Trump’s Attack on Endangered Species Act Harms Wildlife
The Trump administration has proposed a drastic change to the Endangered Species Act, looking to redefine “harm” in a way that would significantly weaken legal protections for vulnerable species. This move seeks to narrow the definition so that only direct actions causing the killing or injury of endangered species qualify as harm. This shift would disregard a pivotal 1995 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which established that harm includes substantial habitat modification or degradation. Conservationists insist that this proposal would threaten the survival of many species, including those dependent on specific habitats.
The redefinition under consideration would remove the current prohibition against habitat destruction, which is critical for species like the northern spotted owl and red-legged frog. Under the proposed rule, actions like logging in old-growth forest areas or filling wetlands would not be considered harmful unless they involve direct harm to the animals themselves, such as shooting or injuring them. This change aligns with the Trump administration’s ongoing agenda to prioritize economic growth over environmental protections, effectively catering to corporate interests while jeopardizing biodiversity.
Noah Greenwald from the Center for Biological Diversity stated that the proposal could “fundamentally upend how we’ve been protecting endangered species in this country.” The implications are alarming; if finalized, this shift would create an environment ripe for exploitation by industries such as timber, thereby accelerating the decline of already threatened species. With the northern spotted owl facing a perilous decline, the new regulation could act as a final blow, hindering recovery efforts and endangering their future.
The proposed change also appears to be part of a broader Trump administration strategy aimed at increasing resource extraction on public lands. Recently, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins mandated the opening of roughly 112.5 million acres of national forest land for increased logging. Coupled with other aggressive actions to expand energy production, this move demonstrates a blatant disregard for environmental stewardship.