Trump Suggests Images of Iran School Bombing Were AI

President Donald Trump suggested during a Fox News interview Tuesday that images documenting a U.S. airstrike on an Iranian school may have been artificially generated, deflecting from mounting evidence that American missiles killed at least 150 people, including approximately 120 children. When confronted with photographic evidence showing fragments consistent with U.S. Tomahawk missiles at the strike site, Trump dismissed the documentation as potentially “AI generated” without providing any basis for the claim.

Trump declined to commit to releasing the findings of his administration’s ongoing investigation into the bombing, telling Fox News chief foreign correspondent Trey Yingst that “I don’t think anybody’s going to ever be able to say what happened there.” When pressed on whether he would eventually disclose the results, Trump offered only a noncommittal “I guess so” and suggested his “military people” might have undisclosed reasons to withhold findings.

Internal administration sources previously told The New York Times that officials believed the school was struck by U.S. missiles, contradicting the initial public claim that Iran was responsible. Trump has explicitly rejected negotiations to end the Iran conflict, stating he does not want to pursue diplomatic solutions while simultaneously obscuring accountability for civilian casualties.

Trump’s dismissal of physical evidence as fabricated and his refusal to guarantee transparency on a catastrophic attack killing over 100 children demonstrates his systematic obstruction of accountability for actions taken under his authority. His administration has escalated military actions against Iran, including reimposing a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, while simultaneously suppressing documentation of civilian harm resulting from those operations.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-suggests-images-of-iran-school-bombing-were-ai-generated-doesnt-commit-to-releasing-results-of-investigation/)neously suppressing documentation of civilian harm resulting from those operations.

FCC Officials Took Gifts From Paramount While It Had Business Before Them — ProPublica

FCC officials who voted on Paramount’s merger accepted luxury Kennedy Center gala tickets worth over $260,000 from the company they regulate, violating federal ethics rules that explicitly prohibit gifts from entities with pending business before the agency. FCC Chair Brendan Carr attended the December 2025 gala in a private $125,000 skybox with Paramount CEO David Ellison after the company sought FCC approval for its $110 billion merger with Skydance Media, while Commissioner Olivia Trusty received tickets worth $12,000 before casting a decisive vote approving the deal.

Ethics experts, including former Office of Government Ethics director Walter Shaub and former White House ethics lawyer Virginia Canter, said the commissioners violated federal law by accepting gifts from a regulated entity with business pending before them. Shaub stated that “there’s no way that any top federal regulator should ever accept a gift from a regulated company with interests their work will foreseeably affect,” and Canter called the conduct “shocking” and “disturbing.” The experts warned that Carr and Trusty compromised the agency’s impartiality and should have recused themselves from voting on the merger.

Seven of ten FCC commissioners who served since 2016 accepted Kennedy Center tickets from CBS or its parent company, totaling over $260,000 according to ProPublica’s analysis of ethics disclosures. Carr alone has accepted tickets at least seven times since 2017, totaling over $63,000. Federal ethics rules explicitly ban employees from accepting gifts from entities that do business with, are regulated by, or seek official action from their agency, yet the FCC claimed agency ethics officers approved the practice as consistent with law—a justification Shaub dismissed as equivalent to a “school child” excuse.

The timing of the gifts intensified the conflict. Paramount filed its Skydance merger paperwork in September 2024, and the December gala occurred as the company prepared its hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery. Hours after the gala ended, Paramount launched the hostile bid. Trump has systematically pressured the FCC to strip broadcast licenses, and Carr reopened a CBS investigation days after taking office, later requiring Paramount to eliminate diversity initiatives and appoint a bias ombudsperson to secure the merger’s approval.

Multiple ethics experts told ProPublica that the Justice Department should investigate potential violations of federal ethics rules and that the commissioners’ gift-taking could become central in legal challenges to the merger. California, New York and ten other Democratic states filed a lawsuit seeking to block the $110 billion consolidation under federal and state anti-monopoly laws, citing concerns about job elimination and industry independence from consolidated ownership.



(Source: https://www.propublica.org/article/paramount-mergers-fcc-kennedy-center-gala?fbclid=IwdGRleATEdV1wZG9mA2ZkaWQWUKl7HV6hSpBeYhKKEUCD5qTfb1VVhGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR5j5tj7vuKcNF4EYkiA-zdtgiNLF39w-xW5ou0h_zK0uZfJ56eQA2uIrEgulg_aem_j4wlCLmUFGCAM_E3ngC6aw)state anti-monopoly laws, citing concerns about job elimination and industry independence from consolidated ownership.

Trump Reignites Blockade Against Iran in Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump declared the United States the “Guardian of the Strait of Hormuz” on Monday, announcing a blockade targeting Iranian vessels and a 20% toll on all cargo transiting the waterway. Trump stated that while other nations retain passage rights, Iranian ships and their customers will be barred from entering or leaving, framing the seizure of control over this critical international shipping lane as a matter of “fairness” for American protection costs. The announcement followed retaliatory U.S. military strikes against Iran after Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces attacked a Cyprus-flagged container ship and falsely claimed to have closed the strait.

Trump told Fox News the U.S. will “keep” and “probably run” the strait, extracting substantial revenue from global commerce while positioning American forces as enforcers. He claimed the United States had negotiated “a done deal” with Iran before Iran violated a ceasefire agreement over the weekend, stating “we’re just going to hit them very hard and keep the strait, and probably run it.” Trump asserted that Iran has a pattern of breaking agreements, citing ten previous deals he said the regime had violated.

The unilateral seizure of control over an internationally recognized waterway through which approximately one-third of global seaborne oil passes represents Trump’s assertion of military dominance over a crucial global chokepoint. By imposing a 20% toll and explicitly blocking Iranian commerce, Trump transforms a shared international passage into a revenue-generating American territory, a move that contradicts international maritime law and conventions governing freedom of navigation. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed U.S. military strikes followed Iran’s attack on the merchant vessel, but Trump’s subsequent assertion of permanent control expands the conflict beyond defensive response.

Trump’s escalation abandons the pretense of negotiation in favor of direct territorial and economic control, structuring the international order around American military power and financial extraction. Trump previously claimed the strait was open following overnight military strikes, but his Monday declarations reveal intent to monopolize control and profit from global energy transit. The president’s rhetoric conflates security provision with commercial exploitation, justifying American toll collection on international commerce as compensation for military operations initiated at his direction.

This consolidation of control over a vital international waterway exemplifies Trump’s model of authoritarian resource extraction, in which the U.S. military apparatus becomes an instrument for enriching American leadership and subordinating global commerce to Trump’s financial interests. The blockade of Iranian vessels and imposition of cargo fees establish a de facto American empire over a region critical to global trade, enforced by military force and defended through nationalist framing that obscures the seizure of international territory.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-dubs-usa-guardian-of-the-hormuz-strait-and-relaunches-blockade-against-iran/)financial interests. The blockade of Iranian vessels and imposition of cargo fees establish a de facto American empire over a region critical to global trade, enforced by military force and defended through nationalist framing that obscures the seizure of international territory.

Trump Rushed Kennedy Center Renovations for FIFA Ceremony

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse disclosed whistleblower allegations that the Kennedy Center accelerated renovations with disregard for federal contracting standards to prepare for Trump’s December 2025 FIFA “peace prize” ceremony. Multiple former project managers documented rushed work, including an $8 million no-bid flooring contract awarded to a firm lacking concert-hall experience, corner-cutting that left steel columns rusting and a reflecting pool already deteriorating, and the demolition of a brand-new bathroom floor because Trump objected to its color.

The Kennedy Center rewrote its own contracting rules retrospectively to justify the no-bid awards, according to whistleblower disclosures submitted through the Government Accountability Project. Trump’s preferred contractor cut corners on repainting the center’s columns, leaving taxpayers responsible for repairs. Whitehouse characterized the work as driven by Trump’s aesthetic preferences rather than the building’s actual maintenance needs, describing the facility’s transformation into a personal renovation project rather than stewardship of a national memorial.

The center received $257 million from Congress for repairs and restoration, yet whistleblowers documented that rushed cosmetic work prioritized televised events in December over legitimate building preservation. The reflecting pool revamp is already rusting and peeling and will require complete reconstruction. Representative Rick Larsen, the senior Democrat on the House infrastructure committee, called the allegations serious and expressed concern that approved federal funds were diverted to temporary cosmetic fixes instead of durable, necessary repairs.

The Kennedy Center claimed in a statement that it operates with rigorous financial oversight and that whistleblower assertions about bypassed contracting standards were incorrect, emphasizing commitment to responsible stewardship. The White House responded by blaming previous Democratic leadership for allowing the center to deteriorate and credited Trump with providing “bold leadership and proper resources” to restore the facility, a characterization contradicted by whistleblower documentation of hastily executed, substandard work prioritizing Trump’s personal preferences over institutional integrity.

Whitehouse requested documents and answers from the Kennedy Center’s executive director by July 23. The allegations expose how Trump’s administration subordinated federal procurement standards and institutional accountability to serve the President’s demand for a visually impressive venue for his December events, similar to prior no-bid contracts for gilding statues and court battles over Trump’s name on the Kennedy Center.



(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/11/trump-kennedy-center-renovations-whistleblowers?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcATAevNwZG9mA2ZkaWQWUKYiNODhW95UC_hl8jPYLSjXsM3cHGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7aC5SJbx88IIvHH-f68kmhFbzdYEeAYiviNm5AHVOQSiBU-7k98aGx-Vgz1w_aem_2d5c2v98ms2nkNujtGXHcA#Echobox=1783794823)

DOGE Records Deleted From NLRB Amid Investigation

In April 2025, federal IT staffer Dan Berulis filed a whistleblower complaint with Congress alleging that members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had accessed and potentially exfiltrated sensitive information from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Shortly after filing the complaint, Berulis discovered that his car’s brakes had been cut following a minor accident near his home. The NLRB’s Office of the Inspector General opened an investigation in May 2025, which remains ongoing.

A Government Accountability Office report released in April 2026 examined DOGE’s access to NLRB systems but conspicuously covered only the period after Berulis’ complaint was filed. The report’s footnotes revealed that in August 2025, after DOGE members departed the NLRB, the agency deleted team member accounts and associated access records before GAO investigators could observe the systems. This deletion eliminated digital evidence of what data DOGE members accessed and when, preventing confirmation of statements made to investigators. According to Don Moynihan, a University of Michigan public policy professor, the report “raises more questions than it resolves, such as who deleted the data.”

Berulis’ complaint alleged that DOGE officials demanded the highest level of access to NLRB systems, including “tenant owner” accounts with unrestricted permission to read, copy, and alter data, exceeding even the agency’s chief information officer’s access. The NLRB enforces labor laws and investigates unfair labor practices, giving it access to whistleblower identities, testimony, trade secrets, and investigative materials. The GAO acknowledged interviewing NLRB staff about DOGE’s access levels but could not verify their accounts because the accounts had already been deleted. Justin Fox, Nate Cavanaugh, and Jordan Wick were all at the NLRB at various points, but no specific DOGE members are named in the report or Berulis’ complaint.

The deletion of these records violates the General Records Schedule, which mandates that agencies retain access records from systems containing personally identifiable information for six years. The two systems DOGE accessed, the Electronic Official Personnel Folders and the Federal Personnel and Payroll System, both contain federal workers’ personal information. Dan McGrath, senior oversight counsel at Democracy Forward, stated the deletion “violates the Federal Records Act because it’s not preserving their activities.” Michael Duff, a former NLRB lawyer and Saint Louis University law professor, called the deletion “irregular and almost certainly contrary to practice,” noting that deleting data during an ongoing inspector general investigation compounds the concern. WIRED previously reported that DOGE members used encrypted messaging with auto-deleting features, which experts warned could violate federal record retention laws.

The deletion may not be isolated; Berulis’ complaint documented evidence that a DOGE account may have been created and deleted from NLRB cloud systems as early as March 6, 2025. Elon Musk, who led DOGE and owns Tesla and SpaceX, has financial interests in NLRB decisions; the agency dropped its case against SpaceX earlier this year, prompting Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren and Richard Blumenthal to request answers on whether the dismissal was politically motivated. In a functioning oversight system, according to Moynihan, this would trigger congressional hearings and sworn testimony, but such accountability remains unlikely.



(Source: https://www.wired.com/story/federal-investigators-say-certain-doge-records-were-deleted/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_brand=wired&utm_social-type=owned&fbclid=IwdGRjcAS_jqNwZG9mA2ZkaWQWUKVvhXR3lFy12rLF31dXHiKpftXWLWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR5ZFGZD-T_vJjIKipMGXHUKyO5UDJPcwxTdUCrATGDEfIdliYMkX5jl6p-HwQ_aem_vaPxhHw7M5OzAYT5Um2qgQ)

Trump Commerce Grants UAE AI Chip Access After Sheikh’s Investment

The Trump administration’s Commerce Department granted the United Arab Emirates license-free access to critical U.S. artificial intelligence technology, including advanced semiconductor chips. The decision follows a $500 million investment by Abu Dhabi royal Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan in World Liberty Financial, a Trump family cryptocurrency venture, which Eric Trump finalized four days before the president’s inauguration.

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren condemned the arrangement as a “corrupt deal” and demanded testimony from Commerce Department officials, citing direct national security threats. Warren argued that the preferential export control change violates U.S. security protocols and creates vulnerability to foreign adversaries, particularly China, given G42’s documented past collaborations with sanctioned technology firm Huawei.

The financial arrangement between the Trump family and the UAE official represents a direct conflict of interest, with Trump personally benefiting from cryptocurrency holdings tied to Tahnoon’s substantial investments. This deal follows the Trump family’s sale of a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million to representatives of the same Sheikh, demonstrating a pattern of financial entanglement between Trump’s personal wealth and U.S. technology policy decisions.

The Commerce Department’s action undermines established national security safeguards by providing a foreign nation unrestricted access to sensitive semiconductor technology without standard licensing requirements. This preferential treatment contradicts standard U.S. export control frameworks designed to prevent advanced chip technology from reaching potential adversaries.

The deal exemplifies how Trump uses presidential authority to enrich himself and his family while simultaneously compromising national security. The administration’s decision to grant technological privileges to a foreign investor who directly funded Trump family business interests demonstrates the weaponization of government power for personal financial gain.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-uae-investor-license-free-crypto-ai-chips-b3013179.html)

Trump DOJ Subpoenas NY Times Journalists Over Qatar Jet Report

Trump’s Justice Department issued subpoenas to multiple New York Times journalists, compelling their testimony before a federal grand jury in New York City on Wednesday. Federal agents delivered subpoenas to reporters’ homes, citing vague allegations of “alleged violation of federal criminal law,” following the Times’ reporting on security deficiencies in the Qatar-gifted Boeing 747 designated for presidential use, which lacks advanced security features standard to Air Force One.

The New York Times denounced the subpoenas as a “brazen act” designed to intimidate journalists and suppress reporting on matters of public interest. The administration provided no specific explanation for the criminal allegations or the targeting of individual reporters, leaving the stated basis for the grand jury investigation opaque.

This action exemplifies Trump’s documented pattern of weaponizing federal law enforcement against the press. The subpoenas represent a direct assault on First Amendment protections, using the machinery of criminal justice to silence coverage of presidential conduct and security vulnerabilities affecting national assets. The Qatari 747 arrangement itself reflects Trump’s corruption, accepting a foreign government gift to replace Air Force One, raising immediate questions about quid pro quo arrangements and Trump’s financial interests abroad.

The targeting of journalists represents an escalation in Trump’s authoritarian governance. By prosecuting the messengers rather than addressing the substantive security failures they reported, Trump demonstrates contempt for accountability and the constitutional safeguards protecting a free press from executive retaliation.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-new-york-times-reporters-qatari-air-force-one-b3013194.html)

‘Wow!’ Trump Wakes Up Basking In Glow of New Trump Airport

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed legislation in March 2026 requiring Palm Beach County to rename its airport to President Donald J. Trump International Airport, triggering widespread backlash over the use of public funds for rebranding costs including new signage, uniforms, software updates, and airport identifier code changes. The Trump Organization has filed federal trademark applications claiming exclusive rights to the airport name and related merchandise, raising concerns about potential financial kickbacks to the Trump family through approved vendor requirements for branded goods.

Local residents and pilots filed lawsuits challenging the renaming as illegal, citing safety risks from the airport identifier code change and violations of local home rule authority. The legal action reflects substantial opposition to the rebranding initiative within the Palm Beach community and aviation sector, though the airport officially became the President Donald J. Trump International Airport in July 2026.

Trump responded to the renaming with social media posts on Saturday morning celebrating the airport change, describing Palm Beach as “a special place” and sharing photographs of the airport’s signage. The posts came hours after Trump had spent Friday night issuing threatening warnings about Iranian assassination plots, including claims he had ordered military strikes against Iran, demonstrating a sharp tonal shift in his public messaging.

Critics have characterized the renaming as a corruption scheme designed to benefit the Trump family financially while burdening taxpayers with millions in rebranding expenses. Legal experts and local opponents argue the arrangement creates pathways for Trump Organization profits through merchandise licensing and vendor approvals tied to the airport’s new branding identity.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/wow-trump-wakes-up-basking-in-glow-of-new-honor-after-going-to-bed-raging-about-assassination-plans/)

Bannon, Epshteyn Ran Extortion Scheme Against Left Leaning Law Firms At Trump Direction

The American Bar Association filed a court motion demanding the White House release communications involving Trump allies Steve Bannon and Boris Epshteyn related to Trump's attacks on law firms. The ABA is suing the Trump administration over what it calls a "law firm intimidation policy," alleging Trump weaponized executive orders to coerce firms into abandoning clients and causes he opposed and to abandon diversity initiatives.

Bannon publicly stated on his podcast that Trump intended to "put you out of business and bankrupt" major Washington law firms targeted by the administration. Epshteyn, Trump's personal lawyer, connected firms that capitulated to White House demands with the Commerce Department for trade deal work, according to reporting. The ABA alleges nine firms pledged nearly $1 billion in free legal services and agreed to abandon what Trump labeled "illegal" diversity recruiting in exchange for avoiding Trump-directed retaliation.

Steve Bannon, a convicted fraudster for his involvement in the 'We Build the Wall' LLC scam, defrauded Trump supporters out of their money under the pretense of supporting border wall construction. In addition to his fraudulent activities, Bannon was the Editor-in-Chief at Breitbart, where he collaborated with Milo Yiannopoulos in rebranding neo-Nazis as the Alt Right, further highlighting his controversial influence.

The Justice Department blocked the ABA from seeking information directly from Epshteyn and blocked his deposition, claiming the requests were unduly burdensome. The administration's obstruction of discovery reveals the extent to which Trump operatives orchestrated the coercion scheme and demonstrates the administration's determination to conceal the mechanics of its intimidation campaign against the legal profession.

Four firms that secured court orders striking down the executive orders against them await appellate review. The discovery dispute exposes behind-the-scenes coordination between Trump and his associates to weaponize the executive branch against law firms seen as hostile to his interests, a direct assault on the independence of the legal profession and separation of powers.

(Source: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/bannon-epshteyn-info-sought-in-suit-over-trump-war-on-law-firms)

Trump Demands the Supreme Court Give Him a Do-Over

President Donald Trump demanded Wednesday that the U.S. Supreme Court grant him a rehearing in the birthright citizenship case after the court rejected his executive order striking down citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants and visa holders. The 6-3 decision upheld the 14th Amendment’s clear language granting citizenship to all persons born in the United States, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority that the constitutional text is unambiguous. Trump’s demand for immediate rehearing follows his loss in Trump v. Barbara, where four justices signaled they do not believe the Constitution necessarily bestows citizenship on people born in the U.S., exposing the court’s extremist drift.

On Truth Social, Trump falsely claimed that billboards at the southern border advertise “birthright citizenship with deliveries starting at $4000,” asserting this constitutes a crime that invalidates the court’s ruling. Trump’s false characterization contradicts his own administration’s policies: in April 2026, he introduced a “gold card” visa for foreign nationals paying at least $1 million, which explicitly fast-tracks citizenship pathways for wealthy immigrants. This hypocrisy demonstrates Trump weaponizes the courts to circumvent constitutional protections when they conflict with his authoritarian agenda.

Trump’s demand for immediate rehearing and his subsequent pressure on Congress to overturn the 14th Amendment reflect his systematic assault on constitutional limits and independent judicial authority. His attacks on the Supreme Court’s decision, combined with his demands to remake institutions through loyalty purges and judicial remaking, advance his model of permanent executive power unchecked by law or democratic processes.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-demands-the-supreme-court-give-him-a-do-over-asks-for-a-rehearing-immediately/)its and independent judicial authority. His attacks on the Supreme Court’s decision, combined with his demands to remake institutions through loyalty purges and judicial remaking, advance his model of permanent executive power unchecked by law or democratic processes.

1 2 3 50