Trump Deputy Issues Visa to Polish Minister Fleeing Charges

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau directed State Department officials to issue a visa to Zbigniew Ziobro, Poland’s former justice minister, enabling him to flee to the United States from Hungary in May 2024. Ziobro faces 26 criminal charges in Poland, primarily for allegedly misusing funds from a crime victims’ compensation program to purchase Pegasus spyware for surveillance of political opponents and for political gain during his tenure as justice minister under the conservative Law and Justice party from 2015 to 2023.

Landau justified the visa issuance to senior officials in the State Department’s Consular Affairs Bureau by framing it as “a national security issue,” according to sources familiar with the decision. The timing was critical: Landau expedited the visa before Peter Magyar’s May 9 swearing-in as Hungary’s new prime minister. Magyar had publicly committed to extraditing Ziobro to Poland immediately upon taking office, but the accelerated visa process allowed Ziobro to depart Hungary before that could happen.

The European Union previously determined that Ziobro’s judicial reforms as justice minister undermined Poland’s judicial independence and rule of law. Poland’s current Justice Minister Waldemar Zurek expressed shock at the visa grant, stating prosecutors possess “very strong” evidence against Ziobro and that Poland maintains an extradition request ready to submit. The Polish government has annulled Ziobro’s passports and requested Washington and Budapest provide legal justification for his departure.

The Trump administration frames European prosecutions of conservative politicians as “lawfare,” a term used within MAGA circles to describe alleged weaponization of courts against right-wing figures. State Department officials declined to explain the national security rationale for Ziobro’s visa, citing visa confidentiality. Neither Secretary of State Marco Rubio nor White House officials responded to inquiries about their involvement in the decision.

Ziobro began working as a television commentator for Polish broadcaster TV Republika shortly after arriving in the United States, describing America on air as “the world’s strongest democracy.” The visa grant demonstrates the Trump administration’s prioritization of supporting conservative politicians facing legal accountability in allied nations, even when those prosecutions stem from documented abuses of power and judicial independence.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/christopher-landau-zbigniew-ziobro-poland-b2979357.html)

Trump Proposes Axis Alliance Against ICC During Beijing Summit

During last week's Beijing summit, Donald Trump proposed during the summit that the United States, China, and Russia should coordinate against the International Criminal Court, arguing their interests were aligned. The Trump administration has consistently opposed the ICC, characterizing it as engaging in politicization, abuse of power, and illegitimate judicial overreach, with some officials describing it as an instrument for "lawfare" against America. The White House declined to comment on these discussions, and the factsheet published after the summit contained no reference to conversations about Putin or the war.

China's foreign ministry rejected the account as "completely false," while the White House maintained silence. Trump's proposal to ally with Russia and China against the ICC contradicts established international accountability mechanisms and positions the administration alongside authoritarian regimes in opposing judicial oversight of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The summit occurred as Putin prepares a visit to China on Tuesday, four days after hosting Trump. Russia's war has devolved into a stalemate after four years, with Ukraine conducting increasingly effective drone strikes against Russian forces and infrastructure. Last week, Ukraine launched drone strikes near Moscow that President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described as "entirely justified" in response to Russia's record aerial bombardment of Kyiv, following a three-day ceasefire Trump had brokered to allow Putin's Victory Day parade.

The Biden administration frequently accused China of supplying dual-use materials to Russia that sustained its military campaign against Ukraine. The Trump administration has raised concerns less frequently, even as Russia and the United States operate without strategic arms control frameworks. Trump's alignment with Russian and Chinese positions on the ICC signals a departure from democratic accountability standards and a convergence with authoritarian approaches to international law.

(Source: https://www.ft.com/content/567c57b0-6346-43e6-9d14-840a793b4d1d?syn-25a6b1a6=1)

Trump Demands Thune Fire Parliamentarian Blocking Ballroom Funds

President Donald Trump demanded that Senate Majority Leader John Thune fire Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough after she blocked $1 billion in taxpayer funding for Trump’s ballroom project from a budget reconciliation bill. MacDonough determined that the ballroom funding violated the Byrd Rule, which prohibits non-budgetary items from passing with a simple majority vote. Trump called Thune to pressure him into removing MacDonough, but Thune refused, stating he would not fire her and noting that both sides of contentious reconciliation debates routinely criticize the parliamentarian.

Trump’s ballroom project has destroyed significant portions of the White House, including the entire East Wing, contradicting his initial assurances that construction would not interfere with existing structures. Initial claims that private donors would fund the project proved murky, and the endeavor has violated ethics standards regarding conflicts of interest. After an attempted shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, Trump and Republicans pivoted to demanding $1 billion in taxpayer funding for the ballroom’s “modernization” and security upgrades as part of a Secret Service budget.

The Senate Parliamentarian is a nonpartisan official tasked with interpreting and applying Senate rules. MacDonough’s Saturday ruling followed standard parliamentary procedure and reflects the institution’s established constraints on reconciliation bills. Republicans indicated they would revise the provision to comply with the Byrd Rule, a standard procedural response when proposals fail initial review.

This is not the first time Trump has pressured Thune to remove MacDonough. Trump has a documented pattern of threatening institutional measures when he does not get his way. Last year, when MacDonough stripped Medicaid provisions from a tax bill during reconciliation, Trump allies demanded her removal. Thune rejected that demand as well, maintaining that he would not overrule or fire MacDonough for doing her constitutional job.

The White House declined to confirm whether Trump made the call to Thune, offering only a statement that it does not comment on private conversations. Thune’s refusal to cave to presidential pressure demonstrates that Senate leadership remains bound by institutional constraints, though Trump’s attempt to weaponize the parliamentary process for personal projects demonstrates his contempt for constitutional limits on executive power.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-is-reportedly-trying-to-badger-senate-leader-into-firing-official-who-nixed-ballroom-funding/)

Trump Rages Over $149B Tariff Refunds After Supreme Court Voids Regime

President Donald Trump remains angry three months after the Supreme Court invalidated his tariff regime in February, telling Fortune that he is furious about being forced to refund $149 billion to countries and entities he claims “hate us” and “ripped us off for years.” The 6-3 decision by the conservative-majority Court ruled that Trump lacked clear congressional authorization to unilaterally impose tariffs under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing that Trump’s assertion of “extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope” exceeded constitutional bounds.

Trump’s primary complaint centers not on the ruling itself but on the financial consequences: his administration must issue refunds exceeding $35.5 billion to importers who filed for tariff relief. However, economic research contradicts Trump’s framing that tariffs burden foreign nations. A January 2025 Kiel Institute for the World Economy report found U.S. consumers paid for “nearly all” tariffs, while a February Tax Foundation analysis estimated the levies cost the average American household approximately $1,300 annually. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s research indicates Trump’s tariffs have sustained elevated inflation levels.

Despite the Supreme Court’s decision, Trump has pursued legal workarounds to reimpose tariffs, invoking Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to impose a 10 percent levy on all imports. Trump attacked the justices who ruled against him, including Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, whom he appointed, calling them “incorrect” and stating he was “absolutely ashamed” of their decision. His administration collected $195 billion in tariff revenue during the last fiscal year, which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cited as progress toward deficit reduction.

Public opposition to Trump’s tariff expansion has grown substantially. A February Pew Research Center survey found 60 percent of Americans disapprove of the administration’s expanded tariffs. Companies that directly paid tariffs will receive refunds through the administration’s ongoing process, but consumers are unlikely to see relief, according to reporting from The New York Times, as payments flow only to importers rather than end users.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-tariffs-supreme-court-refunds-b2978803.html)

Trump Posts Racist Memes Attacking Newsom, Jeffries

President Donald Trump posted a series of inflammatory memes and fabricated images on Truth Social on Sunday attacking California Governor Gavin Newsom, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and former President Barack Obama. The posts included a doctored image of Newsom appearing terrified in a padded mental institution cell surrounded by Trump’s name, a parody of the 1994 film “Dumb and Dumber” depicting Pritzker and Johnson as sweaty and red-faced, and a racist caricature of Jeffries holding cash with a burning New York City in the background.

Trump’s attacks on Newsom intensified his ongoing mockery of the governor, whom he frequently derides as “Newscum.” The fabricated asylum image weaponizes mental illness as ridicule, a tactic consistent with Trump’s documented pattern of mocking individuals with disabilities, as demonstrated when he previously attacked Newsom’s dyslexia as “disqualifying” for political office. Trump’s post targeting Jeffries, labeled “Low IQ,” followed his recent demand that the congressman be expelled from Congress for characterizing the Supreme Court as “illegitimate” over its decision striking down a majority-Black voting district in Louisiana.

Pritzker and Johnson have publicly opposed Trump’s immigration enforcement actions and statements on violence. Pritzker compared ICE raids to Nazi Germany and stated that Trump “set the tone” for political violence in the United States, remarks made ten days after Trump survived an assassination attempt. Trump’s mocking post about Illinois governance directly targets these criticisms.

The meme attacking Obama used a Drake-format template to mock the former president’s opposition to the Supreme Court’s ruling that eliminated a majority-Black congressional district in Louisiana. Trump’s post falsely characterized voting rights protections as “Jim Crow 2.0” under Republican maps while framing Democratic-majority districts as threats to “democracy,” inverting the actual impact of the Court’s decision on minority representation.

These posts reflect Trump’s consistent use of social media to attack political opponents through dehumanizing imagery, fabricated scenarios, and racist caricatures. The attacks target officials who have criticized his authoritarian policies and judicial decisions that restrict voting rights protections, demonstrating his weaponization of the presidency against perceived enemies while using platform control to disseminate disinformation without editorial restraint.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-mocks-political-rivals-in-social-media-flurry-including-pic-of-gavin-newsom-in-a-mental-asylum/)

Trump Posts AI Video of Himself Blowing Up Iranian Jet

President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated video on Truth Social on Saturday depicting a U.S. battleship destroying an Iranian fighter jet, using a repurposed clip of himself playing drums at his Oval Office desk while narrating “Fire, boom.” The fabricated video splices Trump’s Saturday afternoon posting to make it appear he directed the strike with precise timing, exemplifying his routine deployment of manipulated media to inflate his military persona.

Trump’s Saturday posting spree included multiple photographs from his recent China visit showing him alongside President Xi Jinping, along with a mocking image of former President Joe Biden appearing disoriented during his own meeting with Xi. The posts functioned as propaganda designed to contrast Trump’s diplomatic positioning with his predecessor while cementing his relationship with an authoritarian leader.

Trump signaled escalation toward Iran by posting a photograph of himself towering over a Navy ship with the caption “It was the Calm Before the Storm,” directly contradicting his earlier false claim of an active ceasefire. On May 12, Trump told reporters he was considering ending the month-long ceasefire, stating “We’re either going to make a deal or they’re going to be decimated,” confirming his intent to resume military aggression.

Trump also posted about the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation, claiming the project costs a “small fraction” of the $355 million he attributed to Biden and Obama while boasting that the 2,030-foot pool would exceed the height of the Empire State Building and Sears Tower if converted to a skyscraper. The post mixed infrastructure claims with self-promotion typical of Trump’s use of presidential platforms for personal brand amplification.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-goes-on-posting-spree-and-shares-friendly-xi-pics-and-ai-video-of-him-blowing-up-an-iranian-fighter-jet/)

Trump Defends Giant Golden Statue of Himself Amid Much Debate

Trump defended a 22-foot golden statue of himself erected at Trump National Doral Miami, commissioned by the $PATRIOT cryptocurrency group and unveiled in May 2026. Trump stated the statue, dubbed “Don Colossus” and covered in gold leaf, was created by “a large group of political supporters” and predicted it would “become a landmark,” while praising those involved as “great American patriots.”

Pastor Mark Burns, a spiritual adviser to Trump who led the dedication ceremony, issued a lengthy statement defending the installation after critics compared it to the biblical golden calf and accused supporters of idolatry. Burns asserted the statue represented “patriotism,” not worship, stating “We worship the Lord Jesus Christ and him alone” while arguing critics were “in gross error” if they believed the statue constituted idol worship.

Late-night hosts Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart mocked the golden display, with Colbert describing it as “some recreational idolatry.” The statue was commissioned in August 2024 by sculptor Alan Cottrill following the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, with the design referencing Trump’s fist-raised gesture to the crowd after the shooting. The original plan called for unveiling during Trump’s inauguration, but reported internal disputes delayed its release.

The golden statue represents part of a broader pattern of Trump’s personal brand permeating government spaces and commercial products since his return to the White House, including Trump’s use of government resources for personal benefit, limited-edition passports, commemorative coins, and banners adorning federal buildings. This pattern mirrors House Republicans funding Trump’s Doral resort through their three-day retreat, further blending his personal commercial interests with political operations.

Critics have also installed counter-statues on the National Mall, including a bronze sculpture depicting Trump holding hands with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a Titanic-themed pose that appeared in late 2025, and a gold-painted replica in March 2026 showing Trump embracing Epstein with outstretched arms. These installations emerged amid renewed calls for full release o(Source: https://time.com/article/2026/05/15/trump-gold-statue-controversy-comments-history/)f the Epstein files and renewed scrutiny of Trump’s former relationship with the disgraced financier.

Trump Attacks Taiwan in Wild Fox News Bret Baier Exchange

During a Fox News interview in Beijing following meetings with President Xi Jinping, Trump attacked Taiwan, claiming the island “stole our chip industry” and suggesting both Taiwan and China should “cool it” regarding escalating tensions. When pressed by anchor Bret Baier about whether Taiwanese people should feel more secure after his talks with Xi, Trump deflected, saying they should feel “neutral,” then pivoted to blaming previous U.S. administrations for failing to impose tariffs that would have kept semiconductor manufacturing domestic.

Trump framed Taiwan as a “negotiating chip” worth “$12 billion” in potential arms sales, emphasizing China’s size and proximity to the island while noting the United States is 9,500 miles away. He argued that tariffs of 100 to 200 percent on imported chips would have prevented Taiwan’s development as a semiconductor hub, repeating his longstanding complaint that American presidents lacked the foresight or will to protect domestic chip manufacturers. His comments suggested a willingness to deprioritize Taiwan’s security concerns in favor of what he characterized as economic leverage.

The remarks reflected a pattern consistent with Trump’s reported pressure on Japan’s leadership to suppress public support for Taiwan following his call with Xi. Trump’s framing of Taiwan as a bargaining tool rather than a democratic ally with independent strategic interests echoed his approach of accommodating authoritarian leaders’ positions on geopolitical disputes. His suggestion that Taiwan should “cool it” appeared to align Beijing’s preferred narrative that the island should refrain from asserting its autonomy.

The interview demonstrated Trump’s tendency to blame domestic predecessors rather than acknowledge China’s agency in Taiwan’s development, while simultaneously treating the island’s security as secondary to his transactional view of U.S. foreign policy. His comments on the a(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-attacks-taiwan-in-wild-fox-news-exchange-they-stole-our-chip-industry/)rms sale remained vague, neither committing to nor explicitly rejecting the pending $12 billion package, leaving Taiwan’s defensive capabilities in uncertain standing after his Beijing visit.

Trump DOJ Creates $1.776B Slush Fund to Settle IRS

Trump’s Department of Justice is finalizing a deal to establish a $1.776 billion “Truth and Justice Commission” compensation fund, contingent on Trump dropping his lawsuit against the IRS and two civil claims totaling $230 million related to the Russia investigation and the Mar-a-Lago search. DOJ lawyers initially attempted to justify Trump suing the government he directly controls by invoking a “rule of necessity,” arguing no alternative existed despite the obvious conflict of interest. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams rejected this framework after raising concerns that Trump possesses “extraordinary” control over the defendants and that the arrangement would allow defendants to “operate at the President’s direction.”

The proposed compensation structure would bypass normal oversight mechanisms: a five-member commission, four appointed by the attorney general with Trump holding removal power without cause, would distribute nearly $2 billion with no obligation to disclose its award process. Trump himself cannot claim payments for the three dropped cases, but entities associated with him are eligible to file claims, creating a mechanism for indirect personal enrichment. Democratic lawmakers condemned the arrangement as corruption and a “slush fund” for Trump’s allies, with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stating, “We’re looking at a billion dollars for a ballroom; $1.7 billion for a slush fund for the president’s friends.”

The settlement violates fundamental principles of judicial integrity and separation of powers. Trump sued the IRS in 2023 after a government contractor admitted stealing his tax information in 2019 and 2020, but the underlying legal claim became a vehicle for Trump to extract taxpayer funds while exercising direct authority over the defendants. The commission’s lack of transparency and removal power vested in Trump transforms a compensation mechanism into an instrument for rewarding political loyalty without accountability. Court-appointed attorneys warned that Trump has “significantly expanded” presidential oversight over the DOJ in “ways that blur the line between fidelity to the President’s policy priorities and fidelity to the President himself.”

It remains unclear whether Judge Williams will approve the settlement or whether it will reach the Supreme Court. Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick acknowledged the constitutional dimension of the arrangement, stating “I don’t even know how that’s allowable to happen,” signaling that even GOP lawmakers recognize the proposal exceeds executive authority. Democratic lawmakers have called for congressional legislation to restrict taxpayer funding of the compensation fund, recognizing that the executive branch has unilaterally created a mechanism to distribute federal funds without legislative oversight or judicial review.

(Source: https://abcnews.com/US/trump-administration-create-1776b-truth-justice-commission-compensate/story?id=133005480)

Trump Attacks Cassidy as ‘Disloyal’ Over 2021 Impeachment Vote

President Donald Trump attacked Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana on Saturday, calling him a “disloyal disaster” and “sleazebag” while urging voters to support Cassidy’s primary challengers, Representative Julia Letlow and state Treasurer John Fleming. Trump posted on Truth Social that Cassidy campaigned on loyalty to Trump in 2020 but then voted to convict him during the 2021 impeachment trial, accusing the senator of betrayal and claiming Cassidy is “BAD FOR LOUISIANA.”

Cassidy is facing his first primary challenge since the impeachment vote, with Trump endorsing Letlow as “a winner who will NEVER let you down.” In the post, Trump emphasized his electoral dominance in Louisiana, stating he won the state three times and “got the most votes in its history, by far,” framing the primary as a test of loyalty to his political movement.

When CNN’s Manu Raju asked Cassidy last month about Trump’s repeated accusations of disloyalty, the senator deflected multiple times before stating he is “loyal to the United States of America” and committed to working with the president “whenever we’re working for the best of the U.S.” Cassidy’s careful distinction between loyalty to the country and loyalty to Trump reflects the tension between institutional duty and party demands for personal allegiance.

Saturday’s primary election in Louisiana determines whether Cassidy advances or faces a runoff in late June if no candidate secures a majority vote. Trump’s full-throated intervention exemplifies his pattern of targeting Republicans who defy his directives, using inflammatory language and endorsements to remove party members he views as insufficiently loyal to his leadership.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/disloyal-disaster-trump-trashes-sleazebag-republican-senator-battling-primary-challengers/)

1 2 3 143