Smith College: Department of Education opens investigation into all-women’s college for admitting trans women | CNN

The Department of Education launched a Title IX investigation into Smith College, an all-women’s liberal arts institution in Massachusetts, for admitting trans women as students. The investigation, initiated in response to a complaint filed by Defending Education, a conservative nonprofit, accuses Smith of violating Title IX by “admitting biological men and granting them access to women-only spaces, including dormitories, bathrooms, locker rooms, and athletic teams.” Smith College clarified that it “considers for admission any applicants who self-identify as women; cis, trans, and nonbinary women are eligible to apply to Smith” and stated it remains “fully committed to its institutional values, including compliance with civil rights laws.”

The Department of Education claims that Smith’s admissions policy violates the single-sex exception under Title IX, arguing that “an all-girls college that enrolls male students professing a female identity would cease to qualify as single sex under Title IX.” Shannon Minter, an attorney with the National Center for LGBTQ Rights, characterized the investigation as government overreach into private institutions. Minter stated that women’s colleges “should be able to do freely without being worried about persecution by the federal government” when they admit transgender students. He described the investigation as reflecting a broader strategy by the current administration to eliminate any inclusion of transgender people in American society.

This investigation exemplifies Trump administration efforts to restrict transgender rights across multiple policy areas. Trump has implemented sweeping measures including banning trans people from the military, suing states for allowing trans athletes on high school sports teams, restricting trans and nonbinary children’s access to gender-affirming care, and issuing a Day 1 executive order redefining gender as “sex” determined by biology at conception. These actions target a demographic representing just 1% of the U.S. population ages 13 and older, according to the Williams Institute.

Smith College adapted its admissions policies in 2015 to explicitly include trans students after denying admission to trans woman Calliope Wong in 2013, which triggered campus activism. The college provides trans-affirming healthcare, peer support, single-occupancy all-gender restrooms, and an all-gender locker room with private changing and showering areas. Nicholas Hite, a senior attorney at Lambda Legal, noted that the complaint did not originate from anyone at Smith College and that trans students chose these institutions specifically for their inclusive policies.

Minter argued that the investigation constitutes “misuse and weaponization of anti-discrimination laws to do the very opposite of the thing those laws were enacted for,” stating that Title IX was meant to protect people against all forms of sex-based discrimination, including discrimination against transgender people. He warned that the investigation would likely cause fear and anxiety for trans students, describing the administration’s actions as “seeking to destroy every single safe place for transgender young people in this country” and characterizing them as “a vicious vendetta against a small vulne(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/04/us/smith-college-title-ix-trans-students?Date=20260504&Profile=CNN,CNN+International&utm_content=1777937654&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcARm0KRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEe36UO6J33TOcE7wi1oenXSP3QdfbmnHil1wErZeyTQL11CBaq92qix64Zbj0_aem_WB4yfWOoKwkZg3ewFGLJdw)rable group of kids.”

Trump Admin Shuts Detention Watchdog, Eliminates Abuse Oversight

The Department of Homeland Security closed the Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, the agency responsible for investigating abuse and misconduct in immigration detention facilities. The office removed all public signage, shut down its website that helped detainees’ families file complaints, and ended inspections. DHS claimed Congress failed to fund the office in the recent appropriations bill, though the bill text contains no requirement for the closure.

Adam Isaacson of the Washington Office on Latin America stated the closure violates federal law because Congress established the office in 2019 and only Congress can eliminate it. The ombudsman’s office likely retained sufficient funding from previous appropriations to continue operating. Isaacson characterized the closure as part of a deliberate strategy to make detention conditions as severe as possible, forcing immigrants to abandon legal cases rather than endure confinement.

The Trump administration had already gutted the office’s capacity, reducing staff from over one hundred at the start of 2024 to five people by March 2025, even as immigration detention facilities more than doubled. Over 30 people died in ICE custody last year, the deadliest year since 2004, and 18 deaths have already been reported in 2025. DHS officials have explicitly stated that detention conditions are intentionally brutal to incentivize “self-deportation,” with one spokesperson telling HuffPost in March that “being in detention is a choice.”

The ombudsman’s closure removes a critical check on detention abuse as immigration detention capacity surged to a record 73,000 people earlier this year, though recent numbers decreased slightly to approximately 60,000. Isaacson described the move as part of a “larger strategy” to coerce immigrants into abandoning asylum and immigration proceedings through deliberate suffering and the threat of indefinite confinement in the worst possible conditions.

(Source: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/immigration-detention-ombudsman-closure_n_69f8facee4b0115dd7bf98e5?ref=bffbhuffpost&ncid_tag=fcbklnkushpmg00000063&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=us_main&d_id=11876884&fbclid=IwdGRjcARmzqVleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEegPZQZVDRQoU8W0yMSsnkoSSsuT41cjzDBJyuDSR7EwDlQjmRjZonRxEws14_aem_wPy4NATdr6sslO9XelMVAA)

US claims it has sank six Iranian boats targeting civilian ships as Trump moves to reopen Strait of Hormuz | The Independent

The U.S. military announced it sank six Iranian boats in the Strait of Hormuz as Trump initiated “Project Freedom,” an operation to escort commercial vessels through waters Iran has blockaded since February 28. U.S. Central Command Admiral Brad Cooper claimed Iran targeted commercial and military ships with cruise missiles, though Iran’s military denied the reports and accused the U.S. of fabricating incidents to justify military action.

Trump threatened Iran would be “blown off the face of the Earth” if they attacked U.S. vessels executing Project Freedom, declaring the operation a “humanitarian” mission to free trapped ships. In a Truth Social post, Trump framed the operation as rescuing neutral parties and innocent bystanders, stating the U.S. would “guide their Ships safely out of these restricted Waterways.” Trump had rejected Iran’s 14-point peace proposal, stating Tehran had “not yet paid a big enough price.”

Iran’s military leadership directly warned the U.S. that any involvement in managing Strait of Hormuz shipping violates the ceasefire and threatened to attack foreign armed forces entering the waterway. Ali Abdollahi, head of Iran’s unified command, declared that vessel passage “needs to be coordinated with the armed forces” and that the strait’s security remains under Iranian control. Senior Iranian lawmaker Ibrahim Azizi dismissed Trump’s initiative as delusional, rejecting the idea Washington could direct the waterway.

The UAE reported coming under Iranian attack for the first time since the April ceasefire, with its defense ministry engaging 15 missiles and four drones; one drone caused a fire at an oil facility, injuring three Indian nationals. The UK Maritime Trade Organization reported two cargo vessels ablaze off the UAE, and multiple commercial ships remain stranded in the Strait of Hormuz with dwindling supplies.

Trump has reportedly received a one-month negotiation deadline from Iran regarding its proposed deal to reopen the strait. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called on China to increase diplomatic pressure on Iran t(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/us-military-iran-warship-missiles-strait-of-hormuz-b2970104.html)o end the blockade, signaling Washington will monitor Beijing’s response.

Trump family’s crypto firm sues investor Justin Sun, escalating feud – ABC News

World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s cryptocurrency venture, filed a defamation lawsuit in Florida state court on Monday against Chinese crypto mogul Justin Sun, escalating their legal conflict. The suit accuses Sun of orchestrating a “scorched-earth pressure campaign” against the firm, including hiring influencers and deploying fake social media bot accounts to spread what World Liberty Financial characterizes as lies about the company.

Sun initiated the conflict by suing World Liberty Financial last month, alleging the firm improperly froze his investment in its digital tokens. World Liberty Financial denies those claims and contends in its lawsuit that it froze Sun’s assets to protect its community after discovering alleged misconduct by Sun, including suspected short selling of the WLFI token and straw purchases of WLFI tokens on behalf of undisclosed third parties.

The litigation represents the breakdown of a previously profitable relationship. Sun had invested over 45 million dollars into World Liberty Financial and millions more into President Trump’s meme coin called TRUMP. Sun dismissed the lawsuit as “nothing more than a meritless PR stunt” on social media and stated he will defeat the case in court.

Donald Trump Jr., a World Liberty Financial co-founder, amplified the firm’s allegations by reposting the lawsuit claims on X to his followers, urging them to “Read this entire thread for the truth!!!!” Eric Trump serves as a newly appointed ALT5 Board Director, further entangling Trump family financial interests with the cryptocurrency venture.

Earlier in 2026, Sun resolved a civil fraud case brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission during the Biden administration by paying 10 million dollars, a settlement that critics characterized as favorable to the Chinese investor. The ongoing legal battle between World Liberty Financial and Sun signals deepening fractures within Trump family cryptocurrency operations and their reliance on foreign capital from individuals with documented regulatory violations.

(Source: https://abcnews.com/US/trump-familys-crypto-firm-sues-investor-justin-sun/story?id=132632914)

Trump Nominee Refuses to Confirm 22nd Amendment Bars Third

Trump’s judicial nominee John George Edward Marck refused to answer Senator Chris Coons’ direct question about what the 22nd Amendment states during a federal court confirmation hearing for the Southern District of Texas on May 4, 2026. The 22nd Amendment explicitly prohibits any person from being elected President more than twice. When Coons asked whether Trump is eligible to run for a third term, Marck claimed he needed to “review the facts” rather than confirming the constitutional bar, and sat silently while another witness answered.

Marck’s evasion violated constitutional duty by dodging a foundational legal question that judges must understand. Former Republican Representative Adam Kinzinger labeled the response “DISQUALIFYING,” and former GOP analyst Tara Setmayer called it “UNEQUIVOCALLY DISQUALIFYING.” The silence from other Trump nominees when asked to confirm the constitutional two-term limit demonstrated coordinated refusal to acknowledge clear constitutional limits on Trump’s power.

Trump has threatened to run for a third term, contradicting the explicit language of the 22nd Amendment. Republicans in Congress have offered only minimal resistance to this threat. Trump has a documented history of surrounding himself with advisers willing to abandon constitutional norms and reshape federal institutions according to his personal agenda.

Author Nick Bryant described Marck’s response as “really chilling” and “like a scene from a dystopian movie.” The nominee’s refusal to answer a basic constitutional question revealed Trump’s intention to pack federal courts with judges unwilling to enforce constitutional limits on executive power. This nomination exemplifies Trump’s systematic dismantling of institutional independence through loyalty-based judicial appointments.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-judiciary-2676849914/)

Trump Talks About Leaving Office in ‘Eight or Nine Years’

Trump declared at a White House small business summit on Monday that he would remain in office “eight or nine years from now,” drawing applause and laughter from supporters. The statement functioned as a joke about the ten-year window for business tax deductions included in Republican legislation, but it articulated his intention to extend his presidency far beyond constitutional limits. This rhetoric aligns with Trump’s pattern of signaling indefinite retention of power, consistent with his attacks on constitutional constraints he has previously called an “archaic system” and a “bad thing for the country.”

During the same event, Trump made false economic claims, asserting that analysts predicted his Iran military conflict would drive oil prices to $300 per barrel and that he has secured $18 trillion in foreign investments. He also falsely credited himself with leading China in artificial intelligence and boasted about auto and AI manufacturing expansion across the country. These disproven statements demonstrate Trump’s routine use of fabricated statistics to manufacture a false record of economic success.

Trump’s comment about staying in office reflects the authoritarian trajectory of his presidency, which involves dismantling institutional independence and consolidating executive power. His willingness to joke about violating term limits before a supportive audience normalizes the elimination of democratic constraints, particularly as he has already installed loyalists in the Justice Department to obstruct investigations into himself and his associates.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/white-house-crowd-applauds-as-trump-talks-about-leaving-office-eight-or-nine-years-from-now/)

Trump Demands GOP Gerrymander Elections Amid Approval Collapse

Trump publicly urged Republican state legislatures to maximize racial gerrymandering following a Supreme Court decision that gutted protections against it. On Truth Social, Trump demanded GOP legislatures seize the opportunity, falsely claiming gerrymandering would net an additional 20 congressional seats in the midterms, conflating the current cycle with the next one without acknowledging the deception underlying his scheme to consolidate power as his approval ratings collapse to historic lows.

Trump’s call for systematic gerrymandering exposes his authoritarian intent to maintain Republican control regardless of voter preference. His net approval has reached a new low while disapproval hit a record high, yet he continues pushing antidemocratic tactics to offset cratering public support rather than adjusting his agenda to reflect constituent demands.

Fair Fight Action and voting rights advocates have documented that Democrats possess the capacity to undertake retaliatory redistrictings to neutralize GOP advantages created through gerrymandering. The strategic roadmap exists for Democrats to match Republican abuse of redistricting power, though the fundamental issue remains Trump’s explicit orchestration of electoral manipulation to guarantee one-party rule.

Trump’s demand for gerrymandering represents a direct assault on democratic representation and majority rule. His coordinated purge of Indiana Republicans who opposed gerrymandering demonstrates his willingness to eliminate party members who refuse to participate in his antidemocratic schemes, enforcing absolute loyalty to his power consolidation strategy.

The Supreme Court’s decision to allow states broader latitude in redistricting has enabled Trump to openly coordinate a nationwide effort to rig electoral maps in Republican favor. His stated regret about not ordering the National Guard to seize voting machines after 2020 demonstrates a continuous pattern of pursuing authoritarian measures to override democratic outcomes when electoral results threaten his control.

(Source: https://newrepublic.com/article/209932/confused-trump-openly-admits-plot-rig-midterms-polls-turn-brutal?utm_campaign=SF_TNR&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleARoJ8ZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEemSXZeap4xUm991Vl5RQmMxwUvgmormXLpYfsW6ypZDb2debTm5bgYH1HcHo_aem_slcdPJ-9b3CTP0x6UFGe1Q)

Trump Demands Jeffries Expulsion Over Supreme Court Criticism

Donald Trump, the current President of the United States, demanded House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries be removed from Congress after Jeffries criticized the Supreme Court’s decision voiding Louisiana’s second majority Black congressional district as “illegitimate.” Trump posted on Truth Social that Jeffries, whom he called “a Low IQ individual,” should face impeachment, falsely claiming representatives can be impeached when the Constitution permits only expulsion by two-thirds vote of the House.

Jeffries attacked the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling, which eliminated the district that Chief Justice John Roberts characterized as a “snake” created along racial lines and Justice Samuel Alito deemed an “unconstitutional gerrymander.” Jeffries stated the decision helps Trump “scheme to suppress the vote and rig” midterm elections and called it “the Trump Court” rather than the Roberts Court. Trump celebrated the ruling on Wednesday, calling it the “kind of ruling I like,” directly contradicting his subsequent demand to punish Jeffries for questioning it.

Trump’s attack on Jeffries deploys racist language consistent with his documented pattern targeting African Americans with dehumanizing terms. A Truthout examination found that 8 in 10 posts by Trump calling someone “Low IQ” target a person of color, with communications experts identifying the term as “a racist dog whistle with a long history in the US.” Trump frequently uses such terms against Black political figures including Congresswoman Maxine Waters and TV host Don Lemon, focusing narrowly on intelligence while varying insults for others.

This assault on Jeffries violates the implicit agreement to moderate political discourse that followed a shooting incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Trump’s demand to expel a Democratic lawmaker for legitimate criticism of the judiciary demonstrates authoritarian abuse of power and his refusal to acknowledge the connection between his own inflammatory rhetoric and the climate of hostility endangering political figures.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-calls-for-hakeem-jeffries-to-be-impeached-for-bashing-illegitimate-supreme-court-why-not/)

Acting AG Blanche Defends Weak Comey Indictment

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the second indictment of former FBI Director James Comey on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday, claiming the prosecution extends beyond Comey’s Instagram post displaying seashells arranged as “86 47” from November 2025. Blanche asserted that career prosecutors, FBI agents, and Secret Service agents investigated the case thoroughly, though he refused to disclose what additional evidence exists. Experts and even some Republicans have declared the case meritless, and Judge Colm Connolly previously dismissed Comey’s first indictment in September 2025 for lying to Congress, ruling that Trump’s appointee leading that prosecution was illegally appointed.

Comey’s second indictment violates prosecutorial norms by following Trump’s direct demand for indictments posted on Truth Social in September 2025. Trump publicly ordered his then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to indict Comey, Adam Schiff, Letitia James, and others, describing them as “guilty as hell.” This represents an unprecedented weaponization of the Justice Department as Trump’s political enforcement mechanism. Comey’s second indictment stems from allegations that his social media post suggested harm to Trump, though Comey removed the post and apologized months before charges were filed.

Senator Adam Schiff, a former prosecutor with nearly six years of experience, stated directly that he had never encountered such a weak case and predicted dismissal before trial. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cited Trump’s unprecedented legal assault against him, along with political investigations targeting Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James, as justification for remaining on the Federal Reserve board until the investigation concluded transparently. The Trump Justice Department ended its investigation into Powell last month to secure a key Republican senator’s vote for Powell’s replacement, demonstrating the politicized nature of these prosecutions.

Blanche’s defense of the indictment occurred within Trump’s documented pattern of using the Justice Department to target political enemies, following the framework established by Trump’s personal attorneys now leading the DOJ. Career attorneys and officials have departed the Justice Department in significant numbers due to its increased political manipulation, undermining the agency’s prosecutorial capacity. Comey responded via Substack video, stating he expects further Trump administration attacks but remains convinced of his innocence and an independent justice system’s eventual restoration.

Blanche acknowledged on Sunday that thousands of Americans who have used the phrase “86 47,” widely available on Amazon merchandise, should not face prosecution, directly contradicting the reasoning behind Comey’s indictment and exposing the selective, politically motivated nature of the prosecution. The Trump administration has already fired prosecutors who refused to pursue the Comey prosecution, illustrating the coercive pressure within the Department of Justice to secure convictions against Trump’s identified enemies regardless of evidence quality.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/todd-blanche-nbc-comey-indictment-b2969764.html)

Trump Blurts Loaded Attack on Top Dem Hakeem Jeffries

President Donald Trump attacked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Truth Social Friday night, calling him a "THUG" and "Low IQ Democrat Minority Leader" who is "a danger to our Country," accompanying the post with a photo of Jeffries holding a baseball bat. This attack occurred less than a week after a shooting at the White House Correspondents' Dinner on Saturday prompted widespread calls for reducing heated political rhetoric, with the White House itself urging Democrats to abandon violent language.

President Trump frequently targets African Americans with controversial language, often referring to them as "low IQ" or "thugs." Such terms have been consistently used against figures like Congresswoman Maxine Waters and TV host Don Lemon, focusing primarily on their intelligence. Despite using various insults for others, Trump's criticisms of black individuals often emphasize intelligence alone, making his racial appeals overt. This pattern reflects a troubling tactic in Trump's rhetoric. A Truthout examination revealed that 8 in 10 posts by Trump calling someone "Low IQ" target a person of color. Communications experts describe this term as “a racist dog whistle with a long history in the US.”

The loaded language Trump deployed violates the implicit agreement to moderate discourse that followed the shooting incident. Trump used the terms "thug" and "Low IQ," which carry specific racial and dehumanizing connotations, according to NewNation White House Correspondent Kellie Meyer, who publicly criticized both the characterization and the photo choice. Meyer noted that Trump was labeling Jeffries a "danger" to the country while simultaneously the White House had demanded Democrats cease violent rhetoric.

The Truth Social post came hours after Trump delivered a speech in Florida that included an attack on Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota) based on the discredited claim that she married her brother, a conspiracy theory debunked by independent fact-checkers and journalists. Trump's pattern of inflammatory rhetoric directed at Democratic leaders demonstrates his refusal to acknowledge the connection between his own language and the climate of hostility that precipitated the WHCD shooting.

The incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner occurred when suspect Cole Tomas Allen rushed through the security perimeter and allegedly opened fire, causing chaos before being taken into custody. Initial reports that Allen had been shot or killed proved inaccurate, and Trump was not injured in the incident.

Following the shooting, Democrats pushed back against the White House's selective calls for toning down rhetoric, pointing out that Republican and Trump-affiliated language had been equally or more inflammatory. Trump's Friday attack on Jeffries directly contradicts any commitment to reducing heated political discourse and exposes the administration's selective application of civility standards.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-blurts-loaded-attack-on-top-dem-amid-post-shooting-rhetoric-discourse/)

1 2 3 4 141