Trump Launches Controversial $1 Million Gold Card Visa Program

Donald Trump has announced a new “gold card” visa program that allows foreigners to gain permanent residency in the U.S. by paying $1 million. The card features Trump’s image alongside national symbols such as the Statue of Liberty and a bald eagle, reinforcing his branding while commodifying immigration. The program aims to fast-track applications for those who can afford it, effectively prioritizing wealth over need.

Trump revealed details about the card on Truth Social, declaring it a direct path to citizenship for qualified individuals willing to make significant financial contributions to the U.S. The initiative requires a $1 million donation for individuals or $2 million for corporate applications on behalf of employees, raising ethical questions about the monetization of citizenship.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick reported a significant success during the program’s rollout, claiming the sale of 1,000 gold cards on its launch day, which supposedly raised $5 billion. Those who hold the gold card may apply for citizenship after five years, creating a fast-track, profit-driven process that undermines traditional immigration pathways and values.

The gold card’s design resembles previous promotional items, featuring Trump’s picture and signature as a central theme, further entrenching his personal brand in governmental functions. Critics argue this move continues a trend of leveraging the immigration system for personal gain, spotlighting the intersection of wealth, privilege, and citizenship.

On top of the gold card scheme, Trump has also hinted at introducing platinum cards, which would provide limited residency without taxation on foreign income, again emphasizing the financial barrier for those seeking to enter the U.S.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-unveils-1-million-gold-card-with-his-mug-and-bald-eagle-for-quickie-visas-so-exciting/)

Trump Claims 6G Lets You See Deeper into Skin

In a recent meeting with business leaders, President Donald Trump made an unusual claim regarding the upcoming 6G cellular networks. He suggested that these advanced networks would allow for a capability to see “a little bit deeper view into somebody’s skin,” a statement that reflects a lack of understanding about the technology.

During this meeting, Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon briefed Trump on the developments of 6G technology. Trump, who boasted about his role in promoting 5G, jumped in with his bizarre commentary about viewing people’s skin, highlighting a troubling disconnect from reality. He reminisced about “the cameras from the old days,” failing to provide coherent thoughts on the subjects discussed.

The remarks are yet another example of Trump’s tendency to make unfounded and confusing assertions. His comments have left many questioning his grasp of technological advancements and their implications.

This incident isn’t isolated and adds to the list of surreal statements made by Trump. His fixation on technology often strays into the nonsensical, raising valid concerns about his understanding of significant issues facing the nation.

As Trump continues to make headlines for his unconventional views and statements, his claims regarding 6G serve as a reminder of his unpredictable approach to office and engagement with experts in vital fields.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-6g-networks-skin/)

Trump’s Demented Riff on Dolls and Pencils Highlight Cognitive Decline

During a recent rally, President Donald Trump delivered a bizarre monologue regarding pencils and the extravagance of buying “37 dolls for your daughter,” as he attempted to defend his handling of the affordability crisis. Despite numerous polls reflecting a backlash against his economic policies, Trump dismissively labeled concerns over rising prices as a “con job,” insisting that he has already resolved the issue. His remarks came during a lengthy speech at the Mount Airy Casino Resort, where he further discussed the positive impact of his tariffs on U.S. steel production.

Trump’s bizarre comments highlighted his disregard for the economic struggles faced by Americans, as he suggested families could forego excessive purchases of dolls and pencils instead of addressing the root causes of inflation and cost-of-living increases. He claimed that the tariffs have revitalized steel production in the United States, framing this as a national security issue. His cavalier attitude towards essential purchases reflects a profound disconnect from the everyday experiences of ordinary citizens.

Despite his insistence that Americans could sacrifice non-essential items, Trump’s policies have contributed to economic hardship. This was especially evident as he faced criticism for the effects of his tariffs on consumer goods, which have only exacerbated inflation. Rather than taking responsibility for these challenges, he deflected with whimsical suggestions about what families need.

Trump’s rhetoric points to a broader issue within his administration: a failure to engage with the tangible economic realities that most Americans encounter daily. As he continues to downplay the significance of affordability, it becomes clear that his understanding of the economic landscape remains detached from the struggles faced by many.

In the face of a fluctuating economy that threatens livelihoods, Trump’s focus on abstract concepts, like his tariffs and metaphorical suggestions of excess doll purchases, serves as a symptom of his inability to prioritize the actual needs of his constituents, further solidifying his status as a controversial and divisive figure in American politics.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-wanders-through-bizarre-riff-about-not-buying-pencils-or-37-dolls-to-combat-affordability-crisis/)

Trump Claims Acing Three Cognitive Tests Amid Health Scrutiny

During a recent post on Truth Social, Donald Trump claimed he underwent three cognitive tests, boasting about his performance monitored by numerous physicians. His assertions come amidst growing scrutiny regarding his health, including reports of him dozing off during cabinet meetings. Trump responded to these allegations by stating that he participates in extensive medical examinations at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, where he insists he receives “PERFECT marks.”

Trump described these cognitive tests as unique, suggesting that few are capable of passing them successfully, yet his admission raises eyebrows. Commenting on his claims, former Rep. Justin Amash stated that such pronouncements would typically signal mental instability in anyone else, emphasizing Trump’s unusual behavior regarding this matter. Critiques flooded social media, with commentators questioning the validity of his assertions regarding cognitive function.

Trump’s recent declarations appear to be an attempt to counteract rumors about his declining health, particularly in light of his past ridicule of Joe Biden as “Sleepy Joe.” Observers, including commentators from news outlets, pointed out the oddity of a healthy senior requiring three cognitive assessments, implying this raises doubts about his current well-being.

Notably, Trump’s claims seem to conflict with observations of his performance, prompting discussions about the implications of such a state for someone holding the highest office. As reactions mounted online, many speculated that this is an acknowledgment of serious health issues rather than a demonstration of prowess.

The discourse surrounding Trump’s health is significant, considering his history of dismissing public concerns about cognitive decline in others. This new information serves to highlight the paradox between his past derision of opponents and his current situation.

(Source: https://www.rawstory.com/alternet-posts/trump-chris-hayes/)

Trump Calls Health Reports ‘Treasonous’ Following Criticism

Donald Trump criticized The New York Times for reporting on his health, labeling claims about his physical decline as “seditious” and potentially “treasonous.” The article from the Times highlighted his aging signs, including fatigue and physical ailments noticeable during public events. In response, Trump took to Truth Social to defend his health and fitness after undergoing multiple medical exams.

During his rants, Trump boasted about “acing” cognitive tests and criticized the media’s portrayal of him as deteriorating. He claimed that he works harder than ever, dismissing the notion that he is slowing down. Trump expressed disdain for the Times’ coverage, suggesting that the publication touches on “libel” against the office of the presidency.

Despite concerns about his health, including visible symptoms such as a drooping face and bandaged hands, Trump remained adamant about his fitness and effort levels. He argued that the reports constitute a false narrative aimed at undermining his presidency.

Trump’s language reflected the combative style of his administration, where he frequently attacked media outlets that challenged him. His vehement defense of his condition underscores the complexities surrounding the perception of his health as he continues his term.

Ultimately, Trump’s reaction to the health scrutiny reveals both his insecurity about aging as a high-profile leader and his broader strategy of dismissing unfavorable reporting as attacks on his legitimacy. He closed his remarks by suggesting that The New York Times should stop publishing altogether.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-suggests-its-treasonous-to-report-hes-in-bad-physical-shape/)

Trump’s Rhetoric Fuels Racism at PA Rally Against Ilhan Omar

During a recent rally in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, President Donald Trump incited his supporters by making inflammatory remarks about Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN), falsely alleging she is in the U.S. illegally. Trump, who has a history of targeting Omar with derogatory comments, asked the crowd if anyone was from Somalia before ridiculing her background and attire. His comments about Omar included a baseless accusation of her marrying her brother for immigration purposes.

As Trump continued with his tirade, his supporters began chanting “Send her back!”—a phrase that echoes the racist rhetoric he has previously directed at Omar. Trump’s remarks not only perpetuated unfounded claims but also sought to dehumanize a sitting congresswoman and whitewash her contributions to American society. This kind of rhetoric has been criticized for its dangerous implications on racial and immigrant communities.

Ilhan Omar, a Somali immigrant and U.S. citizen who has served in Congress since 2019, continues to be a target for Trump’s vitriol. His previous comments have included suggestions that she doesn’t belong in Congress, reflecting a broader strategy of using fear and division to rally his base. The president’s blatant disregard for fact in this situation demonstrates a commitment to xenophobic and racist attack tactics.

Trump’s statements not only violate the principles of basic decency but also have real-world consequences, as they can stoke hatred and inspire violence against marginalized groups. His rhetoric is frequently criticized as aligning closely with white supremacist narratives that aim to undermine democracy and promote division within the nation.

In addition to this specific incident, Trump’s ongoing efforts to delegitimize and attack prominent figures like Omar reflect a troubling trend in American politics. The normalization of such inflammatory speech poses significant risks to democratic discourse and inclusivity, revealing a growing divide fueled by the pursuit of power through fearmongering.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/send-her-back-maga-crowd-rages-after-trump-claims-house-democrat-is-here-illegally/)

Karoline Leavitt Blasted for Misleading Claims on Trump’s Tariffs

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, faced significant backlash for claiming that China did not purchase American soybeans during the Biden administration. This assertion, made while defending former President Donald Trump’s tariffs, inaccurately shifted blame for reduced soybean sales from the Trump administration’s trade policies to Biden’s leadership.

Leavitt stated on Newsmax that Trump’s influence led to renewed Chinese purchases of soybeans, contradicting the reality that China ceased buying American soybeans due to tariffs imposed by Trump earlier. The American Soybean Association confirmed that China has not purchased U.S. soybeans since May, pivoting to suppliers in Brazil and Argentina, resulting in panic among U.S. farmers struggling with these losses.

Various experts quickly rebuked Leavitt’s claims. Political Science Professor Branislav Slantchev highlighted the negative impact of Trump’s policies on farmers, questioning why they continue to support him despite the evident harm. Economists and journalists joined the outcry, underscoring Leavitt’s misrepresentation of the agricultural trade scenario.

This incident illustrates the disturbing pattern of misinformation surrounding Trump’s trade policies, which have profoundly affected American agriculture. The consequences of the trade war and subsequent tariffs included a significant drop in U.S. soybean exports, prompting a bailout for farmers impacted by the tumultuous market conditions.

The backlash against Leavitt reflects broader frustration with the administration’s ongoing attempts to manipulate facts in support of discredited former policies, jeopardizing both credibility and the livelihoods of American farmers.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/karoline-leavitt-roasted-over-blatantly-false-claim-on-trumps-tariffs-impacting-farmers/)

Trump’s $12 Billion Bailout Fails to Address Agricultural Crisis

President Trump has introduced a $12 billion bailout aimed at supporting farmers adversely affected by his trade policies. This initiative is a blatant reaction to the financial turmoil that his own tariffs have inflicted on the agricultural sector. By announcing this relief package at the White House alongside farmers, Trump attempts to placate his base, despite being the architect of their economic struggles.

Trump’s trade war, particularly with China, has severely restricted U.S. farmers’ access to major markets. Retaliatory tariffs imposed by China halted purchases of key American crops like soybeans, highlighting the damaging consequences of his policies. Despite claiming to stand by farmers, Trump’s actions are the root cause of their current predicaments.

The bailout will primarily allocate funds through the Agriculture Department’s Farmer Bridge Assistance program, targeting producers of corn, cotton, sorghum, soybeans, rice, and wheat. Trump indicated that the payments would begin by the end of February, with a total of $11 billion initially set for distribution, and another $1 billion reserved for fruits and vegetables.

While Trump touts the bailout as a result of tariffs providing federal revenue, this misleading statement ignores the fact that the tariffs are fundamentally what compelled the government to step in. The payments are not funded directly by the income from these tariffs, making the entire situation an ironic twist in his economic approach.

This bailout not only reflects Trump’s failure to maintain a stable agricultural market but also reveals his tendency to use taxpayer money to mask the consequences of his ill-advised decisions. Farmers who supported him are now reliant on government handouts that arise from the financial chaos of his own creation.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/us/politics/trump-farmers-aid-bailout.html)

Trump Attacks ABC Reporter Over Military Strike Footage

Donald Trump lashed out at ABC senior political reporter Rachel Scott during a press briefing on December 8, 2025. He labeled her as “terrible” and “the most obnoxious reporter” after she pressed him about releasing classified video footage of a controversial military strike on a suspected drug boat. This conflict arose following allegations against Secretary of War Pete Hegseth regarding a second illegal strike on survivors from the initial attack, which reportedly killed nine people.

In response to Scott’s inquiry about his commitment to releasing the footage, Trump dismissed her question, claiming he previously stated it was up to Hegseth to decide. He also denied having made a previous comment about having “no problem” with the footage’s release, accusing ABC of disseminating “fake news.”

Scott’s persistent line of questioning highlighted the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Hegseth’s military decisions, particularly a Washington Post report suggesting he ordered a second strike on survivors, which was contested by military officials. The incident underscores the tensions between the Trump administration and the media, particularly regarding military transparency and accountability.

Trump defended the administration’s military actions, claiming that over 20 strikes have significantly reduced drug smuggling operations, attributing a 94% reduction in drug boat activities to these efforts. His confrontational stance toward Scott is part of a broader pattern of hostility towards female reporters.

Criticism of Trump’s administration continues to grow, as many experts and officials call into question the legality and ethical implications of the military operations ordered under Hegseth’s command.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-rages-at-obnoxious-reporter-after-follow-up-on-releasing-boat-strike-clip/)

Trump Rages Against Pardon Recipient Cuellar’s Loyalty

Donald Trump expressed outrage over Rep. Henry Cuellar’s decision to run for re-election as a Democrat, following the president’s recent pardon of Cuellar and his wife, Imelda, who were facing bribery charges. Despite the pardon—which Trump issued after receiving a letter from Cuellar’s daughters pleading for their parents’ release—Trump condemned Cuellar for not switching allegiance to the Republican Party, labeling him as “disloyal.”

In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed Cuellar and his family were unfairly targeted by Democrats, portraying them as victims of political persecution. He emphasized that the Democrats would have imprisoned them for 15 years and accused them of continuing to pursue Cuellar despite the pardon.

Trump’s tone shifted quickly from one of compassion to fury, stating Cuellar’s decision to remain a Democrat demonstrates a betrayal. He warned that this lack of loyalty would not sit well with Texas voters or Cuellar’s family, threatening, “next time, no more Mr. Nice guy.”

In response to Trump’s comments, Cuellar reaffirmed his status as “a good old conservative Democrat,” insisting that his political beliefs remain unchanged despite the pardon.

Trump’s reaction highlights his expectation of absolute loyalty from those he supports, revealing his authoritarian tendencies in expecting individuals to align completely with his party after receiving favors.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-rages-against-house-democrat-he-just-pardoned-such-a-lack-of-loyalty/)

1 2 3 102