Author: Stop the Donald Trump

Trump Administration Rejects Medicare Coverage for Obesity Medications Ignoring Public Health Needs

President Donald Trump’s administration has made a controversial decision by refusing to cover obesity medications under Medicare. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced this late Friday, indicating that drugs like Wegovy and Zepbound will not be included in Medicare’s Part D prescription drug coverage. This action primarily impacts elderly Americans, who rely heavily on Medicare for their health care needs.

This decision represents a stark departure from the proposal put forth by Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden. After Biden won re-election, he aimed to finalize a rule extending coverage for these high-demand treatments. However, with Trump returning to office in January, the new administration swiftly dismissed the proposal. Notably, Dr. Mehmet Oz, a controversial figure with no prior experience in public health leadership, was confirmed to head CMS just days before the announcement.

Despite a significant portion of the American public supporting coverage for obesity treatments, Trump’s Health and Human Services secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has been vocal against such medications, continues to shape health policy in a direction that neglects public health concerns. The absence of a detailed explanation from CMS regarding their decision raises questions about the motivations behind it.

Advocates for the coverage argue that addressing obesity efficiently can lead to substantial long-term savings by reducing costly health complications such as heart attacks and strokes. In fact, statistics from insurance consultant Mercer show that 44% of U.S. companies with 500 or more employees provided coverage for obesity drugs in the past year. Yet, this administration’s refusal to cover these drugs stands at odds with efforts to promote long-term health and wellness.

While Medicare does cover these medications under certain conditions—for patients with heart disease, for example—this broader refusal to cover obesity drugs limits access for many who could benefit from them. The rejection of such a significant health initiative aligns with a pattern of prioritizing corporate interests over public wellbeing, further confirming the Trump administration’s troubling approach to healthcare in America.

CDC Compromises Measles Response Due to Political Pressure from Trump’s Anti-Vaccine Agenda

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently faced scrutiny for failing to release a crucial measles risk assessment during an ongoing outbreak affecting 19 states. Internal documents obtained by ProPublica reveal that CDC leadership ordered staff not to publish findings emphasizing the high risk of measles in communities with low vaccination rates. This decision aligns with the shift in public health messaging under the Trump administration and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has consistently criticized vaccine policies.

Although a CDC spokesperson stated that the withheld assessment did not provide new information, the agency’s messaging has notably changed. They echoed Kennedy’s rhetoric, suggesting vaccination is a personal choice and indicating that decisions should be made in consultation with healthcare providers. This deviation from a firm public health stance raises concerns among health experts regarding the urgency of vaccination amid a rising number of measles cases.

Jennifer Nuzzo from Brown University expressed alarm at the CDC’s revised messaging, which seems to undermine the importance of vaccination. She pointed out that the existing measles outbreak has already surpassed the total cases of the previous year, which should prompt more transparent communication regarding public health risks. However, political pressures from the Trump administration and the new leadership at HHS seem to prioritize subjective opinions over established public health guidelines.

Critics also highlight a troubling pattern of behavior from the Trump administration, which has attempted to reshape health agencies to align with anti-vaccine sentiments. This is exemplified by Kennedy’s dismissal of CDC campaigns encouraging vaccinations and assertions that downplay the seriousness of outbreaks. With ongoing concerns about job cuts within the CDC, employees feel that scientific evidence is being sidelined in favor of political narratives.

As the situation escalates, health officials stress the importance of vaccination as the sole effective means to prevent measles, a highly contagious disease. The lack of decisive action and accurate information from the CDC could exacerbate public health risks, particularly in communities where misinformation about vaccines has taken root. The apparent favoritism towards an anti-vaccine agenda from Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to public health nationwide.

(h/t: https://www.propublica.org/article/measles-vaccine-rfk-cdc-report?utm_campaign=propublica-sprout&utm_content=1743765970&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR43qsDwhR-_bqpCLs-ziE-6_mldDWrw9RxdZbUYwUtt-uO7hvBnHyVS5M8F0g_aem_haUSgSS4Fv13E1_rGkO-jQ)

Trump Administration’s Threats to Harvard: A Political Attack on Academic Freedom

The Trump administration has launched an aggressive campaign against Harvard University, threatening to withdraw over $9 billion in federal funding unless the institution complies with a series of demands. These demands target alleged antisemitism on campus and reflect a broader effort to impose control over elite universities, which are viewed as bastions of liberal thought.

In a letter revealed by Harvard’s Crimson student paper, federal authorities called for significant changes in university policy, including the end of diversity initiatives and enhanced cooperation with federal law enforcement. The administration accuses Harvard of failing to protect students from antisemitic incidents during pro-Palestine protests and seeks to enforce compliance with the directives from the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services.

University president Alan Garber articulated the potential dangers of such funding cuts, warning that they could halt critical research and innovation at Harvard. He asserted that the university remains committed to combating antisemitism, despite the administration’s threats, which many see as punitive and politically motivated.

The reaction on campus has been mixed, with some faculty and students expressing immediate concern about the implications of these demands. History professor Kirsten Weld characterized the administration’s actions as a “dominance test,” suggesting that compliance would lead to further demands, likening it to bullying tactics.

Critics of the Trump administration argue that this offensive is less about addressing antisemitism and more about undermining academic institutions and stifling dissent. Calls for Harvard to challenge the government’s directives in court have gained traction, emphasizing the ongoing struggle between academic freedom and authoritarian political maneuvering.

Trump’s Cutbacks Threaten Miner Safety as MSHA Offices Close Nationwide

In West Virginia, retired coal miner Stanley “Goose” Stewart is expressing grave concerns about safety in the mining industry due to the planned closures of Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) offices. These cuts, driven by President Donald Trump and his administration’s push for reductions in federal spending, aim to shutter 34 MSHA offices across 19 states, raising alarms among those who prioritize worker safety.

Stewart, who survived the devastating Upper Big Branch mine disaster that killed 29 of his coworkers in 2010, fears that the proposed MSHA cutbacks will embolden coal companies to neglect essential safety protocols. He describes the proposals as “idiotic” and worries they will lead to a lax enforcement of safety laws, ultimately jeopardizing the lives of miners. These closures represent not only a significant retrenchment in safety oversight but also a continuation of the trend initiated by Trump to undermine federal regulatory agencies.

While some Republican lawmakers like Tom Clark point to a decrease in mining fatalities to justify the closures, critics argue that many accidents and deaths in the mining sector are preventable and the federal government’s role is essential in protecting workers. The lack of federal oversight is projected to lead to poorer safety outcomes, as state inspectors often lack the same level of independence from mining companies that federal inspectors possess.

Jack Spadaro, a former MSHA safety investigator, asserts that the proposed cuts reflect a deep ignorance about mine safety regulations, emphasizing that oversight is crucial to prevent tragedies like Upper Big Branch. With federal inspectors already spread thin, these office closures will inevitably lengthen response times, putting miners at further risk, as noted by current miners who fear the ramifications of diminished inspection capabilities.

In light of these challenges, UMW (United Mine Workers) President Cecil Roberts warns that the safety of workers will heavily rely on the will of employers if federal protections are removed. He highlights the historical context of coal mining, where inadequate safety measures and lack of governmental support have led to devastating accidents. The current trajectory under Trump’s administration, characterized by deregulation and hostility toward labor protections, threatens to exacerbate these dangerous conditions.

Trump’s Golf Game Over Fallen Soldiers Sparks Outrage Among Veterans

Military veterans and their families have expressed outrage over President Donald Trump’s decision to skip the dignified transfer of four fallen soldiers in favor of attending a golf event at his Doral Golf Course. Instead of honoring those killed in a training exercise in Lithuania, Trump sent Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to represent him at the ceremony, which many have deemed a deep disrespect to those who serve and sacrifice for the country.

Veterans like Joe Stutler, who served in Desert Storm, voiced their disgust at the president prioritizing a golf event sponsored by the Saudi-backed LIV Golf over honoring the slain soldiers. Stutler noted that while civilian leadership is essential, respect for fallen service members is a fundamental responsibility of the Commander in Chief, which Trump neglects. “This will be remembered in history,” he stated, condemning Trump’s behavior as a disservice to those who served.

Blythe Potter, a military police veteran, expressed her embarrassment at Trump’s actions, believing that the Commander in Chief’s lack of interest in honoring the soldiers reflects poorly on America. “He doesn’t care about our troops dead or alive,” she asserted, highlighting the troubling implications for U.S. international relationships, especially with allied nations like Poland and Lithuania.

Rebekah Sanderlin, the spouse of a retired Army veteran, also empathized with the families of the fallen, lamenting the missed opportunity for the president to provide solace and gratitude during such a somber occasion. “It would have meant a lot to those families to have their Commander in Chief greet our fallen heroes,” she remarked, underlining the honor that comes with such sacrifices.

Army veteran Scott Peoples criticized Trump’s decision to skip the ceremony, asserting that it epitomizes his disregard for military service members. He concluded, “Nothing matters to him other than money, power, and ego,” illustrating a pattern of behavior that has consistently devalued the contributions and sacrifices made by those who serve the nation.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/vets-and-spouses-outraged-over-trump-blowing-off-dignified-transfer-of-slain-soldiers-for-golf-event/)

Part Time President Trump Goes Golfing After Crashing Global Economy

Donald Trump’s recent trip to Doral, Florida, highlights his continued alignment with Saudi-backed interests amidst his domestic challenges. After landing at Miami International Airport, Trump traveled directly to the Trump National Doral, where the controversial LIV Golf event is set to take place from April 4 to 6. The event features golfers such as Brooks Koepta and Bryson DeChambeau, attracting scrutiny due to its financial ties to Saudi Arabia, which is known for multiple human rights violations.

Accompanied by his son Eric Trump, who was seen driving him in a golf cart, Trump’s visit also welcomed Florida Governor Ron DeSantis as a notable guest. Following the dinner at Doral, Trump planned to return to his Mar-a-Lago estate in West Palm Beach and visit the Trump National Golf Club in Jupiter, continuing his pattern of using taxpayer-funded travel to bolster his business ventures while in office.

This trip occurred shortly after Trump made headlines for announcing a new 10% base tariff on imports, a move aimed at generating revenue but criticized for threatening economic stability. Claiming that the U.S. has been “looted” by foreign competitors, Trump dismissed the looming financial repercussions—evidenced by plummeting stock market indices, with the S&P 500 falling by 4.8% and the Dow Jones by over 1,600 points.

Trump’s insistence that the stock market would thrive despite these tariffs is another instance of his disconnection from reality. Most economic experts anticipate long-term negative effects on American markets and consumers rather than the anticipated “boom” Trump touted. This disconnect further illustrates the dangerous level of misinformation coming from the Trump administration.

The implications of Trump’s policies and actions extend beyond financial markets, threatening public safety and national security as well. His focus on personal business interests undermines the integrity of his presidential duties, illustrating the problematic fusion of state and private interests typical of fascist regimes. This pattern not only raises ethical questions but poses real risks for American democracy and the broader global economic landscape.

(h/t: https://www.local10.com/news/local/2025/04/03/trump-flies-from-mia-to-doral-for-golf-tournament-is-set-to-stay-at-mar-a-lago/)

Trump Evades Accountability Over Pentagon’s ‘Signalgate’ Investigation

During a recent press conference aboard Air Force One, President Donald Trump aggressively dismissed a reporter’s inquiry regarding the Pentagon’s inquiry into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of the Signal app for sensitive military communications. The reporter addressed Trump’s responsibility to comment on the ongoing investigation, referred to as “Signalgate,” highlighting the concerning issue at hand.

Trump, seemingly uninterested in the crucial matter, retorted, “Oh, you’re bringing that up again? Don’t bring that up again,” illustrating his tendency to evade accountability and downplay significant issues that reflect the chaotic governance under his administration. Rather than engaging with the subject, Trump redirected the conversation to another unrelated topic.

The investigation, led by Acting Pentagon Inspector General Steven Stebbins, aims to assess whether Hegseth and other Department of Defense personnel adhered to established protocols while utilizing the Signal app to discuss military actions. This investigation is vital given the implications of misusing platforms for confidential military communication.

Adding to the confusion, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt recently declared that the inquiry into this incident had been “closed” from their perspective, despite the ongoing nature of the evaluation highlighted by the Inspector General. This contradictory messaging raises concerns about accountability and transparency within the Trump administration.

The incident encapsulates a broader pattern of dismissiveness and neglect towards serious issues, with Trump and his administration repeatedly failing to address the implications of their actions, especially regarding national security and ethical governance. Such blatant dismissal of critical inquiries only exacerbates fears of governmental incompetence and recklessness.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/dont-bring-that-up-again-trump-scolds-reporter-for-asking-question-about-signalgate/)

Trump Targets Brown University with $510 Million Funding Cuts to Shape Anti-DEI Agenda

The Trump administration is poised to cut over $510 million in federal contracts and grants to Brown University, targeting a series of Ivy League institutions due to their responses to allegations of antisemitism. This decision reflects a broader campaign against universities following pro-Palestinian protests, with the White House signaling a crackdown on what it perceives as insufficient responses to Jewish student safety.

A White House official, speaking anonymously, confirmed that Brown would be significantly affected, echoing similar actions taken against Princeton University just days prior. The impending funding cuts come amidst federal investigations into numerous educational institutions accused of fostering antisemitic environments, primarily targeting elite universities. Previously, Columbia University lost $400 million in federal support and faced demands to revise its campus policies and oversight of its Middle East studies program.

Brown University’s Provost, Frank Doyle, acknowledged awareness of the “troubling rumors” regarding potential funding losses but emphasized a lack of substantiating information at present. The aggressive stance adopted by the Trump administration aims to shift the narrative surrounding campus antisemitism, harshly criticizing former President Biden for allegedly being lenient towards universities implicated in these matters.

The Trump administration has dangled the threat of funding loss not just as punitive measures but also as political leverage in an increasingly contentious cultural war. It’s clear that these funding decisions are intricately tied to broader Republican efforts to align educational policies with their ideological agenda, effectively weaponizing federal funds against institutions they view as non-compliant.

This tactic raises significant concerns about the politicization of federal funding and the implications for academic freedom across leading universities in America. The Trump administration’s systematic targeting of educational institutions illustrates a dangerous precedent wherein educational oversight converges with partisanship, undermining the integrity of academic discourse in the U.S.

Trump Mandates Schools Certify Against DEI for Federal Funds

The Trump administration has instituted a new requirement for K-12 schools to certify compliance with federal civil rights laws as a condition for receiving federal funding. This mandate represents a blatant move to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices in educational institutions. Schools have been given just 10 days to sign and return a certification notice sent by the Education Department, highlighting the urgency and severity of this directive.

The administration’s acting assistant secretary for civil rights, Craig Trainor, claims that many educational institutions have disregarded their legal responsibilities by employing DEI programs in a manner that allegedly discriminates against certain groups. He stated, “Federal financial assistance is a privilege, not a right,” framing this new policy as a necessary oversight to protect against what the administration describes as illegal favoritism.

This certification process entails an acknowledgment from school and state leaders that their federal support hinges on adherence to specific legal guidelines outlined by the administration. According to the notification, any DEI practices that could favor one race over another violate federal law and could jeopardize critical funding. Schools that do not comply risk losing their federal financial assistance, including Title I funding, which is crucial for low-income areas, affecting billions in educational support.

Moreover, the Education Department has explicitly threatened legal repercussions for noncompliance, emphasizing that institutions can be held liable under the False Claims Act. This aggressive stance follows a memo issued earlier that declared any school policies differentiating treatment based on race as illegal. The administration continues to maintain that such policies unfairly disadvantage white and Asian American students.

This latest initiative by the Trump administration to undermine DEI policies is part of a broader Republican agenda aimed at dismantling diversity initiatives across various sectors. By wielding federal funding as leverage, the administration seeks to impose its discriminatory beliefs on K-12 education, fundamentally reshaping the American educational landscape in an anti-diversity direction.

(h/t: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/schools-trump-washington-education-department-republican-b2726971.html)

Trump Fires National Security Staff After Meeting with White Supremacist Laura Loomer

In a disturbing display of loyalty to extremist ideologies, multiple staff members of the National Security Council were fired following a meeting between President Donald Trump and far-right activist Laura Loomer. This meeting, held in the Oval Office, involved Loomer questioning the commitment of certain staffers to Trump’s agenda, which is increasingly aligned with white supremacist and fascist rhetoric.

The fired staffers include Brian Walsh, Thomas Boodry, and David Feith, all of whom had served under Trump’s administration. Their dismissal follows Loomer’s claims that some personnel were insufficiently aligned with Trump’s extreme vision. Loomer’s presence in the Oval Office, and her influence over national security matters, raises grave concerns about the political integrity of the Trump administration.

Loomer took to social media to discuss her meeting with Trump, describing it as an “honor” and insisting on the necessity of strong vetting within the National Security Council to safeguard national security. Her radical views, including promoting conspiracy theories and fostering division, underline the dangers of allowing such individuals access to decision-making power at the highest levels of government.

The meeting, which also included Trump’s chief of staff Susie Wiles and national security adviser Mike Waltz, exemplifies a trend in Trump’s administration to purge individuals perceived as insufficiently loyal to his increasingly radicalized agenda. This reflects a broader push by Trump and his allies to consolidate power through the removal of dissenting voices.

The implications of this purge extend beyond staff changes; they indicate an alarming shift towards an official endorsement of discriminatory and extremist views within the federal apparatus, further entwining Trump’s presidency with the ideologies of white supremacy and authoritarianism.

1 2 3 … 45