Category: Loyalty Purge

Trump DOJ Fires Prosecutor Who Rejected Comey Prosecution

The Trump administration’s Justice Department fired Robert McBride, the second-ranking official in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, after he declined to lead the prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey. McBride, a 64-year-old career prosecutor and former Navy lawyer, was serving as first assistant to U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan and had been asked to take charge of the Comey case while also managing office operations.

McBride told senior Justice Department officials that leading the Comey prosecution while simultaneously running the office presented an untenable conflict, according to sources briefed on the matter. His removal came after he held private meetings with federal judges in the Eastern District of Virginia without Halligan’s knowledge—meetings that administration officials viewed as undermining their authority.

The timing of McBride’s firing directly follows a judge’s November ruling that Halligan was not legally appointed to her position, which led to the dismissal of both the Comey indictment and charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James. The Attorney General’s and Deputy Attorney General’s offices, along with the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys, supported McBride’s removal and signed the termination paperwork.

McBride’s firing exemplifies the systematic weaponization of the DOJ against perceived enemies, as the administration continues pursuing charges against Comey despite judicial rejection of the case. This action against a prosecutor unwilling to serve as a tool for the administration’s political agenda demonstrates the purge of officials who refuse absolute compliance with Trump’s directives.

(Source: https://www.ms.now/news/trump-doj-fires-prosecutor-who-declined-to-pursue-james-comey-case)

Leavitt Defends ICE Shooting, Dismisses Renee Good Protesters

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Minneapolis protesters demonstrating against the fatal shooting of 37-year-old poet and mother Renee Good by ICE officer Jonathan Ross, questioning their grievances during a Monday press gaggle. Leavitt framed the killing as justified self-defense, claiming Good rammed Ross with her vehicle during what she characterized as an organized effort to impede law enforcement operations. Vice President JD Vance has falsely claimed the officer is protected by absolute immunity, a legal assertion that contradicts established law.

Leavitt attacked protesters by asserting they opposed ICE’s removal of individuals she described as “heinous murderers and rapists and criminals,” framing opposition to the agency as protection of “illegal alien pedophiles” rather than engagement with the specific circumstances of Good’s death. She declared ICE performs a critical national security function and pledged the administration’s full support for “the brave men and women of ice, including the officer in Minneapolis.” This rhetorical strategy conflated general immigration enforcement with the narrow question of whether Ross’s use of lethal force was proportional and lawful.

Protesters have explicitly demanded ICE’s removal from their communities, justice for Good, and state involvement in the shooting investigation—specific demands grounded in accountability for the killing itself. President Trump has blocked Minnesota state investigators from the probe, citing the state’s purportedly “corrupt” government, centralizing control over the investigation in federal hands where the Trump administration exercises direct authority over the Department of Justice.

Video evidence of the incident has been widely described as a “Rorschach Test” reflecting observers’ preexisting political positions rather than settling disputed facts about whether Good’s actions constituted a lethal threat requiring deadly force in response. Leavitt’s dismissal of protesters’ concerns sidestepped the substantive questions surrounding the shooting itself, instead reframing the event within an immigration enforcement narrative designed to delegitimize dissent.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/protesting-what-exactly-karoline-leavitt-rages-at-protesters-angry-over-renee-good-shooting/)

Trump Tells Jared Polis and Colorado ‘RINO’ to ‘Rot in Hell’

President Trump attacked Colorado Governor Jared Polis and a Republican district attorney in a December 31st Truth Social post, calling Polis a “scumbag” and the DA “disgusting” while telling both to “rot in Hell.” Trump’s outburst targeted officials responsible for prosecuting former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, who is serving nine years in prison for seven state-level charges related to 2020 election interference, including providing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s associate unauthorized access to county election software.

Trump falsely claimed earlier in December that he had pardoned Peters, stating she was being “relentlessly” targeted for “demanding honest elections.” However, Trump lacks authority to pardon individuals convicted of state-level crimes; Peters’ conviction and imprisonment remain valid regardless of any presidential pardon claim. Trump characterized her prosecution as evidence that Democrats prosecute election-security advocates while ignoring their own alleged mail-in ballot fraud, assertions contradicted by documented fact patterns showing no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Colorado or nationally.

Trump previously weaponized disaster aid to Colorado, denying federal assistance following wildfires and flooding while Governor Polis governed the state. This pattern of targeting Colorado’s Democratic leadership demonstrates Trump’s use of presidential authority to punish political opponents, further illustrating the authoritarian consolidation of power through weaponized governance.

Trump’s attack on a fellow Republican official as a “RINO” (Republican In Name Only) reflects his ongoing purge of party members who do not demonstrate absolute loyalty to him personally. His refusal to accept Peters’ lawful conviction—despite her documented actions undermining election integrity through unauthorized system access—prioritizes Trump’s electoral narrative over institutional accountability and rule of law.

The Truth Social post exemplifies Trump’s pattern of attacking state officials and judicial processes when outcomes conflict with his interests, framing legitimate prosecutions as political persecution while simultaneously attempting to overturn state convictions through false pardon claims that carry no legal weight.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-tells-scumbag-governor-and-disgusting-rino-to-rot-in-hell/)

Trump threatens lawsuit against Fed Chair Jerome Powell

President Trump announced he is considering filing a lawsuit against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, citing “gross incompetence” over renovations to Federal Reserve buildings. During a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump claimed the construction project was poorly managed and that the costs ballooned unnecessarily, calling Powell’s oversight of the work his “baby” and describing the outcome as incompetent.

Powell has disputed Trump’s characterization of the renovation expenses. The Federal Reserve published a FAQ addressing the claims, clarifying that the project was first approved in 2017 and has undergone annual budget review by the Fed’s board of governors since its inception, contradicting Trump’s narrative of unchecked spending under Powell’s watch.

Trump has previously threatened legal action against Powell and has repeatedly demanded his resignation, stating “He should resign. It would be a favor to the nation.” However, Trump indicated he would allow Powell to complete his term, which ends in May, noting he was “so close” to the term’s conclusion and acknowledged Powell’s impending departure even as he suggested he might still remove him.

Trump originally nominated Powell to lead the Federal Reserve during his first presidency, and President Biden subsequently renominated Powell for a second four-year term. Trump’s ongoing fixation on the Federal Reserve leadership and his repeated attacks on Powell reflect his broader pattern of targeting the institution when monetary policy decisions conflict with his economic demands.

This lawsuit threat represents another instance of Trump weaponizing the legal system against federal officials who do not comply with his directives. The Federal Reserve’s independence from presidential control is foundational to U.S. economic stability; Trump’s repeated attempts to intimidate, remove, or sue the Fed chair directly undermine that institutional autonomy.

(Source: https://thehill.com/business/5665840-trump-powell-lawsuit-fed-buildings/amp/)

Trump Threatens Indiana GOP with Primary Challenges Over Redistricting

In a bold move, former President Donald Trump is threatening Indiana Republicans with primary challenges after they refused to gerrymander the state to benefit the GOP. Trump’s post on Truth Social targets “RINO Senators” Rod Bray and Greg Goode, accusing them of depriving Republicans of a crucial House majority ahead of the 2026 midterms. He expresses his disappointment in their reluctance to draw new congressional districts that favor the party.

Trump’s demand reflects a significant push for partisan redistricting, which he claims is essential for Republican success. He criticized the inaction of Indiana’s Republican leadership, stating they are hindering the party’s potential to gain two additional congressional seats. According to Trump, such inaction mirrors what he perceives as Democrats’ consistent and often unscrupulous gerrymandering tactics across the country.

Furthermore, Trump draws comparisons to California’s recent Prop 50 redistricting measure, which he claims helps Democrats gain seats without any backlash. He highlights the Republican Party’s perceived weakness, asserting that it contributes to detrimental policies and a lack of political resolve that ultimately harms the country.

The former president also hinted at dissatisfaction with Indiana Governor Mike Braun, who, according to Trump, should be more proactive in garnering support for the redistricting. Trump’s ultimatum is clear: any Republican who fails to advocate for this critical redistricting effort should face primary challenges, underscoring his authoritarian inclination to reshape party loyalty.

No comments have been received from the targeted senators or Governor Braun regarding Trump’s incendiary remarks. This move not only threatens potential political careers but also reflects Trump’s ongoing influence over the Republican Party, as he seeks to consolidate power and control over election strategies, embodying a troubling pattern of political intimidation.

FBI Director Kash Patel Fires Veteran Over Personal Jet

FBI Director Kash Patel, a controversial figure known for his aggressive management style, has dismissed Steven Palmer, a 27-year veteran of the bureau, after media scrutiny revealed Patel’s use of FBI jets to travel for personal reasons. Reports indicate that Patel was incensed by negative media attention surrounding his flights to see his girlfriend, country music artist Alexis Wilkins, which were highlighted on social media and in news articles.

Palmer’s forced resignation is the latest in a series of retaliatory firings under Patel’s leadership, reflecting a troubling trend of purging individuals perceived as obstacles. This event marks Palmer as the third high-ranking official in Patel’s aviation unit to be ousted, demonstrating a disturbing pattern of retribution within the FBI.

Those familiar with the situation expressed confusion at Patel’s decision to blame Palmer for his own travel disclosures, as Patel’s flights were publicly accessible information. Critics have suggested that such actions reveal a broader effort to silence dissent within the bureau and maintain a facade of control amidst escalating scrutiny.

Former prosecutor Ron Filipkowski commented on the situation, emphasizing the absurdity of Patel firing someone for merely revealing his personal jet use. The incident underscores the issues of transparency and accountability within the FBI, as Patel prioritizes personal grievances over the integrity of the agency.

The fallout from this incident raises concerns about the direction of the FBI under Patel’s leadership, as the agency grapples with maintaining its reputation amid orchestrated firings that appear motivated by personal vendettas rather than professional conduct.

Trump Purges ICE Leadership to Accelerate Deportations

The Trump administration is undergoing significant changes at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), with reports indicating the ousting of key leadership figures aimed at amplifying the agency’s deportation efforts. Sources from within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) suggest a systematic removal of up to 12 ICE field office chiefs, which may lead to an increase in deportations executed by more aggressive Border Patrol operatives.

This restructuring, described as a “purge” by immigration expert Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, involves replacing traditional ICE leadership with officials from Border Patrol and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), particularly under the influence of controversial Border Patrol Commander Greg Bovino. The change signals a shift toward less targeted enforcement operations that focus broadly on undocumented immigrants rather than prioritizing those with criminal records.

Historically, ICE has operated with an emphasis on identifying and arresting specific criminal individuals through surveillance and planned enforcement actions. In contrast, the current Border Patrol strategy has been characterized by more indiscriminate sweeps, leading to conflicts and legal challenges across various states where their methods have drawn judicial scrutiny.

Reichlin-Melnick provided insight on social media, indicating that this move could lead to escalated enforcement tactics reminiscent of the ‘Midway Blitz’ operations employed under Trump’s previous administration, which were often criticized for their aggressive approach. This suggests that the already heightened tensions within immigration enforcement may worsen, affecting both immigrants and communities across the United States.

The announcement of these changes has raised alarms among advocates and policy experts who recognize the potential for increased deportations and a shift in deportation priorities that could bypass established protocols aimed at protecting vulnerable populations. As the landscape of U.S. immigration enforcement continues to evolve under Trump’s direction, the implications for law and order, as well as civil rights, remain a point of contention.

Hegseth Replaces Army’s Mingus Amid Pentagon Leadership Purge

The recent military reshuffling led by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has raised significant concerns within the Pentagon. Lt. Gen. Christopher LaNeve is set to replace Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. James Mingus, marking a notable shift in military leadership structure. This selection is interpreted as a strong statement from Hegseth, as he places a close associate in a pivotal role, signaling an intent to consolidate control over the Army amidst ongoing purges in military leadership.

Reports indicate that this move is particularly impactful, with the Army feeling the effects of Hegseth’s leadership choices more intensely than other branches of the military. The swift nature of these appointments follows an alarming trend of retirements and dismissals, including high-profile individuals like Adm. Alvin Holsey and Gen. Thomas Bussiere, who have unexpectedly stepped down or announced early retirements for personal reasons.

The ongoing changes highlight a broader purge environment under Hegseth’s oversight, with multiple generals and admirals either being pushed out or opting for early retirement in recent months. This series of firings and resignations is contributing to a climate of apprehension and uncertainty within military ranks, which historically have seen less turnover at this level.

Hegseth’s recent actions appear to prioritize loyalty and alignment with his vision for military operations and governance, possibly altering the traditional balance and dynamics within the Pentagon. This could have long-term implications for military strategy and operations, especially as the Army braces for further internal changes.

The fallout from these decisions raises questions about the future leadership within the Pentagon and the potential for increased politicization of military appointments. As Hegseth continues to assert influence over military leadership, the ramifications of his choices are likely to resonate well beyond the immediate scope of the Army.

Trump’s Weaponization Group Targets Perceived Enemies Across Agencies

A wide-ranging assembly of U.S. officials is reportedly collaborating to advance President Donald Trump’s agenda of seeking retribution against his perceived adversaries. This Interagency Weaponization Working Group, which has been active since at least May, includes representatives from various government agencies such as the White House, Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), CIA, and the Justice and Defense Departments.

Formed after Trump issued an executive order on his inauguration day instructing action against past misconduct by government agencies, the working group’s mission aligns with Trump’s long-standing narrative of a “Deep State” undermining his presidency. Notably, Attorney General Pam Bondi and ODNI Director Tulsi Gabbard have publicly emphasized the group’s role in identifying those they allege misused government power against Trump.

Documentation reveals that the group’s focus includes high-profile figures such as former FBI Director James Comey and Anthony Fauci, in addition to broader discussions surrounding individuals and entities tied to government operations perceived as targeting Trump. The group’s activities suggest a systematic effort not only to investigate but also potentially to retaliate against former officials from the Obama and Biden administrations.

Although the exact actions the group can undertake remain unclear, officials assert that its operations reflect a deeper commitment to exploring claims regarding the politicization of federal resources. Some involved have vocalized Trump-supporting narratives, calling into question the legitimacy of past election outcomes and government responses, particularly in relation to events surrounding January 6, 2021.

As ongoing scrutiny mounts from both major political parties over the scope of the group’s operations and its implications, officials maintain that its primary objective is to foster transparency and accountability within federal operations, countering the allegations of weaponization leveled at previous administrations.

Pentagon Investigates Nearly 300 Personnel After Charlie Kirk Death

The Pentagon has launched a sweeping investigation into nearly 300 Defense Department personnel—including both military members and civilian contractors—following the controversial killing of Charlie Kirk, a prominent right-wing activist. This measure underscores the lengths to which the Trump administration is willing to go to silence dissent and shield its allies from criticism.

Documents obtained by The Washington Post reveal that individuals are being scrutinized for their online comments regarding Kirk’s tragic death. This expansive inquiry appears to serve a dual purpose: it both intimidates potential critics of Kirk and reinforces the culture of loyalty demanded by Trump and his allies.

Kirk’s death has been leveraged by right-wing figures to rally their base and vilify their opponents, portraying any negative commentary as an attack on a revered conservative martyr. While the administration pursues these investigations, it continues to suppress free speech under the guise of national security, fundamentally eroding democratic norms.

The investigation raises serious questions about the integrity of free expression within the armed forces and the implications of punishing employees for their opinions, especially when those opinions pertain to political figures affiliated with the Republican Party. Such actions illustrate a disturbing trend toward authoritarianism, aligning with Trump’s broader strategy of creating a compliant political environment.

Overall, the interrogation of personnel reflects a growing concern regarding the Trump administration’s increasing authoritarian grip, targeting dissent while elevating extremist ideologies under the banner of patriotism.

1 2 3 … 16