Author: Stop the Donald Trump

President Trump has introduced a $12 billion bailout aimed at supporting farmers adversely affected by his trade policies. This initiative is a blatant reaction to the financial turmoil that his own tariffs have inflicted on the agricultural sector. By announcing this relief package at the White House alongside farmers, Trump attempts to placate his base, despite being the architect of their economic struggles.

Trump’s trade war, particularly with China, has severely restricted U.S. farmers’ access to major markets. Retaliatory tariffs imposed by China halted purchases of key American crops like soybeans, highlighting the damaging consequences of his policies. Despite claiming to stand by farmers, Trump’s actions are the root cause of their current predicaments.

The bailout will primarily allocate funds through the Agriculture Department’s Farmer Bridge Assistance program, targeting producers of corn, cotton, sorghum, soybeans, rice, and wheat. Trump indicated that the payments would begin by the end of February, with a total of $11 billion initially set for distribution, and another $1 billion reserved for fruits and vegetables.

While Trump touts the bailout as a result of tariffs providing federal revenue, this misleading statement ignores the fact that the tariffs are fundamentally what compelled the government to step in. The payments are not funded directly by the income from these tariffs, making the entire situation an ironic twist in his economic approach.

This bailout not only reflects Trump’s failure to maintain a stable agricultural market but also reveals his tendency to use taxpayer money to mask the consequences of his ill-advised decisions. Farmers who supported him are now reliant on government handouts that arise from the financial chaos of his own creation.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/us/politics/trump-farmers-aid-bailout.html)

Donald Trump lashed out at ABC senior political reporter Rachel Scott during a press briefing on December 8, 2025. He labeled her as “terrible” and “the most obnoxious reporter” after she pressed him about releasing classified video footage of a controversial military strike on a suspected drug boat. This conflict arose following allegations against Secretary of War Pete Hegseth regarding a second illegal strike on survivors from the initial attack, which reportedly killed nine people.

In response to Scott’s inquiry about his commitment to releasing the footage, Trump dismissed her question, claiming he previously stated it was up to Hegseth to decide. He also denied having made a previous comment about having “no problem” with the footage’s release, accusing ABC of disseminating “fake news.”

Scott’s persistent line of questioning highlighted the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Hegseth’s military decisions, particularly a Washington Post report suggesting he ordered a second strike on survivors, which was contested by military officials. The incident underscores the tensions between the Trump administration and the media, particularly regarding military transparency and accountability.

Trump defended the administration’s military actions, claiming that over 20 strikes have significantly reduced drug smuggling operations, attributing a 94% reduction in drug boat activities to these efforts. His confrontational stance toward Scott is part of a broader pattern of hostility towards female reporters.

Criticism of Trump’s administration continues to grow, as many experts and officials call into question the legality and ethical implications of the military operations ordered under Hegseth’s command.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-rages-at-obnoxious-reporter-after-follow-up-on-releasing-boat-strike-clip/)

Donald Trump expressed outrage over Rep. Henry Cuellar’s decision to run for re-election as a Democrat, following the president’s recent pardon of Cuellar and his wife, Imelda, who were facing bribery charges. Despite the pardon—which Trump issued after receiving a letter from Cuellar’s daughters pleading for their parents’ release—Trump condemned Cuellar for not switching allegiance to the Republican Party, labeling him as “disloyal.”

In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed Cuellar and his family were unfairly targeted by Democrats, portraying them as victims of political persecution. He emphasized that the Democrats would have imprisoned them for 15 years and accused them of continuing to pursue Cuellar despite the pardon.

Trump’s tone shifted quickly from one of compassion to fury, stating Cuellar’s decision to remain a Democrat demonstrates a betrayal. He warned that this lack of loyalty would not sit well with Texas voters or Cuellar’s family, threatening, “next time, no more Mr. Nice guy.”

In response to Trump’s comments, Cuellar reaffirmed his status as “a good old conservative Democrat,” insisting that his political beliefs remain unchanged despite the pardon.

Trump’s reaction highlights his expectation of absolute loyalty from those he supports, revealing his authoritarian tendencies in expecting individuals to align completely with his party after receiving favors.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-rages-against-house-democrat-he-just-pardoned-such-a-lack-of-loyalty/)

President Donald Trump recently received the newly-created “inaugural 2025 FIFA Peace Prize” during the World Cup draw held at The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center. The award, presented by FIFA President Gianni Infantino, has been mocked as an invented accolade meant to flatter Trump, who has previously campaigned for a Nobel Peace Prize while disparaging it.

During his Christmas concert at the White House later that evening, Trump mistakenly referred to the FIFA draw as the “FIFA Awards,” seemingly embracing the blunder. He touted the event, claiming it had captivated over a billion viewers and offered high praise to tenor Andrea Bocelli, effectively conflating the award ceremony with the FIFA event.

Critics have largely viewed the Peace Prize as a superficial honor, questioning its legitimacy and intent, especially given Trump’s controversial political track record and authoritarian tendencies. The event highlighted Trump’s continuing quest for validation and recognition from both domestic and international spheres, framing him as a so-called “dynamic leader” in the eyes of FIFA.

His recent hyphenation of terms indicates not only a lack of understanding of the event’s purpose but also a concerning self-referential attitude that prioritizes personal gain over the integrity of international accolades. This incident reflects broader issues related to Trump’s approach to leadership and recognition.

The presentation of this peace prize raises eyebrows considering Trump’s ongoing actions, which often contradict the values a peace prize embodies, thereby further solidifying his critics’ arguments that such honors are more about personal image than genuine merit.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/sports/trump-renames-sporting-event-in-his-own-honor-as-he-basks-in-glow-of-just-invented-peace-prize-at-christmas-party/)

FBI Director Kash Patel has come under fire for reportedly using government resources for personal matters. Sources allege that he instructed agents, assigned to provide security for his girlfriend Alexis Wilkins, to drive her drunk friend home after a night out. Despite agents objecting, Patel insisted they comply, even yelling at the lead agent to fulfill the request.

This incident follows recent scrutiny of Patel’s unconventional practices, including assigning an elite FBI security detail to Wilkins, a move deemed unprecedented and raising serious ethical concerns within the bureau. The security detail reportedly consists of members who were formerly part of a SWAT team in Nashville, suggesting a significant diversion of FBI resources.

Concerns among FBI agents regarding Patel’s management style have escalated, with reports indicating that he has extended the use of FBI agents to assist Wilkins on multiple occasions. The involvement of taxpayer-funded security for personal errands has drawn criticism from within the bureau, emphasizing unease over the misuse of agency personnel.

As the story unfolds, an FBI spokesperson has denied the allegations, labeling them as “made up” and claiming the events did not occur. Nonetheless, the narrative circulating among agents highlights issues of propriety and the misuse of government assets under Patel’s directorship.

This situation illustrates broader concerns regarding the integrity of the FBI under Patel, who has already faced scrutiny for other controversial actions tied to his tenure. Such misuse of agency resources not only raises ethical questions but also undermines public trust in the institution.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/kash-patel-yelled-at-fbi-agent-to-be-the-designated-driver-for-his-girlfriends-drunk-friend-report/)