Author: Stop the Donald Trump

Trump DOJ Creates $1.776B Slush Fund to Settle IRS

Trump’s Department of Justice is finalizing a deal to establish a $1.776 billion “Truth and Justice Commission” compensation fund, contingent on Trump dropping his lawsuit against the IRS and two civil claims totaling $230 million related to the Russia investigation and the Mar-a-Lago search. DOJ lawyers initially attempted to justify Trump suing the government he directly controls by invoking a “rule of necessity,” arguing no alternative existed despite the obvious conflict of interest. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams rejected this framework after raising concerns that Trump possesses “extraordinary” control over the defendants and that the arrangement would allow defendants to “operate at the President’s direction.”

The proposed compensation structure would bypass normal oversight mechanisms: a five-member commission, four appointed by the attorney general with Trump holding removal power without cause, would distribute nearly $2 billion with no obligation to disclose its award process. Trump himself cannot claim payments for the three dropped cases, but entities associated with him are eligible to file claims, creating a mechanism for indirect personal enrichment. Democratic lawmakers condemned the arrangement as corruption and a “slush fund” for Trump’s allies, with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stating, “We’re looking at a billion dollars for a ballroom; $1.7 billion for a slush fund for the president’s friends.”

The settlement violates fundamental principles of judicial integrity and separation of powers. Trump sued the IRS in 2023 after a government contractor admitted stealing his tax information in 2019 and 2020, but the underlying legal claim became a vehicle for Trump to extract taxpayer funds while exercising direct authority over the defendants. The commission’s lack of transparency and removal power vested in Trump transforms a compensation mechanism into an instrument for rewarding political loyalty without accountability. Court-appointed attorneys warned that Trump has “significantly expanded” presidential oversight over the DOJ in “ways that blur the line between fidelity to the President’s policy priorities and fidelity to the President himself.”

It remains unclear whether Judge Williams will approve the settlement or whether it will reach the Supreme Court. Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick acknowledged the constitutional dimension of the arrangement, stating “I don’t even know how that’s allowable to happen,” signaling that even GOP lawmakers recognize the proposal exceeds executive authority. Democratic lawmakers have called for congressional legislation to restrict taxpayer funding of the compensation fund, recognizing that the executive branch has unilaterally created a mechanism to distribute federal funds without legislative oversight or judicial review.

(Source: https://abcnews.com/US/trump-administration-create-1776b-truth-justice-commission-compensate/story?id=133005480)

Trump Attacks Cassidy as ‘Disloyal’ Over 2021 Impeachment Vote

President Donald Trump attacked Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana on Saturday, calling him a “disloyal disaster” and “sleazebag” while urging voters to support Cassidy’s primary challengers, Representative Julia Letlow and state Treasurer John Fleming. Trump posted on Truth Social that Cassidy campaigned on loyalty to Trump in 2020 but then voted to convict him during the 2021 impeachment trial, accusing the senator of betrayal and claiming Cassidy is “BAD FOR LOUISIANA.”

Cassidy is facing his first primary challenge since the impeachment vote, with Trump endorsing Letlow as “a winner who will NEVER let you down.” In the post, Trump emphasized his electoral dominance in Louisiana, stating he won the state three times and “got the most votes in its history, by far,” framing the primary as a test of loyalty to his political movement.

When CNN’s Manu Raju asked Cassidy last month about Trump’s repeated accusations of disloyalty, the senator deflected multiple times before stating he is “loyal to the United States of America” and committed to working with the president “whenever we’re working for the best of the U.S.” Cassidy’s careful distinction between loyalty to the country and loyalty to Trump reflects the tension between institutional duty and party demands for personal allegiance.

Saturday’s primary election in Louisiana determines whether Cassidy advances or faces a runoff in late June if no candidate secures a majority vote. Trump’s full-throated intervention exemplifies his pattern of targeting Republicans who defy his directives, using inflammatory language and endorsements to remove party members he views as insufficiently loyal to his leadership.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/disloyal-disaster-trump-trashes-sleazebag-republican-senator-battling-primary-challengers/)

Trump Attacks Talarico with False Claims About Gender and Faith

Donald Trump attacked Democratic Texas state Senate nominee James Talarico aboard Air Force One on Friday, calling him “weird” and “pathetic” while making obscure and false claims about his background. Trump’s attack included references to “six genders” and an unclear jab about “Jesus,” alongside attacks on Talarico’s dietary choices, describing him as vegan in contradictory statements.

Talarico won the Democratic primary on March 4, defeating Rep. Jasmine Crockett. Trump’s remarks came as he declined to endorse a Republican candidate in the party’s unresolved primary between Sen. John Cornyn and Attorney General Ken Paxton, who will compete in a May 26 runoff. Cornyn has been a reliable Trump ally in the Senate, while Paxton has advanced Trump’s false 2020 election fraud narrative despite facing impeachment by the Republican-controlled Texas House.

The “six genders” reference appears to distort a 2021 statement by Talarico about biological sexes. Trump’s “hit on Jesus” comment lacks clear meaning, though Talarico has publicly discussed his Christian faith repeatedly. Trump’s incoherent attacks reflect his pattern of making false and contradictory personal attacks on political opponents.

Trump claimed his “record of endorsements is extraordinary” while declining to specify which Republican candidate he would support in the Texas runoff. He stated he knows both candidates “very well” and likes them “a lot,” yet proceeded to attack the Democratic nominee rather than address the Republican primary race directly.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-uncorks-gonzo-attack-on-political-foe-six-genders-a-real-hit-on-jesus/)

Eric Trump Threatens Lawsuit Against Jen Psaki Over Alt5

Eric Trump announced plans to sue MSNBC’s Jen Psaki and the network over a May 15, 2026 segment in which Psaki identified him as a board member of Alt5 Sigma, a Las Vegas-based fintech firm rebranded as AI Financial. Trump denied the claim in a post to X, stating he had “NEVER” served on the company’s board and accused Psaki of spreading “blatant lies.”

Psaki’s segment addressed Eric Trump’s presence during his father’s Beijing trip, citing a Financial Times report that Alt5 Sigma was exploring a deal with a Chinese chipmaker connected to the Chinese Communist Party. The MSNBC host noted Eric Trump appeared in footage ringing the NASDAQ opening bell alongside the Alt5 Sigma logo and questioned potential conflicts of interest given his stated separation from family business operations during his father’s presidency.

Eric Trump was previously listed as a board observer and adviser for Alt5 Sigma following the company’s August 2025 partnership announcement with World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture founded by President Trump and his sons. Bloomberg reported in April 2026 that Eric Trump’s name and affiliation were removed from the company’s public website amid financial losses and executive turnover.

Psaki’s reporting detailed multiple instances of Trump family business dealings during the presidency, including Pentagon contracts worth millions awarded to companies partially or fully owned by Eric and Donald Trump Jr. She questioned whether the family’s financial interests warranted closer scrutiny from agencies like the Internal Revenue Service given apparent conflicts of interest.

President Trump has pursued an aggressive litigation strategy against media outlets, having reached settlements with Paramount and ABC while maintaining ongoing defamation cases against other news organizations including the BBC. Eric Trump’s threatened lawsuit against Psaki and MSNBC continues this pattern of using legal threats to challenge critical media coverage.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/eric-trump-accuses-jen-psaki-of-blatant-lies-as-he-announces-lawsuit-against-her-and-ms-now/)

JD Vance Claims Dead People ‘Vote for Democrats’ in Maine Anti-Fraud Speech

Vice President JD Vance claimed during a March 27, 2026 Task Force to Eliminate Fraud meeting in Bangor, Maine, that dead people "vote for Democrats," repeating a debunked election conspiracy theory. Vance stated, "Unfortunately, they vote for Democrats, they don't vote for us, my friends," after an audience member interjected with this claim. Election experts have consistently found that while isolated cases of deceased individuals appearing on voter rolls occur, the phenomenon does not occur at a scale capable of influencing election outcomes.

The speech conflated Medicaid enrollment fraud with election fraud, a tactic that misrepresents how federal benefit programs operate. Vance cited a Department of Health and Human Services report claiming Maine made "at least $45.6 million in improper fee-for-service Medicaid payments" for autism services, but enrollment in Medicaid differs fundamentally from receiving active benefits. Dead individuals cannot unenroll themselves from programs, yet this administrative reality does not equate to fraudulent benefit distribution or validate claims of systematic election manipulation.

Vance invoked anecdotal examples of alleged fraud, including people "driving Lamborghinis" while receiving low-income housing assistance and individuals claiming hospice benefits without terminal illnesses. He presented identity theft as evidence justifying expanded fraud investigation powers under Trump's administration. These narratives frame fraud-fighting as protecting taxpayers, though the connection between isolated cases and broad policy conclusions remains unsupported by systematic evidence presented in the speech.

The Task Force to Eliminate Fraud has specifically targeted Democratic-led states including Maine, Illinois, Minnesota, California, and New York for alleged mismanagement. Critics have characterized such fraud investigations as vehicles for reducing access to social safety net programs rather than addressing genuine systemic vulnerabilities, particularly when claims conflate administrative technicalities with intentional fraud.

Vance framed aggressive fraud prosecution as protecting Americans from government "fleecing" accumulated over "15, 20, 30 years," positioning the Trump administration as uniquely committed to scrutiny that he claimed previous administrations ignored. The speech did not distinguish between confirmed fraud cases and unverified claims, nor did it address how fraud investigations might affect legitimate beneficiaries seeking assistance.

(Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jd-vance-claims-dead-people-182226971.html)

Trump Attacks BBC Over Iran Bombing Query, Repeats False AI Claims

Trump attacked the BBC as "fake" aboard Air Force One on Friday after being questioned about an Iranian school bombing that killed over 170 civilians, including children. Admiral Brad Cooper, head of U.S. Central Command, testified that week that the United States may have caused the bombing, which is under investigation. Trump used the question to rehash his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC, falsely claiming the network used artificial intelligence to manipulate his January 6 speech and "put words in my mouth."

Trump attacked the BBC as "fake" after questions about an Iranian school bombing. He cited his lawsuit against BBC, misrepresenting their editing of his January 6 speech. While the BBC admitted to edits that unintentionally misled viewers, Trump's speech indeed indirectly incited violence, urging supporters to march to the Capitol. Despite no direct call for violence, his inaction during the attack and later actions, like pardoning participants and releasing a song with them, emphasize his indirect influence and support for the rioters.

Trump's lawsuit against the BBC follows resignations of BBC Director-General Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness in the aftermath of the editing controversy. The departures came as the BBC faced public criticism over the January 6 segment, though the broadcaster maintained the edit was unintentional rather than malicious. Trump weaponized the incident to deflect from questioning about civilian deaths in Iran and to attack press accountability.

Trump's outburst exemplifies his pattern of attacking journalists and news organizations when confronted with uncomfortable questions about military actions and their consequences. By characterizing legitimate editorial scrutiny as "fake" and fabricated, Trump delegitimized the question about the Iranian school bombing itself. His false claims about AI manipulation and invented defenses obscured accountability for the deaths of over 170 civilians, including children.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-lashes-out-at-reporter-and-fake-bbc-over-iran-question-the-ones-who-put-ai-in-my-mouth/)

Trump Slams Reporter Inches From His Face on Air Force One

During the return flight from Beijing on Air Force One, President Donald Trump attacked New York Times White House and National Security Correspondent David Sanger with a sustained barrage of personal insults while positioned inches from the reporter’s face. Trump called Sanger “fake,” “treasonous,” and accused him and The New York Times of writing false accounts of military operations in Iran, falsely claiming Trump achieved a “total military victory” that destroyed Iran’s Navy, Air Force, air defense systems, radar, and leadership across multiple command divisions.

Sanger had questioned Trump about the utility of repeating bombing campaigns in Iran after 38 days of strikes failed to produce the stated political changes. Trump responded by denying the basic facts reported by the Times and other outlets, insisting that New York Times coverage constituted “treason” because journalists described Iran as maintaining military capability when Trump asserted they had been completely dismantled. Trump threatened additional destruction, stating “Within two days, we can knock out the whole thing” and claimed he could destroy Iran’s bridges and electrical infrastructure at will.

Trump attributed the New York Times’ declining subscriber numbers to what he characterized as fake news coverage, weaponizing the encounter to attack press credibility while simultaneously making grandiose and unverified claims about military achievements. The confrontation exemplifies Trump’s documented pattern of threatening media outlets for unfavorable coverage and using presidential power to intimidate journalists who contradict his statements.

Sanger’s colleagues at the Times subsequently published a report documenting Iran’s capability restoration and the Trump administration’s exaggeration of military success, directly contradicting Trump’s claims aboard Air Force One. The incident occurred following Trump’s high-security visit to Beijing, where he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping under conditions of secrecy and pageantry that limited independent press access.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-attacks-reporter-inches-from-his-face-on-air-force-one-treasonous-fake-guy/)

White House “Re-migration” Rhetoric Mirrors Neo-Nazi Ideologies and Invokes Ethnic Cleansing

A recent post by the White House has sparked concern over its use of the term "re-migration," normalizing language deeply rooted in neo-Nazi ideology. This terminology has gained traction within far-right circles and is part of a disturbing trend where state policies reflect and reinforce extremist beliefs. The rhetoric of re-migration mirrors the enforcement tactics used by ICE, where mass deportations are seen as a form of ethnic cleansing. This approach, under the guise of maintaining national security and order, contributes to a broader, unsettling narrative that targets and alienates communities based on ethnicity.

Historically, this term was propagated by groups such as Identity Europa and Alternative for Germany (AfD), organizations known for their far-right affiliations and ideologies. These groups, which have often aligned themselves with neo-Nazi principles, see re-migration as a way to preserve ethnic homogeneity by exporting non-native populations. The rhetoric used by these groups emphasizes a stark division between “us” and “them,” often excluding anyone who does not fit their narrow definition of national identity.

The controversial nature of re-migration policies was thrust into the spotlight following a report by the German investigative newsroom Correctiv. According to their findings, a secret meeting took place in late 2023 attended by influential AfD leaders and far-right activists, including Martin Sellner, a prominent identitarian figure. During this meeting, a re-migration plan targeting asylum seekers, non-native residents, and "unassimilated" German citizens was outlined without any opposition from those present. This plan has been criticized as a form of ethnic cleansing under the guise of social engineering.

Critics and researchers have pointed out that the rhetoric of re-migration mirrors the language often used in white supremacist narratives, emphasizing themes of cultural dilution and existential threat to native populations. This aligns with the discourse used by political leaders in official stances against global initiatives such as the Global Compact on Migration. Public declarations have been made suggesting that under certain administrations, policies aligning with replacement migration, as promoted by international agreements, would be resisted strongly.

The debate surrounding re-migration underscores the urgent need for careful consideration of the language and policies being endorsed at the highest levels of government. As these ideologies continue to seep into mainstream discourse, it is crucial for policymakers and citizens alike to remain vigilant against the normalization of concepts rooted in bigotry and division. Efforts to address migration must prioritize human rights and integration, rather than fostering an environment of fear and exclusion.

Trump Posts Sewage Image of Obama Biden Pelosi

Trump posted a digitally manipulated image on Truth Social depicting former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi submerged in sewage at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, captioned “Dumacrats Love Sewage.” The post was part of a broader Truth Social spree in which Trump distributed multiple fabricated and AI-generated images designed to demean political opponents.

In the same posting sequence, Trump distributed false images of U.S. military equipment destroying Iranian assets, a dehumanizing image comparing House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’s district to a slum, and an AI-generated image of Illinois Governor JB Pritzker consuming large quantities of food. Trump also posted a doctored $100 bill bearing his likeness and a chart falsely understating the duration of his military conflict with Iran at six weeks when it had already entered its tenth week.

Trump also launched a verbal attack against the New York Times, characterizing it as “one of the worst newspapers anywhere in the World” and claiming it was “losing subscribers on an hourly basis.” Trump accused the publication of covering his 2024 election victory inaccurately and of attempting to justify what he described as Obama and Biden’s “expensively botched” effort to repair the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/online/dumacrats-love-sewage-trump-posts-image-of-obama-biden-pelosi-bathing-in-feces-in-new-truth-social-meme-spree/)

Trump Secretary Spent Last Year Making Reality TV Show With Family | The New Republic

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy spent seven of his first seven months in office on a family road trip across eight conservative states and Washington, D.C., documented as a reality television show called “The Great American Road Trip” produced in partnership with Fox News for YouTube release. Duffy confirmed in a Fox News interview on Friday that the multimonth journey, which consumed nearly half his tenure since his Senate confirmation in January 2025, was his idea to celebrate America’s 250th birthday, stating his motto as “To love America is to see America.” His wife, Rachel Campos-Duffy, later revealed the project originated from a directive by Donald Trump urging Cabinet members to develop ways to mark the anniversary, though the couple framed it as a spontaneous family decision to produce “wholesome” content.

Campos-Duffy defended the extended absence from Duffy’s official duties by characterizing American culture as a “PornHub world” and positioning the road trip as wholesome family content, urging other Americans to embark on similar journeys during 2026. The couple provided no acknowledgment of how working families facing severe economic hardship could afford such an undertaking, particularly as fuel costs remain elevated due to the ongoing war with Iran. Gas prices nationwide average $4.54 per gallon according to the American Automobile Association, approximately 50 percent higher than pre-war levels, with California regions such as Mono County experiencing prices exceeding $7 per gallon. Energy Secretary Chris Wright predicted costs could climb further before the midterm elections as the conflict continues.

The road trip states visited were Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Florida, Texas, Arizona, Montana, Massachusetts, and Washington, D.C.—a deliberately selective geographic footprint excluding 41 states and heavily favoring conservative strongholds. Duffy’s documented absence from transportation policy oversight while the nation faces infrastructural and energy challenges demonstrates how Trump’s Cabinet uses federal positions to advance personal projects and media ventures. The promotion of family leisure travel as national policy inspiration(Source: https://newrepublic.com/post/210192/donald-trump-transportation-secretary-reality-tv-show-family) during a period of economic strain for ordinary Americans exemplifies the disconnect between Trump administration messaging and material reality facing working people.

1 2 3 … 142