Stop The Donald Trump

He's a fascist, authoritarian, racist, sexist, and the former Republican President of the United States of America.

This site is a database of over 4,000 articles of every controversial statement made by Donald Trump and to help you when debating family, friends, and strangers on why this man is the most dangerous candidate and president this country has ever seen.

You can search for articles, or find a set of articles from a categorized list.

Under "Rebuttals" you can also find in-depth articles reviewing the policies of Donald Trump and how they can help or (most likely) harm you.

Ross Ulbricht Praises Trump at GOP Convention for Pardon

In a shocking display of Republican support for questionable figures, Ross Ulbricht, the notorious founder of the Silk Road dark web marketplace, recently addressed the GOP midterm convention in Dallas. Ulbricht’s speech showered praise on former President Donald Trump, whom he credited for his release through a pardon. Ulbricht claimed that Trump’s actions to free him from a life sentence symbolized a broader commitment to liberty, a message Ulbricht eagerly delivered to his audience of Republican supporters.

Ulbricht attempted to draw a parallel between his own legal battles and Trump’s presidency, suggesting both men were victims of a “weaponized government.” His narrative framed Trump as a benevolent figure who recognized the injustices within federal investigations. He argued that Trump’s pardon was a humanitarian gesture, motivated by compassion and recognition of a flawed justice system.

This event exemplifies the current Republican Party’s alarming detachment from reality. Celebrating a figure like Ulbricht, who facilitated a massive illicit drug market, highlights a disturbing willingness to overlook criminal behavior for political gains. This rhetorical alignment with Trump’s alleged anti-establishment image represents an unsettling embrace of figures who flouted the law.

Despite the controversy surrounding the pardon, Ulbricht insisted on Trump’s commitment to liberty, reinforcing his loyalty to the agenda Trump set out for America. He continued to link his narrative to a broader political mission by urging the audience to vote Republican, claiming that protecting individual freedoms depended on Trump’s ideological victories.

The presence of figures like Ulbricht at Republican events raises significant questions about the future direction of the party. Rather than distancing themselves from criminality, their embrace suggests a troubling endorsement of lawlessness under the guise of defending freedom. This alignment with Ulbricht is a stark reflection of the party’s abandonment of conventional norms and ethical boundaries in favor of expanding their base.



(Source: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/live-blog-posts/silk-road-founder-ross-ulbricht-praises-trump-for-pardon/)

Trump’s $5K Checks Blasted as Impossible Bribe

Donald Trump recently expressed strong criticism towards Democrats for allegedly opposing his plan to distribute $5,000 checks to Americans if Republicans maintain control of Congress after the upcoming midterms. Trump has dubbed these checks as the “Trump Dividend,” claiming they are a reward for America’s success and economic growth, and blamed “Dumocrats” for hoping the initiative doesn’t materialize.

In a statement on Truth Social, Trump boasted about his previous achievements, using them as proof that he delivers on his promises. He emphasized a previous financial gift to the military as an example of his ability to fulfill commitments similarly. Trump urged voters to support the Republican party to ensure such policies are enacted.

The promise of these $5,000 checks has been met with skepticism and criticism, with some labeling it akin to a cash-for-votes scheme. Critics argue that such a payout would require Congressional approval, a point Trump dismisses by implying autonomy in the decision-making process, despite ongoing national debt concerns.

Trump’s confrontation with ABC News’ Rachel Scott further highlighted his aggressive stance. When Scott questioned the feasibility of the $5,000 dividend amid a $40 trillion national debt, Trump lashed out, deeming her and her network as “the worst.” This exchange underscores Trump’s contentious relationship with the press and his intolerance for criticism.

This latest proposal fits Trump’s pattern of making grand promises while dismissing procedural and fiscal constraints. His insistence on distributing the dividend without Congressional approval raises questions about the practicality and legality of such initiatives within the framework of U.S. governance.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trump-slams-dumocrats-for-hoping-his-promised-5k-midterm-dividend-never-happens/)

Trump’s $5K Checks Defy Congress and Reality

Donald Trump has claimed that his proposal to distribute $5,000 checks to every American does not require Congressional approval. During a speech at the GOP midterm convention in Dallas, Trump unveiled this plan, which he conditioned on Republicans maintaining control of Congress. The plan, is criticized across the political spectrum, with some Democrats calling it “socialism for the rich” and fiscal conservatives worrying about its $1.3 trillion cost.

Trump, in an interview with CBS News, insisted that the U.S. had generated trillions from tariffs and investments, suggesting such efforts funded his proposal without Congress. However, Trump’s statements faced scrutiny as fact-checkers, like CNN’s Daniel Dale, revealed inaccuracies, noting tariffs generated far less revenue. Additionally, Trump’s claim of over $20 trillion in new investments is unsubstantiated, with federal data indicating much lower figures.

A review found that the purported $11.2 trillion in investments touted by the White House was exaggerated. The administration counted vague pledges rather than actual investments, lessening the reliability of these numbers. Fact-checkers assert Trump frequently makes these exaggerated claims, despite lacking evidence from government sources.

Overall, Trump’s proposal to unilaterally issue $5,000 checks underlines his authoritarian tendencies aiming to bypass institutional checks like Congress. His unchecked assertions fuel skepticism regarding the feasibility and legality of such financial distributions without legislative backing.

This proposal aligns with Trump’s history of making untenable financial promises, reflecting a pattern of disinformation that misguides the public on economic realities, raising serious concerns about governance under his leadership.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/just-in-trump-claims-his-5k-check-proposal-wont-need-congressional-approval/)

Jimmy Kimmel Moves Political Interview Online Amid FCC Threats

ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live” decided to move an interview with Texas State Rep. James Talarico, a Democratic Senate candidate, from television to YouTube. This decision came after frequent threats from a politically charged FCC under Chairman Brendan Carr, who has aggressively targeted critics of Donald Trump’s administration. ABC is wary of potential repercussions for its local stations, especially in Texas, stemming from these FCC threats.

Previously, similar tactics were employed against “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” where legal concerns prevented the airing of a Talarico interview. This incident ultimately led to significant fundraising and viewership on YouTube for Talarico’s campaign. Kimmel has expressed concern over these developments as traditional editorial decisions are hindered by political pressures, differing from past presidents’ more open stance towards media appearances.

The FCC’s actions are viewed as an extraordinary assault on free speech rights by ABC, which has filed a lawsuit against the commission. This move underscores the growing tension and alleged misuse of regulatory powers to control media narratives that challenge or criticize the Trump administration.

Kimmel’s candid remarks highlight the discrepancy between past and present media relations under Trump. He notes how Trump previously participated in such interviews himself without issue, indicating a shift towards more authoritarian measures as president. These developments emphasize the importance of engaging with alternative media platforms like YouTube in the face of increased governmental interference.

In this polarized political climate, Kimmel emphasizes the importance of staying informed and encourages viewers to register and vote, recognizing these as critical steps to upholding democracy amidst an era marked by Trump’s authoritarian-style governance.



(Source: https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/jimmy-kimmel-live-james-talarico-youtube-fcc-1236856911/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAUP_0BwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOJAaWZZa-ssDhFzBXIVEHv2IERvsGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7j6SjTJok0sUVYM5u57GVnL52Z2PUJObe7DaTg5h3gdeKma1_6lZsarVQUNw_aem_H3iPmKflc1gb_T6ZdtGzDw&utm_id=97758_v0_s00_e0_tv4_a1demo0htc1t2h)

Trump’s $5,000 Payout Promise Lacks Foundation

Donald Trump’s promise to give $5,000 to every adult American if Republicans win the midterms reeks of a classic bribe. The outlandish proposal was announced during a speech at a Texas Republican convention, where he declared this “Trump Dividend” would only happen if his party took control of both the House and Senate. This outrageous claim seems less like a policy proposal and more like an empty attempt to sway voters.

This isn’t the first time Trump has made such hollow promises. Previously, he teased $5,000 “DOGE dividends” and $2,000 tariff rebates—none of which came to fruition. His latest proposal would require congressional approval and is financially baseless, considering such a payout would cost $1.2 trillion, far exceeding any tariff revenues they could boast about collecting.

Vice President JD Vance attempted damage control by suggesting the payment wouldn’t target wealthy Americans and could be funded through tariff revenues. However, Erica York from the Tax Foundation quickly debunked this, pointing out that a one-time payment of this magnitude would drain a decade’s worth of tariff collection, a revenue stream already dented by required refunds following a Supreme Court ruling.

The administration’s net tariff revenue stands substantially lower than the proclaimed payout requirements, signifying an insurmountable financial gap. With legal rulings mandating refunds of tariffs collected, Trump’s grand promise falls flat amid fiscal impracticalities. Like previous claims, this could be just another ploy to energize his voter base as his own presence on the ballot won’t be available to sway Republican turnout through traditional means.

The enormous financial shortfall, coupled with Trump’s history of broken promises, underlines the improbability of this proposal coming to light. The Republican effort to leverage flashy promises for election gains once again illustrates the extent Trump is willing to go to keep himself and his party in power without real deliverables for the American public.



(Source: https://www.wired.com/story/trump-offers-every-american-5000-if-republicans-win-the-midterms/?utm_brand=wired&utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_medium=social&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUPsnZwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOJzt1WwOC9vFfAQAzs7BfBz9L6i5mV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR6Gtmij4Ozi5oR7c3Wsa1mi6Q1SO7aAwNAkR9YA-WX_bOR0cYw4KCAxP44bAA_aem_CfEq949-BU5lbYl3tCJwVw)

DOJ Probes Fox’s $22B Roku Acquisition Amid Trump Feud

The Department of Justice under President Donald Trump has requested additional information from Fox Corp. regarding its planned $22-billion acquisition of Roku, a deal that aims to expand Fox’s presence in the streaming industry. This move by the DOJ comes after Fox’s controversial firing of anchor Maria Bartiromo, which has been linked to her sharing internal communications with the White House. Analysts suggest that the DOJ’s request might indicate Trump’s retaliatory stance against media networks that disagree with him, raising concerns about potential political interference.

The deal, announced in June, would grant Fox access to Roku’s extensive user base and enhance its advertising capabilities amid a decline in traditional TV platforms. Although such requests for additional data from the DOJ are common in merger reviews, some analysts speculate that Trump’s influence could impact the outcome in a manner inconsistent with standard regulatory procedure.

Maria Bartiromo was removed from her Fox News shows, reportedly due to tensions after her sharing texts with the Trump administration, sparking Trump’s social media outburst lamenting her exit and hinting at possible consequences. The president’s reaction underscores potential motives behind DOJ actions, fueling speculation of retaliatory motivations involved in the scrutiny of the Fox-Roku merger.

Fox and Roku have stated they will continue cooperating with the DOJ’s review, hoping to finalize the merger by the first half of 2027, pending standard regulatory and shareholder approvals. Despite the disruption caused by DOJ scrutiny, legal experts believe antitrust issues may not be significant, considering both companies are not dominant players in the streaming market.

The situation highlights the chaos within the federal government under Trump’s administration, where personal grievances appear to intertwine with official duties, potentially influencing significant corporate transactions. Analysts warn that unpredictable political interventions could undermine trust in regulatory fairness and stability.



(Source: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2026-09-09/doj-seeks-more-information-on-22-billion-roku-deal-after-trump-blasts-ouster-of-fox-news-host)

Trump Attacks ABC’s Mary Bruce at GOP Convention

Donald Trump lashed out at ABC News reporter Mary Bruce for questioning why some Republican candidates are skipping his midterm convention in Dallas. When Bruce highlighted that not all Republicans in competitive races would be attending, Trump dismissed her query by declaring that the event was “sold out” and criticized ABC News as “fake news,” alleging space limitations as the reason for the absence of certain politicians.

Bruce’s interaction with Trump reflected his ongoing hostility towards ABC, a network he frequently attacks. Historically, Trump pursued legal action against the network, resulting in a $16 million settlement and an apology from George Stephanopoulos following a defamation lawsuit. Trump’s disdain extends to late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, another vocal critic at the network.

Trump continued to boast about the expected turnout at the Dallas convention, asserting a “tremendous crowd” and heralding it as an opportunity to showcase his presidency’s achievements. He insisted that every desired politician would be present, casting doubts on the necessity of attendance for those already dominating their races.

This exchange with Bruce underscores Trump’s strategy of attacking media outlets that challenge him. He uses these confrontations to maintain control over his narrative, even when faced with challenging questions about his administration and its dynamics within the Republican Party.

With the convention in focus, Trump’s rhetoric continues to emphasize his self-styled image as an embattled leader fighting against perceived media bias and institutional adversaries, showcasing his authoritarian tendencies Trump demands NBC ABC license revocation.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/you-are-the-worst-of-all-trump-snaps-at-reporter-asking-about-republicans-skipping-midterm-convention/)

Judges Prepare Against Trump-Driven Ballot Seizures

The unprecedented prospect of federal law enforcement seizing ballots during elections is now a reality as the Trump administration aggressively pursues baseless claims of voter fraud. Voting officials, fearing federal interference, are proactively training to handle such potential crises. Despite these preparations, the Trump-endorsed climate of misinformation poses severe threats to election integrity and trust in democratic institutions.

A new guide by UCLA’s Safeguarding Democracy Project aims to help judges navigate the controversial scenarios of search warrants related to elections. Rick Hasen, the guide’s lead author, emphasizes the urgency the legal community now faces to preemptively scrutinize dubious claims about voter fraud that may lead to unjust seizures of ballots. This guide urges collaboration with election administrators and stresses transparency, especially during active election periods.

Retired judges are leading efforts to fortify the judiciary against manipulative tactics used to validate fake electoral fraud claims. When ballots are seized, the chain of custody is broken, leading to potential chaos and disputed election results. This was evident when unfounded conspiracy theories motivated a search warrant executed in Fulton County, Georgia, highlighting systemic vulnerabilities.

Informed judges serve as the final defense in this troubling landscape, tasked with discerning valid claims from deceit. The guide recommends alternatives such as waiting until after certification for warrants, using reproductions for investigations, or observing vote counting processes without physically intervening. These measures seek to protect the integrity of the democratic process.

As Trump continues to erode democratic norms, these judicial measures are more crucial than ever. Legal professionals must prepare for the worst, maintaining a vigilant stance against any attempts to illegitimately seize control or disrupt American elections, ensuring they remain free from political manipulation and authoritarian tactics.



(Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/09/nx-s1-5954189/2026-midterm-election-ballot-security-search-warrant-judge)

Trump Attacks Haberman and NY Mag Over 9/11 Coverage

Donald Trump has launched a fierce attack on journalist Maggie Haberman and New York Magazine over their reporting on his whereabouts following the September 11 attacks. Trump used his Truth Social platform to demand retractions, dismissing their reports as false and labeling the journalists “liars and scoundrels.” He also insulted Haberman personally, calling her “unattractive both inside and out.”

Trump’s tirade is in response to reports questioning his claims about his presence at Ground Zero after 9/11. These reports suggest a lack of evidence for Trump’s assertion that he was actively involved in recovery efforts shortly after the attacks. Trump shared an archival video from September 13, 2001, showing him at the site, claiming to have workers help with the efforts.

The altercation with Haberman also touched on reports about Trump’s plans for the 25th anniversary of the attacks. According to previous discussions, there were claims that Trump sought to speak at the New York ceremony but was instead attending the Pentagon event after a schedule reorganization. The New York Times has refused to issue a retraction regarding these claims, suggesting it was yet another instance of Trump repudiating unfavorable media coverage.

Haberman and her colleagues’ reporting on Trump’s 9/11 plans indicated that his presence was expected at the Pentagon, not Ground Zero, aligning with a desire to speak at such events. Trump’s assault on media figures has been a significant part of his approach to media criticisms, often resulting in public confrontations.

In response to the ongoing scrutiny, Trump’s defense of his post-9/11 actions emphasizes his narrative but lacks tangible corroboration from witnesses or officials present at Ground Zero. This latest incident underscores Trump’s pattern of attacking media outlets that challenge his narrative, a tactic that has defined much of his public engagements.



(Source: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump/trump-rages-at-maggie-haberman-and-new-york-mag-over-9-11-reports-liars-and-scoundrels/)

Trump Fabricates Ground Zero Rescue Story Again

Donald Trump, marking the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, once again attempted to place himself at the heart of the tragedy’s immediate aftermath. Speaking at the Ellipse near the White House, Trump recounted a questionable story of being carried by firefighters at Ground Zero, a claim that has been debunked by first responders who were present at the time.

Trump utilized the solemn occasion not only to reminisce inaccurately about his whereabouts during the crisis but also to tout his administration’s economic achievements. He misleadingly asserted that America is stronger now under his leadership, citing improved stock market performances and inflated labor participation statistics without substantiating evidence.

This isn’t the first time Trump has falsely claimed involvement in the 9/11 recovery efforts. During his 2016 campaign, he similarly boasted about being on the scene with firefighters, promoting an image of heroism despite lacking any credible substantiation. His narrative clashes with reports from actual rescuers who have consistently refuted his presence.

In conjunction with his Ground Zero narrative, Trump plans to speak at a commemoration ceremony at the Pentagon, opting out of attending the annual event at the World Trade Center site in New York. Instead, Vice President JD Vance will represent the administration alongside other former presidents.

Trump’s consistent attempts to rewrite his history with the 9/11 attacks reveal a pattern of manipulating public memories to enhance his image disconnected from reality, highlighting his authoritarian tactics aimed at self-aggrandizement rather than honoring the victims and first responders of the tragedy.



(Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-9-11-ground-zero-rescue-b3046756.html?fbclid=IwdGRjcAUNRzlwZG9mBWZkaWQWUOCyxDxFBCl6843mp4WdMfizcVEflWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR7xHZIhkahnVFzxiTsK_F-397CjvscjjLwLgjmRYZDOQyCPz1exNnn46I8WZw_aem_fuiKR13RH-x_99ILOhVB4Q)

1 2 3 … 548