Category: Corruption

Trump admin says White House ballroom ‘beyond the point of no return’ in Supreme Court appeal – ABC News

Trump administration officials filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court on Friday seeking to overturn a lower court injunction that would halt construction of a White House ballroom and helipad. Solicitor General John Sauer, invoking six alleged assassination attempts against Trump, claimed the project is essential to presidential security and that halting work would endanger Trump’s life. The administration asserts it has authority to conduct the renovation without congressional approval, citing precedent for presidential alterations to the executive residence.

A federal district court and divided appeals court determined Trump lacks authority to overhaul the White House without congressional approval, prompting the administration’s Supreme Court intervention. The injunction is scheduled to take effect August 21 unless the Court grants the emergency stay. Sauer argued the district court would improperly elevate a single judge as arbiter of presidential security decisions, framing the matter as one of executive power rather than institutional oversight.

The administration claims the project is 65 percent complete with $200 million spent or committed, operating with a 250-person crew working 20 hours daily seven days a week. White House director Joshua Fisher declared in a sworn statement that stopping construction would be “a disaster” because the concrete-and-steel structure is now “beyond the point of no return” and cannot be safely altered or dismantled. The filing asserts the project operates “on time” and “under budget” with “zero taxpayer dollars” required, though this omits reference to a $1 billion White House hardening request to Congress widely tied to the ballroom project.

The administration’s filings include declarations from the secretary of state, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, FBI director, and Secret Service director defending the project on national security grounds. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which challenged the construction as destructive to the building’s historic integrity, will have the opportunity to respond to the Supreme Court within the coming week. Trump devoted nearly 45,000 words across 84 public events to construction projects including this ballroom during the first seven months of 2026.

Senate Democrats requested the Government Accountability Office audit the project, citing the unusual scale, destruction of historic architecture, opaque funding mix of public and private sources, and absence of standard federal review processes. The Supreme Court is expected to decide whether to grant the emergency stay and potentially expedite oral arguments on the merits of presidential renovation authority versus congressional oversight.



(Source: https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-appeals-supreme-court-white-house-ballroom-construction/story?id=135642539)de whether to grant the emergency stay and potentially expedite oral arguments on the merits of presidential renovation authority versus congressional oversight.

NAS Removes Climate Chapter From Judges Manual After Trump Pressure

The National Academy of Sciences removed a climate science chapter from its Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence after pressure from President Donald Trump and Republican officials who falsely characterized the peer-reviewed work as “biased,” “fraudulent,” and “misleading.” The chapter, titled “Reference Guide on Climate Science,” had been included for the first time in the 2025 edition and covered the greenhouse effect, atmospheric cycling, attribution science, and peer-reviewed research to assist judges in reasoning through cases involving complex scientific topics.

Trump and dozens of state attorneys general attacked the chapter in early 2026, prompting the Federal Judicial Center to remove it in February. The NAS subsequently announced the chapter would remain offline pending an “independent review,” claiming questions about development processes warranted examination. This decision subordinates scientific evidence to political pressure, despite the chapter undergoing rigorous peer review from external scientists, judges, and National Academies staff according to the same standards applied to all manual sections.

Authors Jessica Wentz and Radley Horton, both from Columbia University, defended their work as science-based and properly vetted through extensive external review. Their chapter presented established climate science findings to serve the judiciary in complex litigation. The removal demonstrates how Trump’s federal attack on the National Academy of Sciences extends beyond investigation to direct suppression of scientific guidance that contradicts his interests and those of fossil fuel allies.

The action exemplifies Trump’s systematic assault on independent institutions and scientific authority. By weaponizing accusations of bias against peer-reviewed climate science, Trump manufactures pretexts for erasing inconvenient research from judicial reference materials, obstructing judges’ access to credible scientific evidence necessary for sound legal reasoning on environmental cases. The capitulation by the NAS and Federal Judicial Center signals institutional vulnerability to authoritarian pressure campaigns disguised as procedural reviews.



(Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/national-academy-of-sciences-pulls-climate-chapter-from-judges-manual/?fbclid=IwdGRjcATrIC1wZG9mBWZkaWQWUMZ6s8by4ageyWFLZJOlZd9RMlUyKmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4pJlcKCUmPfRwgQAFhKYQrqASw-byqdNMuOvzpsPkat-GNTLopRJPOkPaenw_aem_0rxQnwFSMEE7-5KTB6PYUw)

We crunched the numbers: Trump devoted 45,000 words to construction like Reflecting Pool, ballroom – PolitiFact

PolitiFact analyzed Trump's public events and speeches from January through July 2026, documenting that he devoted nearly 45,000 words to construction projects including the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and White House ballroom across 84 events over 66 days. Construction projects consumed more than a quarter of his public speaking time during this period and became his dominant topic when making unprompted remarks, second only to the Iran war when responding to reporters' questions.

Trump's focus on the Reflecting Pool intensified in May as the July 4th anniversary approached, consuming approximately 10% of his speaking time in events where he mentioned it. He made inconsistent cost claims about repairs, initially stating the project would cost $1.5 million to $2 million in April, then raising estimates to $10 million to $16 million by June. Trump cited contradictory figures about predecessor spending, claiming Obama spent either $38 million or $100 million on repairs when records show Obama actually spent $35 million. After a new pool liner began peeling in June, Trump blamed vandals without evidence, but prosecutors led by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro determined that faulty contractor installation caused the damage and dropped all charges.

Trump's $200 million White House ballroom project, later doubled in size to $400 million at what he claimed was military request, exemplifies how he frames construction through his personal identity. Trump repeatedly asserted no taxpayer funds would be used, claiming wealthy donors including Apple and Microsoft would pay, yet a Washington Post investigation of contractor estimates revealed taxpayers could cover more than half the $600 million projected cost. A federal appeals court blocked the ballroom construction in August, ruling Trump needs Congressional approval, prompting him to announce plans to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Political communication experts identify Trump's construction rhetoric as distinctly narcissistic, transforming projects into extensions of his personal judgment rather than institutional stewardship. Sam Martin, Boise State University associate professor, noted that Trump's framing reflects "a view of presidential power that depends primarily on the judgment, instincts, and abilities of one exceptional individual rather than on constitutional processes or institutional collaboration." Allison Prasch, University of Wisconsin-Madison rhetoric professor, observed that Trump disregards expert recommendations and historical preservation standards to "shape this national narrative" in ways that "his influence and eminence will outlast himself."

Public opposition to Trump's construction agenda contradicts his rhetoric. A July Washington Post/Ipsos poll found nearly two in three Americans dissatisfied or upset with the projects, including 90% of Democrats and 68% of Republicans, though 86% of self-identified MAGA Republicans supported them. Trump's preoccupation with construction projects and the Reflecting Pool during an ongoing Iran war, rising gasoline prices, and accelerated Kennedy Center renovations bypassing federal contracting standards demonstrates his prioritization of monument-building and personal legacy over governance.

(Source: https://politifact.com/article/2026/aug/11/trump-construction-ballroom-reflecting-pool/)

Surprise! Todd Blanche Immediately Breaks His Promises to GOP Senators | The New Republic

Todd Blanche issued a Department of Justice memo on his first day as Attorney General that expands executive privilege protections for President Trump, allowing him to shield communications with private advisers from congressional oversight. The memo extends privilege claims to cover exchanges between the president's advisers and civilians, a significant expansion from traditional interpretations. Senate Democrats, particularly Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, identified the move as evidence Trump is preparing to obstruct potential investigations if Democrats regain House control.

Blanche's immediate action contradicts assurances he provided during his confirmation hearing to Senators Bill Cassidy, John Cornyn, and Tom Tillis regarding limits on presidential immunity and accountability. His memo demonstrates the Attorney General is committed to shielding Trump from legal consequences and blocking government transparency rather than enforcing the law independently. The move directly undermines the stated commitments that secured his confirmation vote.

The administration is simultaneously pursuing aggressive immigration enforcement that targets military families despite ongoing recruitment efforts that promise immigration protections. In April 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement reversed longstanding policy treating military service as a mitigating factor in enforcement decisions, leading to detention of over 50 military spouses and relatives. More than 60 congressional Democrats, led by Senators Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth, and Richard Blumenthal, launched an investigation into whether the Defense Department collaborated with Homeland Security to detain servicemembers and their families, a potential violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

The administration also announced plans to separate the MMR vaccine into three individual shots, falsely linking the combined vaccine to autism, despite CDC confirmation that no scientific evidence supports splitting the vaccine. Outgoing Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician, directly condemned the executive order as medically unsound and likely to increase vaccine hesitancy among families. Cassidy's criticism carries limited credibility given his decisive confirmation vote for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-vaccine activist without public health expertise.

Trump nominated Dennis Kirk, a Project 2025 author and former Office of Personnel Management official, as Interior Department Inspector General, positioning a Trump loyalist to oversee ethics investigations and potential probes into the $16 million renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The nomination drew Democratic opposition, with House Natural Resources Committee ranking member Jared Huffman calling Kirk a "fake and fraudulent watchdog" designed to shield administration officials from accountability. Trump's administration has already defied federal court orders in other contexts, signaling systematic resistance to judicial oversight.

(Source: https://newrepublic.com/post/214186/todd-blanche-breaks-promises-donald-trump?utm_medium=social&utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=SF_TNR&fbclid=IwdGRjcAToUhpwZG9mBWZkaWQWUMSMzAgdnNxqwI-26BM6ALF5VHUZa2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR6Q_bhedKdybU3lTo998_TuvOU4ympm8H4ySVS25-LyOmFWhcKbh6WzNuH6MQ_aem_ozjN_-gR48igEMiBuFNGiw)

Trump Attacks Pirro After Pool Charges Dismissed

President Trump publicly attacked U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro on Monday after she dismissed criminal charges against Olympic canoeist David Hearn, who had been accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. Trump told reporters Pirro had “choked” and “folded like an umbrella” in dropping the charges, marking his strongest public comments yet on whether her job remains secure.

Pirro appeared at the White House Monday afternoon with a banker’s box of evidence to defend her prosecutorial decision to Trump directly. During the contentious meeting, Pirro lashed out at Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and accused him of misleading the president and covering up mistakes regarding the pool’s damage. National Park Service engineers had privately blamed a private contractor hired through a no-bid Department of Interior contract for the flawed installation, evidence Pirro said emerged after charges were already filed.

Pirro’s 20-page filing stated the damage resulted from “flawed installation by the contractor” rather than vandalism, contradicting Trump’s longstanding public position on the matter. She dismissed not only Hearn’s felony indictment but also misdemeanor cases against three others related to destruction at the pool. Internal National Park Service communications from June 11 raised concerns about the peeling pool liner more than a week before Hearn’s arrest, according to court documents.

Trump did not inform Pirro he intended to fire her during the meeting, nor did she offer to resign, according to sources familiar with the private discussion. However, Trump reiterated late Tuesday that Pirro is “totally wrong” about the pool and said he was “not happy” with his hand-picked U.S. attorney, leaving her employment status unresolved. A White House official confirmed the president was not aware in advance that Pirro would file court papers dismissing the charges.



(Source: https://abcnews.com/Politics/inside-trumps-contentious-oval-office-meeting-jeanine-pirro/story?id=135393382)

Trump Admin Subpoenas NY Times Reporter Over North Korea Story

The Trump administration subpoenaed freelance New York Times reporter Matthew Cole over his reporting on a failed classified military operation in North Korea, according to the Times. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents delivered the subpoena to Cole’s New York home on behalf of prosecutors in Virginia, demanding two years of his contacts and sources. Cole’s attorney, David A. O’Neil, stated the reporter will defend press freedom and the First Amendment against what he characterized as the administration’s direct attacks on journalists.

This subpoena follows the administration’s earlier assault on Times journalists covering Air Force One security vulnerabilities. Prosecutors initially subpoenaed four Times reporters, including Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, and Eric Schmitt, and sought phone records for the journalists and their relatives. U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian questioned whether prosecutors followed legal standards for journalist subpoenas, and the Department of Justice ultimately withdrew those subpoenas under judicial pressure.

Trump claimed the subpoenas targeted “leakers” rather than journalists, stating he did not know “what’s appropriate and what’s not” regarding such legal actions. He framed the pursuit as necessary for national security, saying the administration must compel journalists to identify their sources to find people he described as “cowards,” “unpatriotic,” and “treasonous.” This language demonstrates the administration’s weaponization of the justice system to suppress press freedom and intimidate sources willing to expose government misconduct.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-administration-reportedly-subpoenas-new-york-times-freelancer-over-north-korea-story/)

Trump EPA Exempts Data Centers From Acid Rain Pollution Rules

The Trump administration exempted power plants serving data centers from the Clean Air Act’s Acid Rain Program, which mandates reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions that cause environmental damage and respiratory harm. EPA Assistant Administrator Aaron Szabo stated the exemption supports “artificial intelligence dominance” and protects consumer electric bills, claiming “islanded” power plants disconnected from the broader grid fall outside the program’s scope.

The administration justified the exemption by redefining data center power plants as non-utilities ineligible for acid rain restrictions, despite these facilities producing the same pollutants as traditional power plants. The EPA issued guidance after states and companies requested “clarity” on regulatory provisions, effectively granting data centers immunity from pollution controls that protect aquatic ecosystems and human respiratory health.

This exemption advances the administration’s pattern of subordinating environmental protection to corporate interests, particularly those aligned with favored figures like Elon Musk. Last month, the administration backed Musk’s xAI in court against the NAACP’s illegal air pollution accusations and has previously sought to curtail environmental reviews and expedite chemical approvals for data center operations.

The decision abandons enforceable acid rain safeguards in favor of claims that self-powered data centers will reduce grid strain and consumer costs. By allowing these facilities to operate without emission controls, the administration eliminates accountability mechanisms designed to prevent the atmospheric and environmental degradation acid rain causes.



(Source: https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5992657-epa-data-center-power-plants-acid-rain/?fbclid=IwdGRjcATU5e1wZG9mBWZkaWQWULbfziC-koGvpXNgWZpPJmSTWBVc82V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7TK-zejq2S6OsAKiZSpqkh6vtbxIdWR_zy9NoY8VIK9YSjUxeosPCv5lLRcQ_aem_bVggeQCJB0yfjGYFUr-yNQ)

Trump Claims Miss Universe Pageant Qualifies Him to Control Venezuela

President Donald Trump justified his control over Venezuela’s political future by claiming expertise derived from owning the Miss Universe pageant, stating “Miss Venezuela always did very well” in the competition. Trump’s remarks came as he defended the absence of elections in Venezuela, asserting the country “is not really ready for them yet” despite the U.S. military seizure of former President Nicolás Maduro in January 2026 on allegations of election rigging.

Trump boasted that Venezuela is “becoming extremely successful” under acting president Delcy Rodríguez and that the nation generates record oil revenues benefiting major corporations like ExxonMobil. He claimed the U.S. has recouped its military intervention costs through resource extraction, stating “We’ve paid for the war many times over.” Trump asserted his popularity in the country, attributing Venezuela’s progress entirely to his administration’s involvement.

The comments reveal Trump’s authoritarian framework for Venezuela: indefinite postponement of democratic elections under the guise of national readiness, coupled with economic extraction disguised as development. Secretary of State Marco Rubio functions as de facto viceroy over Venezuela, controlling finances, natural resources, government appointments, and foreign policy from Washington, while Trump frames the occupation as benevolent governance.

Trump’s reliance on Miss Universe pageant experience as qualification to govern a nation’s political timeline contradicts his earlier fabricated claims of settling multiple wars, revealing a pattern of substituting actual expertise or diplomatic achievement with celebrity credentials and personal commercial interests. His insistence that Venezuela remain under U.S. control indefinitely while denying Venezuelans electoral agency demonstrates the permanence of his occupation model.

Trump has directed major oil executives including billionaire donor Jeffery Hildebrand to commit $100 billion to Venezuela’s petroleum sector, transforming military conquest into a mechanism for corporate profit extraction and Trump-aligned business expansion under the banner of economic development.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-boasts-he-understands-venezuela-because-miss-venezuela-always-did-very-well-in-miss-universe-pageant/)

Trump Approves Nuclear Deal Enabling Saudi Uranium Enrichment

President Trump formally approved a landmark 30-year nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia that grants the kingdom a civilian nuclear program and potentially permits uranium enrichment on Saudi territory, according to administration officials. The deal, valued at tens of billions of dollars, is structured to secure dominant market access for American companies while excluding foreign competitors from Saudi Arabia's nuclear infrastructure development.

The agreement advances Trump's stated goal of deepening U.S. ties with Saudi Arabia and securing its alignment with American geopolitical interests in the Middle East. Trump previously met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the White House to advance the nuclear partnership, which represents a significant expansion of bilateral cooperation on defense and energy matters.

The nuclear arrangement contradicts nonproliferation safeguards by enabling uranium enrichment capabilities within a region already marked by volatile power dynamics and unresolved security tensions. Granting such advanced nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia without rigorous international oversight mechanisms creates direct pathways for nuclear weapons development in a strategically unstable area, particularly given the kingdom's pattern of aggressive regional military interventions and documented human rights abuses under bin Salman's rule.

The deal financially benefits American nuclear and defense contractors substantially while transferring critical security risks to the international community. Trump's approval prioritizes corporate profit over global nuclear security standards, following his administration's pattern of dismantling institutional guardrails to benefit allied autocrats and domestic industries.

Trump's commercial relationship with Saudi interests dates back to the 1980s, when a Saudi prince purchased his superyacht and the Plaza Hotel. In the years following his first term, the Trump family secured numerous lucrative commercial ties. Notable connections include:

  • Real Estate and Licensing: The Trump Organization entered into major brand licensing and development deals for projects in Saudi Arabia, including luxury towers in Riyadh and a $1 billion "Trump Plaza" project in Jeddah.
  • Kushner's Private Equity: Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and former senior advisor, established a private equity firm, Affinity Partners, which secured approximately $2 billion in capital commitments from Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund.
  • LIV Golf: Trump’s golf courses have hosted several high-profile tournaments backed by LIV Golf, which is funded by the Saudi government's sovereign wealth fund, pouring millions into his properties.

(Source: https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trump-approves-landmark-nuclear-deal-with-saudi-arabia-in-big-win-for-kingdom-2ed77584)

RFK Jr. Halts Medicaid Funds to Blue States Despite No Proof of Fraud | The New Republic

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Dr. Mehmet Oz announced a $1 billion freeze on Medicare and Medicaid payments to California and Minnesota on Tuesday, accusing the states of “suspected fraud and noncompliance.” Kennedy demanded the states provide documentation proving the payments were legitimate but presented no new evidence supporting the fraud allegations, according to Reuters.

The funding freeze follows a pattern of Trump administration officials targeting Democratic-led states with unsubstantiated accusations of widespread public program fraud. In May, the White House blocked $1.3 billion in Medicaid reimbursements for California; last month Trump directed federal agencies to investigate blocking additional California funding; and the Federal Emergency Management Agency held up disaster aid to blue states earlier this year. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin recently threatened to block federal grants and jail state officials in Democratic states refusing to surrender voter registration data to the administration.

California and Minnesota are expected to challenge the funding cuts in court, where states have previously prevailed in similar disputes. The termination of payments to Democratic states without credible documentation of fraud follows the administration’s broader pattern of weaponizing federal resources against political opponents, as Kennedy has already moved to purge federal health institutions aligned with evidence-based policy.

The Medicaid freeze occurs alongside other administration actions cutting safety net programs. Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” slashed food assistance, eliminating SNAP benefits for 4.5 million people, including 1.5 million children, since July 2025. Arizona saw the steepest decline with over 50 percent of its SNAP recipients—more than 440,000 people—dropped from the program in less than a year, with federal officials praising the state for “leading the way” in cutting what the administration characterizes as fraud and waste.

The funding restrictions on Democratic states and cuts to federal benefits demonstrate the administration’s use of federal authority to punish political opponents while dismantling programs protecting vulnerable populations. States challenging these actions will confront an administration unwilling to substantiate its fraud accusations with evidence.



(Source: https://newrepublic.com/post/213335/rfk-jr-halts-medicaid-funds-california-minnesota-no-proof-fraud?fbclid=IwVERDUATM1z1wZG9mBWZkaWQWUK9D1WPZ3x2pxJ1C3SiLuWg7hbLUY2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR4LVWXhVRaqodn3njclczLoKR-qXpqfNGVm_vUi6RiM0qc1CaGiwX7UdnWnLQ_aem_PVQGpOuA_mTkTUCEY1xHMQ)willing to substantiate its fraud accusations with evidence.

1 2 3 … 52