Trump Admin Sends Saudi Nuclear Deal With Uranium Enrichment to Congress

The Trump administration submitted a nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia to Congress on Monday, which would permit uranium enrichment on Saudi territory and take effect automatically in 90 days unless both chambers pass disapproval resolutions. Energy Secretary Chris Wright confirmed the deal includes a pathway for Saudi enrichment of uranium fuel for civilian reactors, though he stated such arrangements remain “many years down the road.” The agreement’s full text was sent to Congress in classified form, described by sources as “highly unusual,” with experts noting that classifying an entire civil nuclear cooperation agreement would be “unprecedented.”

The White House conditioned the agreement’s advancement on Saudi Arabia joining Trump’s Abraham Accords initiative, which normalizes diplomatic relations with Israel, despite the signed agreement containing no such mandate. An administration official stated Trump’s “position has not changed” and that the agreement will proceed only if Riyadh joins the accords. However, the White House offered no explanation for how it would prevent the deal from automatically taking effect after 90 days if Saudi Arabia does not comply, leaving the mechanism for enforcing this condition unclear.

The agreement permits Saudi enrichment without requiring adoption of the Additional Protocol, the standard international safeguard that grants the UN nuclear watchdog broad authority to inspect suspected weapons sites. Wright argued that bilaterally negotiated safeguards developed “in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency” would be sufficient to prevent weapons development. IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi stated the agency’s Board of Governors must review and approve the safeguards agreement and pledged he would “never put forward an agreement that would not guarantee nonproliferation.”

The diplomatic condition linking the deal to the Abraham Accords surprised Trump’s own nuclear negotiators, according to sources briefed on the matter. Trump formally approved the 30-year nuclear agreement in July, structuring it to secure dominant market access for American companies while excluding foreign competitors from Saudi Arabia’s nuclear infrastructure. Scott Roecker of the Nuclear Threat Initiative suggested the administration could refuse to finalize the agreement after Congress completes its review, potentially using the accords condition as leverage to pressure Saudi Arabia toward Israeli normalization.

The administration’s approach mirrors precedent set during George W. Bush’s presidency, when his administration withdrew a nuclear agreement with Russia from congressional consideration in 2008 following Moscow’s invasion of Georgia. Trump issued his certification for the Saudi agreement on July 16, according to the Federal Register, but the intertwining of the nuclear deal with unrelated diplomatic objectives has left lawmakers uncertain how to evaluate the agreement’s nuclear merits independently.



(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/26/politics/trump-saudi-arabia-nuclear-deal?Date=20260826&Profile=CNN&utm_content=1787777104&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAT8SR5wZG9mBWZkaWQWUNPW_zGo1xpalQI2bG2ghAonaG4g3GV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR55T2Hst1IZkGT4sMiro6WFCClyed7RwMEwsG5N7LjK4z4diwjPhGSzT9vEnQ_aem_RBwOCizapX4ifgZJ62oCcA)agreement’s nuclear merits independently.

Trump Orders Military Exercises Cut to Appease North Korean Dictator Kim

President Trump ordered Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to substantially reduce joint military exercises with South Korea, claiming North Korea has been “unthreatening and respectful” under his administration due to his personal relationship with dictator Kim Jong Un. Trump stated the exercises are costly, primarily funded by the United States, and send a “totally inappropriate and hostile” signal to the regime, despite acknowledging it was too late to cancel them entirely.

Trump’s accommodation of North Korea contradicts his first-term rhetoric, when he labeled Kim “Rocket Man” and threatened total destruction of the country over its nuclear weapons program in 2017. His relationship with the dictator has shifted dramatically, with Trump calling Kim “very honorable” in 2018 and later proposing during his 2024 campaign to take him to a Yankees game to convince him to abandon nuclear weapons development.

During his first term, Trump’s correspondence with Kim Jong Un became a media sensation, with the President himself describing the exchanges as “love letters.” Trump publicly expressed his admiration for Kim, at one point stating, “We fell in love.” This highly personal diplomatic approach reflected Trump’s inclination towards favoring strongman leaders.

Trump’s fondness for authoritarian figures extended beyond North Korea. In Helsinki, he took the side of Russian President Vladimir Putin over U.S. intelligence agencies regarding election interference. He welcomed Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to the White House, who had been shunned by other Western nations. Furthermore, his rhetoric often turned hostile towards traditional allies in NATO, including France, Germany, and Canada. Trump even went so far as to make controversial suggestions regarding territorial acquisitions, including the surreal propositions of taking over Canada, the Panama Canal, Greenland, and the Strait of Hormuz, showcasing his unpredictable foreign policy stance.

The order reveals Trump’s pattern of weaponizing executive power to reward allies and punish rivals, as he simultaneously pressures South Korea to assist in his Iran military campaign. When South Korea declined participation, Trump publicly criticized the country for rejecting his demand, framing refusal to support his war effort as insufficient loyalty.

Trump’s deference to authoritarian regimes mirrors his broader approach to foreign policy, subordinating strategic military partnerships and allied security arrangements to personal diplomacy with autocrats. The move undermines decades of U.S. security commitments in the region and signals to North Korea that nuclear weapons development will not trigger consequences under Trump’s rule, effectively legitimizing weapons proliferation by an adversarial regime.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-praises-unthreatening-and-respectful-kim-jong-un-urges-pete-hegseth-to-scale-back-military-exercises-near-north-korea/)

Trump Drops Stunning Quote on Letting Iran Have Missiles

At the G7 Summit in Evian-le-Bains, France on Wednesday, Trump defended allowing Iran to retain missile capability during a press conference closing the summit. Trump stated that missiles "hurt a little location, but they don't blow up the planet," dismissing concerns about Iranian conventional ballistic weapons as part of broader negotiations tied to a leaked 14-point Iran Memorandum of Understanding that includes a $300 billion reconstruction fund.

Trump's comments contradicted established nonproliferation policy by normalizing Iranian missile development. He argued that preventing Iran from possessing missiles while permitting Saudi Arabia to retain them would be inconsistent, claiming "it doesn't work that way," and positioned missile capability as inevitable given that other regional actors possess such weapons.

The statement represents Trump's continued pattern of claiming imminent Iran deal breakthroughs while simultaneously conceding major concessions to Iranian demands. Trump's acknowledgment that Iran would retain missiles—a core non-nuclear component of the disputed agreement—signals capitulation on a key security concern that regional allies and defense analysts have identified as destabilizing.

Trump framed the position through false equivalence, suggesting that allowing a state designated as a terrorism sponsor to develop missiles mirrors regional arms balancing. His dismissal of missile threats as affecting only "a little location" contradicts U.S. military assessments of Iranian ballistic capability and previous rhetoric in which Trump threatened Iran with unspecified consequences following military escalations tied to Iranian missile systems.

The remarks underscore Trump's willingness to abandon longstanding security positions to secure a deal that he has declared imminent repeatedly over recent months, prioritizing a negotiated agreement over substantive limits on Iranian weapons development.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-drops-stunning-quote-in-riff-on-letting-iran-have-missiles-they-hurt-a-little-location-but/)

Iran says Strait of Hormuz ‘closed again’ until US blockade lifted | The Independent

Iran declared the Strait of Hormuz closed on Saturday in response to the Trump administration’s naval blockade of Iranian ports, with the Revolutionary Guards stating the waterway would remain shut until the US military lifts its restrictions on Iranian vessels. Two Indian-flagged tankers reported coming under gunfire in the channel shortly after Iran’s announcement, escalating tensions in one of the world’s most critical shipping routes.

Iranian supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei threatened “bitter defeats” on enemies, effectively undermining prospects for weekend peace negotiations between the nations. The threat reflects Tehran’s hardening stance as Trump administration pressure tactics intensify following the collapse of earlier diplomatic efforts in Pakistan.

Trump convened a crisis meeting to address the escalating situation in the Strait, where approximately 21 percent of global petroleum passes through daily. Iran’s Supreme National Security Council is currently evaluating new US proposals that were transmitted through Pakistani intermediaries, though the blockade remains a fundamental point of contention.

Trump publicly warned Tehran that it “can’t blackmail us,” characterizing Iran’s closure announcement as coercive rather than a legitimate response to American military aggression. The administration’s threats to eliminate Iranian vessels violating the blockade and consideration of military strikes have narrowed diplomatic pathways and intensified the crisis.

The standoff represents a significant escalation from Trump’s announcement of the blockade following failed negotiations, with both sides now locked in a direct confrontation over control of the strategic waterway and regional naval dominance.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-iran-war-latest-strait-of-hormuz-b2960383.html)

Trump Kicks Off Presser With Haunting Threat Against Iran

During a Monday press conference, President Donald Trump opened remarks about the rescue of two American military pilots by threatening Iran with annihilation, stating the country “could be taken out in one night, and that night might be tomorrow night.” Trump framed the pilot rescue as a major military achievement while escalating his rhetoric about the ongoing conflict with Iran.

Trump claimed the rescue mission represented “one of the largest, most complex most harrowing combat searches” ever attempted, describing U.S. operations in the region as succeeding “at a level that nobody’s ever seen before.” The president also characterized the Easter holiday as “one of our better Easters” partly due to military performance, conflating religious observance with military aggression.

The threat came after Trump posted to Truth Social on Easter Sunday that “Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran,” explicitly targeting civilian infrastructure. Trump’s post included vulgar language directed at Iran and referenced the Strait of Hormuz, demonstrating a pattern of escalating threats against Iranian civilian targets that violate post-World War II international law prohibiting attacks on non-military locations.

Trump’s rhetoric follows previous threats to commit war crimes against Iran at a White House briefing where he falsely blamed American journalists for revealing the downed pilot’s location, despite an Israeli journalist citing Iranian state media breaking the story first. Trump demanded identification and prosecution of the alleged leaker while dismissing concerns about violations of international law prohibiting civilian infrastructure attacks.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei rejected a U.S. ceasefire proposal and stated that Iran is reviewing a Pakistani-authored pause plan ahead of Trump’s deadline. Baghaei emphasized that negotiations are incompatible with ultimatums and threats to commit war crimes, indicating Iran views Trump’s public threats as precluding serious diplomatic engagement.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-issues-haunting-threat-iran-could-be-taken-out-in-one-night-and-that-night-might-be-tomorrow-night/)

Donald Trump Doubles Down on Iran Threat in New Interview

During an ABC News interview on Sunday, Trump escalated threats against Iran, stating the conflict must conclude “in days” or he will “blow up the whole country” with “very little” off the table. Trump claimed “no sane group of people could stand the punishment” if a deal is not reached, while simultaneously stating he has “no idea” whether a deal will materialize and refusing to extend his deadline.

Trump’s threats followed a vulgar Easter Truth Social post promising “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day” in Iran and demanding the country “open the Fuckin’ Strait.” When asked if anything would be off-limits in military action, Trump said “very little,” and he did not rule out deploying American ground troops despite saying it is not currently necessary.

Trump also claimed he was “testing NATO” on the Strait of Hormuz, characterizing the alliance as a “paper tiger” with “no ships” and “no nothing.” He asserted that Russian President Vladimir Putin has “zero fear” of NATO, contradicting his earlier use of the alliance to justify military pressure on Iran.

The Republican’s statements represent a continuation of his pattern of threatening military escalation against Iran without clear diplomatic strategy. Trump previously threatened to “blow everything up and take over the oil” and warned that “bridges and power plants” would be destroyed, language echoed in his latest remarks to ABC News.

Trump’s threats constitute abuse of power and reckless military posturing that endangers American service members and destabilizes global security. His simultaneous threats to withdraw from NATO while invoking the alliance for Iran operations demonstrate incoherent foreign policy driven by personal grievance rather than national strategy.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-doubles-down-on-iran-threat-in-new-interview-after-his-shocking-post-if-theres-no-deal-were-blowing-up-the-whole-country/)

Trump Threatens War Crimes Of Iran Oil Seizure, Power Plant Destruction

Donald Trump threatened military action against Iran, stating he would “blow everything up and take over the oil” if negotiations for a deal are not completed by Monday. Trump also warned that “bridges and power plants” across Iran would be targeted for destruction if an agreement is not reached quickly, according to remarks made during a Fox News interview on Sunday.

Trump claimed that Iran is currently engaged in negotiations and expressed confidence a deal is possible within the stated timeframe. His threats escalate the military confrontation with Iran that has already destabilized global energy markets, raising the stakes for broader regional conflict and economic disruption.

Trump asserted without evidence that the United States attempted to supply arms to Iranian protesters in January and suggested Kurdish forces may have retained those weapons. These claims lack substantiation and appear designed to justify further military aggression against the nation.

The president’s ultimatum to seize Iranian oil resources constitutes a threat of illegal war of aggression and theft of a sovereign nation’s natural resources. Combined with threats to destroy critical civilian infrastructure including power plants, Trump’s statements describe potential crimes against humanity that have prompted massive nationwide protests under the “No Kings” banner opposing his Iran war policies.

These threats demonstrate Trump’s willingness to pursue unilateral military action and resource seizure to force compliance with his demands, disregarding international law and the sovereignty of Iran.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/trump-iran-war-oil-deal-b2952169.html)

New START Treaty Expires, Ending Nuclear Arms Control

The New START treaty between the United States and Russia expired on February 6, 2026, eliminating the only binding cap on deployed nuclear warheads—set at 1,550 per side. The expiration marks the first time in over 50 years that no strategic arms control limits exist between the world’s two largest nuclear powers, each possessing roughly 5,250 warheads. Without the treaty’s verification mechanisms, data-sharing protocols, and dialogue channels, American and Russian officials lost transparency into each other’s arsenals and intentions, creating a low-trust environment vulnerable to miscalculation.

President Trump dismissed urgency around negotiating a replacement, stating in January that if the treaty “expires, it expires” and claiming he would pursue “a better agreement” involving China. However, Beijing has refused to participate in nuclear disarmament talks, arguing it is “neither fair nor reasonable” given the vast disparity between its 600 warheads and those of the U.S. and Russia. A Trump administration official told NBC News the door remained open to talks with both nations, but no formal negotiations or counter-proposals have materialized.

Trump’s pattern of weaponizing federal authority against officials who resist his demands reflects broader disregard for institutional independence. Former Soviet negotiator Nikolai Sokov warned the world has reverted to early Cold War mentality, where uncertainty and acceptance of conflict were high. Without predictability mechanisms, China is expanding its arsenal by roughly 100 warheads annually and is projected to possess over 1,000 by 2030—a buildup experts attribute partly to the absence of verification checks and transparency.

Former President Obama stated the expiration would “pointlessly wipe out decades of diplomacy and could spark another arms race that makes the world less safe.” UN Secretary-General António Guterres called it a “grave moment” for international peace and security. Russia suspended the treaty in early 2023 over U.S. support for Ukraine but offered in September to voluntarily abide by its limits for one additional year—an offer Trump called “a good idea” but to which Washington provided no official response.

Experts warn that without a replacement agreement within five to seven years, an unrestricted nuclear arms race focusing on accuracy, sophistication, and interceptor-resistant designs rather than warhead quantity becomes likely. Sokov cautioned that “the sooner we start talking, the better the chance that we will be able to, once again, start regulating the nuclear arms race before it becomes irreversible.”

(Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/world/russia/nuclear-arms-race-start-treaty-expires-russia-china-trump-putin-xi-rcna257012)

Trump Deploys Massive Armada to Iran Threatening Military Escalation

President Trump announced on Truth Social Wednesday that a “massive Armada” is en route to Iran, demanding the regime negotiate and threatening escalated military strikes. Trump stated the fleet is “moving quickly, with great power, enthusiasm, and purpose,” and explicitly warned that “the next attack will be far worse” if Iran does not comply with his demand for a nuclear weapons-free agreement.

Trump referenced a prior military operation against Iran called “Operation Midnight Hammer,” describing it as “a major destruction of Iran,” and framed the current deployment as leverage to force Iranian leadership to “Come to the Table” and accept his terms. He invoked artificial urgency, declaring “Time is running out, it is truly of the essence,” while using characteristic ultimatums demanding Iran “MAKE A DEAL!”

The military escalation coincides with ongoing civil unrest in Iran, where reports document thousands of deaths during protests. Trump previously threatened military intervention to support demonstrators, then reversed course by claiming “the killing in Iran is stopping” and signaling openness to negotiation with Iranian rulers—a pattern demonstrating his willingness to weaponize humanitarian crises for geopolitical leverage.

Trump made similar threats to reporters aboard Air Force One returning from Davos last week, stating “We’re watching Iran” and confirming that ships were being repositioned “just in case.” These repeated warnings escalate tensions through military posturing while Trump simultaneously presents himself as open to diplomatic resolution, a contradiction characteristic of his pattern of weaponizing foreign relations for domestic political effect.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-reveals-hes-sending-massive-armada-to-iran-warns-regime-next-attack-will-be-far-worse/)

Trump Orders Pentagon to Initiate Immediate Nuclear Testing

U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he has directed the Department of Defense to commence testing of nuclear weapons immediately. This decision was conveyed through a Truth Social post as Trump cited the ongoing nuclear testing programs of other nations as the impetus for his announcement.

Trump’s statement comes ahead of an impending meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in South Korea, highlighting the geopolitical tensions surrounding nuclear capabilities. This assertion indicates a potential escalation in the arms race, as Trump seeks to ensure that the U.S. maintains a competitive stance concerning its nuclear arsenal.

The timing of this announcement has drawn attention amid the complexities of North Korea’s and China’s nuclear programs. Analysts suggest that Trump’s aggressive stance may further complicate diplomatic relations with these nations, particularly in the context of ongoing trade discussions.

This move is reflective of Trump’s broader strategy regarding national security and defense policies, which have often prioritized a robust military posture. The implications of restarting nuclear tests may provoke responses from both allies and adversaries, signaling a significant shift in defense strategy.

As tensions rise, the Pentagon’s upcoming actions will be closely monitored by international observers, underscoring the delicate balance of power in the global arena regarding nuclear deterrence.

1 2 3 5