the future of our planet and the health of its inhabitants. Advisers close to the former president confirmed plans to dismantle Biden’s landmark climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), in favor of policies that would “maximize fossil fuel production.” This blatant disregard for scientific evidence and the well-being of future generations is nothing short of reckless and dangerous.

The scientific consensus is undeniable: human activity is driving climate change, with devastating consequences already unfolding worldwide. Rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and mass extinctions are just a few of the repercussions we face if we fail to act decisively. Yet, Trump’s proposed policies cater solely to the interests of his oil industry donors,prioritizing short-term profits over the long-term survival of our planet.

Gutting the IRA would cripple America’s progress towards a clean energy future. This legislation represents a crucial step in curbing greenhouse gas emissions and investing in renewable energy sources like solar and wind. Trump’s proposed cuts would not only jeopardize these advancements but also send a chilling message about America’s commitment to combating climate change.

The health impacts of continued fossil fuel dependence are equally alarming. Air pollution from burning coal, oil, and gas contributes to millions of respiratory illnesses and deaths each year. Trump’s policies would exacerbate these problems,disproportionately harming vulnerable communities already burdened by environmental injustices.

In conclusion, Donald Trump’s climate denial and fossil fuel obsession pose a dire threat to our planet and its inhabitants.His proposed policies prioritize corporate greed over scientific facts and public health, jeopardizing the progress made under the IRA and putting the future of our planet at stake. We must stand united against this dangerous agenda and demand leaders who prioritize science, reason, and the well-being of all over the interests of a select few. The future of our planet and the health of our communities depend on it.

h/t: https://www.ft.com/content/ed4b352b-5c06-4f8d-9df7-1b1f9fecb269?segmentID=dc0a9f57-51f8-2c48-3cb3-4b42eb8c679c

A Trump Insider Embeds Climate Denial in Scientific Research

An official at the Interior Department embarked on a campaign that has inserted misleading language about climate change — including debunked claims that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is beneficial — into the agency’s scientific reports, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times.

The misleading language appears in at least nine reports, including environmental studies and impact statements on major watersheds in the American West that could be used to justify allocating increasingly scarce water to farmers at the expense of wildlife conservation and fisheries.

The effort was led by Indur M. Goklany, a longtime Interior Department employee who, in 2017 near the start of the Trump administration, was promoted to the office of the deputy secretary with responsibility for reviewing the agency’s climate policies. The Interior Department’s scientific work is the basis for critical decisions about water and mineral rights affecting millions of Americans and hundreds of millions of acres of land.

The wording, known internally as the “Goks uncertainty language” based on Mr. Goklany’s nickname, inaccurately claims that there is a lack of consensus among scientists that the earth is warming. In Interior Department emails to scientists, Mr. Goklany pushed misleading interpretations of climate science, saying it “may be overestimating the rate of global warming, for whatever reason;” climate modeling has largely predicted global warming accurately. The final language states inaccurately that some studies have found the earth to be warming, while others have not.

He also instructed department scientists to add that rising carbon dioxide — the main force driving global warming — is beneficial because it “may increase plant water use efficiency” and “lengthen the agricultural growing season.” Both assertions misrepresent the scientific consensus that, overall, climate change will result in severe disruptions to global agriculture and significant reductions in crop yields.

Samuel Myers, a principal research scientist at Harvard University’s Center for the Environment who has studied the effects of climate change on nutrition, said the language “takes very specific and isolated pieces of science, and tries to expand it in an extraordinarily misleading fashion.”

The Interior Department’s emails, dating from 2017 through last year and obtained under public-records laws by the watchdog group Energy and Policy Institute, provide the latest evidence of the Trump administration’s widespread attacks on government scientific work. The administration has halted or scaled back numerous research projects since taking office, including an Obama-era initiative to fight disease outbreaks around the world — a decision that has drawn criticism in recent weeks as a deadly coronavirus has spread globally.

[The New York Times]

Trump blasts wind turbines in Palm Springs at campaign event

President Donald Trump thinks the windmills in Palm Springs, California, are “rusty,” “rotting,” and “look like hell.”

Trump was talking about energy dependency and the use of wind turbines at a campaign event in Colorado Springs on Thursday, a day after he was in Palm Springs for a fundraiser, according to KESQ. That’s when he “spoke out against” the Palm Springs windmills.

“And they’re all over the place,” The Desert Sun reported Trump said. “You look at Palm Springs, California. Take a look. Palm Springs. … They’re all over the place. They’re closed, they’re rotting, they look like hell.”

He said the windmills are made in China and Germany, have an effect on the ozone layer and kill birds, KESQ reported.

“You know if you shoot a bald eagle they put you in jail for a long time,” Trump said, according to KESQ. “But the windmills knock them down like crazy.”

It’s not the first time Trump has been angry about the Palm Springs windmills. In 2012, Trump tweeted that Palm Springs had been “destroyed” by the “world’s ugliest wind farm.”

In 2016, Trump said Palm Springs was a “poor man’s version of Disneyland” on a radio show, The Desert Sun reported.

Palm Springs Mayor Geoff Kors fired back at Trump on Friday, praising the city’s mission to use only carbon-free energy, NBC Palm Springs reported.

“It is unfortunate that, at this critical time in our history, we have a president who lies about and denigrates clean green power while embracing and promoting dirty power such as coal and offshore oil drilling, which is destroying our planet,” Kors said in a statement to the news outlet.

[Sacramento Bee]

Trump Just Called Climate Scientists ‘Foolish Fortune Tellers’

Despite a growing mountain of evidence that shows the world is careening towards a climate catastrophe, symbolized this month by the devastating bushfires in Australia, President Donald Trump thinks that “this is not a time of pessimism, this is a time for optimism.”

In his remarks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday morning, Trump spent the vast majority of his speech reeling off a laundry list of economic indicators that showed just how strong the U.S. economy is. But he finished his address by attacking climate change activists and scientists who have been raising the alarm about the plight of the planet.

“Fear and doubt is not a good thought process,” Trump said. “Because this is a time for tremendous hope and joy and optimism in action. But to embrace the possibilities of tomorrow, we must reject the perennial prophets of doom, and their predictions of the apocalypse.”

Trump once again repeated the lie that the U.S. has “the cleanest air in the world” when, in fact, his administration has made the air quality in the U.S. worse. According to the Environmental Performance Index, a metric from environmental scientists at Yale and Columbia, the U.S. ranks 10th when it comes to clean air quality.

Trump also said that today’s climate scientists are simply repeating errors of the past when “foolish fortune tellers…predicted an overpopulation crisis in the 1960s, mass starvation in the 70s, and an end of oil in the 1990s.”

Climate change is a hot topic at Davos this year, and an hour before Trump took the stage, Greta Thunberg, the 17-year-old Swedish activist who the U.S. president has criticized for her outspoken opinions and “anger management issues,” told the world’s elite that they have done “basically nothing” to avert a climate catastrophe.

“Pretty much nothing has been done since the global emissions of CO2 has not reduced,” Thunberg said. “If you see it from that aspect, what has concretely been done, if you see it from a bigger perspective, basically nothing, it will require much more than this, this is just the very beginning.”

Trump labeled activists like Thunberg “alarmists” who are simply seeking “absolute power to dominate, transform and control every aspect of our lives.”

“We will never let radical socialists destroy our economy, wreck our country, or eradicate our liberty,” Trump added.

Thunberg said the world needed to pay attention to the findings of the 2018 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, which shows that in order to have the best chance at keeping the rise in global temperatures to under 1.5 degrees, countries must limit carbon emissions to a collective 420 gigatons.

She added that people often assume that “future generations will somehow suck hundreds of billions of tonnes of CO2 out of the atmosphere, even though such technology doesn’t exist yet.”

One of those people appears to be Trump, who made a cryptic reference to some unknown scientific breakthrough that would solve the current crisis.

“We’re continuing to work on things that you’ll be hearing about in the near future,” Trump said. “You’ll be hearing about it but we have found the answers to things people said, would not be possible certainly not in a very short period of time.”

[Vice]

Trump to New York City: If a storm comes, don’t look at me, get a mop!

New Yorkers worried that global warming might flood the city should get mops, President Trump says.

The Queens native — famed for supporting walls that keep immigrants out — on Saturday ripped the idea of a seawall to protect the city from calamities like 2012′s Hurricane Sandy, which caused massive devastation.

“A massive 200 Billion Dollar Sea Wall, built around New York to protect it from rare storms, is a costly, foolish & environmentally unfriendly idea that, when needed, probably won’t work anyway,” Trump tweeted. “It will also look terrible. Sorry, you’ll just have to get your mops & buckets ready!”

A seawall is one of five proposals considered by the Army Corps of Engineers to protect the greatest city in the world from storms that could become more frequent with climate change.

Besides the Mexican border wall, Trump is also fine with seawalls that protect one of his golf courses in Ireland.

Trump last year changed his official residency from New York to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla. He hasn’t said whether he’d like a seawall to protect the oceanfront portion of that property.

[New York Daily News]

Trump moves to overhaul the National Environmental Policy Act

The Trump administration on Thursday unveiled significant changes to the nation’s landmark environmental law that would make it easier for federal agencies to approve infrastructure projects without considering climate change.

Many of the White House’s proposed changes to the 50-year-old National Environmental Policy Act have been supported by business groups that contend the law has delayed or blocked projects like laying out oil pipelines and building dams and mines, among other things.

Environmentalists said that the rules would endanger wildlife and lead to more carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere, and contend that the regulations should be strengthened not weakened as the world copes with global warming.

If the proposals are enacted, it would be the first overhaul of NEPA in more than 40 years.

The plan, released by the White House Council on Environmental Quality, would no longer require any form of federal environmental review of construction projects that lack substantial government funding. The change would also widen the category of projects that will be exempt from NEPA regulations.

“We want to build new roads, bridges, tunnels, highways, bigger, better fast and we want to build them at less cost,” President Donald Trump said at the White House on Thursday.

The move is the latest effort by the Trump administration to roll back a slew of environmental regulations in place to curb greenhouse gas emissions and protect natural habitats from drilling and development.

The changes are expected to be published in the Federal Register on Friday. There will be a 60-day comment period and two open hearings before the final regulation is delivered.

The administration has argued that the law can increase costs for builders, block construction projects and threaten jobs for American workers and labor union members.

“The step we’re taking today, which will ultimately lead to final regulations, I believe will hit a home run in delivering better results to the American people by cutting red tape that has paralyzed common sense decision making for a generation,” Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said Thursday.

Jay Timmons, president and chief executive of the National Association of Manufacturers, said that the president’s plan is exactly what his group wanted.

“Our efforts should be used for building the infrastructure Americans desperately need, not wasted on mountains of paperwork and endless delay,” he said.

Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., a senior member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, argued that the changes prioritize polluters and corporations over the environment.

“This NEPA rewrite favors big polluters and corporate profits over balanced, science-based decision making and would prevent Washingtonians from voicing their views on proposals ranging from siting a new fossil fuel pipeline in their backyard to building an open-pit mine that could destroy the world’s largest sockeye salmon fishery,” she said in a statement.

“We need to make smarter environmental decisions, not roll back the safeguards we already have,” Cantwell said.

The administration’s proposed changes might not make it through court, according to Bruce Huber, an environmental law professor at Notre Dame Law School.

“The law requires federal agencies to report the environmental impacts of their actions that significantly affect ‘the quality of the human environment,’” he said. “If the regulations announced today drive agencies to diminish the extent or quality of their reporting, federal courts may very well conclude that their reports do not comply with the law.”

William Snape, senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity, said that the White House’s proposal is consistent with other environmental regulation rollbacks.

“This is all about the election and Trump getting out there and shoring up his base,” Snape said. “The Trump administration has been losing more cases than it’s winning in oil and gas – and this is a chance to blame someone else.”

[CNBC]

1 2 3 … 9