Trump Flips Out at Gas Companies Over ‘Illegal’ Gouging

President Donald Trump demanded that gasoline retailers immediately slash prices to approximately $2.50 per gallon, accusing them of “totally illegal” price gouging in a Monday Truth Social post. Trump claimed that with crude oil around $68-70 per barrel, significantly lower than the $100+ levels following his Iran war, gas stations were not passing savings to consumers, and warned of “big problems ahead” if retailers did not comply.

The national average gas price stood at $3.86 per gallon as of Monday, down from peaks near $4.50 in recent months. The U.S. and Israel initiated military action against Iran in February, prompting Iran to effectively block the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of global oil transits; a tenuous ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran is currently in effect. Trump previously claimed his administration was conducting a “big investigation” into pricing practices by major oil companies including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP.

Last week, Chevron CFO Eimear Bonner stated that a lag exists between crude oil price declines and retail pump prices, with reductions expected as market conditions normalize. Trump has repeatedly downplayed the impact of his military actions on energy costs, telling reporters in May that gas prices represented “peanuts” and assuring the public the situation would not persist long.

Trump’s current demand contradicts his prior messaging and mischaracterizes how energy markets function. By framing market dynamics as criminal behavior and threatening retailers with unspecified consequences, he attempts to leverage presidential power to dictate prices without acknowledging his own foreign policy decisions that disrupted global oil supplies and contributed to price volatility.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-flips-out-at-gas-companies-over-totally-illegal-gouging-drop-your-price/)al oil supplies and contributed to price volatility.

Trump Celebrates Supreme Court Ruling Expanding Presidential Firing Power

Donald Trump celebrated a Supreme Court ruling that expanded presidential authority to fire Federal Trade Commission (FTC) commissioners, claiming the decision overturned 90 years of precedent and "greatly increasing Presidential Power." Trump had fired Biden-appointee Rebecca Slaughter from the FTC in 2025, citing her service as "inconsistent with the Administration's priorities," and the Court's 6-3 decision on Monday upheld his authority to do so.

In a separate ruling, the Supreme Court limited Trump's power by preventing him from firing Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, preserving the central bank's independence from executive removal authority. Trump had fired Cook in August after Federal Housing Finance Agency chief Bill Pulte accused her of mortgage fraud; Cook has denied the charge. Trump vowed to pursue "appropriate action immediately" and claimed Cook committed "wrongdoing," while Pulte, now interim head of the Department of National Intelligence, reiterated his belief that Cook "will be indicted for mortgage fraud."

It's important to note that Trump has falsely claimed mail-in voting is "really dishonest"; it is a legitimate voting method used by legitimate voters, including Trump himself.

All evidence shows fraud rates are tiny. He also falsely described what Jimmy Carter and a Carter-led 2005 commission said about mail-in ballots. Carter didn't say "you can't have them," and the commission didn't declare cheating inevitable. Additionally, Trump falsely claimed, "We're the only nation that does birthright citizenship," though about three dozen countries provide automatic citizenship to people born on their soil.

CNN's Paula Reid explained the split outcome, noting that the FTC ruling favored Trump because the agency operates within the Executive branch, while the Federal Reserve maintains independence as a separate entity. The decisions represent conflicting judicial positions on the scope of presidential removal powers, with the Court granting Trump greater control over executive agencies while constraining his authority over the Fed.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-takes-victory-lap-over-supreme-court-case-greatly-increasing-presidential-power/)

Supreme Court Lets Border Agents Strip Green Cards Without Proof

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority, led by Justice Clarence Thomas, ruled 6-3 that border officers may deny reentry to green card holders based on unproven criminal allegations without requiring “clear and convincing evidence” of actual wrongdoing. The decision strips lawful permanent residents of foundational due process protections and empowers border agents to treat returning green card holders as “applicants for admission” vulnerable to detention and removal on mere suspicion, even if convictions occur only after their return or result in acquittal.

The case involved Muk Choi Lau, a Chinese national and lawful permanent resident since 2007, who was arrested in 2012 for allegedly selling counterfeit goods and briefly left the U.S. Upon return, immigration officers declared him inadmissible based on pending charges. A federal appeals court had previously required “clear and convincing evidence” of an actual crime before changing his status, but the Supreme Court overturned that protection Tuesday. Lau ultimately pleaded guilty in 2013 and was ordered removed, but the ruling’s scope extends far beyond his case.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent condemned the majority for handing the government a “massive blank check” to rewrite immigration law and circumvent statutory protections. She warned that green card holders face potential years in legal limbo or detention even if later acquitted, as the sequencing of charging before conviction or conviction before hearing fundamentally contradicts the plain terms of immigration statutes. The ruling violates the rights of lawful permanent residents who have already cleared security vetting to establish their status.

This decision amplifies the Trump administration’s coordinated assault on legal immigration pathways, executed by Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and immigration officials who have transformed agencies into loyalty enforcement arms of the mass deportation campaign. A federal judge recently found that USCIS policies unlawfully discriminated against asylum seekers, green card applicants, and citizenship candidates “solely by the happenstance of their birth,” using purported national security concerns that “mask anti-immigrant sentiments” to justify sweeping removal actions leaving thousands in legal limbo.

Concurrent efforts target additional legal immigration protections, including attempts to strip Temporary Protected Status from over one million immigrants and accelerated citizenship revocation proceedings against naturalized Americans. The administration also unlawfully terminated status for tens of thousands who used a Biden-era appointment app at the U.S.-Mexico border, a determination a federal judge made earlier this year. Combined with Tuesday’s Supreme Court green card ruling, these actions dismantle legal immigration infrastructure while operating under false claims that enforcement targets only the “worst of the worst.”



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/supreme-court-green-card-immigration-ruling-b3005036.html)

Trump White House Secretly Pressured Board Protecting Federal Workers

The Trump administration orchestrated a covert pressure campaign on the Merit Systems Protection Board, a federal agency designed to shield civil service employees from arbitrary dismissal, resulting in a March ruling that dismantled decades of precedent protecting federal workers. The board's decision accepted the White House's constitutional theory that President Trump possesses sweeping authority to remove officials without due process, effectively erasing civil service protections for federal employees, including immigration judges whose legal duties often conflict with Trump's political objectives. This ruling represents a deliberate dismantling of the most effective mechanism federal workers possess to contest wrongful termination.

The pressure campaign, led by a White House aide dedicated to expediting federal worker terminations, operated through both public and private channels in ways that parallel direct judicial coercion. By compelling the board to abandon established legal standards, the Trump administration weaponized a protective agency into a tool for authoritarian control over the federal workforce. The board's reversal of longstanding doctrine signals the administration's systematic effort to consolidate executive power and eliminate institutional checks on presidential authority.

This decision implements the "unitary executive" theory, a cornerstone of Trump's governing philosophy that concentrates all executive branch power in the presidency, allowing Trump to direct federal prosecutors, immigration judges, and other officials whose professional independence once constrained his political agenda. The administration has already moved to measure HHS employees' performance based on demonstrable loyalty to Trump's policies, illustrating the practical application of this authority. The ruling defangs the primary legal recourse available to federal workers challenging unlawful dismissals.

Though the board's decision does not directly affect pending Supreme Court cases on presidential power over the civil service, its precedent could devastate protections for vast segments of the federal workforce if upheld on appeal. The timing and methodology of this ruling reveal the administration's calculated assault on institutional independence, transforming independent agencies into compliance mechanisms for Trump's consolidation of power.

(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/28/us/politics/trump-firings-workers-merit-systems-protection-board.html)

Trump, 80, Wants to Run for President Again | The New Republic

At a Pennsylvania rally on June 23, 2026, President Donald Trump publicly floated running for a third presidential term, stating “Maybe we should run again” and “I’d like to do it,” despite the Constitution explicitly prohibiting more than two terms. Trump has repeatedly referenced third-term ambitions, previously stating he is “not joking” about the prospect, and has discussed the scenario with his lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who is writing a book exploring that outcome. The Trump Organization capitalizes on this messaging by selling “Trump 2028” hats for $55, up from $50 the previous year.

Trump’s claims about his military achievements and Iran’s capabilities directly contradict statements he made days earlier. At the same Pennsylvania rally, Trump declared that the U.S. had left Iran with “no Navy, no Air Force, no antiaircraft, no missile capability, no nuclear program,” and claimed Americans could “fly over Tehran just at will.” However, Iran maintains active naval units controlling the Strait of Hormuz, retains its nuclear energy program and development capacity, operates aging aircraft, and possesses substantial ballistic missile capabilities, according to New York Times reporting from May 2026. Trump himself acknowledged Iran’s missile arsenal at the G7 summit the previous week, stating other nations have missiles and questioning why he should disarm Iran while allowing Saudi Arabia to retain its arsenal.

Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, facing federal fraud and bribery charges in Brooklyn under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, met privately with Donald Trump Jr. in November 2024 in Ahmedabad, India. Seven months later, in May 2025, the Department of Justice abruptly dropped all charges against Adani, with prosecutors citing prosecutorial discretion in a brief filing. Trump Jr.’s spokesperson denied the meeting had “zero to do” with the DOJ’s decision, though the substance of their discussion remains undisclosed. The dismissal triggered an immediate market surge in Adani’s companies, temporarily elevating him to Asia’s wealthiest person.

Federal law enforcement deployed AI-powered surveillance towers at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in response to Trump’s unsubstantiated vandalism claims. Trump has alleged that vandals inflicted a progressively enlarging gash on the pool’s floor, expanding his claims from 250 feet on Saturday to 300 feet by Monday to 350 feet by Tuesday, yet has refused to provide photographs or evidence despite claiming the Interior Department possesses video documentation. CBS News inspectors found no evidence of any such damage, and Trump has directed over $16 million in renovations to the pool, which deteriorated again within days, now requiring additional drainage and repairs at unknown cost to taxpayers.

Trump has ordered the arrest of six individuals accused of vandalizing the pool, deploying sophisticated surveillance infrastructure including AI-powered audio alerts, strobes, and spotlights that automatically detect and deter alleged threats. The escalation at the memorial follows Trump’s contentious history with the landmark, including blaming vandalism and ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl for pool deterioration and self-congratulating the renovation project while concealing structural failures underlying its rapid decline.



(Source: https://newrepublic.com/post/212242/trump-80-third-term-president-pennsylvania-lehigh-valley?utm_campaign=SF_TNR&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleASpSJxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeQasl5O59yGmesAb4GJZyNREQYGh2KBJBS2Rgp-wAMsFgdw_cmcIWqqCwul4_aem_Q1yHw0AWtEyNN97VXNycRA)elf-congratulating the renovation project while concealing structural failures underlying its rapid decline.

Trump EPA Taps Hildebrand Lobbyist to Dismantle Methane Rules

Oil billionaire Jeffery Hildebrand, a major Trump donor, received a White House summons in January after Trump ordered the military raid capturing Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. At the East Room meeting, Trump pressed Hildebrand and two dozen other energy executives to commit $100 billion to Venezuela’s oil industry, and Hildebrand pledged Hilcorp’s involvement despite having no significant operations outside the U.S. Hildebrand’s willingness to demonstrate loyalty reflects his strategic positioning as Trump has begun dismantling Biden-era methane regulations that would have cost his company substantially.

Hildebrand’s Hilcorp owns roughly 11,000 wells across the U.S., primarily “stripper wells” that produce minimal oil and gas but release vast quantities of methane, a greenhouse gas 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide. Though stripper wells generate only 6 percent of U.S. oil and gas output, scientists estimate they account for roughly half the sector’s methane emissions due to minimal monitoring and deteriorating infrastructure. A satellite detected a massive methane plume from a Hilcorp well in New Mexico in June 2024 discharging at 199 kilograms per hour, roughly 12 times the well’s typical daily output, with seven of eight Hilcorp sites visited by Earthworks investigators showing evidence of leaks.

Trump has placed a former Hilcorp lobbyist in a top Environmental Protection Agency position overseeing efforts to dismantle the Biden administration’s aggressive methane restrictions. ProPublica’s investigation found the lobbyist is soliciting input from oil industry trade groups backed by Hildebrand as the administration moves to unravel rules that would have imposed steep compliance costs on Hilcorp. The rollback will provide sweeping relief for the nation’s 700,000 stripper wells while shifting climate costs onto society, as methane contributes one-third of global temperature rise since the Industrial Revolution.

Hildebrand’s rise from modest Texas origins to a $15 billion fortune rests on what analysts call the “dung beetle model,” acquiring aging wells at low cost and slashing expenses to maintain profitability. Environmental records show Hilcorp accumulated dozens of violations over the past decade, including a Cook Inlet pipeline rupture in Alaska that spewed methane for nearly four months in 2016. Penalties rarely exceeded $500,000, with analysts characterizing enforcement fines as routine operating costs rather than meaningful deterrence.

Unlike carbon dioxide, which persists in the atmosphere for centuries, methane breaks down in roughly a dozen years, making methane reductions the most effective near-term climate lever available. Stanford researcher Rob Jackson stated that curbing oil and gas methane emissions offers “the best bang for our buck” in fighting global warming, as existing technology is viable and cost-effective. Hildebrand’s transformation into a major Trump donor in 2024 directly followed the Biden administration’s methane restrictions, positioning him to recoup losses through regulatory rollback rather than operational changes.



(Source: https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-epa-methane-jeffery-hildebrand-hilcorp-oil-regulations?utm_campaign=propublica-sprout&utm_content=1781863145&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcASk-2RleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEew_BzskPcQgTl7GpCk52X3GzIB58MLw0LeGYyiqZyGQYou_R_uJFWqE1CGD8_aem_NkX6som_m3wKpWj623tbYA)

DOJ Defies Judge’s Oath Demand on Trump Weaponization Fund

The Justice Department defied a federal judge’s order on Friday by refusing to swear under oath that Trump’s nearly $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund” is dead. Judge Leonie Brinkema had given the administration a seven-day deadline to declare, under penalty of perjury, that the fund would not proceed. Instead, DOJ attorneys claimed the oath requirement violated “separation of powers,” rejecting the judge’s explicit demand.

The fund, announced in May by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche following a Trump-IRS settlement, was designed to compensate individuals claiming “weaponization and lawfare” by the federal government. Lawmakers and watchdogs immediately flagged that the $1.776 billion would likely flow to Trump’s political allies and supporters, with no genuine safeguards against partisan abuse. After public backlash, Blanche told House lawmakers in June the fund was “not moving forward, ever,” yet the administration has continued to dodge court accountability through written oath.

Democracy Forward, representing plaintiffs challenging the fund, characterized the DOJ’s filing as proof of evasion. “It is telling that even after the federal court gave them a week, the Acting Attorney General and other senior administration officials continue to refuse to say under oath that the Slush Fund is dead,” said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of the organization. The DOJ’s refusal to commit in writing contradicts its public assurances and signals the fund’s legal status remains unresolved despite official denials.

DOJ counsel Andrew Block argued that prior statements by administration officials, made “against the backdrop of serious penalties for falsity,” should satisfy the court without formal sworn declarations. However, his assertion that penalties alone substitute for testimony under oath undercuts the judicial authority to enforce compliance and verify executive accountability. Trump previously attacked media coverage of his abandoned anti-weaponization fund during an Oval Office press session, indicating the administration’s sensitivity to scrutiny of the scheme.

Federal courts were closed Friday for Juneteenth, with Judge Brinkema unlikely to respond before Monday. The administration’s defiance of the judge’s direct order exemplifies Trump’s broader pattern of disregarding judicial oversight and refusing transparent accountability for executive action, particularly regarding funds that would have redistributed billions toward his political base.



(Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/5932296-doj-snubs-judge-weaponization-fund/?fbclid=IwdGRleASjHeNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEe0RHlZAtCTd-K1VzzDlsNgkPiPV2ofZ6eegFe9bcVc_HCWwpiOljhMudJL5w_aem_qnM_3Nm8oGzpkfnt_vuGDw)

Trump Blames Vandalism for Reflecting Pool Algae

President Trump blamed “vandalism” and ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl for damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool on Friday, claiming unknown actors used chemicals to harm the newly installed surface after the $13.1 million renovation project deteriorated within days of completion. Trump alleged Karl was “sticking his hand into the Pool” and “trying to rip the rubber off of the surface,” while asserting the algae bloom affecting the pool—which was supposed to display “American flag blue” water—is “75 percent gone” and will be repaired by early the following week. Law enforcement is investigating the alleged damage as the project, which Trump self-congratulated for completing in one month instead of the originally projected timeline, continues to face persistent algae growth and visible surface deterioration.

Trump used a lengthy Truth Social post to tout his administration’s work “cleaning, renovated, and beautified” dozens of sites across Washington, D.C., while claiming the pool damage stemmed from “real problems with vandalism” rather than acknowledging the project’s structural or maintenance failures. The president framed the algae bloom and peeling material as external sabotage, deflecting from questions about why the multimillion-dollar renovation produced substandard results immediately after completion. Trump stated that damage is “limited” and law enforcement is investigating the alleged vandalism.

Former George W. Bush adviser Scott Jennings defended Trump’s vandalism claims during a CNN appearance, stating it is “absolutely true” that someone vandalized the grass surrounding the pool. Jennings characterized Trump’s critics as “broken brained” for allegedly vandalizing national monuments out of hatred for the president, and expressed hope that perpetrators would face jail time. Jennings praised Trump’s efforts to clean up the nation’s capital, endorsing the president’s framing of the pool’s problems as deliberate destruction rather than project defects.

Trump previously promoted the Lincoln pool renovation at an Oval Office event focused on executive orders, characterizing the historic structure—which has operated since 1922 and required only routine maintenance until his administration’s intervention—as “filthy” and “dirty” to justify the expensive overhaul. The project’s rapid deterioration and persistent algae bloom have drawn public scrutiny, yet Trump continues to attribute visible problems to external sabotage and media interference rather than project execution.



(Source: https://www.newsweek.com/trump-reflecting-pool-algae-vandalism-peeling-floor-12098491)

Trump Threatens Unemployment Benefits Cuts in All States

Donald Trump’s administration is threatening to withdraw federal funding for unemployment insurance administration from all 50 states, marking the first time in history the federal government has wielded this weapon against state programs. Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling warned governors in a letter that the administration would withhold administrative funds to combat what it characterizes as “waste, fraud and abuse” in state unemployment systems, despite nearly 2 million Americans currently receiving those benefits and roughly 229,000 filing initial jobless claims weekly.

The threat targets the federal government’s financial support for state administrative costs, which could force state-run unemployment systems to shut down if implemented. Most states provide approximately six months of unemployment payments to qualified workers, funded primarily through state unemployment taxes paid by employers, with federal support covering administrative operations. Without federal backing, the loss of funding would directly harm the delivery of benefits to unemployed Americans who depend on those payments to survive.

Vice President JD Vance leads a task force ostensibly designed to eliminate fraud but operates as part of the administration’s politically motivated assault on Democratic-led states. The same task force already withheld $1.4 billion in federal Medicaid funding after what the White House called “sweeping crackdowns on fraud operations” in California, Minnesota, and other states. Democratic Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley directly accused the government’s anti-fraud campaign of targeting vulnerable populations rather than actual fraudsters, cutting “vital funding for services that seniors, people with disabilities, and children rely on to survive.”

The unemployment benefit threat builds on the administration’s broader assault on social programs across multiple agencies. The Department of Agriculture recently threatened to withhold funding from states that fail to provide participant data for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, including immigration status information, and the Trump administration attempted to freeze the entire program during last year’s government shutdown by declaring “the well has run dry.” The timing of the unemployment fraud focus follows the COVID-19 pandemic, when millions of Americans relied on government assistance during economic upheaval in Trump’s first term.

The administration’s weaponization of federal funding against state programs systematically dismantles the social safety net while disguising cuts as anti-fraud enforcement. By threatening to eliminate federal support for unemployment administration, the Trump administration denies due process and survival resources to millions of working Americans, compounding the authoritarian consolidation of power through institutional capture and the strategic defunding of programs that protect vulnerable populations from destitution.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-unemployment-benefits-fraud-b2997881.html?fbclid=IwdGRjcASgSCxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeEMg5UYetR6T_iIYA4AjoE95C5qIIO670RPk_-O8bvIX-sQs7stGHX-Ah5rU_aem_mhSSR11XtDAVg3hK7mDvqQ)

UFC Pays Fighters in Trump Crypto at White House

The Ultimate Fighting Championship will compensate fighters with stablecoins issued by World Liberty Financial, a Trump family cryptocurrency venture, at a UFC event scheduled for the White House lawn on June 14, Trump's birthday. World Liberty Financial, co-founded by Donald Trump and his sons alongside the Witkoff family in 2024, is now listed as an official sponsor and presenting partner of a $250,000 performance bonus pool for the competition. Trump's financial disclosure forms list his holdings in World Liberty Financial at over $50 million, and Reuters reported this month that Trump family crypto ventures have generated billions in paper gains.

The stablecoin payments, called USD1, are pegged to the US dollar and are separate from a governance token the company previously sold. World Liberty Financial has faced legal disputes, including litigation with crypto investor Justin Sun over allegedly frozen tokens, and is currently seeking a banking license from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The company's involvement in the UFC event raises significant transparency concerns, as World Liberty only announced its sponsorship status on June 10, the UFC announced separate cryptocurrency bonuses on June 11, and only on Friday evening disclosed that World Liberty would be issuing the fighter payments in USD1.

A White House spokesman denied any conflict of interest, stating Trump's assets are held in a trust managed by his children and dismissing concerns as "fabricated" by "Fake News." However, cryptocurrency expert Todd Phillips told the Guardian that announcing fighter payments in USD1 functions as advertising for the Trump-backed stablecoin while maintaining the appearance of legitimate compensation. The arrangement directly links the Trump family's financial interests to a high-profile sporting event being promoted on government property, blending presidential endorsement with commercial cryptocurrency promotion.

World Liberty Financial has positioned itself as a major financial venture under the Trump administration, with Trump previously listed publicly as the company's "Chief Crypto Advocate." The use of USD1 at a federally-hosted event appears designed to legitimize the stablecoin and accelerate its broader adoption in the financial sector, leveraging the White House platform and the UFC's visibility to promote a family business product.

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/14/white-house-ufc-fighters-crypto)

1 2 3 48