Stop The Donald Trump

He's a fascist, authoritarian, racist, sexist, and the former Republican President of the United States of America.

This site is a database of over 4,000 articles of every controversial statement made by Donald Trump and to help you when debating family, friends, and strangers on why this man is the most dangerous candidate and president this country has ever seen.

You can search for articles, or find a set of articles from a categorized list.

Under "Rebuttals" you can also find in-depth articles reviewing the policies of Donald Trump and how they can help or (most likely) harm you.

Chancellor Merz Rebukes Trump’s D-Day Remarks on Nazi Defeat

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz strongly challenged President Donald Trump after the latter remarked that D-Day was “not a great day” for Germany. This statement came during a press conference in the Oval Office, where the leaders discussed cooperation to address the ongoing war in Ukraine and its implications.

In his response, Merz pointed out the significance of June 6, marking the anniversary of D-Day, a pivotal moment when Allied forces defeated Nazi Germany. Merz emphasized that this defeat ultimately led to the liberation of Germany from the Nazi dictatorship, acknowledging the role of the United States in this historical event.

Merz articulated a shared commitment to bringing the current war in Ukraine to an end, stressing the necessity of collaborative efforts between the U.S. and Germany. He urged Trump to recognize the potential for American leadership in mitigating the ongoing conflict, while also underscoring Germany’s support for Ukraine and the need for increased pressure on Russia.

Trump’s dismissive comments about such a significant historical event demonstrate a troubling ignorance regarding the consequences of World War II and the liberation from fascism. His failure to recognize the context and gravitas of D-Day reflects a broader disregard for historical lessons, which is concerning for U.S.-German relations.

This incident showcases the alarming tendencies within Trump’s rhetoric that undermine democratic values and the legacy of international cooperation in favor of a distorted view of history that aligns with nationalist sentiments. It stands as a reminder of the risks posed by leaders who trivialize pivotal moments of liberation and democracy.

(h/t: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/german-chancellor-objects-when-trump-cracks-that-nazi-defeat-was-not-a-great-day-for-germany/)

Trump’s Baseless Claims Against Biden Aim to Disrupt Democracy and Distract from Republican Failures

Former President Donald Trump has intensified his unfounded claims that President Joe Biden’s aides illegally utilized autopens to execute executive orders, asserting that Biden was not truly in charge during his presidency. Trump’s allegations lack concrete evidence, yet he described the situation as potentially “the biggest scandal maybe in the last 100 years.” This rhetoric came amidst his directive for the Justice Department to investigate Biden’s purported cognitive abilities during his time in office.

In a chaotic Oval Office session, Trump suggested that the use of autopens was a significant violation, claiming it allowed unnamed individuals to impose radical policies without Biden’s awareness. Despite Biden decisively denying these allegations and confirming his authorship of executive orders, Trump maintained that the president had little grasp of governance. The legal counsel of the Justice Department has previously affirmed that using autopens for signing documents is lawful, but Trump distorted this fact to create panic around Biden’s capability to govern.

Biden responded to Trump’s claims by asserting that they serve as a distraction from the pressing issues facing American communities. He emphasized the stark reality of his decision-making authority during his presidency, refuting Trump’s insinuations of negligence. In his statement, Biden criticized Trump’s actions as an attempt to divert attention from disastrous Republican-led legislation targeting essential social programs while providing tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy.

Adding to the controversy, Republican figures like Senators Eric Schmitt and John Cornyn plan to convene a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing focused on Biden’s mental state, reflecting a concerted effort to undermine the current administration. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer has also subpoenaed Biden’s physician, signaling a blatant attempt at political maneuvering through unsubstantiated claims of cognitive decline.

Trump’s dialogue around these issues is emblematic of a broader trend among Republicans, utilizing incendiary allegations without factual basis in a strategy aimed at destabilizing the Biden presidency. As Trump continues rhetoric that undermines democratic processes and facts, it becomes increasingly evident that his tactics align more with distraction than constructive political discourse.

Trump’s Assault on Harvard: International Student Admissions Under Threat

President Donald Trump has intensified his anti-Harvard campaign by issuing an order that effectively bars international students from studying at the university, claiming it is due to alleged national security concerns. This directive adds another layer to Trump’s ongoing conflict with Harvard and aligns with his administration’s broader agenda of targeting academic institutions critical of his policies.

Alongside preventing new international student admissions, Trump has authorized Secretary of State Marco Rubio to begin revoking existing visas for foreign students already enrolled at Harvard. Trump’s assertions that Harvard has not disclosed information regarding “known illegal activity” purportedly tied to international students signal an attempt to undermine the university’s autonomy.

The Trump administration previously expressed intentions to interfere with Harvard’s enrollment of foreign students. However, a federal judge blocked these efforts, highlighting the illegality of the administration’s interference with academic processes. Harvard has pushed back against Trump’s claims, defending their commitment to protecting their international student body amidst what they characterize as retaliatory actions from the White House.

Furthermore, Trump previously threatened to strip Harvard of over $2 billion in federal funding unless the university altered its admissions and disciplinary policies. This retaliation seems to stem from Trump’s perceptions of the institution’s response to protests related to antisemitism. The refusal of Harvard to comply with such demands has made it a target of punitive measures from the Trump administration.

Critics, including Lawrence Summers, former professor and Secretary of the Treasury, have condemned Trump’s actions as “punitive extortion,” arguing that they undermine the integrity and contribution of academic institutions to the national economy. They caution that such an approach could alienate allies and hinder America’s global competitiveness in scientific and educational fields.

Trump’s New Travel Ban Targets 12 Countries Citing Security

In a recent proclamation, U.S. President Donald Trump has banned nationals from 12 countries, asserting that these measures are essential for national security. The countries affected by this prohibition include Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Additionally, Trump has imposed partial travel restrictions on seven other nations: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. The order goes into effect on June 9, 2025, at 12:01 am EDT, although visas issued prior to this date will not be revoked.

In a video announcing the ban, Trump declared, “We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm.” The newly restricted countries were chosen based on their alleged “large-scale presence of terrorists,” lack of cooperation on visa security, and deficiencies in verifying the identities of travelers. Trump’s rationale reflects a continuity of his administration’s hardline immigration stance, harking back to his earlier bans on travelers from predominantly Muslim countries.

The decision follows a recent incident in Boulder, Colorado, where a gasoline bomb was thrown at pro-Israel demonstrators by an Egyptian national, underscoring Trump’s claim of a national security threat, despite Egypt not being on the restricted list. Trump’s broader immigration policies aim to intensify security vetting of foreigners seeking admission to the U.S. and suggest additional potential restrictions could come in the future.

In response, countries like Somalia and Venezuela have expressed concern. Somalia’s ambassador indicated a desire for dialogue to address the security issues raised by the ban. Conversely, Venezuelan officials accused the U.S. of pursuing a fascistic agenda and warned their citizens of the dangers they could face in the U.S., highlighting the broader implications Trump’s policies have not only on travel and immigration but also on international relations.

This latest prohibition reflects Trump’s ongoing focus on a security-first approach to immigration, a policy style that has been criticized as reactionary and inherently discriminatory. Critics argue that these moves reaffirm a pattern of exclusion and discrimination against countries that do not align with Trump’s political narrative, exacerbating divisions and fostering anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States.

(h/t: https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-signs-proclamation-banning-travel-12-countries-cbs-news-reports-2025-06-04/)

Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s Evasive Responses Risk Educational Integrity Amid Trump-Era Revisions

Education Secretary Linda McMahon has remained evasive regarding the teaching of the 2020 presidential election results during a recent House Education and Workforce Committee hearing. When pressed by Democratic Rep. Summer Lee on whether teaching that Joe Biden won the election constitutes “illegal DEI” (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) practices under threats from the Trump administration, McMahon failed to provide a direct answer and emphasized the need for accurate social studies education.

During the exchange, Lee highlighted significant historical events and figures, such as the Tulsa race massacre and Ruby Bridges, but McMahon’s unfamiliarity with these topics raised concerns about her qualifications for the position. Her responses — or lack thereof — suggested a troubling disconnect from fundamental aspects of American history, which could reflect a broader agenda to undermine educational integrity.

The hearing was particularly contentious as it also touched on new education standards in places like Oklahoma, which echo Trump’s unfounded claims about election fraud. These standards require students to question the legitimacy of the 2020 election, further perpetuating the misinformation that has defined much of Trump’s influence in education policy.

McMahon has been advocating for drastic budget cuts to the Department of Education, seeking a substantial reduction that could negatively impact educational resources for lower-income families and rural students. This push aligns with Trump’s broader agenda to weaken educational oversight and promote a curriculum that aligns with his and his administration’s narratives.

The implications of McMahon’s ambiguous stance, combined with the proposed cuts and the push for a distorted educational narrative, reflect a systematic attempt to manipulate educational content to serve a political ideology. This effort not only jeopardizes the integrity of the education system but also threatens the foundation of democracy by propagating misinformation to the next generation.

Trump Administration Delays Key Farm Trade Report Over Deficit

Officials within the Trump administration suppressed a key farm trade report that forecasted an increase in the country’s trade deficit, a document that contradicted President Trump’s claims regarding the success of his economic policies and tariffs. The decision to delay the publication of this vital analysis demonstrates the administration’s preference for controlling information, particularly when it conflicts with their narrative that tariffs would diminish trade imbalances.

The report, which was officially released but redacted, contained data showing a projected trade deficit for farm goods rising to a record $49.5 billion, up from a previous estimate of $49 billion. This sharp increase is significant, particularly as it contradicts long-standing Republican rhetoric that blames the Democratic administration for failing to support U.S. agriculture exports. Historical reliance on these reports underlines the importance of objective data in shaping trade policies, making the decision to delay publication a breach of public trust.

USDA spokesperson Alec Varsamis attributed the postponement to an internal review process, suggesting bureaucratic reasons rather than political motivations. However, former USDA chief economist Joe Glauber emphasized the crucial need for objectivity in such reports, warning that the erosion of trust could have detrimental effects on public reliance on government data.

The implications of this delay are far-reaching, as farmers navigate a challenging economic backdrop evident from shrinking foreign markets and heightened inflation. With Trump’s administration pushing controversial tariffs on China and other trading partners, the resulting uncertainty only adds to the difficulties faced by agricultural producers. Critics of the administration’s handling of trade clearly point to the inconsistency in policy and communication, which places the interests of wealthy elites above those of working Americans.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has continued to advocate for Trump’s tariffs, framing them as necessary for fair trade, yet the reality depicted in the now-suppressed report is of an industry under pressure. As the administration seeks to mask the unfavorable data, questions of ethics and transparency loom, spotlighting a troubling trend in the manipulation of government information for political gain.

(h/t: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/04/trump-officials-farm-product-trade-deficit-forecast-00382549)

Trump’s Reckless Tariffs and Misguided Demands are Ruining the Economy

Former President Donald Trump has intensified his attacks on Jerome Powell, the current Chair of the Federal Reserve, urging for his “immediate termination” due to Powell’s reluctance to cut interest rates in response to Trump’s misguided economic policies. This criticism came in light of a recently released ADP report indicating the lowest number of private-sector jobs created in over two years, a figure Trump seems to misinterpret as a reason for drastic monetary policy changes.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump expressed frustration over current interest rates, asserting, “Too Late Powell must now LOWER THE RATE.” His claims are unfounded, as Powell has highlighted the necessity of stable policies before implementing significant rate changes, especially amid the fluctuations caused by Trump’s reckless tariffs.

The May ADP report revealed only 37,000 new jobs were added, falling short of the expected 60,000, and marking a stark decrease from previous figures. Despite this, Powell remains cautious, indicating that lowering rates hastily could further destabilize the economy. Trump’s reaction, blaming Powell for economic issues stemming from his own administration’s policies, exemplifies a profound misunderstanding of economic fundamentals.

Trump’s public vilification of Powell has included derogatory remarks, calling him a “fool” and denouncing any meaningful dialogue, which reflects a broader trend within his party to scapegoat economic indicators rather than address the underlying issues of their failed policies. Powell’s cautious approach stands in stark contrast to Trump’s impulsive and self-serving directives.

This reliance on aggressive tariffs and the demand for lower interest rates displays not only Trump’s failure to grasp economic principles but also his insistent push towards a populist facade that ultimately benefits the wealthy elite at the expense of working-class Americans. Rather than accepting accountability, Trump continues to promote harmful economic choices that threaten the financial stability of the nation.

Trump Administration Purges Education Board in Politically Charged Move Against Research Integrity

The Trump Administration recently dismissed all 13 members of the National Board for Education Sciences (NBES), all appointed by Biden, highlighting a politically motivated attack on an essential federal education research body. This purge occurred on May 23, 2025, and comes as part of an ongoing strategy to undermine the Department of Education and dismantle its crucial functions.

The NBES was established by Congress in 2002 to guide the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) in shaping a $900 million research agenda aimed at improving educational outcomes and closing achievement gaps. However, the new leadership under Trump and Education Secretary Linda McMahon has shifted focus away from research integrity and into a narrative of alleged partisan influence, justifying these firings by claiming failures in student performance and excessive spending on research contracts.

Madi Biedermann, a spokesperson for the Education Department, stated that the board’s priorities were misaligned and cited poor results from the Nation’s Report Card as a measure of their purported failings. These claims, however, are largely viewed as a facade to mask a broader objective to politicize educational research and suppress diversity and inclusion efforts in schools.

Former NBES member Shaun Harper expressed outrage at the allegations, firmly denying any misconduct or political bias within the board’s activities. Harper noted their commitment as educators and researchers was solely to advance beneficial policies for democracy, contrary to the Administration’s mischaracterization. He further warned that dismantling the board without appropriate replacements would exacerbate educational inequities, particularly for underserved populations.

This significant shakeup raises concerns over the future of the IES and the integrity of educational research in America. As crucial contracts for long-term educational studies are canceled and insights into family dynamics and student needs diminish, students from marginalized groups face an increased risk of educational neglect. Trump’s systematic dismantling of the department not only undermines academic research but fundamentally threatens the principles of equity and access to quality education.

Trump’s Disastrous Disaster Relief Mismanagement Exposed

The Biden administration has revealed serious communication failures regarding federal disaster relief efforts, specifically citing President Donald Trump’s unpredictable and haphazard approach. In recent incidents, the White House has approved significant assistance for states without informing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), leading to frustrating delays in aid distribution.

In a striking example, millions in aid was approved for Virginia in response to severe winter storms, yet FEMA was not notified until days later. As a result, communities in urgent need of resources faced unnecessary waiting periods, demonstrating a dangerous pattern of disorganization that could worsen with the current hurricane season looming. Traditionally, FEMA plays a crucial role in coordinating disaster relief, but under Trump, this collaboration has diminished greatly.

The lack of a structured communication process has left state officials, including Republican leaders, exasperated. With urgent timelines for assistance in disaster recovery at stake, the failure to promptly relay this information not only hinders FEMA’s efficiency but also endangers lives by delaying the relief that hard-hit communities desperately require. One FEMA official highlighted that such delays “prevent FEMA from fulfilling its statutory roles,” creating further chaos during emergencies.

Moreover, the Trump administration has indicated a shift in how disaster aid is determined, potentially complicating future requests. The President now insists that he is not obligated to heed FEMA’s recommendations, which have historically been based on data and verified methodologies for assessing disaster needs. These developments raise alarms around an already strained agency grappling with staff shortages and uncertain leadership.

The confluence of bureaucratic turmoil within FEMA, Trump’s unpredictability, and the lack of solid disaster response plans threatens to undermine effective disaster management at a time when climate catastrophes are increasing in frequency and intensity. With senior agency officials resigning out of frustration and morale declining, this administration’s handling of federal disaster assistance reveals a systematic dismantling of critical support systems for the American people.

(h/t: https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/04/politics/fema-white-house-disaster-relief-funds)

Trump Administration Rescinds Emergency Abortion Guidance Threatening Women’s Health

The Trump administration has officially rescinded guidance from the Biden era that required hospitals to perform necessary emergency abortions. This decision comes after the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade, leading to the dismantling of federal protections for abortion rights. The now-revoked guidance was issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in July 2022, underlining that under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), hospitals are obligated to offer stabilizing medical treatment, including abortion, to patients facing emergency medical situations.

The EMTALA mandates that all patients must receive emergency care, regardless of their ability to pay. Hospitals that neglect to provide essential stabilizing care may face civil penalties. The guidance aimed to ensure that women could still access abortions when their health or that of their unborn child was at risk due to medical emergencies like ectopic pregnancies or severe pregnancy complications. However, the Trump administration’s recent move indicates a troubling shift away from these protections.

In a press release, HHS and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) clarified that the rescinded guidance does not reflect the current administration’s policy. CMS promised to uphold EMTALA and its enforcement for all individuals seeking emergency treatment, ostensibly reassuring that hospitals would still be obligated to provide care. Yet, the erasure of the guidance raises serious concerns about the future of abortion access under the Trump administration.

Abortion rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have vocally criticized this rollback, arguing that it shifts the administration’s stance towards its anti-abortion allies and jeopardizes women’s health. Alexa Kolbi-Molinas of the ACLU condemned the decision, asserting that it prioritizes political agendas over the urgent medical needs of women, potentially endangering lives. This rhetoric highlights the immediate consequences of the administration’s actions on reproductive health and rights.

The rescission of the Biden-era guidance underscores a wider trend of hostility towards reproductive rights under Trump’s leadership. Legal challenges have previously emerged against the Biden guidance, including a federal appeals court ruling denying Texas hospitals the obligation to perform emergency abortions. Furthermore, the Department of Justice’s dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Idaho’s near-total abortion ban illustrates a broader pattern of undermining women’s rights, reinforcing the notion that the Trump administration continues to align with regressive policies that threaten health care access for vulnerable populations.

1 2 3 … 443