Trump Admin Sends Saudi Nuclear Deal With Uranium Enrichment to Congress

The Trump administration submitted a nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia to Congress on Monday, which would permit uranium enrichment on Saudi territory and take effect automatically in 90 days unless both chambers pass disapproval resolutions. Energy Secretary Chris Wright confirmed the deal includes a pathway for Saudi enrichment of uranium fuel for civilian reactors, though he stated such arrangements remain “many years down the road.” The agreement’s full text was sent to Congress in classified form, described by sources as “highly unusual,” with experts noting that classifying an entire civil nuclear cooperation agreement would be “unprecedented.”

The White House conditioned the agreement’s advancement on Saudi Arabia joining Trump’s Abraham Accords initiative, which normalizes diplomatic relations with Israel, despite the signed agreement containing no such mandate. An administration official stated Trump’s “position has not changed” and that the agreement will proceed only if Riyadh joins the accords. However, the White House offered no explanation for how it would prevent the deal from automatically taking effect after 90 days if Saudi Arabia does not comply, leaving the mechanism for enforcing this condition unclear.

The agreement permits Saudi enrichment without requiring adoption of the Additional Protocol, the standard international safeguard that grants the UN nuclear watchdog broad authority to inspect suspected weapons sites. Wright argued that bilaterally negotiated safeguards developed “in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency” would be sufficient to prevent weapons development. IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi stated the agency’s Board of Governors must review and approve the safeguards agreement and pledged he would “never put forward an agreement that would not guarantee nonproliferation.”

The diplomatic condition linking the deal to the Abraham Accords surprised Trump’s own nuclear negotiators, according to sources briefed on the matter. Trump formally approved the 30-year nuclear agreement in July, structuring it to secure dominant market access for American companies while excluding foreign competitors from Saudi Arabia’s nuclear infrastructure. Scott Roecker of the Nuclear Threat Initiative suggested the administration could refuse to finalize the agreement after Congress completes its review, potentially using the accords condition as leverage to pressure Saudi Arabia toward Israeli normalization.

The administration’s approach mirrors precedent set during George W. Bush’s presidency, when his administration withdrew a nuclear agreement with Russia from congressional consideration in 2008 following Moscow’s invasion of Georgia. Trump issued his certification for the Saudi agreement on July 16, according to the Federal Register, but the intertwining of the nuclear deal with unrelated diplomatic objectives has left lawmakers uncertain how to evaluate the agreement’s nuclear merits independently.



(Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/26/politics/trump-saudi-arabia-nuclear-deal?Date=20260826&Profile=CNN&utm_content=1787777104&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAT8SR5wZG9mBWZkaWQWUNPW_zGo1xpalQI2bG2ghAonaG4g3GV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR55T2Hst1IZkGT4sMiro6WFCClyed7RwMEwsG5N7LjK4z4diwjPhGSzT9vEnQ_aem_RBwOCizapX4ifgZJ62oCcA)agreement’s nuclear merits independently.

Trump Attacks CNN’s Holmes Over North Korea Questions

President Trump attacked CNN White House correspondent Kristen Holmes during an Oval Office event, repeatedly ordering her to be silent as she questioned his scaling back of military exercises with South Korea and his communications with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. Trump dismissed Holmes’ questions as disrespectful, calling her a “loud, boisterous person” and accusing CNN of “fake news” when she persisted in asking whether Kim Jong Un had requested the military drawdown.

Trump claimed his reduction of joint U.S.-South Korea military drills enhanced regional security and asserted he maintains a strong personal relationship with Kim Jong Un based on prior meetings. When Holmes attempted to clarify whether Kim Jong Un had specifically requested the scaled-back exercises, Trump shut down her line of questioning and invoked a teenage lifeguard being honored at the event, asking the young man whether he found Holmes “disrespectful” as a means to deflect from substantive inquiry.

The White House subsequently issued a statement attacking Holmes as “a disgraceful, humiliating embarrassment” to journalism, describing her as part of “scumbags” and “the lowest of the low” for asking policy questions during the event. This coordinated attack on a journalist for performing her professional duties occurred immediately after Trump’s public confrontation with her in the Oval Office.

CNN’s statement in response defended Holmes as “one of the most respected and accomplished journalists covering the White House,” characterizing her questions as tough, relevant, and newsworthy. The network condemned personal attacks on journalists as inconsistent with free press principles and beneath the office of the presidency, noting that public officials may challenge reporting but should not resort to personal attacks for questioning they disagree with.

Trump also used the same event to dismiss a CNN report about conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, claiming a retired admiral had told him the ship was “beautifully maintained,” thereby dismissing documented concerns as fabricated without addressing the specific allegations raised by the network’s reporting.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/quiet-trump-rages-at-cnn-reporter-during-wild-exchange-in-the-oval-office/)

Trump Orders Military Exercises Cut to Appease North Korean Dictator Kim

President Trump ordered Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to substantially reduce joint military exercises with South Korea, claiming North Korea has been “unthreatening and respectful” under his administration due to his personal relationship with dictator Kim Jong Un. Trump stated the exercises are costly, primarily funded by the United States, and send a “totally inappropriate and hostile” signal to the regime, despite acknowledging it was too late to cancel them entirely.

Trump’s accommodation of North Korea contradicts his first-term rhetoric, when he labeled Kim “Rocket Man” and threatened total destruction of the country over its nuclear weapons program in 2017. His relationship with the dictator has shifted dramatically, with Trump calling Kim “very honorable” in 2018 and later proposing during his 2024 campaign to take him to a Yankees game to convince him to abandon nuclear weapons development.

During his first term, Trump’s correspondence with Kim Jong Un became a media sensation, with the President himself describing the exchanges as “love letters.” Trump publicly expressed his admiration for Kim, at one point stating, “We fell in love.” This highly personal diplomatic approach reflected Trump’s inclination towards favoring strongman leaders.

Trump’s fondness for authoritarian figures extended beyond North Korea. In Helsinki, he took the side of Russian President Vladimir Putin over U.S. intelligence agencies regarding election interference. He welcomed Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to the White House, who had been shunned by other Western nations. Furthermore, his rhetoric often turned hostile towards traditional allies in NATO, including France, Germany, and Canada. Trump even went so far as to make controversial suggestions regarding territorial acquisitions, including the surreal propositions of taking over Canada, the Panama Canal, Greenland, and the Strait of Hormuz, showcasing his unpredictable foreign policy stance.

The order reveals Trump’s pattern of weaponizing executive power to reward allies and punish rivals, as he simultaneously pressures South Korea to assist in his Iran military campaign. When South Korea declined participation, Trump publicly criticized the country for rejecting his demand, framing refusal to support his war effort as insufficient loyalty.

Trump’s deference to authoritarian regimes mirrors his broader approach to foreign policy, subordinating strategic military partnerships and allied security arrangements to personal diplomacy with autocrats. The move undermines decades of U.S. security commitments in the region and signals to North Korea that nuclear weapons development will not trigger consequences under Trump’s rule, effectively legitimizing weapons proliferation by an adversarial regime.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-praises-unthreatening-and-respectful-kim-jong-un-urges-pete-hegseth-to-scale-back-military-exercises-near-north-korea/)

Trump Claims Miss Universe Pageant Qualifies Him to Control Venezuela

President Donald Trump justified his control over Venezuela’s political future by claiming expertise derived from owning the Miss Universe pageant, stating “Miss Venezuela always did very well” in the competition. Trump’s remarks came as he defended the absence of elections in Venezuela, asserting the country “is not really ready for them yet” despite the U.S. military seizure of former President Nicolás Maduro in January 2026 on allegations of election rigging.

Trump boasted that Venezuela is “becoming extremely successful” under acting president Delcy Rodríguez and that the nation generates record oil revenues benefiting major corporations like ExxonMobil. He claimed the U.S. has recouped its military intervention costs through resource extraction, stating “We’ve paid for the war many times over.” Trump asserted his popularity in the country, attributing Venezuela’s progress entirely to his administration’s involvement.

The comments reveal Trump’s authoritarian framework for Venezuela: indefinite postponement of democratic elections under the guise of national readiness, coupled with economic extraction disguised as development. Secretary of State Marco Rubio functions as de facto viceroy over Venezuela, controlling finances, natural resources, government appointments, and foreign policy from Washington, while Trump frames the occupation as benevolent governance.

Trump’s reliance on Miss Universe pageant experience as qualification to govern a nation’s political timeline contradicts his earlier fabricated claims of settling multiple wars, revealing a pattern of substituting actual expertise or diplomatic achievement with celebrity credentials and personal commercial interests. His insistence that Venezuela remain under U.S. control indefinitely while denying Venezuelans electoral agency demonstrates the permanence of his occupation model.

Trump has directed major oil executives including billionaire donor Jeffery Hildebrand to commit $100 billion to Venezuela’s petroleum sector, transforming military conquest into a mechanism for corporate profit extraction and Trump-aligned business expansion under the banner of economic development.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-boasts-he-understands-venezuela-because-miss-venezuela-always-did-very-well-in-miss-universe-pageant/)

Trump Approves Nuclear Deal Enabling Saudi Uranium Enrichment

President Trump formally approved a landmark 30-year nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia that grants the kingdom a civilian nuclear program and potentially permits uranium enrichment on Saudi territory, according to administration officials. The deal, valued at tens of billions of dollars, is structured to secure dominant market access for American companies while excluding foreign competitors from Saudi Arabia's nuclear infrastructure development.

The agreement advances Trump's stated goal of deepening U.S. ties with Saudi Arabia and securing its alignment with American geopolitical interests in the Middle East. Trump previously met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the White House to advance the nuclear partnership, which represents a significant expansion of bilateral cooperation on defense and energy matters.

The nuclear arrangement contradicts nonproliferation safeguards by enabling uranium enrichment capabilities within a region already marked by volatile power dynamics and unresolved security tensions. Granting such advanced nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia without rigorous international oversight mechanisms creates direct pathways for nuclear weapons development in a strategically unstable area, particularly given the kingdom's pattern of aggressive regional military interventions and documented human rights abuses under bin Salman's rule.

The deal financially benefits American nuclear and defense contractors substantially while transferring critical security risks to the international community. Trump's approval prioritizes corporate profit over global nuclear security standards, following his administration's pattern of dismantling institutional guardrails to benefit allied autocrats and domestic industries.

Trump's commercial relationship with Saudi interests dates back to the 1980s, when a Saudi prince purchased his superyacht and the Plaza Hotel. In the years following his first term, the Trump family secured numerous lucrative commercial ties. Notable connections include:

  • Real Estate and Licensing: The Trump Organization entered into major brand licensing and development deals for projects in Saudi Arabia, including luxury towers in Riyadh and a $1 billion "Trump Plaza" project in Jeddah.
  • Kushner's Private Equity: Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and former senior advisor, established a private equity firm, Affinity Partners, which secured approximately $2 billion in capital commitments from Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund.
  • LIV Golf: Trump’s golf courses have hosted several high-profile tournaments backed by LIV Golf, which is funded by the Saudi government's sovereign wealth fund, pouring millions into his properties.

(Source: https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trump-approves-landmark-nuclear-deal-with-saudi-arabia-in-big-win-for-kingdom-2ed77584)

Trump Vows F-35 Sale to Turkey, Attacks NATO Spending

President Donald Trump attacked NATO during a meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Ankara on Tuesday, claiming the alliance failed to support the United States in an Iran military operation and questioning why America invests trillions defending European nations. Trump stated, "We've invested trillions of dollars in NATO. Why? To protect European countries and others, Canada, etc.," while accusing NATO members of refusing assistance despite his requests.

During the same meeting, Trump declared his willingness to sell F-35 fighter jets to Turkey despite explicit U.S. law prohibiting the sale until Turkey removes its Russian S-400 missile system. Trump told reporters, "We have a better relationship with Turkey, and Turkey has been more loyal than other countries that we think would be loyal. So yeah, it is something certainly we would consider," directly contradicting existing legal restrictions designed to prevent advanced weapons transfers to nations with Russian military equipment.

Trump's statements demonstrate his pattern of subordinating national security policy and legal constraints to personal relationships and transactional loyalty calculations. Trump has repeatedly demonstrated fundamental misunderstandings about F-35 capabilities, falsely claiming the jets are invisible to the naked eye when they are only radar-stealthy, undermining confidence in his judgment on weapons systems decisions.

Trump specifically criticized British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for NATO's lack of support during the Iran operation, personalizing geopolitical strategy rather than addressing structural alliance commitments. His trip to the NATO Summit in Ankara came only after initially refusing to attend, reversing course out of personal regard for Erdoğan, whom he repeatedly referred to as his "friend." The New York Times had reported Trump intended to signal willingness to sell F-35s to Turkey before the meeting occurred.

Trump's willingness to circumvent federal law governing weapons sales, his weaponization of alliance relationships based on personal loyalty, and his dismissal of collective security obligations in favor of transactional deals violate established foreign policy frameworks and subordinate institutional checks to executive preference. His pressure on NATO and simultaneous cultivation of authoritarian-friendly Turkey positions the U.S. strategic interests against democratic alliance structures.

(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-bashes-nato-debates-selling-fighter-jets-to-loyal-turkey-despite-restrictions/)

Trump’s Ignores Russia And China Helped Iran, Thanks Them

Trump claimed to the New York Times that Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian leader Vladimir Putin helped secure a peace deal with Iran, crediting both authoritarian leaders for their cooperation. Trump stated Xi “was a total gentleman” for not interfering with a U.S. blockade of the Strait, while praising Putin’s restraint in the conflict. The White House declined to clarify what Trump meant by their assistance, and neither the Chinese nor Russian embassies responded to requests for comment.

Trump’s praise for Russia and China directly contradicts documented intelligence showing both nations actively aided Iran during the war. The State Department imposed sanctions on companies for sending Chinese arms to Iran, and Russia provided Iran with intelligence on U.S. troop locations and movements using satellite imagery, enabling Iranian targeting of American forces. CNN reported in early March that Russia shared this military intelligence to help Iran locate U.S. troops for retaliation strikes.

The conflict resulted in 13 U.S. service members killed and approximately 370 injured, primarily from Iranian missile strikes on American military bases throughout the Middle East. New York Times diplomatic correspondent Edward Wong highlighted the contradiction, noting that Trump “didn’t mention” Russia’s intelligence aid to Iran or China’s weapon transfers to the regime. Wong documented that the State Department had imposed sanctions specifically for companies sending Chinese military equipment to Iran during the hostilities.

Trump initiated the call from the White House residence on his 80th birthday as family gathered for a celebratory dinner, where he framed the Iran conflict as having “remade the Middle East in America’s favor.” He characterized the deal as a success warranting praise for two authoritarian regimes, despite their documented military support for his stated adversary. The White House and State Department declined to provide substantive responses when pressed on Trump’s claims about Russian and Chinese assistance in brokering the agreement.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-thanks-russia-and-china-for-helping-with-iran-deal-ignores-they-helped-iran-target-us-troops/)The White House and State Department declined to provide substantive responses when pressed on Trump’s claims about Russian and Chinese assistance in brokering the agreement.

Trump Berates Netanyahu Over Israel Lebanon Escalation

President Trump engaged in an expletive-laden tirade against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a Monday call over Israel's military escalation in Lebanon, according to two U.S. officials and a third source briefed on the exchange. Trump accused Netanyahu of ingratitude and invoked his role in shielding Netanyahu from corruption prosecution, saying "You'd be in prison if it weren't for me. I'm saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this." Trump also demanded Netanyahu halt plans to strike Beirut, telling him he was "fucking crazy" and demanding "What the fuck are you doing?"

Trump's fury stemmed from his assessment that Netanyahu was escalating disproportionately in Lebanon despite understanding Israel's legitimate need to defend itself against Hezbollah attacks. Trump objected specifically to the high civilian death toll and Israel's practice of demolishing buildings to eliminate single Hezbollah commanders. One official stated Trump was "pissed" throughout much of the call, which one source described as among the worst Trump has had with Netanyahu since returning to office. Following the call, Israel abandoned its plan to strike targets in Beirut, an Israeli official confirmed to Axios.

Trump's intervention directly targeted his broader strategic objective of negotiating an end to the conflict with Iran, which has conditioned talks on halting the fighting in Lebanon. Earlier Monday, Iran threatened to withdraw from negotiations over Israel's actions in Lebanon. The U.S. memorandum under negotiation with Iran explicitly calls for an end to the fighting in Lebanon, making Netanyahu's escalation a direct obstacle to Trump's diplomatic initiative.

Netanyahu responded with a defiant statement reaffirming his commitment to strike Hezbollah targets in Beirut if attacks on Israel continue and to expand ground operations in southern Lebanon. A second U.S. official, however, claimed Trump had "steamrolled" Netanyahu on the call, with Netanyahu ultimately acquiescing by saying "OK, OK, just make sure everything is taken care of." Netanyahu's office did not respond to requests for further comment.

The confrontation underscores tension between Trump's objective of securing a negotiated settlement with Iran and Netanyahu's commitment to aggressive military operations against Iranian-backed Hezbollah. Trump posted to Truth Social after the call that Iran talks were "continuing, at a rapid pace," signaling his determination to advance those negotiations despite the friction with Israel's leadership.

(Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/trump-netanyahu-israel-lebanon-call)

Trump Deploys Caribbean Military Armada Threatening Cuba

The Trump administration has deployed the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group, guided missile destroyers, and fighter jets throughout the Caribbean and Florida in what Politico reports is the largest concentration of U.S. military forces outside the Middle East. Military officials acknowledge months of buildup but refuse to comment on operational specifics, while Trump has publicly threatened to seize Cuba, describing the island as a failed state he will "soon be taking." A Trump official told Axios that "everything is on the table," though no invasion is currently planned or imminent.

The White House is executing what administration advisers call an "accelerationism" strategy to collapse Cuba's government through intensified economic strangulation. The strategy combines the existing U.S. blockade with newly imposed oil supply restrictions that have triggered widespread blackouts and humanitarian collapse across the island. One official stated, "We don't want to kill off the regime just yet. There's a method to this. It's in stages," confirming the administration's deliberate use of civilian suffering as a destabilization tactic.

Trump's military posturing follows the January capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and seizure of Venezuela's oil sector, which severed Cuba's primary economic lifeline. Last week, the administration indicted former Cuban president Raúl Castro the same day the Nimitz arrived in Caribbean waters. Mark Cancian, a senior analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Politico that "the Nimitz is likely there primarily for intimidation, though it could be used in a military operation if needed," underscoring the carrier's dual purpose as both threat and operational asset.

High-level Trump officials have delivered explicit warnings to Cuban leadership in recent weeks. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posed before a map of Cuba while meeting with U.S. Southern Command's Gen. Francis Donovan, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe held direct talks with Cuban officials to convey Trump's demands for "fundamental changes" in exchange for engagement. These diplomatic maneuvers, combined with the military buildup, constitute coordinated pressure designed to force regime capitulation or justify intervention.

The Caribbean operation reflects Trump's broader imperial strategy across Latin America. The administration has signed security agreements with Paraguay, Ecuador, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, the Dominican Republic, and Panama, authorizing U.S. troop deployments and military operations under the cover of a "war on drugs." U.S. forces have conducted lethal strikes on suspected drug vessels, establishing a pattern of militarized control over the region while the Trump administration positions itself to exploit Cuba's destabilized state.

(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-cuba-invasion-navy-caribbean-b2985491.html)

Trump Proposes Axis Alliance Against ICC During Beijing Summit

During last week's Beijing summit, Donald Trump proposed during the summit that the United States, China, and Russia should coordinate against the International Criminal Court, arguing their interests were aligned. The Trump administration has consistently opposed the ICC, characterizing it as engaging in politicization, abuse of power, and illegitimate judicial overreach, with some officials describing it as an instrument for "lawfare" against America. The White House declined to comment on these discussions, and the factsheet published after the summit contained no reference to conversations about Putin or the war.

China's foreign ministry rejected the account as "completely false," while the White House maintained silence. Trump's proposal to ally with Russia and China against the ICC contradicts established international accountability mechanisms and positions the administration alongside authoritarian regimes in opposing judicial oversight of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The summit occurred as Putin prepares a visit to China on Tuesday, four days after hosting Trump. Russia's war has devolved into a stalemate after four years, with Ukraine conducting increasingly effective drone strikes against Russian forces and infrastructure. Last week, Ukraine launched drone strikes near Moscow that President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described as "entirely justified" in response to Russia's record aerial bombardment of Kyiv, following a three-day ceasefire Trump had brokered to allow Putin's Victory Day parade.

The Biden administration frequently accused China of supplying dual-use materials to Russia that sustained its military campaign against Ukraine. The Trump administration has raised concerns less frequently, even as Russia and the United States operate without strategic arms control frameworks. Trump's alignment with Russian and Chinese positions on the ICC signals a departure from democratic accountability standards and a convergence with authoritarian approaches to international law.

(Source: https://www.ft.com/content/567c57b0-6346-43e6-9d14-840a793b4d1d?syn-25a6b1a6=1)

1 2 3 28